Tax expenditures (TEs) are preferential tax treatments granted to specific individuals or categories of households, with the aim of achieving social and economic goals. They are widely used by EU Member States. However, their fiscal and equity impacts are not always clear and their effectiveness and efficiency as a policy instrument need to be carefully evaluated, especially in the present context of constrained public finances. This article quantifies the fiscal and equity effects of social TEs related to housing, education and health in 28 European countries making use of EUROMOD, the EU-wide microsimulation model. We find a variety of effects, in terms of sign and magnitude, across Member States, and within these, among types of households. Overall, our findings suggest that the impact of TE on tax revenues and on income inequalities can be sizable. The redistributive impact of removing TEs can go in both directions, either on the progressive or regressive side, depending on the country and the TE considered.
AdemaW. (1997) What Do Countries Really Spend on Social Policies? A Comparative Note, OECD Economic Studies No. 28. Paris: OECD Publishing.
2.
AdemaW.FronP.LadaiqueM. (2011) Is the European Welfare State Really More Expensive? OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers No.124. Paris: OECD Publishing.
3.
AdemaW.FronP.LadaiqueM. (2014) ‘How Much Do OECD Countries Spend on Social Protection and How Redistributive Are Their Tax/benefit Systems?’ International Social Security Review67(1): 1–25.
4.
AvramS. (2018) ‘Who Benefits from the “Hidden Welfare State”? The Distributional Effects of Personal Income Tax Expenditure in Six Countries’, Journal of European Social Policy28(3): 271–93.
5.
BarrN.DiamondP. (2009) Pension Reform: a Short Guide. New York: Oxford University Press.
6.
BarriosS.Coda MoscarolaF.FigariF.GandulliaL. (2019) “Size and distributional pattern of pension-related tax expenditures in European countries”. International Tax and Public Finance. Epub ahead of print.
7.
BarriosS.FaticaS.Martinez-LopezD.MourreG. (2018) ‘The Fiscal Effects of Work-Related Tax Expenditures in Europe’, Public Finance Review46(5): 793–820.
8.
BrancoR.CostaE. (2018) ‘The Golden Age of Tax Expenditures: Fiscal Welfare and Inequality in Portugal (1989–2011)’, New Political Economy24(6): 1–18.
9.
BurmanL.E.GeisslerC.ToderE.J. (2008) ‘How Big Are Total Individual Income Tax Expenditures, and Who Benefits from Them?’ American Economic Review98: 79–83.
10.
CollinsM.L.WalshM. (2011) Tax Expenditures: Revenue and Information Forgone – The Experience of Ireland, Trinity Economics Papers, Working Paper No. 1211. Dublin: Department of Economics, Trinity College.
11.
Di NoviC.MarenziA.RizziD. (2018) ‘Do Healthcare Tax Credit Help Poor-Health Individuals on Low Income?’ The European Journal of Health Economics19: 293–307.
12.
DoerrenbergP.PeichlA.SieglochS. (2017) ‘The Elasticity of Taxable Income in the Presence of Deduction Possibilities’, Journal of Public Economics151: 41–55.
13.
DynarskyS.M.Scott-ClaytonJ. (2017) ‘Tax Benefits for College Attendance’, in AuerbachA.SmettersK. (eds) The Economics of Tax Policy, pp. 157–77. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
14.
European Commission (2014) Tax Expenditures in Direct Taxation in EU Member States, Occasional Papers No. 207, December. Brussels: European Commission.
15.
FigariF.HollanK.MatsaganisM.ZòlyomiE. (2019) ‘Fiscal Vs. Social Welfare: Support for Affordable Housing in Seven EU Countries’, Politiche Sociali/Social Policies1: 67–92.
16.
FigariF.PaulusA.SutherlandH.TsakloglouP.VerbistG.ZantomioF. (2017) ‘Removing Homeownership Bias in Taxation: The Distributional Effects of Including Net Imputed Rent in Taxable Income’, Fiscal Studies38(4): 525–57.
17.
FischerW.HuangC. (2013) ‘Mortgage Interest Deduction Is Ripe for Reform’, Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, Washington, DC, available at: www.cbpp.org.
18.
GreveB. (1994) ‘The Hidden Welfare State: Tax Expenditure and Social Policy’, Scandinavian Journal of Social Welfare3(4): 203–11.
19.
HackerJ.S. (2002) The Divided Welfare State: The Battle Over Public and Private Social Benefits in the United States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
20.
HindeJ.M. (2016) ‘Do Premium Tax Credits Increase Private Health Insurance Coverage? Evidence from the 2006 Massachusetts Health Care Reform’, Economics Letters143: 121–4.
21.
HowardC. (1997) The Hidden Welfare State: Tax Expenditure and Social Policy in the United States. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
22.
ImmervollH.KlevenH.J.KreinerC.T.SaezE. (2007) ‘Welfare Reform in European Countries: A Microsimulation Analysis’, The Economic Journal117(516): 1–44.
23.
KalyvaA.AstaritaC.BaugerL.FaticaS.MourreG.WöhlbierF. (2014) Tax Expenditures in Direct Taxation in EU Member States, European Economy, Occasional Paper No. 207. Brussels: Directorate General for Economic and Financial Affairs.
24.
KlunM. (2012) ‘Slovenian Income Taxes and Analysis of Their Tax Expenditure in 2006–2010’, Financial Theory and Practice36(3): 229–43.
25.
MorelN.TouzetC.ZemmourM. (2018) ‘Fiscal Welfare in Europe: Why Should We Care and What Do We Know So Far?’ Journal of European Social Policy28(5): 549–60.
26.
MorelN.TouzetC.ZemmourM. (2019) ‘From the Hidden Welfare State to the Hidden Part of Welfare State Reform: Analyzing the Uses and Effects of Fiscal Welfare in France’, Social Policy & Administration53(1): 34–48.
27.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2003) Revenue Statistics 1965–2002. Special Features: Tax Reliefs and the Interpretation of Tax-to-GDP Ratios. Paris: OECD Publishing.
28.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2010) Tax Expenditure in OECD Countries. Paris: OECD Publishing.
29.
Official Journal of the European Union (OJEU) (2013) Regulation (EU) No 549/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 May 2013 on the European system of national and regional accounts in the European Union, L 174, 26 June, Luxembourg. available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2013:174:0001:0727:EN:PDF.
30.
PoterbaJ. (1984) ‘Tax Subsidies to Owner-Occupied Housing: An Asset-Market Approach’, The Quarterly Journal of Economics99(4): 729–52.
31.
PrasadM. (2011) ‘Tax “expenditures” and Welfare States: A Critique’, Journal of Policy History23(2): 251–66.
32.
SinfieldA. (2018a) ‘Fiscal Welfare’, in GreveB. (ed.) Routledge Handbook of the Welfare State, 2nd edn., pp. 45–55. Abingdon: Routledge.
33.
SinfieldA. (2018b) ‘Fiscal Welfare and its Contribution to Inequality’, in NeedhamC.HeinsE.ReesJ. (eds) Social Policy Review 30: Analysis and Debate in Social Policy, p. 91. Bristol: Policy Press.
34.
StiglitzJ.E. (2002) ‘New Perspectives on Public Finance: Recent Achievements and Future Challenges’, Journal of Public Economics86: 341–60.
35.
SurreyS.McDanielP. (1985) Tax Expenditures. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
36.
SutherlandH.FigariF. (2013) ‘EUROMOD: The European Union Tax-Benefit Microsimulation Model’, International Journal of Microsimulation6(1): 4–26.
37.
SwiftZ.L. (2006) Managing the Effects of Tax Expenditures on National Budgets, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 3927. Washington DC: World Bank.
38.
ThöneM. (2013) 18 Billion at One Blow Evaluating Germany’s Twenty Biggest Tax Expenditures. FiFo Discussion Paper No. 12–4.
39.
ToderE. (2000) ‘Tax Cuts or Spending – Does It Make a Difference?’ National Tax Journal53(1): 361–71.
ToderE.J.HarrisB.LimK. (2011) ‘Distributional Effects of Tax Expenditures in the United States’, in PhilippsL.BrooksN.LiJ. (eds) Tax Expenditures: State of the Art. Toronto, ON, Canada: Canadian Tax Foundation, pp. 4:2–4:35.
42.
TysonJ. (2014) Reforming Tax Expenditures in Italy: What, Why, and How? IMF Working Paper No. 14/7. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
