If a ‘migrant in the family’ is the prevalent pattern of care work in Mediterranean societies today, what are the emergent patterns in other familialistic societies, and what factors are driving or impeding them? We address these questions by examining the cases of Japan, Korea, Canada, and the US. Our analysis shows that while care work patterns in all these four countries resemble those of the Mediterranean countries in their increased use of migrant care workers, they also differ from the Mediterranean and among themselves, partly because of their varying conceptualizations of nationhood. We argue that concepts of nationhood are significant but not all-determining in efforts to reconcile care work and migration regimes.
Arat-KocS. (1997) ‘From “Mothers of the Nation” to Migrant Workers’, in BakanB.StasiulisD. (eds) Not One of the Family: Foreign Domestic Workers in Canada, Toronto, University of Toronto Press.
BettioF.VillaP.SimonazziA. (2006) ‘Changing Care Regimes and Female Migration’, Journal of European Social Policy16(3): 271–85.
4.
BorisE.KleinJ. (2006) ‘Organizing Home Care: Low-waged Workers in the Welfare State’, Politics and Society34(1): 81–108.
5.
BoydM. (2011) ‘Labour Migration for Care: Women Migrants in Canada Under the Live-in Caregiver Program’, unpublished paper presented at conference on Rethinking Care and Migration in the Age of Low Fertility and Ageing Population, University of Toronto, 9–10 March.
ChishtiM. (2011) ‘The Legal Context for Caregiver Immigration’, in MichelS. (ed.) Women, Migration and the Work of Care: The United States in Comparative Perspective. Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Center.
8.
CohenD. (2011) Braceros: Migrant Citizens and Transnational Subjects in the Postwar United States and Mexico, Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.
DaenzerP. (1997) ‘An Affair between Nations: International Relations and the Movement of Household Service Workers’, in BakanB.StasiulisD. (eds) Not One of the Family: Foreign Domestic Workers in Canada. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
11.
El NasserH. (2007) ‘Fewer Seniors Live in Nursing Homes’, USA Today, 27September.
12.
GlennE. (2010) Forced to Care: Coercion and Caregiving in America. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
13.
HarzigC. (2003) ‘MacNamara’s DP Domestics: Immigration Policy Makers Negotiate Class, Race, and Gender in the Aftermath of World War II’, Social Politics10(1): 23–48.
14.
International Labour Organization (2011) LABORSTA Labour Statistics Database 1975–2011. Available at: http://laborsta.ilo.org/ (accessed 12 November 2011).
15.
Japan-Bureau of Statistics (2011) Japan Statistical Yearbook 2011. Tokyo: JBS.
16.
Japan Institute of Labor (2010) ‘Rodoseisaku Forum: Kongo no Shigoto to Katei no Ryoritu shien [Labor Policy Forum: Future of Work–Family Reconciliation Support]’. Available at: www.jil.go.jp/event/ro_forum/houkoku/20100603/houkoku01.htm.
17.
Japan-Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare (1998) White Paper on Health, Labor and Welfare: 1998. Tokyo: Gyosei.
18.
Japan-Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare (2008) Kaigorodosha no Kakuho Teichaku nado ni kansuru Kenkyukai – chukan torimatome [Interim Report of the Research Committee on Recruitment and Retention of Care Workers]. Available at: www.mhlw.go.jp/houdou/2008/07/h0729-2.html.
19.
Japan-Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare (2010) Population Data. Toyko: Gyosei.
Japan-National Institute for Population and Social Security Research (2009) The Cost of Social Security in Japan: Fiscal Year 2008. Tokyo: NIPSSR.
22.
JensonJ. (2004) ‘Changing the Paradigm: Family Responsibility or Investing in Children’, Journal of Sociology/Cahiers canadiens de sociologie29(2): 169–92.
23.
JohnsonC. (1982) MITI and the Japanese Miracle: The Growth of Industrial Policy, 1925–1975. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Korea Institute of Child Care and Education (2008) Annual Number of Children Enrolled in Childcare Centres, 1990–2008. Available at: www.kicce.re.kr/eng/ (extracted 29November2011).
Korea-Ministry of Justice (2010) The First Basic Plan for Immigration Policy: 2008–2012. Seoul: MOJ.
29.
KremerM. (2006) ‘The Politics of Ideals of Care: Danish and Flemish Child Care Policy Compared’, Social Politics13(2): 261–85.
30.
LeeH. (2011) ‘Marriage Migration and Immigration Policy Reform in South Korea’, paper presented to workshop on Demography, Gender and Care Migration, Toronto, Canada, 9 March.
31.
LyonD. (2006) ‘The Organization of Care Work in Italy: Gender and Migrant Labor in the New Economy’, Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies13(1): 207–24.
32.
MahonR.PhillipsS. (2002) ‘Dual-Earner Families Caught in a Liberal Welfare Regime? The Politics of Child Care Policy in Canada’, in MichelS.MahonR. (eds) Child Care at the Crossroads: Gender and Welfare State Restructuring. New York: Routledge.
33.
MartinS.LowellB.L.GozdziakE.M.BumpM.BreedingM.E. (2009) ‘The Role of Migrant Care Workers in Aging Societies’, Washington, DC: Institute for the Study of International Migration, Georgetown University. Available at: www12.georgetown.edu/sfs/docs/20101201_Elder_Care_Report.pdf.
34.
MichelS. (1999) Children’s Interests/Mother’s Rights: The Shaping of America’s Child Care Policies. New Haven: Yale University Press.
35.
MichelS.Urias LevyD. (2002) ‘More Can Be Less: Child Care and Welfare Reform in the United States’, in MichelS.MahonR. (eds) Child Care at the Crossroads: Gender and Welfare State Restructuring. New York: Routledge.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2011b) Korea: Long-Term Care, report prepared by OECD, 18 May. Available at: www.oecd.org/dataoecd/61/40/47877789.pdf.
40.
PasselJ.CohnD. (2009) A Portrait of Unauthorized Immigrants in the United States. Washington, DC: Pew Hispanic Center. Available at: http://pewhispanic.org/files/reports/107.pdf.
41.
PengI. (2002) ‘Social Care in Crisis: Gender, Demography and Welfare State Restructuring in Japan,’ Social Politics9(3): 411–43.
42.
PengI. (2004) ‘Postindustrial Pressures, Political Regime Shifts, and Social Policy Reforms in Japan and South Korea’, Journal of East Asian Studies4(3): 389–425.
43.
PengI. (2010) ‘The Expansion of Social Care and reform: Implications for Care Workers in the Republic of Korea, International Labour Review149(4): 461–76.
44.
PengI (2011) ‘The Good, The Bad, and The Confused: Political Economy of Social Care in South Korea’, Development & Change42(4): 905–23.
van WalsumS. (2008) The Family and the Nation: Dutch Family Migration Policies in the Context of Changing Family Norms. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
52.
UmS. (2011) ‘Migrant Care Workers in the South Korean Elder Care Market: At the Intersection of Immigration, Care, and Labour Market Policies’, paper presented to workshop on Demography, Gender and Care Migration, Toronto, Canada, 9 March.
