Continuity and change in Swedish family policy reforms

Abstract

This paper examines whether and to what extent three recently implemented family policies in Sweden change incentives regarding employment and choice of childcare for parents of young children, and whether these incentives differ by income level. These policy innovations warrant close examination because they represent a decisive ideological shift from what was a coherent set of policies that created incentives for high levels of female employment and that has been identified as a model of best practice in Europe. Simulating the economic incentive effects of the three new policies for heterosexual couple families with different levels of income, we find that while family policy in Sweden continues to provide the strongest support for a model of gender equality that combines full-time dual earning with public childcare, alternative organizations of family life are now more affordable. Nonetheless, the extent to which the costs of deviation from this model have changed varies by income level.

Keywords

Sweden gender equality caregiving cash-for-care parental leave child care

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bradshaw, J. , Ditch, J. , Holmes, H. and Vilhiteford, P. ( 1993) ‘A Comparative Study of Child Support in Fifteen Countries’, Journal of European Social Policy 3(4): 255-71.

Brink, A. , Nordblom, K. and Wahlberg, R. ( 2007) ‘Maximum Fee Versus Child Benefit: A Welfare Analysis of Swedish Child-care Reform’, International Tax and Public Finance 14(4): 457-80.

Dagens Nyheter (2009) ‘3 x fel resultat’, Dagens Nyheter (29 November). Available from www.dn.se/ledare/huvudledare/3-x-fel-resultat-1.1003930 (accessed 23 August 2010).

Dagens Nyheter (2010a) ‘Vårdnadsbidraget ökar i invandrartäta förorter’, Dagens Nyheter (5 January). Available from www.dn.se/nyheter/sverige/vardnadsbidraget-okar-i-invandrartata-fororter-1.1022590 (accessed 23 August 2010).

Dagens Nyheter (2010b) ‘Fler passar barnen med rut’, Dagens Nyheter (20 July). Available from www.dn.se/ekonomi/fler-passar-barnen-med-rut-1.1140240 (accessed 23 August 2010).

Daly, M. ( 2002) ‘Care as a Good for Social Policy’, Journal of Social Policy 31(2): 251-70.

Demeny, P. ( 2003) ‘Population Policy Dilemmas in Europe at the Dawn of the Twenty-First Century’, Population and Development Review 29(1): 1-28.

Duncan, S. ( 2002) ‘Policy Discourses on "Reconciling Work and Life" in the EU’, Social Policy and Society 1(4): 305-14.

Duvander, A.-Z. , Ferrarini, T. and Thalberg, S. ( 2005) Swedish Parental Leave and Gender Equality: Achievements and Reform Challenges in a European Perspective, Institute for Future Studies Working paper 2005:11, Stockholm.

10.

Ellingsaeter, A.L. ( 2006) ‘The Norwegian Childcare Regime and Its Paradoxes’ , in A. L. Ellingsaeter and A. Leira (eds) Politicising Parenthood in Scandinavia: Gender Relations in Welfare States. Bristol : The Policy Press, pp. 121-44.

11.

Fagnani, Jeanne ( 1998) ‘Helping Mothers to Combine Paid and Unpaid Work: Or Fighting Unemployment? The Ambiguities of French Family Policy’, Community, Work and Family 1(3): 297-312.

12.

Finansdepartementet [Swedish Ministry of Finance] ( 2006) Promemoria om skattelättnader för hushållsnära tjänster [Government Proposal: Tax Deduction for Domestic Services]. Available from http://regeringen.se/sb/d/108/a/74314 (accessed on 17 December 2010).

13.

Försäkringskassan (2010) ‘Utfall av jämställdhetsbonus: 27,5 miljoner kronor till 7000 föräldrar’, Försäkringskassan (31 May) press release. Available from http://www.forsakringskassan.se/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/guid/b07aa060-d54e-2d10-33add9e6ad6ab26c (accessed to 22 January 2011).

14.

Fraser, N. ( 1994) ‘After the Family Wage: Gender Equity and the Welfare State’, Political Theory 22(4): 591-618.

15.

Government Offices of Sweden (2008a) Financial Family Policy. Available from www.sweden.gov.se/sb/d/3827 (accessed 21 August 2008).

16.

Government Offices of Sweden (2008b) Equality Between Women and Men in Sweden. Available from www.sweden.gov.se/sb/d/4096 (accessed 21 August 2008).

17.

Haas, L. ( 2003) ‘Parental Leave and Gender Equality: Lessons from the European Union’, Review of Policy Research 20(1): 89-114.

18.

Hiilamo, H. and Kangas, O. (2009) ‘Trap for Women or Freedom to Choose? The Struggle over Cash for Child Care Schemes in Sweden and Finland’, Journal of Social Policy 38 (3): 457-76.

19.

Hiilamo, H. and Kangas, O. (2009) ‘Trap for Women or Freedom to Choose? The Struggle over Cash for Child Care Schemes in Sweden and Finland’, Journal of Social Policy 38 (3): 457-76.

20.

Himmelweit, S. ( 2005) ‘Can We Afford [Not] to Care: Prospects and Policy’ , Gender Institute New Working Paper Issue 15, July.

21.

Hobson, B. ( 2003) ‘The Individualised Worker, the Gender Participatory and the Gender Equity Models in Sweden’, Social Policy and Society 3(1): 75-83.

22.

Lammi-Tuskola, J. ( 2006) ‘Nordic Men on Parental Leave: Can the Welfare State Change Gender Relations?’, in A. L. Ellingsaeter and A. Leira (eds) Politicising Parenthood in Scandinavia: Gender Relations in Welfare States . Bristol: The Policy Press, pp. 79-99.

23.

Leira, Arnlaug ( 2006) ‘Parenthood Change and Policy Reform in Scandinavia, 1970s-2000s’ in Anne Lise Ellingsaeter and Arnlaug Leira (eds) Politicising Parenthood in Scandinavia: Gender Relations in Welfare States . Bristol: The Policy Press, pp. 27-51.

24.

Lewis, J. , Campbell, M. and Huerta, C. ( 2008) ‘Patterns of Paid and Unpaid Work in Western Europe: Gender, Commodification, Preferences and the Implications for Policy’ , Journal of European Social Policy 18(1): 21-37.

25.

Liu, G. and Vikat, A. ( 2004) ‘Does Divorce Risk Depend on Spouses’ Relative Income? A Register-based Study of First Marriages in Sweden in 1981-1998’ , Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research (MPIDR) Working Papers WP-2004-010. Rostock, Germany: MPIDR.

26.

Luxembourg Income Study (LIS) Database, http://www.lisproject.org/techdoc.htm (the calculations were carried out in June 2009).

27.

Mahon, R. ( 2002) ‘Child Care: Toward what Kind of Social Europe?’ , Social Politics 9(3): 343-79.

28.

Michel, S. ( 2002) ‘Dilemmas of Child Care’, in S. Michel and R. Mahon (eds) Child Care Policy at the Crossroads: Gender and Welfare State Restructuring. New York and London: Routledge, pp. 333-8.

29.

Morgan, K.J. and Zippel, K. ( 2003) ‘Paid to Care: The Origins and Effects of Care Leave Policies in Western Europe’, Social Politics 10(1): 49-85.

30.

Olofsson, M. and Sabuni, N. ( 2009) ‘Alla tjänar på jämställdhet’, debate article. Available from www.regeringen.se/sb/d/3213/a/128975 (accessed 23 August 2010).

31.

Platzer, E. ( 2006) ‘From Private Solutions to Public Responsibility and Back Again: The New Domestic Services in Sweden’, Gender and History 18(2): 211-21.

32.

Ray, R. , Gornick, J.C. and Schmitt, J. ( 2010). ‘Who Cares? Assessing Generosity and Gender Equality in Parental Leave Policy Designs in 21 Countries’, Journal of European Social Policy 20 (3): 196-216.

33.

Regeringen [Government of Sweden] (2008a) Jämställdhetsbonus: familjepolitisk reform, Regeringens proposition 2007/08: 93 [Government Bill: Equality Bonus]. Available from http://www.regeringen.se/sb/d/9251/a/101089 (accessed on 17 December 2010).

34.

Regeringen [Government of Sweden] (2008b) Vårdnadsbidrag: familjepolitisk reform, Regeringens proposition 2007/08: 91 [Government Bill: Cash Benefit for Home Childcare]. Available from http://www.regeringen.se/sb/d/9251/a/101087 (accessed on 17 December 2010).

35.

Regeringen [Government of Sweden] (2008c) Ett enklare system för Skattereduktion för hushållsarbete, Regeringens proposition 2008/09:77 [Government Bill: A Simplified System of Tax deduction for Domestic Work]. Available from www.regeringen.se/sb/d/10169/a/116805 (accessed on 17 December 2010).

36.

Sommestad, L. ( 2001) 'Gender Equality - A Key to Our Future Economic Prosperity?’ , Current Sweden.

37.

Spiess, K.C. and Wrohlich, K. ( 2008) ‘The Parental Leave Benefit Reform in Germany: Costs and Labour Market Outcomes of Moving towards the Nordic Model’, Population Policy and Research Review 27(5): 575-91.

38.

Statens offentliga utredningar [Swedish Government Official Reports] (2008) ‘Skattelättnader för hushållstjänster’, SOU 2008: 57. Stockholm: Fritzes. Available at www.regeringen.se/sb/d/108/a/107717 (accessed 13 November 2010).

39.

Statistiska Centralbyrån [Statistics Sweden] ( 2003) Children and Their Families 2002 (Appendix 4: Different Concepts of Income), Statistiska Centralbyrån. Available from www.scb.se/Pages/PublishingCalendarViewInfo____259923 . (accessed to 22 January 2011).

40.

Statistiska Centralbyrån [Statistics Sweden] ( 2008) ‘Barnomsorg’, Utbildningsstatistisk årsbok 2008 [Yearbook of Educational Statistics 2008]: Statistiska Centralbyrån. Available from http://www.scb.se/Pages/PublishingCalendarViewInfo____259923 (accessed on 17 December 2010).

41.

Statistiska Centralbyrån [Statistics Sweden] ( 2009) Salary Structures, Whole Economy. Available from http://www.scb.se/Pages/Product____14376.aspx (accessed on 22 January 2011).

42.

Statistiska Centralbyrån [Statistics Sweden] ( 2010) ‘Skatter och taxerade inkomster 2008: Hushållsnära tjänster ökade i popularitet’, press release (11 February). Available from http://www.scb.se/Pages/PressRelease____287274.aspx,andthedatethesitewas (Accessed on 22 January 2011.

43.

Ungerson, C. ( 2004) ‘Whose Empowerment and Independence? A Cross-national Perspective on "Cash for Care" Schemes’, Ageing and Society 24(2): 189-212.