Activation as a social policy topic has been investigated since the late 1990s and continues to be popular in academic analysis and discourse. In this review, we highlight the wide range of research aims and themes covered within relevant publications. We also identify a considerable degree of conceptual inconsistency and ambiguity across the literature. Informed by methodological considerations, we conclude by suggesting a parsimonious root concept of activation which would allow for a more consistent and less ambiguous application within and across different levels of analysis.
AhmadNSvarerMNaveedA (2019) The effect of active labour market programmes and benefit sanctions on reducing unemployment duration. Journal of Labor Research40(2): 202–229.
2.
AurichP (2011) Activating the unemployed – directions and divisions in Europe. European Journal of Social Security13(3): 294–316.
3.
BarbierJ-C (2005) Citizenship and the activation of social protection: a comparative approach. In: Goul AndersenJGuillemardA-MJensenPH, et al. (eds) The Changing Face of Welfare: Consequences and Outcomes from a Citizenship Perspective. Bristol: Policy Press, pp. 113–134.
4.
BarbierJ-CLudwig-MayerhoferW (2004) Introduction: the many worlds of activation. European Societies 6(4): 423–436.
5.
BélandDPetersenK (eds) (2014) Analysing Social Policy Concepts and Language: Comparative and Transnational Perspectives. Bristol: Policy Press.
6.
BenishA (2014) The public accountability of privatized activation – the case of Israel. Social Policy & Administration48(2): 262–277.
7.
BonoliG (2013) The Origins of Active Social Policy: Labour Market and Childcare Policies in a Comparative Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
8.
BothfeldSBetzeltS (2011) Activation and labour market reforms in Europe: challenges to social citizenship – introduction. In: BetzeltSBothfeldS (eds) Activation and Labour Market Reforms in Europe: Challenges to Social Citizenship. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 3–14.
9.
BreidahlKNClementSL (2010) Does active labour market policy have an impact on social marginalization?Social Policy & Administration44(7): 845–864.
10.
BrodkinEZMarstonG (eds) (2013) Work and the Welfare State: Street-level Organizations and Workfare Politics. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
11.
CardDKluveJWeberA (2010) Active labour market policy evaluations: a meta‐analysis. The Economic Journal120(548): F452–F477.
12.
CarterEWhitworthA (2017) Work activation regimes and well-being of unemployed people: rhetoric, risk and reality of quasi-marketization in the UK work programme. Social Policy & Administration51(5): 796–816.
13.
CaseyB (2004) The OECD jobs strategy and the European employment strategy: two views of the labour market and the welfare state. European Journal of Industrial Relations10(3): 329–352
14.
ChampionCBonoliG (2011) Institutional fragmentation and coordination initiatives in western European welfare states. Journal of European Social Policy21(4): 323–334.
15.
ClarkeJ (2005) New Labour's citizens: activated, empowered, responsibilized, abandoned?Critical Social Policy25(4): 447–463.
16.
ClasenJ (2020) Subsidizing wages or supplementing transfers? The politics and ambiguity of in‐work benefits. Social Policy & Administration54(1): 1–13.
17.
ClasenJCleggD (2003) Unemployment protection and labour market reform in France and Great Britain in the 1990s: solidarity versus activation?Journal of Social Policy32(3): 361–381.
18.
ClasenJCleggD (2007) Levels and levers of conditionality: measuring change in mature welfare states. In: ClasenJSiegelNA (eds) Investigating Welfare State Change: The Dependent Variable Problem In Comparative Analysis. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 166–197.
19.
ClasenJCleggD (eds) (2011) Regulating the Risk of Unemployment: National Adaptations to Post-industrial Labour Markets in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
20.
CollierDLevitskyS (1997) Democracy with adjectives: conceptual innovation in comparative research. World Politics49(3): 430–451.
21.
CollierDMahonJE (1993) Conceptual ‘Stretching’ revisited: adapting categories in comparative analysis. American Political Science Review87(4): 845–855.
22.
DalyM (2021) The concept of care: insights, challenges and research avenues in COVID-19 times. Journal of European Social Policy31(1): 108–118.
23.
DanforthB (2014) Worlds of welfare in time: a historical reassessment of the three-world typology. Journal of European Social Policy24(2): 164–182.
24.
DinanS (2019) A typology of activation incentives. Social Policy & Administration53(1): 1–15.
25.
Diop-ChristensenA (2015) Is ‘making work pay' effective for the ‘unemployable'? The impact of benefit sanctions on social assistance recipients in Denmark. Journal of European Social Policy25(2): 210–224.
26.
EichhorstWKaufmannOKonle-SeidlR (eds) (2008) Bringing the Jobless into Work? Experiences with Activation Schemes in Europe and the US. New York: Springer Science and Business Media.
27.
EtheringtonDIngoldJ (2012) Welfare to work and the inclusive labour market: a comparative study of activation policies for disability and long-term sickness benefit claimants in the UK and Denmark. Journal of European Social Policy22(1): 30–44.
28.
EversAGuillemardAM (eds) (2012) Social Policy and Citizenship: The Changing Landscape. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
29.
EversbergD (2016) Beyond individualisation: the German ‘activation toolbox'. Critical Social Policy36(2): 167–186.
30.
FinnD (2010) Outsourcing employment programmes: contract design and differential prices. European Journal of Social Security12(4): 289–302.
31.
GerringJ (1999) What makes a concept good? A criterial framework for understanding concept formation in the social sciences. Polity31(3): 357–393.
32.
GilbertNVan VoorhisRA (eds) (2001) Activating the Unemployed: A Comparative Appraisal of Work-Oriented Policies. Piscataway, NJ: Transaction Publishers, 3.
33.
GirardiSPulignanoVMaasR (2019) Activated and included? The social inclusion of social assistance beneficiaries engaged in ‘public works’. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy39(9/10): 738–751.
34.
Goul AndersenJGuillemardA-MJensenPH, et al (eds), (2005) The Changing Face of Welfare: Consequences and Outcomes from a Citizenship Perspective. Bristol: Policy Press.
35.
GrimmerBHobbinsJ (2014) Active entrepreneurs and blue-collar workers. Cultural understandings mirrored in European youth unemployment policies. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy34(7/8): 559–576.
36.
GubriumEKLeibetsederBDierckxD, et al. (2017) Investing in work: exclusionary inclusion in Austria, Belgium and Norway. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy37(9/10): 605–622.
37.
HeidenreichMRiceD (2016) Integrating Social and Employment Policies in Europe: Active Inclusion and Challenges for Local Welfare Governance. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
38.
HetzlerA (2009) Labour market activation policies for the long-term ill - a sick idea?European Journal of Social Security11(4): 369–401.
39.
Jenson, J. (2015) Review of D. Béland and K. Petersen (eds) Analysing Social Policy Concepts and Language: Comparative and Transnational Perspectives. Bristol: Policy Press. Journal of Social Policy, 44(4): 830–833.
40.
JohanssonHHvindenB (2007) Re‐activating the Nordic welfare states: do we find a distinct universalistic model?International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy27(7/8): 334–346.
41.
JørgensenH (2009) From a beautiful swan to an ugly duckling: the renewal of Danish activation policy since 2003. European Journal of Social Security11(4): 337–367.
42.
KnijnTMartinCMillarJ (2007) Activation as a common framework for social policies towards lone parents. Social Policy & Administration41(6): 638–652.
43.
KnotzC (2019) Why countries ‘get tough on the work-shy’: the role of adverse economic conditions. Journal of Social Policy48(3): 615–634.
44.
KowalewskaH (2017) Beyond the ‘train-first'/‘work-first' dichotomy: how welfare states help or hinder maternal employment. Journal of European Social Policy27(1): 3–24.
45.
LaenenTMeulemanB (2019) Public support for the social rights and social obligations of the unemployed: two sides of the same coin?International Journal of Social Welfare28(4): 454–467.
46.
LarsenJE (2005) The active society and activation policy: ideologies, contexts and effects. In: Goul AndersenJGuillemardA-MJensenPH, et al (eds) The Changing Face of Welfare: Consequences and Outcomes from a Citizenship Perspective. Bristol: Policy Press, pp. 135–150.
47.
LindJHornemann MøllerI (2006) Activation for what purpose? Lessons from Denmark. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy26(1/2): 5–19.
48.
LindsayCMailandM (2004) Different routes, common directions? Activation policies for young people in Denmark and the UK. International Journal of Social Welfare13(3): 195–207.
49.
LødemelITrickeyH (eds) (2001) ‘An Offer You Can’t Refuse’: Workfare in International Perspective. Bristol: Policy Press.
50.
LødemelIMoreiraA (eds) (2014) Activation or Workfare? Governance and the Neo-liberal Convergence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
51.
Ludwig-MayerhoferWBehrendOSondermannA (2014) Activation, public employment services and their clients: the role of social class in a continental welfare state. Social Policy & Administration48(5): 594–612.
52.
MairP (2008) Concepts and concept formation. In: Della PortaDKeatingM (eds) Approaches and Methodologies in the Social Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 177–197.
53.
MarchalSVan MechelenN (2017) A new kid in town? Active inclusion elements in European minimum income schemes. Social Policy & Administration51(1): 171–194.
54.
MaronAHelmanS (2017) Unravelling the politics of activation reforms: exploring the unusual Israeli trajectory. Social Policy & Administration51(3): 405–423.
55.
MeadeRR (2018) The re-significant of state-funded community development in Ireland: a problem of austerity and neoliberal government. Critical Social Policy38(2): 222–243.
56.
MillarMCrosseR (2018) Lone parent activation in Ireland: putting the cart before the horses?Social Policy & Administration52(1): 111–129.
57.
MinasRJakobsenVKauppinenT, et al. (2018) The governance of poverty: welfare reform, activation policies, and social assistance benefits and caseloads in Nordic countries. Journal of European Social Policy28(5): 487–500.
58.
OhlsC (2017) A qualitative study exploring matters of ill-being and well-being in Norwegian activation policy. Social Policy and Society16(4): 593–606.
59.
PalierB (2005) Change: French Social Policy in the 1990s. In: StreekWThelenK (eds) Beyond Continuity: Institutional Change In Advanced Political Economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 127–145.
60.
PetersenKPetersenJH (2013) Confusion and divergence: origins and meanings of the term ‘welfare state' in Germany and Britain, 1840–1940. Journal of European Social Policy23(1): 37–51.
61.
RosdahlAWeiseH (2001) When all must be active – workfare in Denmark. In: LødemelITrickeyH (eds) ‘An Offer You Can’t Refuse’: Workfare in International Perspective. Bristol: Policy Press, pp. 159–180.
62.
SartoriG (1970) Concept misformation in comparative politics. American Political Science Review64(4): 1033–1053.
63.
SartoriG (1984) Guidelines for concept analysis. In: SartoriG (ed) Social Science Concepts: A Systematic Analysis. Beverly Hills, CA: Beverly Hills Publishing, pp. 15–85.
64.
SauthierIL (2013) Modern unemployment: from the creation of the concept to the international labour office’s first standards. In: KottSDrouxJ (eds) Globalizing Social Rights, International Labour Organization (ILO) Century Series. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
65.
SenghaasM (2020) Street-level judgements about welfare deservingness: how jobcentre advisors decide about the individual mix of ‘support’ and ‘demand’ in the delivery of activation policies. Social Policy and Society20(3): 1–15.
66.
Serrano PascualA (ed) (2004) Are Activation Policies Converging in Europe? The European Employment Strategy for Young People. Brussels: European Trade Union Institute for Research (ETUI).
67.
Serrano PascualAMagnussonL (eds) (2007) Reshaping Welfare States and Activation Regimes in Europe. New York: Peter Lang.
68.
SiimB (1998) Vocabularies of citizenship and gender: Denmark. Critical Social Policy18(56): 375–396.
69.
StrandhM (2001) State intervention and mental well–being among the unemployed. Journal of Social Policy30(1): 57–80.
70.
TorfingJ (1999) Workfare with welfare: recent reforms of the Danish welfare state. Journal of European Social Policy9(1): 5–28.
71.
TrivellatoBBassoliMCatalanoSL (2017) Can quasi-market and multi-level governance co-exist? Insights from the case of Lombardy's employment services system. Social Policy & Administration51(5): 697–718.
72.
van AerschotP (2003) Some aspects of the application of legal safeguards to active social policy in Denmark, Finland and Sweden. European Journal of Social Security5(3): 230–248.
73.
van BerkelRBorghiV (2007) New modes of governance in activation policies. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy27(9/10): 413–424.
74.
van BerkelRMøllerIH (eds) (2002) Active Social Policies in the EU: Inclusion Through Participation?Bristol: Policy Press.
75.
van BerkelRde GraafWSirovátkaT (2012) Governance of the activation policies in Europe. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy32(5/6): 260–272.
76.
van BerkelRLarsenFCaswellD (2018) Introduction: frontline delivery of welfare-to-work in different European contexts. International Social Security Review71(4): 3–11.
77.
van OorschotWAbrahamsonP (2003) The Dutch and Danish miracles revisited: a critical discussion of activation policies in two small welfare states. Social Policy & Administration37(3): 288–304.
78.
VandenbrouckeFVleminckxK (2011) Disappointing poverty trends: is the social investment state to blame?Journal of European Social Policy21(5): 450–471.
79.
VisB (2009) The importance of socio-economic and political losses and gains in welfare state reform. Journal of European Social Policy19(5): 395–407.
80.
WeishauptJT (2010) From the Manpower Revolution to the Activation Paradigm: Explaining Institutional Continuity and Change in an Integrating Europe. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
81.
WeishauptJT (2013) Origin and genesis of activation policies in ‘old' Europe: towards a balanced approach? In: MarxINelsonK (eds) Minimum Income Protection in Flux. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 190–216.
82.
WhitworthA (2016) Neoliberal paternalism and paradoxical subjects: confusion and contradiction in UK activation policy. Critical Social Policy36(3): 412–431.
83.
WigganJ (2015) Reading active labour market policy politically: an autonomist analysis of Britain's work programme and mandatory work activity. Critical Social Policy35(3): 369–392.
84.
WilliamsE (2021) Unemployment, sanctions and mental health: the relationship between benefit sanctions and antidepressant prescribing. Journal of Social Policy50(1): 1–20.
85.
WroblewskiA (2004) More activation - more chances for the unemployed? Changes in Austria's active labour market policy after accessing the European Union. European Journal of Social Security6(1): 60–82.
