Why and how (still) study the Open Method of Co-ordination (OMC)?

Adão e Silva P. (2009) ‘Il Portogallo come caso di studio dell’europeanizzazione delle politiche sociali’, la Rivista delle Politiche Sociali 4: 229–60.

Aidukaite J. (2009) ‘Old Welfare State Theories and New Welfare Regimes in Eastern Europe: Challenges and Implications’, Communist and Post-Communist Studies 42(1): 23–39.

Armstrong K. (2005) ‘How Open is the United Kingdom to the OMC Process on Social Inclusion?’, in Zeitlin J. Pochet P. (eds) The Open Method of Coordination in Action: The European Employment and Social Inclusion Strategies, pp. 287–310. Brussels: PIE-Peter Lang.

Armstrong K. Begg I. Zeitlin J. (2008) ‘EU Governance After Lisbon’, Journal of Common Market Studies 46(2): 413–50.

Armstrong K. Kilpatrick C. (2007) ‘Law, Governance, or New Governance? The Changing Open Method of Coordination’, Columbia Journal of European Law 13(3): 649–77.

Atkinson A. Marlier E. Nolan B. (2004) ‘Indicators and Targets for Social Inclusion in the European Union’, Journal of Common Market Studies 42(1): 47–75.

Barbier J.-C. (2008) La longue marche vers l’Europe sociale. Paris: PUF.

Béland D. (2010) ‘The Idea of Power and the Role of Ideas’, Political Studies Review 8(2): 145–54.

Börzel T. Risse T. (2003) ‘Conceptualizing the Domestic Impact of Europe’, in Featherstone K. Radaelli C. (eds) The Politics of Europeanization, pp. 57–80. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Brandsten T. Pavolini E. Ranci C. Sittermann B. Zimmer A. (2005) ‘The National Action Plan on Social Inclusion: An Opportunity for the Third Sector?’ Third Sector European Policy (TSEP) Working Paper No. 14. London: London School of Economics.

Büchs M. (2007) New Governance in European Social Policy: The Open Method of Co-ordination. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Büchs M. Friedrich D. (2005) ‘Surface Integration. The National Action Plans for Employment and Social Inclusion in Germany’, in Zeitlin J. Pochet P. (eds) The Open Method of Coordination in Action: The Employment and Social Inclusion Strategies, pp. 249–86. Brussels: PIE-Peter Lang:

Casey B. (2004) ‘The European Employment Strategy and the OECD Jobs Strategy: Two Views of the Labour Market and of the Welfare State’, European Journal of Industrial Relations 10(3): 329–52.

de la Porte C. (2008) ‘The Evolution and Influence of the Open Method of Coordination: The Cases of Employment and Social Inclusion’. PhD Thesis, Social and Political Science Department, European University Institute, Florence, Italy.

de la Porte C. (2009) ‘The Role of the OECD and the EU in the Development of Labour Market Policy in the Czech Republic’, Journal of Contemporary European Research 5(4): 539–56. Available at: www.jcer.net/ojs/index.php/jcer/article/view/232/185.

de la Porte C. (2010) ‘State of the Art: Overview of Concepts, Indicators and Methodologies used for analyzing the social OMCs’, RECWOWE working paper 15/10. Available at: www.socialpolicy.ed.ac.uk/recwowepudisc/working_papers/rec-wp_15_10, 53 pp.

de la Porte C. (2011) ‘Principal-Agent Theory and the Open Method of Co-ordination: The Case of the European Employment Strategy’, Journal of European Public Policy 18(4): 485–503.

de la Porte C. Al-Gailany Y. (2011) ‘Case Study Denmark: Analyzing the Social OMCs’, European Commission Report (Lead Partner PPMI) Assessing the Effectiveness and the Impact of the Social OMC in Preparation of the New Cycle, p. 61.

de la Porte C. Jacobsson K. (2011) ‘Social Investment or Recommodification? Assessing the Employment Policies of the EU Member States’ in Morel N. Palier B. Palme J. (eds) Towards a Social Investment Welfare State? Ideas, Policies and Challenges. Bristol: Policy Press.

de la Porte C. Pochet P. (eds) (2002) Building Social Europe Through the Open Method of Co-ordination. Brussels: P.I.E.-Peter Lang.

de la Porte C. Pochet P. Room G. (2001) ‘Social Benchmarking, Policy-making and New Governance in the EU’, Journal of European Social Policy 11(4): 291–307.

Dunia F. Nedergaard P. (2010) ‘Learning in International Governmental Organizations: The Case of Social Protection’, Global Social Policy 10(2): 193–217.

Erhel C. Mandin L. Palier B. (2005) ‘The Leverage Effect. The Open Method of Coordination in France’, in Zeitlin J. Pochet P. Magnusson L. (eds) The Open Method of Coordination in Action. The European Employment and Social Inclusion Strategies, pp. 217–47. Brussels: Peter Lang.

Esping-Andersen G. (1990) The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. London: Polity Press.

Esping-Andersen G. (2002) Why We Need a New Welfare State. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Falkner G. Treib O. Hartlapp M. Leiber S. (2005) Complying with Europe: EU Harmonisation and Soft Law in the Member States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Ferrera M. (1996) ‘The Southern Model of Welfare in Social Europe’, Journal of European Social Policy 6(1): 17–37.

Ferrera M. Sacchi S. (2005) ‘The Open Method of Co-ordination and National Institutional Capabilities. The Italian Experience’, in Zeitlin J. Pochet P. (eds) The Open Method of Coordination in Action: The European Employment and Social Inclusion Strategies, pp. 137–72. Brussels: PIE-Peter Lang.

Ferrera M. Sacchi S. Matsaganis M. (2002) ‘Open Coordination Against Poverty: The New EU Social Inclusion Process’, Journal of European Social Policy 12(3): 227–39.

Goetschy J. (1999) ‘The European Employment Strategy: Genesis and Development’, European Journal of Industrial Relations 5(2): 117–37.

Goetschy J. (2003) ‘The European Employment Strategy, Multi-Level Governance and Policy Coordination: Past, Present and Future’, in Zeitlin J. Trubek D.M. (eds), Governing Work and Welfare in a New Economy: European and American Experiments, pp. 59–87. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Greer S. Vanhercke B. (2010) ‘Governing Health Care through EU Soft Law’, in Mossialos E. Hervey T. Permanand G. Baeten R. (eds) Health System Governance in Europe: The Role of European Union Law and Policy, pp. 186–230. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hall P.A. Taylor R. (1996) ‘Political Science and Three New Institutionalisms’, Political Studies 44(5): 936–57.

Hamel M. Vanhercke B. (2009) ‘The Open Method of Coordination and Domestic Social Policymaking in Belgium and France: Window Dressing, One-way Impact, or Reciprocal Influence?’, in Heidenreich M. Zeitlin J. (eds) Changing European Employment and Welfare Regimes: The Influence of the Open Method of Coordination on National Reforms. London: Routledge.

Hartlapp M. (2009) ‘Learning about Policy Learning. Reflections on the European Employment Strategy’, in Kröger S. (ed.) What We Have Learnt: Advances, Pitfalls And Remaining Questions in OMC Research, European integration online papers (EIoP), 13 (Special Issue 1).

Hatzopoulos V. (2007) ‘Why the Open Method of Coordination is Bad For You: A Letter to the EU’, European Law Journal 13(3): 309–42.

Héritier A. Lehmkuhl D. (2008) ‘Introduction. The Shadow of Hierarchy and New Modes of Governance’, Journal of Public Policy 28(1): 1–17.

Hervey T. Vanhercke B. (2010) ‘Health Care and the EU: The Law and Policy Patchwork’, in Mossialos E. Hervey T. Baeten R. (eds) Health System Governance in Europe: The Role of EU Law and Policy, pp. 84–133. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hodson D. Maher I. (2001) ‘The Open Method as a New Mode of Governance: The Case of Soft Economic Policy Co-Ordination’, Journal of Common Market Studies 39(4): 719–46.

Horvath A. (2008) ‘From Policy to Politics? Informal Practices within the Social Protection Committee after Enlargement’, Journal of European Integration 30(4): 545–61.

Jacobsson K. (2005) ‘Trying to Reform the ‘Best Pupils in the Class’? The Open Method of Coordination in Sweden and Denmark’, in Zeitlin J. Pochet P. with L. Magnusson (eds) The Open Method of Coordination in Action, pp. 107–36. Brussels: PIE Peter Lang.

Jacobsson K. Johansson H. (2009) ‘The Micro- Politics of the Open Method of Coordination: Ngos and the Social Inclusion Process in Sweden’, in Heidenreich M. Zeitlin J. (eds) Changing European Employment and Welfare Regimes: The Influence of the Open Method of Coordination on National Reforms, pp. 173–91. London: Routledge.

Jacobsson K. Schmid J. (2002) ‘The EES in Denmark and Sweden’ in la de Porte C. Pochet P. (eds) Building Social Europe through the Open Method of Co-ordination, pp. 177–221. Brussels: P.I.E.-Peter Lang.

Jacobsson K. Vifell Å . (2007) ‘New Governance Structures in Employment Policy Making: Taking Stock of the European Employment Strategy’, in Linsemann I. Meyer C. Wessels W. (eds) Economic Government of the EU: A Balance Sheet of New Modes of Policy Coordination. Basingstoke: Palgrave.

Jacobsson K. West C. (2009) ‘Joining the European Employment Strategy: Europeanization of Labour Market Policy in the Baltic States’, in Heidenreich M. Zeitlin J. (eds) Changing European Employment and Welfare Regimes: The Influence of the Open Method of Coordination on National Reforms, pp. 112–33. London: Routledge.

Kröger S. (2008) Soft Governance in Hard Politics. European Coordination of Anti-Poverty Policies in France and Germany. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.

Kröger S. (2009) The Open Method of Coordination: Underconceptualisation, Overdetermination, De-Politicisation and Beyond. European Integration online Papers (EIoP), 13 (special issue 1).

Kvist J. (2007) ‘Denmark: From Foot Dragging to Pace Setting in European Union Policy’, in Kvist J. Saari J. (eds) The Europeanisation of Social Protection. Bristol: Policy Press, 195–210.

Lajh D. Silaj T. (2010) ‘Slovenian Employment Policy: From Self-Management to Common (International) Goals and Paradigms’, in Fink-Hafner D. (ed.) The Open Method of Co-ordination: A View from Slovenia, pp. 35–58. Ljubljana: Faculty of Social Sciences.

Lodge M. (2007) ‘Comparing Non-Hierarchical Governance in Action: The Open Method of Co-ordination in Pensions and Information Society’, Journal of Common Market Studies 45(2): 343–65.

López-Santana M. (2009) ‘Soft Europeanization? The Differential Influence of the European Employment Strategy in Belgium, Spain and Sweden’, in Zeitlin J. Heidenreich M. (eds) Changing European employment and welfare regimes. The Influence of the Open Method of Coordination on National Labour Market and Social Welfare Reforms, pp. 134–53. New York: Routledge.

Mailand M. (2009) ‘North, South, East, West: The Implementation of the European Employment Strategy in Denmark, the UK, Spain and Poland’, in Zeitlin J. Heidenreich M. (eds) Changing European Employment and Welfare Regimes. The Influence of the Open Method of Coordination on National Labour Market and Social Welfare Reforms, pp. 154–72. New York: Routledge.

Mosher J. Trubek D. (2003) ‘Alternative Approaches to Governance in the EU: EU Social Policy and the European Employment Strategy’, Journal of Common Market Studies 41(1): 63–88.

O’Donnell R. Moss B. (2005) ‘Ireland: The Very Idea of an Open Method of Coordination’, in Zeitlin J. Pochet P. (eds) The Open Method of Coordination in Action: The European Employment and Social Inclusion Strategies, pp. 311–50. Brussels: PIE-Peter Lang.

Orenstein. (2008) ‘Out-liberalizing the EU: pension privatization in Central and Eastern Europe’, Journal of European Public Policy, 15(6): 899–917.

Pochet P. (1999) ‘The New Employment Chapter of the Amsterdam Treaty’, Journal of European Social Policy 9(3): 271–78.

Preunkert J. Zirra S. (2009) ‘Europeanization of Domestic Employment and Welfare Regimes: The German, French, and Italian Experiences’, in Heidenreich M. Zeitlin J. (eds) Changing European Employment and Welfare Regimes: The Influence of the Open Method of Coordination on National Reforms, pp. 192–213. London: Routledge.

Radaelli C. (2003) ‘The Open Method of Coordination: A New Governance Architecture for the European Union’, Sieps Rapporter 1.

Radulova E. (2011) ‘Europeanization through Framing: An Inquiry into the Influence of the Open Method of Coordination on Childcare Policy in the Netherlands’, PhD thesis, Maastricht University, the Netherlands, October 2011. Available at: http://arno.unimaas.nl/show.cgi?fid=23218.

Saari J. Kangas O. (2007) ‘Finland: Social Protection Reform’, in Kvist J. Saari J. (eds) The Europeanisation of Social Protection, pp. 153–74. Bristol: Policy Press.

Schäfer A. (2004) ‘Beyond the Community Method: Why the Open Method of Co-ordination was Introduced to EU Policy-Making’, European Integration Online Papers (EIoP) 8(13). Available at: http://eiop.or.at/eiop/pdf/2004-013.pdf.

Scharpf F. (2002) ‘The European Social Model’, Journal of Common Market Studies 40(4): 645–70.

Scott J. Trubek D. (2002) ‘Mind the Gap: Law and New Approaches to Governance in the European Union’, European Law Journal 8(1): 1–18.

Smismans S. (2011) ‘From Harmonization to Coordination? EU Law in the Lisbon Governance Architecture’, Journal of European Public Policy 18(4): 504–24.

Szyszczak E. (2000) ‘The Evolving European Employment Strategy’, in Shaw J. (ed.) Social Law and Policy in an Evolving European Union, pp. 197–222. Oxford: Hart Publishing.

Trubek D. Mosher J. (2003) ‘Alternative Approaches to Governance in the EU: EU Social Policy and the European Employment Strategy’, Journal of Common Market Studies 41(1): 63–8.

Trubek D. Trubek L. (2007) ‘New Governance and Legal Regulation: Complementarity, Rivalry or Transformation’, Columbia Journal of European Law 13(3): 539–64.

van Gerven M. (2008) ‘The Broad Tracks of Path Dependent Benefit Reforms: A Longitudinal Study of Social Benefit Reforms in Three European Countries, 1980–2006’. Studies in Social Security and Health 100, Helsinki: Social Insurance Institution Finland.

van Gerven M. Beckers M. (2009) ‘Unemployment Protection Reform in Belgium, Finland, the Netherlands and the UK: Policy Learning Through the OMC?’, in Heidenreich J. Zeitlin J. (eds) Changing European Employment and Welfare Regimes: The Influence of the Open Method of Coordination on National Reforms, pp. 61–83. London: Routledge.

van Riel B. van der Meer M. (2002) ‘The Advocacy Coalition for European Employment Policy – The European Integration Process after EMU’, in Hegmann H. Neumaerker B. (eds) Die Europaische Union aus politökonomischer Perspective, pp. 309–28. Marburg: Metropolis Verlag.

Wallace H. (2010) Policy-making in the European Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Weishaupt T. (2010) ‘An Analytical Overview of Methods Used for Evaluating the OMC in Other Areas than Social OMC’, in Report Evaluation of the Effectiveness and Impact of the Social OMC 2006–2010 for European Commission, DG Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion.

Wilthagen T. (1998) ‘Flexicurity: A New Paradigm for Labour Market Policy Reform?’ Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung, Discussion paper no. 202, FS 198–202.

Zeitlin J. (2005) ‘Conclusion: The Open Method of Coordination in Action: Theoretical Promise, Empirical Realities, Reform Strategy’, in Zeitlin J. Pochet P. (eds) The Open Method of Coordination in Action: The European Employment and Social Inclusion Strategies, pp. 441–98. Brussels: PIE-Peter Lang.

Zeitlin J. (2009) ‘The Open Method of Coordination and National Social and Employment Policy Reforms: Influences, Mechanisms, Effects’, in Heidenreich M. Zeitlin J. (eds) Changing European Employment and Welfare Regimes: The Influence of the Open Method of Coordination on National Reforms. London: Routledge, 214–45.