This paper uses a variety of methods of statistical cluster analysis to examine how EU countries (other than the new East European members) are grouped. Using the four dimensions, family, market vs state, religion and clientelism, the results of the analysis are that Southern European/Mediterranean (SE/M) countries form a distinct cluster that, both in its existence and in its difference from the conservative cluster, contradicts the notion of ‘three worlds of welfare capitalism’. In addition Ireland, though not geographically contiguous, falls into the SE/M grouping.
Abu SharkhM.GoughI. (2010) ‘Global Welfare Regimes: A Cluster Analysis’, Global Social Policy10(1): 27–58.
2.
AllenJ. (2006) ‘Welfare Regimes, Welfare Systems and Housing in Southern Europe’, European Journal of Housing Policy6(3): 251–77.
3.
AllenJ.BarlowJ.LealJ.MaloutasT.PadovaniL. (2004) Housing and Welfare in Southern Europe. London: Blackwell.
4.
AspalterC. (2011) ‘The Development of Ideal-Typical Welfare Regime Theory’, International Social Work54(6): 735–50.
5.
BambraC. (2007) ‘De-familisation and Welfare State Regimes: A Cluster Analysis’, International Journal of Social Welfare16(4): 326–38.
6.
BarlowJ.DuncanS. (1994) Success and Failure in Housing Provision, European Systems Compared. Oxford and New York: Elsevier.
7.
BöhnkeP. (2008) ‘Are the Poor Socially Integrated? The Link Between Poverty and Social Support in Different Welfare Regimes’, Journal of European Social Policy18(2): 133–50.
8.
BonoliG. (1997) ‘Classifying Welfare-states: A Two-dimension Approach’, Journal of Social Policy26(3): 351–72.
9.
BoucherG.CollinsG. (2003) ‘Having One’s Cake and Being Eaten too: Irish Neo-liberal Corporatism’, Review of Social Economy61(3): 295–316.
10.
CastlesF.G.FerreraM. (1996) “Home Ownership and the Welfare State: Is Southern Europe Different?” South European Society and Politics1(2): 163–185.
11.
CastlesF.G.ObingerH. (2008) ‘Worlds, Families, Regimes: Country Clusters in European and OECD Area Public Policy’, West European Politics31(1/2): 321–44.
12.
Esping-AndersenG. (1990) The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.
13.
Esping-AndersenG. (1995) ‘Welfare States Without Work: The Impasse of Labor Shedding and Familialism in Continental European Social Policy’, Working Paper, Fundación Juan March, Madrid, Spain available at www.march.es/ceacs/publicaciones/working/archivos/1995_71.pdf
14.
Esping-AndersenG. (1997) ‘Hybrid or Unique?: The Japanese Welfare State Between Europe and America’, Journal of European Social Policy7(3): 179–89.
15.
Esping-AndersenG. (1999) Social Foundations of Postindustrial Economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
16.
Esping-AndersenG. (2000) ‘Interview on Postindustrialism and the Future of the Welfare State’, Work, Employment and Society14(4): 757–69.
17.
Esping-AndersenG. (2002) ‘A New Gender Contract’, in Esping-AndersenG.GallieD.HemerijkA.MylesJ. (eds) Why We Need a New Welfare State. Oxford: Oxford University Press, Ch.3.
18.
Esping-AndersenG. (2003) ‘Towards the Good Society, Once Again?’, Paper presented at the 4th International Research Conference on Social Security, Antwerp, 5–7 May, available at www.issa.int/pdf/anvers03/keynotes/2esping.pdf
FerreraM. (1996) ‘The Southern Model of Welfare in Social Europe’, Journal of European Social Policy6(1): 17–37.
26.
GalJ. (2010) ‘Is There an Extended Family of Mediterranean Welfare States?’, Journal of European Social Policy20(4): 283–300.
27.
GoughI. (2001) ‘Social Assistance Regimes: A Cluster Analysis’, Journal of European Social Policy11(2): 165–70.
28.
GuillenA-M.AlvarezS. (2001) ‘Globalization and the Southern Welfare States’, in SykesR.PalierB.PriorP.M. (eds) Globalization and European Welfare States. Basingstoke: Palgrave, pp. 103–26.
29.
HoekstraJ. (2010) Divergence in European Housing and Welfare Systems, Sustainable Urban Areas 38. Delft: Delft University Press.
30.
IacovouM.SkewA. (2010) ‘Household Structure in the EU’, Eurostat Methodologies and Working Papers. Luxembourg: Eurosta.
31.
KääriäinenJ.LehtonenH. (2006) ‘The Variety of Social Capital in Welfare State Regimes: A Comparative Study of 21 Countries’, European Societies8(1): 27–57.
32.
KeeferP. (2007) ‘Clientelism, Credibility, and the Policy Choices of Young Democracies’, American Journal of Political Science51(4): 804–21.
33.
LewisJ. (1992) ‘Gender and the Development of Welfare Regimes’, Journal of European Social Policy2(3): 159–73.
34.
MinasC.JacobsonD.McMullanC. (2013a) ‘Welfare Regime and Inter-Household Food Provision: The Case of Cyprus’, Journal of European Social Policy23(3): 300–14.
35.
MinasC.MavrikiouP.JacobsonD. (2013b) ‘Homeownership, Family and the Gift Effect: The Case of Cyprus’, Journal of Housing and the Built Environment28(1): 1–15.
36.
ObingerH.WagschalU. (2001) ‘Families of Nations and Public Policy’, West European Politics24(1): 99–114.
37.
PowellM.BarrientosA. (2004) ‘Welfare Regimes and the Welfare Mix’, European Journal of Political Research43(1): 83–105.
38.
PowellM.BarrientosA. (2011) ‘An Audit of the Welfare Modelling Business’, Social Policy and Administration45(1): 69–84.
39.
Saint-ArnaudS.BernardP. (2003) ‘Convergence or Resilience? A Hierarchical Cluster Analysis of the Welfare Regimes in Advanced Countries’, Current Sociology51(5): 499–527.
40.
SingerM. (2009) ‘Buying Voters with Dirty Money: The Relationship between Clientelism and Corruption’, Paper presented at the American Political Science Association Annual Conference, Toronto.
41.
StoyV. (2012) ‘Worlds of Welfare Services: From Discovery to Exploration’, Social Policy and Administration doi: 10.1111/spol.12006.
42.
TreismanD. (2007) ‘What Have we Learned About the Causes of Corruption from Ten Years of Cross-national Empirical Research’, Annual Review of Political Science10: 211–44.
43.
WincottD. (2001) ‘Reassessing the Social Foundations of Welfare (State) Regimes’, New Political Economy6(3): 409–25.
44.
WoodG.GoughI. (2006) ‘A Comparative Welfare Regime Approach to Global Social Policy’, World Development34(10): 1696–712.
