This article focuses on the relationship between employment protection legislation (EPL) and skill-specific unemployment risks. As a consequence of skill-biased technological progress, low- and high-skilled workers are expected to be affected differently. Moreover, the level of technological progress should moderate the relation between EPL and skill-specific unemployment risks. The analyses are based on data from the Labour Force Survey from the year 2008 and concentrate on the civilian labour force aged between 25 and 49 years in 20 European countries. The results show that stricter EPL strengthens unemployment risks between skill groups only when the level of technological progress is very advanced. In other countries, stricter EPL is related to less inequality in unemployment risks. However, there are two sides to a coin. While stricter EPL is related to lower unemployment risks for the low skilled in most countries, it leads to higher unemployment rates for the highly skilled at the same time.
AutorD.H. (2010) ‘The Polarization of Job Opportunities in the U.S. Labor Market: Implications for Employment and Earnings’, available at http://economics.mit.edu/files/5554.
6.
AutorD.H.KatzL.F.KruegerA.B. (1998) ‘Computing Inequality: Have Computers Changed the Labor Market?’, Quarterly Journal of Economics113(4): 1169–213.
7.
AutorD.H.LevyF.MurnaneR.J. (2003) ‘The Skill Content of Recent Technological Change: An Empirical Exploration’, Quarterly Journal of Economics118(4): 1279–333.
8.
BelotM.BooneJ.Van OursJ. (2002) Welfare Effects of Employment Protection. CentER Discussion Paper: 2002–2048. Tilburg: Macroeconomics
9.
BennettJ. (2012) ‘Ungleichheiten auf dem Arbeitsmarkt aufgrund von Bildungsunterschieden und die Rolle der Arbeitsmarktderegulierung’, Zeitschrift für Sozialreform58(3): 289-313.
10.
BlanchardO.WolfersJ. (2000) ‘The Role of Shocks and Institutions in the Rise of European Unemployment: The Aggregate Evidence’, The Economic Journal110: 1–33.
Council of Europe (2005) Reconciling Labour Flexibility with Social Cohesion: Facing the Challenge. Trends in Social Cohesion 15. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.
13.
DavisD.R.ReeveT.A. (1997) Human Capital, Unemployment, and Relative Wages in a Global Economy. NBER Working Paper 6133. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
14.
De BeerP.SchilsT. (2009) The Labour Market Triangle: Employment Protection, Unemployment Compensation and Activation in Europe. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
15.
Esping-AndersenG. (2000) ‘Who Is Harmed by Labour Market Regulations? Quantitative Evidence’, in ReginiM.Esping-AndersonG. (eds) Why Deregulate Labour Markets?Oxford: Oxford University Press: 66–98.
Eurostat (2010) Quality Report of the European Union Labour Force Survey 2008. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
18.
GebelM.GieseckeJ. (2011) ‘Labor Market Flexibility and Inequality: The Changing Skill-Based Temporary Employment and Unemployment Risks in Europe’, Social Forces90(1): 17–40.
IversenT.CusackT.R. (2000) ‘The Causes of Welfare State Expansion: Deindustrialization or Globalization?’, World Politics52: 313–49.
23.
JonesG.R. (1984) ‘Task Visibility, Free Riding and Shirking: Explaining the Effect of Structure and Technology on Employee Behaviour’, Academy of Management Review9(4): 684–95.
24.
KallebergA.L. (2001) ‘Organizing Flexibility: The Flexible Firm in a New Century’, British Journal of Industrial Relations39(4): 479–504.
25.
LayteR.LevinH.HendrickxJ.BisonI. (2002) ‘Unemployment and Cumulative Disadvantage in the Labour Market’, in GallieD.PaugamS. (eds) Welfare Regimes and the Experience of Unemployment in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 153–174.
ManningA. (2004) ‘We Can Work It Out: The Impact of Technological Change on the Demand for Low-Skill Workers’, Scottish Journal of Political Economy51(5): 581–608.
MoodC. (2010) ‘Logistic Regression: Why We Cannot Do What We Think We Can Do, and What We Can Do about It’, European Sociological Review26(1): 67–82.
30.
MortensenD.T.PissaridesC.A. (1999) ‘Unemployment Responses to Skill-Biased Technology Shocks: The Role of Labor Market Policy’, The Economic Journal109(405): 242–65.
31.
NickellS.LayardR. (1999) ‘Labor Market Institutions and Economic Performance’, in AshenfelterO.CardD. (eds) Handbook of Labor Economics, Vol. 3C, pp. 3029–84. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
32.
NolteA. (2001) Institutionenökonomische Analyse von Kündigungsschutzregelungen: Ein Beitrag zur Reform des Arbeitsrechts. Wiesbaden: DUV.
33.
OECD (1999) Employment Outlook, pp. 47–129. Paris: OECD.
34.
OECD (2004) Employment Outlook, pp. 62–123. Paris: OECD.
OeschD. (2010) ‘What Explains High Unemployment among Low Skilled Workers? Evidence from 21 OECD Countries’, European Journal of Industrial Relations16(1): 39–55.
37.
PRO INNO Europe (2009) European Innovation Scoreboard 2008: Comparative Analyses of Innovation Performance. PRO INNO Europe Report 10. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
38.
RaudenbushS.W.BrykA.S. (2002) Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
39.
SchoferE.MeyerJ.W. (2005) ‘The Worldwide Expansion of Higher Education in the Twentieth Century’, American Sociological Review70(6): 898–920.
40.
SkedingerP. (2010) Employment Protection Legislation: Evolution, Effects, Winners and Losers. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
41.
Spitz-OenerA. (2006) ‘Technical Change, Job Tasks, and Rising Educational Demands: Looking outside the Wage Structure’, Journal of Labor Economics24(2): 235–70.
42.
StormS. (2007) Why Labour Market Regulation May Pay off: Worker Motivation, Coordination and Productivity Growth. Economic and Labour Market Paper 2007/4. Geneva: ILO.
VennD. (2009) ‘Legislation, Collective Bargaining and Enforcement: Updating the OECD Employment Protection Indicators’, available at http://www.oecd.org/els/workingpapers.
45.
WalweiU. (1996) ‘Flexibilisierung und Regulierung des Beschäftigungssystems: Optionen und Effekte’, Mitteilungen der Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung29(2): 219–27.
46.
WalweiU. (2002) ‘Ökonomische Analyse arbeitsrechtlicher Regelungen’, in KleinhenzG. (ed.) IAB-Kompendium Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung: Beiträge zur Arbeitsmarkt und Berufsforschung. Nürnberg: IAB: 95–106.
