The development of the Open Method of Coordination, agreement on the Lisbon Agenda and EU enlargement offered the prospect of a new and substantial EU social policy agenda. This article considers EU social and cohesion policies in the context of the recent negotiation of the EU budget for 2007—13. We find the Commission's wish to redistribute EU spending in favour of these policy areas and new member states was thwarted by key political features of EU budget making: CAP spending levels which are downwardly sticky; institutional arrangements which provide for budget making as, at best, a zero-sum game; and the preferences of contributor member states in the EU-15 to contain overall spending while preserving their net budget positions. Questions are thus raised as to the ability of the EU to make any progress, from a budgetary perspective, on the social and cohesion policy agenda in an enlarged EU.
Ackrill, R.W. (2000) `The European Union Budget, the Balanced Budget Rule and the Development of Common European Policies', Journal of Public Policy20 (1): 1—19.
2.
Ackrill, R.W. and Kay, A. (2006) `Historical Institutionalist Perspectives on the Development of the EU Budget System', Journal of European Public Policy13 (1): 113—33.
3.
Ashiagbor, D. (2004) `Soft Harmonisation: the `Open Method of Coordination' in the European Employment Strategy', EuropeanPublic Law10 (2): 305—32.
4.
Bellamy, R. (2006) `Still in Deficit: Rights, Regulation, and Democracy in the EU', European Law Journal12 (6): 725—42.
5.
Borrás, S. and Jacobsson, K. (2004) `The Open Method of Co-ordination and New Governance Patterns in the EU', Journal of European Public Policy11 (2): 185—208.
6.
Council of the European Union (2002) `Brussels European Council 24 and 25 October 2002, Presidency Conclusions ', Document 14702/02, POLGEN67, Brussels 26 November 2002. Accessed at: [http://ue.eu.int/ueDocs/cms_Data/docs/pressData/en/ec/72968.pdf].
7.
Daly, M. (2006) `EU Social Policy after Lisbon', Journal of Common Market Studies44 (3): 461—81.
8.
Dekker, P., Ederveen, S., Jehoel-Gijsbers, G., de Mooij, A. and Wildeboer Schut, J.M. (2003) Social Europe. European Outlook 1: Annex to State of the European Union 2004. The Hague: CPB and SCP. Accessed at: [http://www.scp.nl/english/publications/books/9037701450/Social_Europe_European_outlook_1.pdf] .
9.
Egan, M. and Wolf, D. (1999) `Regulatory Oversight in Europe: the Case of Comitology ', in C. Joerge and E. Vos (eds) EU Committees: Social Regulation, Law and Politics . Oxford: Hart Publishing.
10.
European Commission (2004a) ` Report of the High-level Group on the Future of Social Policy in an enlarged European Union', Directorate General for Employment and Social Affairs. Accessed at: [http://ec.europa.eu/employment_social/publications/2005/ke6104202_en.pdf] .
11.
European Commission (2004b) ` Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament: Building Our Common Future — Policy Challenges and Budgetary Means of an Enlarged Union 2007—13', COM(2004)101 final, Brussels 10.2.2004. Accessed at: [http://eurlex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/site/en/com/2004/com2004_0101en02.pdf].
12.
European Commission (2004c) ` Proposal for a Council Regulation Laying down General Provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund ', COM(2004)492 final. Brussels 14.7.2004. Accessed at: [http://europa.eu/eur-lex/en/com/pdf/2004/com2004_0492en01.pdf].
13.
European Commission (2004d) ` Commission Working Document: Proposal for renewal of the Interinstitutional Agreement on Budgetary Discipline and Improvement of the Budgetary Procedure ', COM(2004)498 final. Brussels 14.7.2004. Accessed at: [http://eurlex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/site/en/com/2004/com2004_0498en01.pdf].
14.
European Commission (2005a) ` The European Social Fund 2000—06: Europe Investing in People'. Brussels: Directorate General for Employment and Social Affairs. Accessed at: [http://ec.europa.eu/employment_social/publications/2005/ke6505860_en.pdf].
15.
European Commission (2005b) ` The Social Agenda 2005—2010: a Social Europe in the Global Economy. Jobs and Opportunities for All. Brussels: Directorate General for Employment and Social Affairs. Accessed at: [http://ec.europa.eu/employment_social/publications/2005/ke6605062_en.pdf].
16.
European Commission (2005c) ` Allocation of 2004 EU Expenditure by Member State'. Brussels : Budget Directorate General. Accessed at: [http://ec.europa.eu/budget/library/documents/revenue_expenditure/agenda_2000/allocrep_2004_en.pdf].
17.
European Council (2000) Presidency Conclusions: Lisbon European Council 23 and 24 March 2000, SN100/00. Available at: [http://www.consilium.europa.eu/ueDocs/cms_Data/docs/pressData/en/ec/00100-r1.en0.htm] .
18.
European Parliament, Council, Commission ( 2006) `Interinstitutional Agreement between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on Budgetary Discipline and Sound Financial Management', Official Journal of the European UnionC139, 14.6.2006, 1—17. Accessed at: [http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/site/en/oj/2006/c_139/c_13920060614en00010017.pdf].
19.
Follesdal, A. and Hix, S. (2006) `Why there is a Democratic Deficit in the EU: a Response to Majone and Moravcsik', Journal of Common Market Studies44 (3): 533—62.
20.
Hix, S. ( 1998) `The Study of the European Union II: The “New Governance” Agenda and Its Rival', Journal of European Public Policy5 (1): 38—65.
21.
Jepsen, M. and Serrano Pascual, A. (2005) `The European Social Model: an Exercise in Deconstruction', Journal of European Social Policy15 (3): 231—45.
22.
Laffan, B. (2000) `The Big Budgetary Bargains: from Negotiation to Authority', Journal of European Public Policy7 (5): 725—43.
23.
Majone, G. (1994) `The Rise of the Regulatory State in Europe', West EuropeanPolitics17 (3): 77—101.
24.
Majone, G. (1996) Regulating Europe. London: Routledge.
25.
Majone, G. (1998) `Europe's “Democratic Deficit”: the Question of Standards', European Law Journal4 (1): 5—28.
26.
Majone, G. (1999) `The Regulatory State and its Legitimacy Problems', West EuropeanPolitics22 (1): 1—24.
27.
Moran, M. (2002) `Review Article: Understanding the Regulatory State' , British Journal of Political Science32: 391—413.
28.
Moravcsik, A. (1993) `Preferences and Power in the European Community: a Liberal Intergovernmentalist Approach', Journal of Common Market Studies31 (4): 473—524.
29.
Moravcsik, A. (1998) The Choice for Europe: Social Purpose and State Power from Messina to Maastricht. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
30.
Moravcsik, A. (2002) `In Defence of the “Democratic Deficit”: Reassessing Legitimacy in the European Union', Journal of Common Market Studies40 (4): 603—24.
31.
O'Connor, J.S. (2005) `Policy Coordination, Social Indicators and the Social-policy Agenda in the European Union', Journal of European Social Policy15 (4): 345—61.
32.
Regent, S. (2003) `The Open Method of Coordination: a New Supranational Form of Governance?', European Law Journal9 (2): 190—214.
33.
Tondl, G. (2005) `European Union Regional Policy', in P. van der Hoek (ed.) Handbook of Public Administration and Policy in the European Union. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
34.
Trubek, D.M. and Trubek, L.G. (2005) `Hard and Soft Law in the Construction of Social Europe: the Role of the Open Method of Co-ordination', European Law Journal11 (3): 343—64.
35.
Tsarouhas, D. (2005) `European Integration and Path Dependence: Explaining the Evolution of EU Social Policy', EuropeanPolitical Economy Review3 (2): 87—111.
36.
Wincott, D. (2003) `Beyond Social Regulation? New Instruments and/or a New Agenda for Social Policy at Lisbon?', Public Administration81 (3): 533—53.
37.
Wincott, D. (2006) `European Political Development, Regulatory Governance, and the European Social Model: the Challenge of Substantive Legitimacy', European Law Journal12 (6): 743—63.
