While fixed-term work benefits employers and increases the prospects of employability of various categories of workers, it is inherently precarious. The European Union (EU) directive on fixed-term work emphasizes the importance of equal treatment of workers on fixed-term contracts with comparable permanent workers and aims to prevent abuse of this contract form. Surprisingly, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) rulings in this area have by and large been neglected in comparative labour market research. We fill this gap by systematically analysing the CJEU case law concerning fixed-term work and connecting it to the literatures on labour market dualization and Europeanization of labour law. We develop an analytical framework to analyse the Europeanization of labour law, which we then use to analyse the directive and the case law regarding the directive on fixed-term work. Our findings show that the equal treatment is affirmed in all cases under analysis for different provisions of labour contracts. With regard to abuse of recourse to fixed-term contracts, by contrast, the rulings still represent a zone of legal uncertainty, whereby some judgments allow for fixed-term contracts, such as for social policy purposes, while others prohibit their use. We therefore conclude that the CJEU does not put a brake on labour market dualization, but it does insist on equal treatment of workers, regardless of their contractual arrangements.
AlterK. (2001) Establishing the Supremacy of European Law: The Making of an International Rule of Law in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
2.
BellM. (2011) ‘The Principle of Non-discrimination within the Fixed-Term Work Directive’, in MoreauM-A. (ed.) Before and After the Economic Crisis: What Implications for the European Social Model?, pp. 155–169. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
3.
BellM. (2012) ‘Between Flexicurity and Fundamental Social Rights: The EU Directives on Atypical Work’, European Law Review37(1): 31–48.
4.
BermeoN.PontussonJ. (2012) Coping with Crisis: Government Reactions to the Great Recession. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
5.
BlaubergerM. (2012) ‘With Luxembourg in Mind … the Remaking of National Policies in the face of ECJ Jurisprudence’, Journal of European Public Policy19(1): 109–26.
6.
BörzelT.RisseT. (2000) ‘When Europe Hits Home: Europeanization and Domestic Change’, European Integration Online Papers4(15), available at http://eiop.or.at/eiop/pdf/2000-015.pdf.
7.
ConantL. (2002) Justice Contained: Law and Politics in the European Union. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
8.
CountourisN. (2007) The Changing Law of the Employment Relationship: Comparative Analyses in the European Context. Farnham: Ashgate.
9.
Datta GuptaN.SmithN.VernerM. (2008) ‘The Impact of Nordic Countries’ Family Friendly Policies on Employment, Wages, and Children’, Review of Economics of the Household6(1): 65–89.
10.
DaviesA. (2012a) EU Labour Law. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
11.
DaviesG. (2012b) ‘Activism Relocated: The Self-restraint of the European Court of Justice in Its National Context’, Journal of European Public Policy19(1): 76–91.
12.
De la PorteC.JacobssonK. (2012) ‘Social Investment or Re-commodification? Assessing the Employment Policies of the EU Member States’, in MorelN.PalierB.PalmeJ. (eds) Towards a Social Investment Welfare State? Ideas, Policies and Challenges, pp. 117–52. Bristol: Policy Press.
13.
EichhorstW. (2014) ‘Fixed-Term Contracts: Are Fixed-Term Contracts a Stepping Stone to a Permanent Job or a Dead End?’ IZA World of Labor45: 1–10.
14.
EichhorstW.MarxP. (2012) ‘Whatever Works: Dualisation and the Service Economy in Bismarckian Welfare States’, in EmmeneggerP.HäusermannS.PalierB.Seeleib-KaiserM. (eds) The Age of Dualization: The Changing Face of Inequality in Deindustrializing Societies, pp. 73–99. New York: Oxford University Press.
15.
EmmeneggerP. (2014) The Power to Dismiss: Trade Unions and the Regulation of Job Security in Western Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
16.
EmmeneggerP.HäusermannS.PalierB.Seelib-KaiserM. (2012) The Age of Dualization: The Changing Face of Inequality in Deindustrializing Societies. New York: Oxford University Press.
17.
Esping-AndersenG. (2009) The Incomplete Revolution: Adapting to Women’s New Roles. Bristol: Polity Press.
18.
FalknerG.TreibO. (2008) ‘Three Worlds of Compliance or Four? The EU15 Compared to New Member States’, Journal of Common Market Studies46(2): 293–313.
19.
FalknerG.TreibO.HartlappM.LeiberS. (2005) Complying with Europe: EU Harmonisation and Soft Law in Member States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
20.
FarnsworthK.IrvingZ. (2011) Social Policy in Challenging Times: Economic Crisis and Welfare Systems. Bristol: Policy Press.
21.
Gómez AbelleiraF.J. (2012) ‘The Spanish Labour Reform and the Courts: Employment Adjustment and the Search for Legal Certainty’, Spanish Labour Law and Employment Relations Journal1(1–2): 31–46.
22.
HartlappM. (2012) ‘Deconstructing EU Old Age Policy: Assessing the Potential of Soft OMCs and Hard EU Law’, European Integration Online Papers16(3): 20 pages, available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2006415
23.
HeppleB.VenezianiB. (2009) The Transformation of Labour Law in Europe: A Comparative Study of 15 Countries, 1945–2004. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
24.
HowardE. (2011) ‘EU Equality Law: Three Recent Developments’, European Law Journal17(6): 785–803.
25.
KingD.RuedaD. (2008) ‘Cheap Labor: The New Politics of “Bread and Roses” in Industrialized Democracies’, Perspectives on Politics6(2): 279–97.
26.
KroosD.GottschallK. (2012) ‘Dualization and Gender in Social Services: The Role of the State in Germany and France’, in EmmeneggerP.HäusermannS.PalierB.Seeleib-KaiserM. (eds) The Age of Dualization: The Changing Face of Inequality in Deindustrializing Societies, pp. 100–23. New York: Oxford University Press.
27.
LeibfriedS. (2010) ‘Social Policy: Left to Judges and the Markets?’ in WallaceH.PollackM.A.YoungA. (eds) Policy-Making in the European Union, pp. 253–82. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
28.
MartinsenD. (2015) An Ever More Powerful Court? The Political Constraints of Legal Integration in the European Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
29.
MastenbroekE.KaedingM. (2006) ‘Europeanization beyond the Goodness of Fit: Domestic Politics in the Forefront’, Comparative European Politics4(4): 331–54.
30.
MazeyS. (2012) ‘Policy Entrepreneurship, Group Mobilization, and the Creation of a New Policy Domain: Women’s Rights and the European Union’, in RichardsonJ. (ed.) Constructing a Policy-Making State? Policy Dynamics in the EU, pp. 123–44. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
31.
MercaderU.J.R. (2012) ‘Care Crosses the River: The 2012 Spanish Labour Reform’, Spanish Labour Law and Employment Relations Journal1(1–2): 14–21.
32.
OJEC. (1997) ‘Council Directive 97/81/EC of 15 December 1997 concerning the Framework Agreement on part-time work concluded by UNICE, CEEP and the ETUC, Brussels’, 6 pages.
33.
OJEC. (1999) ‘Council Directive 1999/70/EC of 28 June 1999 concerning the Framework Agreement on Fixed-term Work Concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP, Brussels’, 6 pages.
34.
OJEC. (2008) ‘Directive 2008/104/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 November 2008 on Temporary Agency Work, Brussels’, 6 pages.
35.
PalierB.ThelenK. (2010) ‘Institutionalizing Dualism: Complementarities and Change in France and Germany’, Politics & Society38(1): 119–48.
36.
PankeD. (2007) ‘The European Court of Justice as an Agent of Europeanization? Restoring Compliance with EU Law’, Journal of European Public Policy14(6): 847–66.
37.
PollackM.A. (2003) The Engines of European Integration: Delegation, Agency, and the Agenda-Setting in the EU. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
38.
RadaelliC. (2000) ‘Whither Europeanization? Concept Stretching and Substantive Change’, European Integration Online Papers4(8), available at http://eiop.or.at/eiop/texte/2000-008.htm.
39.
ScharpfF.W. (2010) ‘The Asymmetry of European Integration, or Why the EU Cannot Be a “Social Market Economy”’, Socio-Economic Review8(2): 211–50.
40.
SchmidtM. (2005) ‘The Principle of Non-discrimination in Respect of Age: Dimensions of the ECJ’s Mangold Judgment’, German Law Journal7(5): 505–24.
Stone SweetA. (2010) ‘The European Court of Justice and the Judicialization of EU Governance’, Living Reviews in European Governance5(2), available at http://www.livingreviews.org/lreg-2010-2.
44.
Stone SweetA.StranzK. (2012) ‘Rights adjudication and constitutional pluralism in Germany and Europe’, Journal of European Public Policy19(1): 92–108.
VennD. (2009) ‘Legislation, Collective Bargaining and Enforcement: Updating the OECD Employment Protection Indicators’. OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers No. 89, available at www.oecd.org/els/workingpapers.
47.
WasserfallenF. (2010) ‘The Judiciary as Legislator? How the European Court of Justice Shapes Policy-making in the European Union’, Journal of European Public Policy17(8): 1128–46.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
