The aim of this article is to investigate the changing balance between public and private components in the income packages of old age pensioners in a selection of nine OECD countries. Four waves of data from the Luxembourg Income Study databank are used to analyse variation across countries and across time in the public/private mix of retirement income. The article seeks to address two main questions: (a) Is there a general trend towards a stronger reliance on private income provision and, perhaps, a trend towards convergence in the balance between public and private income components? (b) Is there evidence of a tendency for substitution/crowding out between public and private income components, and hence a tendency for crossnational convergence in the relative income position enjoyed by old age pensioners – despite variation in the generosity of national pension systems?
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Atkinson, A. B., Rainwater, L. and Smeeding, T. M. (1995) Income Distribution in OECD Countries. Evidence from the Luxembourg Income Study. Paris: OECD .
2.
Baldwin, P. (1990) The Politics of Solidarity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
3.
Barro, R. J. and MacDonald, G. M. (1979) ‘Social Security and Consumer Spending in an International Cross Section’ , Journal of Public Economics11: 275–289 .
4.
Bateman, H. and Piggot, J. (1997) ‘Private Pensions in OECD Countries – Australia’, Labour Market and Social Policy, Occasional Papers No. 23. Paris: OECD .
5.
Behrendt, C. (2000) ‘Private Pensions – a Viable Alternative? Their Distributive Effects in a Comparative Perspective’ , International Social Security Review53 (3): 3–26 .
6.
Barsch-Supan, A. and Reil-Held, A. (1998) ‘Retirement Income: Level, Risk, and Substitution Among Income Components’, Ageing Working Papers No. 3.7 (revised). Paris: OECD .
7.
Dobbin, F. and Boychuck, T. (1996) ‘Public Policy and the Rise of Private Pensions: the US Experience Since 1930’, in M. Shalev (ed.) The Privatization of Social Policy? Occupational Welfare and the Welfare State in America, Scandinavia and Japan. London: Macmillan .
8.
Esping-Andersen, G. (1987) ‘State and Market in the Formation of Social Security Regimes. A Political Economy Approach’, working paper. Florence: European University Institute .
9.
Esping-Andersen, G. (1990) The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press .
10.
Feldstein, M. (1974) ‘Social Security, Induced Retirement, and Aggregate Capital Accumulation’ , Journal of Political Economy82: 905–926 .
11.
Goldthorpe, J. (1997) ‘Current Issues in Comparative Macrosociology’, in L. Mjøset, F. Engelstad, G. Brochman, R. Kalleberg and A. Leira (eds) Comparative Social Research. Methodological Issues in Comparative Social Science. London: JAI Press .
12.
Hannah, L. (1986) Inventing Retirement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
13.
Hannah, L. (1992) ‘Similarities and Differences in the Growth and Structure of Private Pensions in the OECD Countries’, in E. Duskin (ed.) Private Pensions and Public Policy, Social Policy Studies No. 9. Paris: OECD .
14.
Janoski, T. and. Hicks, A. L. (eds) (1994) The Comparative Political Economy of the Welfare State. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press .
15.
Kangas, O. and Palme, J. (1992) ‘The Private–Public Mix in Pension Policy’, in J. E. Kolberg (ed.) The Study of Welfare State Regimes New York: M. E. Sharpe .
16.
Kohl, J. (1992) ‘The Public/Private Mix in the Income Packages of the Elderly: a Comparative Study’, LIS Working Paper series No. 78. Walferdange: Luxembourg Income Study CEPS/ INSTEAD .
17.
Korpi, W. and Palme, J. (1998) ‘The Paradox of Redistribution and Strategies of Equality: Welfare State Institutions, Inequality, and Poverty in the Western Countries’ , American Sociological Review63: 661–687 .
18.
Lieberson, S. (1985) Making it Count: the Improvement of Social Research and Theory. Berkeley: University of California Press .
19.
Lieberson, S. (1992) ‘Small N’s and Big Conclusions: an Examination of the Reasoning in Comparative Studies Based on a Small Number of Cases’, in C. C. Ragin and H. S. Becker (eds) What is a Case? Exploring the Foundations of Social Inquiry. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press .
20.
Lutjens, E. (1996) ‘Supplementary Pensions in the Netherlands’, in E. Reynauld, L. Roberts, B. Davies and G. Hughes (eds) International Perspectives on Supplementary Pensions. Actors and Issues. London: Quorum Books .
21.
Modigliani, F. and Brumberg, R. (1954) ‘Utility Analysis and the Consumption Function: an Interpretation of Cross-section Data’, in K. K. Kurihara (ed.) Post-Keynesian Economics. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press .
22.
Munnell, A. H. (1982) The Economics of Private Pensions. Washington DC: The Brookings Institution .
23.
Myles, J. (1989) Old Age in the Welfare State. The Political Economy of Public Pensions. Lawrance: University Press of Kansas .
24.
Myles, J. (2000) ‘The Maturation of Canada’s Retirement Income System: Income Levels, Income Inequality and Low Income Among Older Persons’ , Canadian Journal of Aging19: 287–316 .
25.
OECD (2001) Ageing and Income. Financial Resources and Retirement in 9 OECD Countries. Paris: OECD .
26.
Olsberg, D. (1995) ‘Australia’s Retirement Income Revolution: a Finnish System “Down Under” ’ , Scandinavian Journal of Social Welfare4: 8–14 .
27.
Osberg L. (2001) ‘Poverty Among Senior Citizens: a Canadian Success Story in International Perspective’, LIS Working Paper No. 274. Differdange: Luxembourg Income Study .
28.
Pedersen, A. W. (1997) ‘Do Public Pensions Hamper the Growth of Private Pensions? A Comparative Study of Time Series Data for Denmark and Norway’, CWR Working Paper No. 7/1997. Copenhagen: Centre for Welfare State Research, The Danish National Institute for Social Research .
29.
Pedersen, A. W. (1999) ‘The Taming of Inequality in Retirement. A Comparative Study of Pension Policy Outcomes’, Doctoral dissertation, Faforeport No. 317. Oslo: Fafo.
30.
Pestieau, P. (1992) ‘The Distribution of Private Pension Benefits: How Fair Is It?’, in E. Duskin (ed.) Private Pensions and Public Policy, Social Policy Studies No. 9. Paris: OECD .
31.
Petersen, J. H. (1990) ‘The Danish 1891 Act on Old Age Relief: a Response to Agrarian Demand and Pressure’ , Journal of Social Policy19: 69–91 .
32.
Quadagno, J. S. (1990) ‘Generational Equity and the Politics of the Welfare State’ , International Journal of Health Services20: 631–649 .
33.
Rainwater, L. (1993) ‘The Social Wage in the Income Package of Working Parents’, LIS Working Paper Series No. 89. Luxembourg: CEPS/INSTEAD .
34.
Rainwater, L., Rein, M. and Schwatz, J. (1986) Income Packaging in the Welfare State. A Comparative Study of Family Income. Oxford: Clarendon Press .
35.
Rein, M. (1983) From Policy to Practice. New York: M. E. Sharpe .
36.
Rein, M. and Rainwater, L. (1986) Public/Private Interplay in Social Protection. New York: M. E. Sharpe .
37.
Ritakallio, V-M. (2003) ‘The Importance of Housing Costs in Cross-national Comparisons of Welfare (State) Outcomes’ , International Social Security Review56: 81–101 .
38.
Rose, R. and Shiratori, R. (1986) The Welfare State in East and West. New York: Oxford University Press .
39.
Titmuss, R. M. (1958) Essays on the Welfare State. London: George Allen & Unwin .
40.
van Gunsteren, H. and Rein, M. (1985) ‘The Dialectic of Public and Private Pensions’ , Journal of Social Policy14: 129–149 .
41.
Whiteford, P. and Kennedy, S. (1995) ‘Incomes and Living Standards of Older People’, Department of Social Security Research Report No. 34. London: HMSO .
42.
World Bank (1994) Averting the Old Age Crisis: Policies to Protect the Old and Promote Growth. Oxford: Oxford University Press .
