In spite of increasing levels of female employment, having a child below school age often goes along with a substantial decrease in employment engagement for women. Consequently, previous family policy research suggests that increasing childcare availability might be a promising tool to facilitate maternal employment as it increases the economic incentive to take up work. Another line of reasoning highlights that cultural attitudes towards maternal employment are equally important in shaping the employment decisions of mothers. In this article, we combine insights of both approaches and argue that culture, in addition to its direct effect on maternal employment, moderates the impact of childcare policies. In particular, we argue that the positive effect of childcare may be weaker in more conservative cultural contexts. To assess this question empirically, we exploit the implementation of a centralised childcare reform in Poland as a natural experiment by means of a regression discontinuity design. Relying on individual-level data on employment and regional-level information on the influence of conservatism in a certain region, we run multilevel regressions with cross-level interaction terms to estimate the effect of the reform depending on the local cultural context. Consistent with our theoretical expectations, the impact of the reform is rather strong in less conservative areas but fades away in increasingly conservative contexts. Supplementary analyses reveal that the effect also differs with regard to household composition, with smaller families displaying larger gains in maternal employment. These findings confirm that conservative cultural attitudes appear to suppress the positive effect of increasing childcare availability.
AboimS (2010) Gender cultures and the division of labour in contemporary Europe: a cross-national perspective. Sociological Review58(2): 171–196.
2.
AndringaWNieuwenhuisRvan GervenM (2015) Women’s working hours: the interplay between gender role attitudes, motherhood, and public childcare support in 23 European countries. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy35(9/10): 582–599.
3.
AndronescuCGCarnesME (2015) Value coalitions and policy change: the impact of gendered patterns of work, religion and partisanship on childcare policy across German states. Journal of European Social Policy25(2): 159–174.
4.
ArcherMS (1996) Culture and Agency: The Place of Culture in Social Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5.
BanaszakLA (2006) The gendering state and citizens’ attitudes toward women’s roles: state policy, employment, and religion in Germany. Politics & Gender2(1): 29–55.
6.
BauernschusterSSchlotterM (2015) Public child care and mothers’ labor supply: evidence from two quasi-experiments. Journal of Public Economics123: 1–16.
7.
BeckerGS (1981) A Treatise on the Family. Harvard, MA: Harvard University Press.
8.
BeckerGS (1985) Human capital, effort, and the sexual division of labor. Journal of Labor Economics3(1): 33–58.
9.
BerlinskiSGalianiS (2007) The effect of a large expansion of pre-primary school facilities on preschool attendance and maternal employment. Labour Economics14(3): 665–680.
10.
BiewenMFitzenbergerBOsikominuR, et al. (2014) The effectiveness of public-sponsored training revisited: the importance of data and methodological choices. Journal of Labor Economics32(4): 837–897.
11.
BlauDM (2001) The Child Care Problem: An Economic Analysis. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
12.
BoeckmannIMisraJBudigMJ (2015) Cultural and institutional factors shaping mothers’ employment and working hours in postindustrial countries. Social Forces93(4): 1301–1333.
13.
BradyDBlomeAKmecJA (2020) Work–family reconciliation policies and women’s and mothers’ labor market outcomes in rich democracies. Socio-Economic Review18(1): 125–161.
14.
BudigMJEnglandP (2001) The wage penalty for motherhood. American Sociological Review66(2): 204–225.
15.
BudigMJMisraJBoeckmannI (2012) The motherhood penalty in cross-national perspective: the importance of work–family policies and cultural attitudes. Social Politics19(2): 163–193.
16.
CascioEU (2009) Maternal labor supply and the introduction of kindergartens into American public schools. Journal of Human Resources44(1): 140–170.
17.
CastlesFG (2003) The world turned upside down: below replacement fertility, changing preferences and family-friendly public policy in 21 OECD countries. Journal of European Social Policy13(3): 209–227.
18.
ConnellyRKimmelJ (2003) The effect of child care costs on the employment and welfare recipiency of single mothers. Southern Economic Journal69(3): 498–519.
19.
CookeLP (2006) Policy, preferences, and patriarchy: the division of domestic labor in East Germany, West Germany, and the United States. Social Politics13(1): 117–143.
EVS (2011): European Values Study 1981–2008, Longitudinal Data File. GESIS Data Archive, Cologne, ZA4804 Data File Version 2.0.0.
24.
FinseraasHKotsadamA (2017) Ancestry culture and female employment: an analysis using second-generation siblings. European Sociological Review33(3): 382–392.
25.
FinseraasHHardoyISchøneP (2017) School enrolment and mothers’ labor supply: evidence from a regression discontinuity approach. Review of Economics of the Household15: 621–638.
26.
FitzpatrickMD (2010) Preschoolers enrolled and mothers at work? The effects of universal prekindergarten. Journal of Labor Economics28(1): 51–85.
27.
FitzpatrickMD (2012) Revising our thinking about the relationship between maternal labor supply and preschool. Journal of Human Resources47(3): 583–612.
28.
FlynnL (2017) Childcare markets and maternal employment: a typology. Journal of European Social Policy27(3): 260–275.
29.
GambaroLMarcusJPeterF (2019) School entry, afternoon care, and mothers’ labour supply. Empirical Economics57(3): 769–803.
30.
GanglMZiefleA (2009) Motherhood, labor force behaviour, and women’s careers: an empirical assessment of wage penalty for motherhood in Britain, Germany and the United States. Demography46(2): 341–369.
31.
GivordPMarbotC (2015) Does the cost of child care affect female labor market participation? An evaluation of a French reform of childcare subsidies. Labour Economics36: 99–111.
32.
GouxDMaurinE (2010) Public school availability for two-year olds and mothers’ labour supply. Labour Economics17(6): 951–962.
33.
HardoyISchøneP (2015) Enticing even higher female labor supply: the impact of cheaper day care. Review of Economics of the Household13: 815–836.
34.
HavnesTMogstadM (2011) Money for nothing? Universal child care and maternal employment. Journal of Public Economics95(11–12): 1455–1465.
35.
HeQGerberTP (2019) Origin-country culture, migration sequencing, and female employment: variations among immigrant women in the United States. International Migration Review54(1): 233–261.
36.
HerbstCM (2010) The labor supply effects of child care costs and wages in the presence of subsidies and the Earned Income Tax Credit. Review of Economics of the Household8: 199–230.
37.
HummelsheimDHirschleJ (2010) Mother’s employment: cultural imprint or institutional governance? Belgium, West and East Germany in comparison. European Societies12(3): 339–366.
38.
ILO (International Labour Organization) (2020) Employment by Sex and Age – ILO Modelled Estimates. ILOSTAT, https://ilostat.ilo.org/data
39.
KahnJRGarcía-ManglanoJBianchiSM (2014) The motherhood penalty at midlife: long-term effects of children on women’s careers. Journal of Marriage and Family76(1): 56–72.
40.
KatusKPõldmaAPuurA (2008) Work–family orientation and female labour market participation. In: HöhnCAvramovDKotowskaIE (eds) People, Population Change and Policies. European Studies of Population, Vol 16/1. Luxemburg: Springer Science Business and Media.
41.
KeinzA (2011) European desires and national bedrooms? Negotiating ‘normalcy’ in postsocialist Poland. Central European History44(1): 92–117.
42.
KremerM (2007) How Welfare States Care: Culture, Gender, and Parenting in Europe. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
43.
KurowskaA (2018) Gendered effects of home-based work on parents’ capability to balance work with non-work: two countries with different models of division of labour compared. Social Indicators Research151: 405–425.
44.
LeeDLemieuxT (2010) Regression discontinuity designs in economics. Journal of Economic Literature48(2): 281–355.
45.
LefebvrePMerriganP (2008) Child-care policy and the labor supply of mothers with young children: a natural experiment from Canada. Journal of Labor Economics26(3): 519–548.
46.
LeitnerS (2003) Varieties of familialism: the caring function of the family in comparative perspective. European Societies5(4): 353–375.
47.
MöhringK (2016) Life course regimes in Europe: individual employment histories in comparative and historical perspective. Journal of European Social Policy26(2): 124–139.
48.
MorrisseyTW (2017) Child care and parent labor force participation: a review of the research literature. Review of Economics of the Household15(1): 1–24.
49.
NollenbergerNRodríguez-PlanasN (2013) Full-time universal childcare in a context of low maternal employment: quasi-experimental evidence from Spain. Labour Economics36: 124–136.
SaracenoC (2016) Varieties of familialism: comparing four Southern European and East Asian welfare regimes. Journal of European Social Policy26(4): 314–326.
54.
SchoberPSSchmittC (2017) Day-care availability, maternal employment and satisfaction of parents: evidence from cultural and policy variations in Germany. Journal of European Social Policy27(5): 433–446.
55.
SchoberPSSpiessCK (2015) Local day care quality and maternal employment: evidence from East and West Germany. Journal of Marriage and Family77(3): 712–729.
56.
SjöbergO (2004) The role of family policy institutions in explaining gender-role attitudes: a comparative multilevel analysis of thirteen industrialized countries. Journal of European Social Policy14(2): 107–123.
57.
SteiberNHaasB (2012) State of the art: advances in explaining women’s employment patterns. Socio-Economic Review10(2): 343–367.
58.
StetsJEBurkePJ (2000) Identity theory and social identity theory. Social Psychology Quarterly63(3): 224–237.
59.
TavoraIRuberyJ (2013) Female employment, labour market institutions and gender culture in Portugal. European Journal of Industrial Relations19(3): 221–237.
60.
UunkWKalmijnMMuffelsR (2005) The impact of young children on women’s labour supply: a reassessment of institutional effects in Europe. Acta Sociologica48(1): 41–62.
ZiefleAGanglM (2014) Do women respond to changes in family policy? A quasi-experimental study of the duration of mothers’ employment interruptions in Germany. European Sociological Review30(5): 562–581.
63.
ZochG (2020) Public childcare provision and employment participation of East and West German mothers with different educational backgrounds. Journal of European Social Policy30(3): 370–385.
64.
ZochGHondralisI (2017) The expansion of low-cost, state-subsidized childcare availability and mothers’ return-to-work behaviour in East and West Germany. European Sociological Review33(5): 693–707.
65.
ZochGSchoberP (2018) Public child-care expansion and changing gender ideologies of parents in Germany. Journal of Marriage and Family80: 1020–1039.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
