Advisory Committee on Major Hazards (1982). First report of the ACMH. HMSO, London.
2.
BallD.J. (1990) Challenges in the assessment of societal riskProc. Annual Conference of National Society for Clean Air and Environmental Protection. Available from NSCA, 146 North Street, Brighton, UK.
3.
BardeJ-P.PearceD.W. (1991) Valuing the environment. Earthscan Publications, London. ISBN 1 85383 075 5.
4.
BarnesM. (1990) Hinkley Point Public Inquiries. HMSO, London.
5.
ClementC.F. (1989) The characteristics of risks of major disastersProc. Roy. Soc., London. A424, 439–454.
6.
CullenF. (1990) The Public Inquiry into the Piper Alpha Disaster. HMSO, London. ISBN 0 10 113102 X.
7.
DouglasM.WildavskyA.B. (1982) Risk and culture. University of California Press.
8.
FarmerF.R. (1967) Siting criteria - a new approach. In: Containment and Siting of Nuclear Power PlantsProc. Symposium, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, 303–329.
9.
FarmerF.R. (1981) Quantification of physical and engineering risksProc. Roy. Soc. Lond., A376, 103–119.
FritzscheA.F. (1988) Gesundheitsrisiken von Energieversorgungs-systemen, Verlag TUV Rheinland. ISBN 3 88585 539 9.
12.
Health & Safety Executive (1978) Canvey: An Investigation of Potential Hazards from Operations in the Canvey Island/Thurrock Area. HMSO, London.
13.
Health & Safety Executive (1981) Canvey: A Second Report. HMSO, London.
14.
Health & Safety Executive (1988) The Tolerability of Risk from Nuclear Power Stations. HMSO, London.
15.
Health & Safety Executive (1988) Comments on ‘the tolerability of risks from nuclear power stations’. HMSO, London.
16.
Health & Satety Executive (1989a) Risk criteria for land-use planning in the vicinity of major industrial hazards. HMSO, London.
17.
Health & Safety Executive (1898b) Quantified risk assessment. Its input to decision making. HMSO, London.
18.
International Atomic Energy Agency (1991) Senior expert symposium on electricity and the environment, Helsinki. Published by IAEA, P.O. Box 100, A-1400 Vienna, Austria.
19.
LayfieldF. (1987) Sizewell B Public Inquiry. HMSO, London.
20.
LöfstedtR.E. (1991) Public perceptions towards various energy sources in SwedenEnergy, 16, 1059–1065.
21.
MarshallV.C. (1988) Chernobyl - was it the worst accident?Loss Prevention Bulletin, June issue, 1–14.
22.
OkrentD. (1987) The safety goals of the US Nuclear Regulatory CommissionScience, 236, 296.
23.
OkrentD. (1980) Comment on societal riskScience, 208, 372–375.
24.
PettsJ.WithersJ.LeesF. (1986) Expert evidence at inquiries into major hazardsProject Appraisal, March, pp. 3–10.
25.
RobertsL.E.J.HaynsM.R. (1989) Limitations on the usefulness of risk assessmentRisk Analysis, 9, 483–494.
26.
SobyB.A.BallD.J. (1991) Consumer safety and the valuation of life and injuryResearch Report No. 9, Environmental Risk Assessment Unit, University of East Anglia.
27.
ThomasL.M. (1987) Why we must talk about risk. In: Risk CommunicationProc. Natnl. Conference on Risk Communication, Washington DC. Published by The conservation Foundation, pp. 19–25.
28.
VersteegM.F.VisserB.J. (1987) A PRA guide for the NetherlandsProc. of Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Risk Management Conference, Zurich. pp. 1058–1065.
29.
Watt Committee (1990) Risk and the Energy IndustriesPapers to the 27th Consultative Conference. Available from Watt Committee, London.
30.
Williams, A. (1985) Economics of coronary artery by-pass graftingBr. Med. J., 29, 326–329.
31.
Wyre Borough Council (1982) Inspectors Report, PNW/5063/219/16, 25 January.
32.
ZeckhauserR.ViscusiW.K. (1990) Risk within reasonScience, 248, 559–564.