The anti-poverty impact of national social assistance programmes in eight Central and Eastern European countries is examined using data from the European Union-Survey of Income and Living Conditions (EU-SILC). Results indicate that social assistance programmes achieve only limited poverty reduction, while spending a significant amount of their resources on the non-poor. The more extensive and generous programmes achieve higher effectiveness in reducing poverty. Efficiency on the other hand appears to be linked only to programme size and not to benefit levels. Unlike Western Europe, no trade-off between effectiveness and efficiency could be detected.
BarnowB.S.KaplanT.MoffittR. (2000) Evaluating Comprehensive State Welfare Reform: The Wisconsin Works Program. Albany, NY: The Rockefeller Institute Press.
2.
BeckermanW. (1978) ‘The Impact of Income Maintenance Payments on Poverty in Britain, 1975’, The Economic Journal89(354): 261–79.
3.
BehrendtC. (1999) Effectiveness of Means-Tested Transfers in Western Europe: Evidence from the Luxembourg Income Study. Walferdange: Luxembourg Income Study.
4.
BehrendtC. (2000) ‘Do Means-Tested Benefits Alleviate Poverty? Evidence on Sweden, Germany and the United Kingdom from the Luxembourg Income Study’, Journal of European Social Policy10(1): 23–41.
5.
BehrendtC. (2002) At the Margins of the Welfare State: Social Assistance and the Alleviation of Poverty in Germany, Sweden and the United Kingdom. Aldershot: Ashgate.
6.
BlankR.M. (2009) ‘What We Know, What We Don’t Know, and What We Need to Know about Welfare Reform’, in ZiliakJ.P. (ed.) Welfare Reform and Its Long-Term Consequences for America’s Poor, pp. 22–58. New York: Cambridge University Press.
7.
CoadyD.GroshM.HoddinottJ. (2004) ‘Targeting Outcomes Redux’, The World Bank Research Observer19(1): 61–85.
8.
De NeubourgC.CastonguayJ.RoelenK. (2007) ‘Social Safety Nets and Targeted Social Assistance: Lessons from the European Experience’, Social Protection Discussion Paper0718. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
9.
DitchJ. (1999a) ‘Full Circle: A Second Coming for Social Assistance?’, in ClasenJ. (ed.) Comparative Social Policy: Concepts, Theories and Methods, pp. 114–35. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
10.
DitchJ. (1999b) ‘The Structure and Dynamics of Social Assistance in the European Union’, in HeikkiläM. (ed.) Linking Welfare and Work, pp. 59–70. Dublin: European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions.
11.
EardleyT.BradshawJ.DitchJ.GoughI. (1996) Social Assistance in OECD Countries: Synthesis Report. London: HMSO.
12.
FigariF.MatsaganisM.SutherlandH. (2013) ‘Are European Social Safety Nets Tight Enough? Coverage and Adequacy of Minimum Income Schemes in 14 EU Countries’, International Journal of Social Welfare22(1): 3–14.
13.
FoxL. (2003) ‘Safety Nets in Transition Economies: A Primer’, Social Protection Discussion Paper Series. Washington DC: Social Protection Unit, The World Bank.
FrognerB.MoffitR.RibarD.C. (2009) ‘Income, Employment, and Welfare Receipt after Welfare Reform: 1999–2005 from the Three-City Study’, available at www.jhu.edu/threecitystudy.
16.
GoughI.BradshawJ.EardleyT.GoughI. (1997) ‘Social Assistance in OECD Countries’, Journal of European Social Policy7(1): 17–43.
17.
GuibentifP.BougetD. (1997) Minimum Income Policies in the European Union. Lisbon: União das Mutualidades Portuguesas.
18.
HaneschW. (1999) ‘The Debate on Reforms of Social Assistance in Western Europe’, in Linking Welfare and Work, pp. 71–85. Dublin: European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions.
19.
HeikkiläM.KeskitaloE. (2001) Social Assistance in Europe: A Comparative Study of Minimum Income in Seven European Countries. Helsinki: STAKES, National Research and Development Centre for Welfare and Health.
20.
HölschK.KrausM. (2006) ‘European Schemes of Social Assistance: An Empirical Analysis of Set-Ups and Distributive Impacts’, International Journal of Social Welfare15(1): 50–62.
21.
KorpiW.PalmeJ. (1998) ‘The Paradox of Redistribution and Strategies of Equality: Welfare State Institutions, Inequality and Poverty in Western Countries’, American Sociological Review63(5): 661–87.
22.
KuivalainenS. (2005a) ‘Families at the Margins of the Welfare state: A Comparative Study on the Prevalence of Poverty among Families Receiving Social Assistance’, Luxembourg Income Study Working Paper403: Walferdange: LIS.
23.
KuivalainenS. (2005b) ‘Production of Last Resort Support: A Comparison on Social Assistance Schemes in Europe with the Notion of Welfare Production and the Concept of Social Right’, Luxembourg Income Study Working Paper397: Walferdange: LIS.
24.
LodemelI.SchulteB. (1992) ‘Social Assistance: A Part of Social Security or the Poor Law in New Disguise?’, in European Institute of Social Security (ed.) Reforms in Central and Eastern Europe: Beveridge 50 Years After, 515–43. Leuven: Acco Leuven/Amersfoort.
25.
MarxI.NelsonK. (2013) ‘A New Dawn for Minimum Income Protection?’, in MarxI.NelsonK. (eds) Minimum Income Protection in Flux, pp. 1–27. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
26.
MilanovicB. (2000a) ‘Social Transfers and Social Assistance: An Empirical Analysis Using Latvian Household Survey Data’, Policy Research Working Paper. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
27.
MilanovicB. (2000b) ‘The Role of Social Assistance in Addressing Poverty’, in BraithwaiteJ.GrootaertC.MilanovicB. (eds) Poverty and Social Assistance in Transition Countries, pp. 99–156. London: Macmillan Press Ltd.
28.
MitchellD. (1996) ‘Is There a Trade-off between the Efficiency and Effectiveness Goals of Income Transfer Programs?’, Journal of Income Distribution5(1): 111–35.
29.
MoffittR. (2002) Welfare Programs and Labor Supply. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
30.
NelsonK. (2004) ‘Mechanisms of Poverty Alleviation: Anti-Poverty Effects of Non-Means-Tested and Means-Tested Benefits in Five Welfare States’, Journal of European Social Policy14(4): 371–90.
31.
NelsonK. (2007) ‘Universalism vs Targeting: The Vulnerability of Social Insurance and Means-Tested Minimum Income Protection in 18 Countries, 1990–2002’, International Social Security Review60(1): 33–58.
32.
NelsonK. (2010) ‘Social Assistance and Minimum Income Benefits in Old and New EU Democracies’, International Journal of Social Welfare19(4): 367–78.
33.
NottenG.GassmanF. (2008) ‘Size Matters: Targeting Efficiency and Poverty Reduction Effects of Means-Tested and Universal Child Benefits in Russia’, Journal of European Social Policy18(3): 260–74.
34.
ObingerH. (1999) ‘Minimum Income in Switzerland’, Journal of European Social Policy9(1): 29–47.
35.
RingoldD.KasekL.RydvalovaE.Holzer-ZelazewskaD. (2007) Social Assistance in Central Europe and the Baltic States. Washington, DC: World Bank.
36.
SainsburyD.MorissensA. (2002) ‘Poverty in Europe in the Mid-1990s: The Effectiveness of Means-Tested Benefits’, Journal of European Social Policy12(4): 307–27.
37.
SaracenoC. (2002) Social Assistance Dynamics in Europe: National and Poverty Regimes. Bristol: The Policy Press.
38.
SiposS.RingoldD. (2005) ‘Social Safety Nets: Evolution from Inclusion and Control to Inclusion and Participation’, in BarrN. (ed.) Labour Markets and Social Policy in Central and Eastern Europe: The Accession and Beyond, pp. 89–134. Washington DC: World Bank.
39.
Van MechelenN.MarchalS. (2013) ‘Struggle for Life: Social Assistance Benefits, 1992–2009’, in MarxI.NelsonK. (eds) Minimum Income Protection in Flux, pp. 28–53. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
40.
Van MechelenN.MarchalS.GoedeméT.MarxI.CantillonB. (2011) ‘The CSB-Minimum Income Protection Indicators Dataset (CSB-MIPI)’, Centrum voor Sociaal Beleid Working Paper11. Antwerp: CSB, University of Antwerp.
41.
ZiliakJ.P. (2009) Welfare Reform and Its Long-Term Consequences for America’s Poor. New York: Cambridge University Press.
