Abstract
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
en05.pdf and Follow up to Hampton Court: CFSP and ESPD, 4 November 2005, doc. 13992/05, http://register.consilium.eu.int/pdf/en/05/st13/st13992.en05.pdf
2.
Kingdom of Sweden (1994): Declaration No. 46 by the Kingdom of Sweden on social policy, Accession of Austria, Finland and Sweden (1994), OJ C 241 of 29 August 1994.
3.
Andrew Duff (ALDE, UK) and Johannes Voggenhuber Greens-EFA, Aust) Doc. 364. 708 v01-00, http://www.europarl.eu.int/meetdocs/2004_2009/documents/pr/584/584292/584292en.pdf .
4.
Bulgaria 2005 Comprehensive Monitoring Report, SEC (2005) 1352, 25 October 2005 and Romania 2005 Comprehensive Monitoring Report, SEC (2005) 1354, 25 October 2005.
5.
Report on the development of Anti-discrimination Law in the 25 EU Member States: EU Network of Independent Experts on Fundamental Rights (2005): Developing Anti-discrimination Law in Europe. The 25 EU Member States compared, September 2005, http://europa.eu.int/comm/employment_social/fundamental_rights/pdf/legnet/05compan_en.pdf
6.
European Parliament (2005c): European Parliament legislative resolution of 7 September 2005 on the Council common position for adopting the European Parliament and Council Directive on the minimum health and safety requirements regarding the exposure of workers to the risks arising from physical agents (optical radiation) (19th individual Directive within the meaning of Article 16(1) of Directive 89/391/EEC) (5571/6/2005-C6-0129/2005-1992/0449B(COD)).
7.
Social Dialogue: ETUC’s vision of the European Social Model: ETUC (2005): ‘The case for Europe: Shaping a strong and social Europe’ and ‘More and better jobs: Europe needs more flexible macroeconomic policies’, 20 October 2005, http://www.etuc.org/img/doc/04-enhamptoncourt-booklet.doc and http://www.etuc.org/IMG/doc/Pamphlet_steering_commitee.doc