Acker, J.
(1990)
‘Hierarchies, Jobs, Bodies: A Theory of Gendered Organizations’
, Gender & Society4(2):
139-158
.
2.
Amâncio, L.
(1989)
‘Social Differentiation between “Dominant”
and “Dominated” Groups: Toward an Integration of Social
Stereotypes and Social Identity’
, European Journal of Social Psychology19(1):
1-10
.
3.
Amâncio, L.
(1993)
‘Stereotypes as Ideologies. The Case of Gender Categories’
, Revista de Psicologia Social8(2):
163-170
4.
Amâncio, L.
(1994) Masculino e Feminino. A
Construção Social da Diferença(Masculine and
Feminine: A Social Construction of Difference) (2nd edition
1998).
Porto: Afrontamento
.
5.
Amâncio, L.
(1995) ‘Gender, Social Identity and Social
Change’, in
L. Amâncio
and
C. Nogueira
(eds) Gender, Management and Science,pp.
33-42.
Braga: Universidade do Minho, Instituto de
Educação e Psicologia
.
6.
Amâncio, L.
(1996)
‘Representations of Gender and the Representation of the Person’
, The European Legacy: Toward New Paradigms1(3):
999-1003
.
7.
Amâncio, L.
(1997)
‘The Importance of Being Male: Ideology and Context in Gender Identities’
, Revue Internationale de Psychologie Sociale/International Review of
Social Psychology10(2) (special issue on Sex, Gender and Power):
79-94
.
8.
Amâncio, L.
(2003)
‘Gender and Science in Portugal’
, Portuguese Journal of Social Science1(3):
185-198
.
9.
Apfelbaum, E.
(1979) ‘Relations of Domination and Movements
for Liberation: An Analysis of Power between Groups’, in
W. G. Austin
and
S. Worchel
(eds.) The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations, pp.
188-204.
Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole
.
10.
Apfelbaum, E.
(1993)
‘Norwegian and French Women in High Leadership Positions: The
Importance of Cultural Contexts upon Gendered Relations’
, Psychology of Women Quarterly17(4):
409-429
.
11.
Billig, M.
(1976) Social Psychology and Intergroup Relations.
London: Academic Press
.
12.
Cherry, F.
(1999)
‘The Convergence of Power, History and Memory in the work of
Erika Apfelbaum’
, Feminsm & Psychology9(3):
273-277
.
Crawford, M.
and
Unger, R.
(2000) Women and Gender. A Feminist Psychology (3rd
edition).
Boston, MA: McGraw Hill
.
15.
Deschamps, J.-C.
(1982) ‘Social Identity and Relations of Power
between Groups’, in
H. Tajfel
(ed.) Social Identity and Intergroup Relations, pp.
85-98.
London/Paris: Cambridge University Press/Maison
des Sciences de l’Homme
.
16.
Doise, W.
(1986) Levels of Explanation in Social Psychology.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
.
17.
Doise, W.
(1988)
‘Individual and Social Identities in Intergroup Relations’
, European Journal of Social Psychology18(2):
99-111
.
18.
Faludi, S.
(1991) Backlash: The Undeclared War against American
Women.
New York: Anchor Books
.
19.
Fraisse, G.
(1995) Muse de la Raison: Démocratie et Exclusion
des Femmes (Muse of Reason: Democracy and Exclusion of Women).
Paris: Gallimard
.
20.
Fraisse, G.
(1998) Les femmes et leur histoire (Women and their
history).
Paris: Gallimard
.
21.
Reprint of the article published in Quéstions
Féministes 2/3, February and May 1978.
22.
Reprint of the article published in Quéstions
Féministes 6, September 1979.
23.
Gurin, P.
(1999)
‘The Power of the Apfelbaum Analysis’
, Feminsm & Psychology9 (3):
278-281
.
24.
Hare-Mustin, R.T.
and
Marecek, J.
(1990) ‘On Making a
Difference’, in
R.T. Hare-Mustin
and
J. Marecek
(eds) Making a Difference. Psychology and the Construction of
Gender.
New Haven, CT: Yale University Press
.
25.
Kaplan, G.
(1992) Contemporary Western European Feminism.
North Sydney: Allen & Unwin
.
26.
Kitzinger, C.
(1990) ‘The Rhetoric of
Pseudoscience’, in
I. Parker
and
J. Shotter
(eds) Deconstructing Social Psychology, pp.
61-75.
London: Routledge
.
27.
Laqueur, T.
(1990) Making Sex, Body and Gender from the Greeks to
Freud.
Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
.
28.
Lorenzi-Cioldi, F.
(1988) Individus Dominants et Groupes Dominés:
Images Masculines et Féminines (Dominant Individuals and Dominated
Groups: Masculine and Feminine Images).
Grenoble: PUG
.
29.
Nogueira, C.
(2001) Um Novo Olhar Sobre as Relações
Sociais de Género: Feminismo e Perspectivas Críticas na
Psicologia Social (A New Look on Gender Social Relations: Feminism and Critical
Perspectives in Social Psychology).
Lisbon: Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation
.
30.
Nogueira, C.
,
Paúl, C.
and
Amâncio, L.
(1995) ‘Women in Management in Portugal: A
Demographic Overview’, in
L. Amâncio
and
C. Nogueira
(eds), Gender, Management and Science, pp.
207-218.
Braga: Universidade do Minho, Instituto de
Educação e Psicologia
.
31.
Oliveira, J.M.
and
Amâncio, L.
(2002)
‘Liberdades Condicionais: O Conceito de Papel Sexual
Revisitado’ (Conditional Liberties: The Concept of Sex Role Revisited)
, Sociologia - Problemas e Práticas40:
45-61
.
32.
Pichevin, M.-F.
and
Hurtig, M.-C.
(1997)
‘Avant-propos’ (Foreword)
, Revue Internationale de Psychologie Sociale/International Review of
Social Psychology10(2) (special issue on Sex, Gender and Power):
7-10
.
33.
Rodrigues, F. (2001) Género e Política
Organizacional (Gender and Organizational Politics), unpublished
Master’s thesis in Social and Organizational Psychology, ISCTE.
34.
Santos, M.H. (2004) ‘Género e Política: Uma
Análise Psicossociológica das Reacções
às Acções Positivas’ (Gender and
Politics: A Social Psychological Analysis of the Reactions towards Positive
Actions), unpublished Master’s thesis in Social and Organizational
Psychology, ISCTE.
35.
Scott, Joan W.
(1996) Only Paradoxes to Offer.
Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
.
36.
Scott, Joan W.
(1999) Gender and the Politics of History (revised
edition).
New York: Columbia University Press
.
37.
Tajfel, H.
and
Turner, J.
(1979) ‘An Integrative Theory of Intergroup
Conflict’, in
W.G. Austin
and
S. Worchel
(eds) The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations, pp.
33-53.
Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole
.
38.
Unger, R.K.
(1979)
‘Toward a Redefinition of Sex and Gender’
, American Psychologist34:
1085-1094
.
39.
Voet, R.
(1998) Feminism and Citizenship,
London: Sage
.
40.
Wetherell, M.
(1982) ‘Cross-cultural Studies of Minimal
Groups: Implications for the Social Identity Theory Of Intergroup
Relations’, in
H. Tajfel
(ed.) Social Identity and Intergroup Relations, pp.
207-240.
London/Paris: Cambridge University Press/Maison
des Sciences de l’Homme
.
41.
Wollstonecraft, M.
(1992[1792]) A Vindication of the Rights of Women.
London: Penguin Books
.
