AusubelJ.H., 1995. Technical progress and climatic change. Energy Policy, Vol. 23(4/5), 411–416.
2.
AzarC., 1996. Technological change and the long-run cost of reducing CO2 emissions. Working Paper, INSEAD, France.
3.
AzarC.RodheH., 1997. Targets for stabilization of atmospheric CO2Science, Vol. 276:1818–1819.
4.
BaylessC.E.CastenT.R., 1997. Leave CO2 to the Entrepreneurs. Washington Post, December 31, p.A2.
5.
BroeckerW.S., 1997. Thermohaline circulation, the Achilles heel of our climate system: Will man-made CO2 upset the current balance?Science, Vol. 278, 1582–1588.
6.
BrownP.G., 1997. Stewardship of climate. Climatic Change, Vol. 37, 329–334.
7.
ChapmanD.SuriV.HallS.G., 1995. Rolling dice for the future of the planet. Contemporary Economic Policy, Vol. 13, 1–9.
8.
ChichilniskyG., 1996. Development and Global Finance: The Case for an International Bank for Environmental Settlements, UNDP-UNESCO Office of Development Studies, New York.
9.
ClineW.R., 1992. The Economics of Global Warming. Institute for International Economics, Washington, D.C.
10.
CooperR.N., 1998. Toward a Real Global Warming Treaty. Foreign Affairs. Vol. 77(2), 66–79.
11.
Department of Energy (DOE), 1997. Scenarios of U.S. carbon reductions: Potential impacts of energy technologies by 2010 and beyond. Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, U.S. Department of Energy.
12.
EdwardsP.N.SchneiderS.H., 1998. Self-governance and peer review in science-for-policy: The case of the IPCC Second Assessment Report (submitted).
13.
FankhauserS., 1995. Valuing Climate Change: The Economics of the Greenhouse. Earthscan, London.
14.
GaskinsD.WeyantJ., 1993. EMF-12: Model comparisons of the costs of reducing CO2 emissions. American Economic Review, Vol. 83, 318–323.
15.
GoreA., 1992. Earth in the Balance: Ecology and the Human Spirit. Houghton Mifflin, Boston. 407 pp.
16.
GoulderL.H.SchneiderS.H., 1998. Induced technological change, crowding out, and the attractiveness of CO2 emissions abatement. Resource and Environmental Economics (in press).
17.
GrubbM.Ha-DuongM.ChapuisT., 1994. Optimizing Climate Change Abatement Responses: On Inertia and Induced Technology Development, in NakicenovicN.NordhausW.D.RichelsR.TothF.L. (eds.), Integrative Assessment of Mitigation, Impacts, and Adaptation to Climate Change. International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg, Austria.
18.
HahnR.W.StavinsR.N., 1995. Trading in Greenhouse Permits: A Critical Examination of Design and Implementation Issues, in LeeH. (ed.), Shaping National Responses to Climate Change: A Post-Rio Guide. Island Press, Washington, D.C.
19.
HamondM.J.DeCanioS.J.DuxburyP.SanstadA.H.StinsonC.H., 1997. Tax Waste, Not Work: How Changing What We Tax Can Lead To A Stronger Economy and a Cleaner EnvironmentsRedefining Progress, San Francisco, California, April.
20.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climatic Change (IPCC), 1996a. Climate Change 1995. The Science of Climate Change: Contribution of Working Group I to the Second Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. HoughtonJ.T.FilhoMeira L.G.CallanderB.A.HarrisN.KattenbergA.MaskellK., eds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 572 pp.
21.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climatic Change (IPCC), 1996b. Climate Change 1995. Economic and Social Dimensions of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Second Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. BruceJ.P.LeeH.HaitesE.F., eds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 448pp.
22.
JenkinsT.N., 1996. Democratising the Global Economy by Ecologicalising Economics: The Example of Global Warming. Ecological Economics. Vol.16, 227–238.
23.
KaufmannR.K., 1997. Assessing the DICE Model: Uncertainty Associated with the Emission and Retention of Greenhouse Gases. Climatic Change, Vol.35(4), 435–448.
24.
LeggettJ., 1990. The Nature of the Greenhouse Threat, in Global Warming: The Greenpeace Report, LeggettJ., ed. Oxford University Press.
25.
LeggettJ., (ed.), 1994. The Climate Time Bomb: Signs of Climate Change from the Greenpeace Database. Stichting Greenpeace Council, Amsterdam.
SchneiderS.H., 1997. Integrated assessment modeling of global climate change: Transparent rational tool for policy making or opaque screen hiding value-laden assumptions?Environmental Modeling and Assessment, Vol. 2(4), 229–248.
45.
SchneiderS.H.GoulderL.H., 1997. Achieving carbon dioxide concentration targets. What needs to be done now?Nature, Vol. 389, 13–14.
46.
SchneiderS.H.TurnerB.L.IIGarrigaMorehouse H., 1998. Imaginable surprise in global change science. J. of Risk Research, Vol. 1(2), 165–185.
47.
SelmonE.SchneiderS.H., 1997. ‘Hands on’ energy curriculum at Stanford University. Strategic Planning for Energy and the Environment, Vol. 17(1), 26–37
48.
TitusJ.G., 1992. The cost of climate change to the United States. In MajumdarS.KalksteinL.YarnalB.MillerE.RosenfeldL., editors, Global Climate Change: Implications, Challenges, and Mitigation Measures, Pennsylvania Academy of Science, Easton, Pennsylvania.
49.
TolR.S.J., 1995. The damage costs of climate change: Towards more comprehensible calculations. Environmental and Resource Economics, Vol. 5, 353–374.
WigleyT.M.L., 1998. The Kyoto Protocol: CO2, CH4, Temperature and Sea Level Implications. Geophys. Res. Letters, (in press).
52.
WigleyT.M.L.RichelsR.EdmondsJ.A., 1996. Economic and environmental choices in the stabilization of atmospheric CO2 concentrations. Nature, Vol. 379, 240–243.
53.
ZycherB., 1997. Market-Based Policies and International Negotiations. Jobs & Capital (The Journal of the Milken Inst.), Vol. 6(4): 27–29.