Restricted accessReview articleFirst published online 2025
Comparative study and advancement in biocatalysis and hybrid catalysis with life cycle assessment for biodiesel production: Step forward in sustainability and environmental impact reduction: A review
The rising global population and the environmental impact of fossil-fuel dependency have intensified the need for cleaner and renewable energy alternatives. Biodiesel, among biofuels, has gained significant attention as a key contender due to its sustainability and compatibility with existing energy infrastructure. Researchers worldwide are continuously exploring cost-effective, scalable, and sustainable production methods to meet this growing energy need. Waste cooking oil (WCO) and other feedstocks are commonly used for biodiesel production due to their economic advantages and waste reduction potential. To overcome these hurdles, a two-step transesterification or hybrid approach has been adopted for commercial-scale biodiesel production, offering an efficient and environmentally friendly solution for the biofuel industry. In this review, emergence of biocatalysts and hybrid catalytic approaches has been investigated as revolutionary solutions in sustainable biodiesel synthesis. Additionally, economic feasibility, industrial challenges, and potential breakthroughs have been discussed that can drive biodiesel production toward a more sustainable and commercially viable future. By embracing these green innovations, the biofuel industry moves closer to an era of clean, efficient, and cost-effective energy solutions. This study advances sustainable biodiesel production through innovative catalytic approaches, supporting clean energy (sustainable development goal (SDG) 7), waste valorization (SDG 12), and climate action (SDG 13).
RajakAKZeenathSFBoddulaR, et al.Efficient application of rice husk ash-derived silica combined with calcined orange peel as catalysts for biodiesel production from Nigella sativa seed oil within a circular economy framework. Int J Biol Macromol2025; 315: 144067.
2.
TeixeiraCBMadeira JuniorJVMacedoGA. Biocatalysis combined with physical technologies for development of a green biodiesel process. Renew Sustain Energy Rev2014; 33: 333–343.
3.
FerreroGOFabaEMSEimerGA. Biodiesel production from alternative raw materials using a heterogeneous low ordered biosilicified enzyme as biocatalyst. Biotechnol Biofuels2021; 14: 67.
4.
WangBZhouXWangY, et al.Enhancement of thermostability and expression level of Rasamsonia emersonii lipase in Pichia pastoris and its application in biodiesel production in a continuous flow reactor. Int J Biol Macromol2024; 278: 134481.
5.
Tobío-PérezIDomínguezYDMachínLR, et al.Biomass-based heterogeneous catalysts for biodiesel production: a comprehensive review. Int J Energy Res2022; 46: 3782–3809.
6.
EtimAOMusongePEloka-EbokaAC. Effectiveness of biogenic waste-derived heterogeneous catalysts and feedstock hybridization techniques in biodiesel production. Biofpr2020; 14: 620–649.
7.
LamMKLeeKTMohamedAR. Homogeneous, heterogeneous and enzymatic catalysis for transesterification of high free fatty acid oil (waste cooking oil) to biodiesel: a review. Biotechnol Adv2010; 28: 500–518.
8.
MukhtarASaqibSLinH, et al.Current status and challenges in the heterogeneous catalysis for biodiesel production. Renew Sustain Energy Rev2022; 157: 112012.
9.
FaruqueMORazzakSAHossainMM. Application of heterogeneous catalysts for biodiesel production from microalgal oil: a review. Catalysts2020; 10, Article 9.
10.
ChouhanAPSSarmaAK. Modern heterogeneous catalysts for biodiesel production: a comprehensive review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev2011; 15: 4378–4399.
11.
MandariVDevaraiSK. Biodiesel production using homogeneous, heterogeneous, and enzyme catalysts via transesterification and esterification reactions: a critical review. Bioenergy Res2022; 15: 935–961.
12.
GanesanRManigandanSShanmugamS. A detailed scrutinize on panorama of catalysts in biodiesel synthesis. Sci Total Environ2021; 777: 145683.
13.
FerreiraLFPde OliveiraTMHiroshi TomaS, et al.Superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (SPIONs) conjugated with lipase Candida antarctica A for biodiesel synthesis. RSC Adv2020; 10: 38490–38496.
14.
ParandiESafaripourMAbdellattifMH, et al.Biodiesel production from waste cooking oil using a novel biocatalyst of lipase enzyme immobilized magnetic nanocomposite. Fuel2022; 313: 123057.
15.
ChandraKDongCDChauhanAS, et al.Advancements in lipase immobilization: enhancing enzyme efficiency with nanomaterials for industrial applications. Int J Biol Macromol2025; 311: 143754.
16.
AbdulmalekSAYanY. Recent developments of lipase immobilization technology and application of immobilized lipase mixtures for biodiesel production. Biofpr2022; 16: 1062–1094.
17.
HuangSKouXShenJ, et al.“Armor-Plating” enzymes with metal–organic frameworks (MOFs). Angew Chem Int Ed2020; 59: 8786–8798.
18.
ZhaoQZhangXChenZ, et al.Enhanced stability and efficiency of enzyme–inorganic hybrid nanoflowers for organophosphate degradation. Int J Biol Macromol2025; 313: 144312.
19.
ZhongLJiaoXHuH, et al.Activated magnetic lipase–inorganic hybrid nanoflowers: a highly active and recyclable nanobiocatalyst for biodiesel production. Renew Energy2021; 171: 825–832.
20.
MohadesiMAghelBMalekiM, et al.Production of biodiesel from waste cooking oil using a homogeneous catalyst: study of semi-industrial pilot of microreactor. Renew Energy2019; 136: 677–682.
21.
RuhulAMKalamMAMasjukiHH, et al.State of the art of biodiesel production processes: a review of the heterogeneous catalyst. RSC Adv2015; 5: 101023–101044.
22.
BabadiAARahmatiSFakhlaeiR, et al.Emerging technologies for biodiesel production: processes, challenges, and opportunities. Biomass Bioenergy2022; 163: 106521.
23.
FallahAKamran-PirzamanAZanjaniNG. The sono-physical effect of cavitation bubbles on homogeneous catalyzed biodiesel production. Biomass Convers Biorefin2023; 13: 5339–5351.
24.
ThangarajASolomonPRMuniyandiB, et al.Catalysis in biodiesel production. A review. Clean Energy2019; 3: 2–23.
25.
HuNKongZHeL, et al.Effective transesterification of triglyceride with sulphonated modified SBA-15 (SBA-15-SO3H): screening, process and mechanism. Inorg Chim Acta2018; 482: 846–853.
26.
PrabakaranSRupeshKJKeeritiIS, et al.A scientemetric analysis and recent advances of emerging chitosan-based biomaterials as potential catalyst for biodiesel production: a review. Carbohydr Polym2024; 325: 121567.
27.
LiuJNanYTavlaridesLL. Continuous production of ethanol-based biodiesel under subcritical conditions employing trace amount of homogeneous catalysts. Fuel2017; 193: 187–196.
28.
DeussPJBartaKde VriesJG. Homogeneous catalysis for the conversion of biomass and biomass-derived platform chemicals. Catal Sci Technol2014; 4: 1174–1196.
29.
OkechukwuDOJosephENonsoUC, et al.Improving heterogeneous catalysis for biodiesel production process. CLCE2022; 3: 100038.
30.
MardhiahHHOngHCMasjukiHH, et al.A review on latest developments and future prospects of heterogeneous catalyst in biodiesel production from non-edible oils. Renew Sustain Energy Rev2017; 67: 1225–1236.
31.
Raising RathodDSuresh KarkalSJamadarAS, et al.Prospects of novel heterogeneous base catalysts and nanocatalysts in achieving sustainable biodiesel production. Int J Green Energy2024; 21: 1017–1042.
32.
NarulaVKhanMFNegiA, et al.Low temperature optimization of biodiesel production from algal oil using CaO and CaO/Al2O3 as catalyst by the application of response surface methodology. Energy2017; 140: 879–884.
33.
RezaniaSKorraniZSGabrisMA, et al.Lanthanum phosphate foam as novel heterogeneous nanocatalyst for biodiesel production from waste cooking oil. Renew Energy2021; 176: 228–236.
34.
SimbiIAigbeUOOyekolaO, et al.Optimization of biodiesel produced from waste sunflower cooking oil over bi-functional catalyst. Results Eng2022; 13: 100374.
35.
AmalRUsmanM. A review of breakthroughs in biodiesel production with transition and non-transition metal-doped CaO nano-catalysts. Biomass Bioenergy2024; 184: 107158.
36.
IngleAPChandelAKPhilippiniR, et al.Advances in nanocatalysts mediated biodiesel production: a critical appraisal. Symmetry (Basel)2020; 12, Article 2.
37.
GhoshNHalderG. Current progress and perspective of heterogeneous nanocatalytic transesterification towards biodiesel production from edible and inedible feedstock: a review. Energy Convers Manag2022; 270: 116292.
38.
MahdiHIRamleeNNda Silva DuarteJL, et al.A comprehensive review on nanocatalysts and nanobiocatalysts for biodiesel production in Indonesia, Malaysia, Brazil and USA. Chemosphere2023; 319: 138003.
39.
AhmedMAhmadKAVoD-VN, et al.Recent trends in sustainable biodiesel production using heterogeneous nanocatalysts: function of supports, promoters, synthesis techniques, reaction mechanism, and kinetics and thermodynamic studies. Energy Convers Manag2023; 280: 116821.
ZaeraF. Designing sites in heterogeneous catalysis: are we reaching selectivities competitive with those of homogeneous catalysts?Chem Rev2022; 122: 8594–8757.
42.
PoovanFChandrashekharVGNatteK, et al.Synergy between homogeneous and heterogeneous catalysis. Catal Sci Technol2022; 12: 6623–6649.
43.
BellELFinniganWFranceSP, et al. Biocatalysis. Nat Rev2021; 1: 1–21.
44.
BullerRLutzSKazlauskasRJ, et al.From nature to industry: harnessing enzymes for biocatalysis. Science2023; 382: 6673.
45.
McDonaldAGTiptonKF. Enzyme nomenclature and classification: the state of the art. FEBS J2023; 290: 2214–2231.
46.
DuttKMeghwanshiGK. Advances in fungal enzymes and their applications. In: Applied mycology for agriculture and foods. Florida: Apple Academic express, 2024, pp.383–419.
47.
KumarPSinghJ. Exploring enzyme biotechnology's role in green chemistry and advancements in pharmaceutical technologies. In: Enzyme biotechnology for environmental sustainability. Cambridge: Academic Press, 2024, pp.465–495.
48.
KhanjaniMHMohammadiAEmerencianoMG. Water quality in biofloc technology (BFT): an applied review for an evolving aquaculture. Aquac Int2024; 32: 9321–9374.
49.
CavalcanteFTNetoFSde Aguiar FalcãoIR, et al.Opportunities for improving biodiesel production via lipase catalysis. Fuel2021; 288: 119577.
50.
VivekKSandhiaGSSubramaniyanSJ. Extremophilic lipases for industrial applications: a general review. Biotechnol Adv2022; 60: 108002.
51.
AlbayatiSHMasomianMIshakSN, et al.Main structural targets for engineering lipase substrate specificity. Catalysts2020; 10: 747.
52.
BatumalaieKEdbeibMFMahatNA, et al.In silico and empirical approaches toward understanding the structural adaptation of the alkaline-stable lipase KV1 from Acinetobacter haemolyticus. J Biomol Struct Dyn2018; 36: 3077–3093.
53.
DenesyukADimitriouPSJohnsonMS, et al.The acid–base–nucleophile catalytic triad in ABH-fold enzymes is coordinated by a set of structural elements. PLoS One2020; 15: e0229376.
54.
TanZChenGChenS, et al.Engineering lipase at the molecular scale for cleaner biodiesel production—a review. Mol Catal2023; 546: 113271.
55.
HussainMKhanIJiangB, et al.Lipases: sources, immobilization techniques, and applications. Int J Environ Agric Biotechnol2023; 8: 94–121.
56.
ChandraKPatelAKKumarP, et al.Marine thraustochytrids: a potential source for lipase challenges in industrial applications. Indian J Exp Biol2024; 62: 463–474.
57.
ChiokeAOgbonnaCNOnwusiC, et al.Lipase in biodiesel production. Afr J Biochem Res2018; 12: 73–85.
58.
SousaRRSilvaASFernandez-LafuenteR, et al.Solvent-free esterifications mediated by immobilized lipases: a review from thermodynamic and kinetic perspectives. Catal Sci Technol2021; 11: 5696–5711.
59.
HansenRBAgerbaekMANielsenPM, et al.Esterification using a liquid lipase to remove residual free fatty acids in biodiesel. Process Biochem2020; 97: 213–221.
60.
ZhaoZHanMZhouL, et al.Biodiesel production from waste cooking oil using recombinant Escherichia coli cells immobilized into Fe3O4–chitosan magnetic microspheres. Molecules2024; 29: 3469.
61.
AggarwalSChakravartyAIkramS. A comprehensive review on incredible renewable carriers as promising platforms for enzyme immobilization & thereof strategies. Int J Biol Macromol2021; 167: 962–986.
62.
BishtMThayallathSKBharadwajP, et al.Biomass-derived functional materials as carriers for enzymes: towards sustainable and robust biocatalysts. Green Chem2023; 25: 4591–4624.
63.
PatelAKDongCDChenCW, et al.Production, purification, and application of microbial enzymes. In: Biotechnology of microbial enzymes. Academic Press, 2023, pp.25–57.
64.
MotaGFde SousaIGde OliveiraAL, et al.Biodiesel production from microalgae using lipase-based catalysts: current challenges and prospects. Algal Res2022; 62: 102616.
65.
SarmahNRevathiDSheeluG, et al.Recent advances on sources and industrial applications of lipases. Biotechnol Prog2018; 34: 5–28.
66.
KhoobbakhtGKheiralipourKYuanW, et al.Desirability function approach for optimization of enzymatic transesterification catalyzed by lipase immobilized on mesoporous magnetic nanoparticles. Renew Energy2020; 158: 253–262.
67.
GhasemzadehBMatinAAPazhangM, et al.Enzymatic production of biodiesel from waste sunflower oil using rubber-Fe3O4@SiO2@lipase as heterogeneous nano-biocatalyst: optimization by response surface methodology. Nanochem Res2025; 10: 240–258.
68.
SangkharakKMhaisawatSRakkanT, et al.Utilization of mixed chicken waste for biodiesel production using single and combination of immobilized lipase as a catalyst. Biomass Convers Biorefin2022; 12: 1465–1478.
69.
WeiHWangQZhangR, et al.Efficient biodiesel production from waste cooking oil by fast co-immobilization of lipases from Aspergillus oryzae and Rhizomucor miehei in magnetic chitosan microcapsules. Process Biochem2023; 125: 171–180.
70.
Ben BachaAAlonaziMAlharbiMG, et al.Biodiesel production by single and mixed immobilized lipases using waste cooking oil. Molecules2022; 27: 8736.
71.
EsmiFNematianTSalehiZ, et al.Amine and aldehyde functionalized mesoporous silica on magnetic nanoparticles for enhanced lipase immobilization, biodiesel production, and facile separation. Fuel2021; 291: 120126.
72.
CaoXXuHLiF, et al.One-step direct transesterification of wet yeast for biodiesel production catalysed by magnetic nanoparticle-immobilized lipase. Renew Energy2021; 171: 11–21.
73.
KumarDDasTGiriBS, et al.Preparation and characterization of novel hybrid bio-support material immobilized from Pseudomonas cepacia lipase and its application to enhance biodiesel production. Renew Energy2020; 147: 11–24.
74.
ZhongLFengYHuH, et al.Enhanced enzymatic performance of immobilized lipase on metal organic frameworks with superhydrophobic coating for biodiesel production. J Colloid Interface Sci2021; 602: 426–436.
75.
AbdulmalekSALiKWangJ, et al.Enhanced performance of Rhizopus oryzae lipase immobilized onto a hybrid–nanocomposite matrix and its application for biodiesel production under the assistance of ultrasonic technique. Fuel Process Technol2022; 232: 107274.
76.
BinhayeedingNKlomklaoSPrasertsanP, et al.Improvement of biodiesel production using waste cooking oil and applying single and mixed immobilized lipases on polyhydroxyalkanoate. Renew Energy2020; 116: 218–1927.
77.
ArumugamAGopinathKAnuseP, et al.Kinetic modelling and techno-economic analysis of biodiesel production from Calophyllum inophyllum oil. Biomass Convers Biorefin2019; 9: 363–378.
78.
KarmeeSKPatriaRDLinCSK. Techno-economic evaluation of biodiesel production from waste cooking oil a case study of Hong Kong. Int J Mol Sci2015; 16: 4362–4371.
79.
WangYXuePCaoM, et al.Directed evolution: methodologies and applications. Chem Rev2021; 121: 12384–12444.
80.
Birch-PriceZHardyFJListerTM, et al.Noncanonical amino acids in biocatalysis. Chem Rev2024; 124: 8740–8746.
81.
Victorino da Silva AmattoIGonsales da Rosa-GarzonNAntonio de Oliveira SimoesF, et al.Enzyme engineering and its industrial applications. Biotechnol Appl Biochem2022; 69: 389–409.
82.
OsunaS. The challenge of predicting distal active site mutations in computational enzyme design. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Comput Mol Sci2021; 11: e1502.
83.
ZhangYFeiLSunL, et al.Advances and opportunities in RNA structure experimental determination and computational modelling. Nat Methods2022; 19: 1193–1207.
84.
FerreiraPFernandesPARamosMJ. Modern computational methods for rational enzyme engineering. Chem Catal2022; 2: 2481–2498.
85.
Benítez-MateosAIContenteMLRoura PadrosaD, et al.Flow biocatalysis 101: design, development, and applications. React Chem Eng2021; 6: 599–611.
86.
SongZZhangQWuW, et al.Rational design of enzyme activity and enantioselectivity. Front Bioeng Biotechnol2023; 11: 1129149.
87.
WuLQinYNieY, et al.Computer-aided understanding and engineering of enzymatic selectivity. Biotechnol Adv2022; 54: 107793.
88.
SinghNMalikSGuptaA, et al.Revolutionizing enzyme engineering through artificial intelligence and machine learning. ETLS2021; 5: 113–125.
89.
CurrinAParkerSRobinsonCJ, et al.The evolving art of creating genetic diversity: from directed evolution to synthetic biology. Biotechnol Adv2021; 50: 107762.
90.
GargiuloSSoumillionP. Directed evolution for enzyme development in biocatalysis. Curr Opin Chem Biol2021; 61: 107–113.
91.
ChowdhuryRMaranasCD. From directed evolution to computational enzyme engineering: a review. AIChE J2020; 66: e16847.
CaudyAAHanchardJAHsiehA, et al.Functional genetic discovery of enzymes using full-scan mass spectrometry metabolomics. Biochem Cell Biol2019; 97: 73–84.
94.
ZhangRParvinMChenD, et al.High-throughput microfluidic droplets in biomolecular analytical system: a review. Biosens Bioelectron2023; 228: 115213.
95.
PagarADPatilMDFloodDT, et al.Recent advances in biocatalysis with chemical modification and expanded amino acid alphabet. Chem Rev2021; 121: 6173–6245.
96.
ZhouJHuangM. Navigating the landscape of enzyme design: from molecular simulations to machine learning. Chem Soc Rev2024; 53: 8202–8239.
97.
LiHGaoSQiuY, et al.Genome mining integrating semi-rational protein engineering and nanoreactor design: roadmap for a robust biocatalyst for industrial resolution of Vince lactam. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol2020; 104: 1109–1123.
98.
LiLLiuXBaiY, et al.High-throughput screening techniques for the selection of thermostable enzymes. J Agric Food Chem2024; 72: 3833–3845.
99.
TianLYangPLvZ, et al.Improvement of methanol tolerance and catalytic activity of Rhizomucor miehei lipase for one-step synthesis of biodiesel by semi-rational design. Bioresour Technol2022; 348: 126769.
100.
GuptaSMazumderPBScottD, et al.Ultrasound-assisted production of biodiesel using engineered methanol tolerant Proteus vulgaris lipase immobilized on functionalized polysulfone beads. Ultrason Sonochem2020; 68: 105211.
101.
YanJKuangYGuiX, et al.Engineering a malic enzyme to enhance lipid accumulation in Chlorella protothecoides and direct production of biodiesel from the microalgal biomass. Biomass Bioenergy2019; 122: 298–304.
102.
TianKTaiKChuaBJ, et al.Directed evolution of Thermomyces lanuginosus lipase to enhance methanol tolerance for efficient production of biodiesel from waste grease. Bioresour Technol2017; 245: 1491–1497.
103.
HeaterBSChanWSLeeMM, et al.Directed evolution of a genetically encoded immobilized lipase for the efficient production of biodiesel from waste cooking oil. Biotechnol Biofuels2019; 12: 1–4.
104.
QuRLazimDLiR, et al.Zhang, enhancing methanol tolerance of Thermomyces lanuginosus lipase by rational design and biodiesel production through one-step feeding of methanol. J Clean Prod2024; 450: 141949.
AmeenMAhmadMZafarM, et al.Prospects of catalysis for process sustainability of eco-green biodiesel synthesis via transesterification: a state-of-the-art review. Sustainability2022; 14, Article 12.
107.
RozinaMAhmadMZafarZ, et al.Identification of novel, non-edible oil seeds via scanning electron microscopy as potential feedstock for green synthesis of biodiesel. Microsc Res Tech2022; 85: 708–720.
108.
BorgesMEDíazL. Recent developments on heterogeneous catalysts for biodiesel production by oil esterification and transesterification reactions: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev2012; 16: 2839–2849.
109.
SalaheldeenMMariodAAArouaMK, et al.Current state and perspectives on transesterification of triglycerides for biodiesel production. Catalysts2021; 11, Article 9.
110.
SamiosDPedrottiFNicolauA, et al.A transesterification double step process TDSP for biodiesel preparation from fatty acids triglycerides. Fuel Process Technol2009; 90: 599–605.
111.
NgaosuwanKLoteroESuwannakarnK, et al.Hydrolysis of triglycerides using solid acid catalysts. Ind Eng Chem Res2009; 48: 4757–4767.
112.
MalekiBEsmaeiliHVenkateshYK, et al.A critical review on MOFs and COFs-based heterogeneous catalysts in biodiesel generation: synthesis methods, structural features, mechanisms, kinetic, economic/environmental evaluation, and their performance. Process Saf Environ Prot2024; 187: 903–925.
113.
NavasMBRuggeraJFLickID, et al.A sustainable process for biodiesel production using Zn/Mg oxidic species as active, selective and reusable heterogeneous catalysts. Bioresour Bioprocess2020; 7: 4.
114.
VelusamyKDevanandJSenthil KumarP, et al.A review on nano-catalysts and biochar-based catalysts for biofuel production. Fuel2021; 306: 121632.
115.
SinghDSharmaDSoniSL, et al.A comprehensive review of biodiesel production from waste cooking oil and its use as fuel in compression ignition engines: 3rd generation cleaner feedstock. J Clean Prod2021; 307: 127299.
116.
OngHCTiongYWGohBHH, et al.Recent advances in biodiesel production from agricultural products and microalgae using ionic liquids: opportunities and challenges. Energy Convers Manag2021; 228: 113647.
117.
KasirajanR. Biodiesel production by two step process from an energy source of Chrysophyllum albidum oil using homogeneous catalyst. S Afr J Chem Eng2021; 37: 161–166.
118.
OzaSThakarHKodgireP, et al.Utilizing an ultra-sonication process to optimize a two-step biodiesel production from karanja oil. Environ Sci Pollut Res2025; 32: 13208–13221.
119.
PratikaRAWijayaKTrisunaryantiW. Hydrothermal treatment of SO4/TiO2 and TiO2/CaO as heterogeneous catalysts for the conversion of Jatropha oil into biodiesel. J Environ Chem Eng2021; 9: 106547.
120.
SánchezNEncinarJMNogalesS, et al.Biodiesel production from castor oil by two-step catalytic transesterification: optimization of the process and economic assessment. Catalysts2019; 9, Article 10.
121.
CaoYDhahadHAEsmaeiliH, et al.Mgo@CNT@K2CO3 as a superior catalyst for biodiesel production from waste edible oil using two-step transesterification process. Process Saf Environ Prot2022; 161: 136–146.
122.
TanSXLimSOngHC, et al.Two-step catalytic reactive extraction and transesterification process via ultrasonic irradiation for biodiesel production from solid Jatropha oil seeds. Chem Eng Process Process Intensif2019; 146: 107687.
123.
BolonioDMarco NeuPSchoberS, et al.Fatty acid ethyl esters from animal fat using supercritical ethanol process. Energy Fuels2018; 32: 490–496.
124.
SuwannapaPTippayawongN. Optimization of two-step biodiesel production from beef tallow with microwave heating. Chem Eng Commun2017; 204: 618–624.
125.
RezaniaSOryaniBParkJ, et al.Review on transesterification of non-edible sources for biodiesel production with a focus on economic aspects, fuel properties and by-product applications. Energy Convers Manag2019; 201: 112155.
126.
AbidMTouzaniABenhimaR. Synthesis of biodiesel from chicken’s skin waste by homogeneous transesterification. Int J Sustain Eng2019; 12: 272–280.
127.
KumarVMuthurajMPalabhanviB, et al.Evaluation and optimization of two stage sequential in situ transesterification process for fatty acid methyl ester quantification from microalgae. Renew Energy2014; 68: 560–569.
128.
BurtonRFanXAusticG. Evaluation of two-step reaction and enzyme catalysis approaches for biodiesel production from spent coffee grounds. Int J Green Energy2010; 7: 530–536.
129.
MonikaABangaSPathakVV. Biodiesel production from waste cooking oil: a comprehensive review on the application of heterogenous catalysts. Energy Nexus2023; 10: 100209.
130.
ZhangHChenLLiY, et al.Functionalized organic–inorganic hybrid porous coordination polymer-based catalysts for biodiesel production via trans/esterification. Green Chem2022; 24: 7763–7786.
131.
MaheshwariPHaiderMBYusufM, et al.A review on latest trends in cleaner biodiesel production: role of feedstock, production methods, and catalysts. J Clean Prod2022; 355:131588.
132.
TamjidiBMoghadasKEsmaeiliH. Ultrasound-assisted biodiesel generation from waste edible oil using CoFe2O4@GO as a superior and reclaimable nanocatalyst: optimization of two-step transesterification by RSM. Fuel2022; 327: 125170.
133.
XieYWangDAlmojilSF, et al.CaO–MgFe2O4@K2CO3 as a novel and retrievable nanocatalyst for two-step transesterification of used frying oils to biodiesel. Process Saf Environ Prot2023; 172: 195–210.
134.
MaulidiyahNNurdinMFatmaF, et al.Characterization of methyl ester compound of biodiesel from industrial liquid waste of crude palm oil processing. Anal Chem Res2017; 12: 1–9.
135.
MaYLiuSWangY, et al.Direct biodiesel production from wet microalgae assisted by radio frequency heating. Fuel2019; 256: 115994.
136.
HsiaoM-CLinW-TChiuW-C, et al.Two-stage biodiesel synthesis from used cooking oil with a high acid value via an ultrasound-assisted method. Energies2021; 14, Article 3703.
137.
HazratMARasulMGKhanMMK, et al.Kinetic modelling of esterification and transesterification processes for biodiesel production utilising waste-based resource. Catalysts2022; 12, Article 1472.
138.
Vijay KumarMVeeresh BabuARavi KumarP. Producing biodiesel from crude Mahua oil by two steps of transesterification process. Aust J Mech Eng2019; 17: 2–7.
139.
KarmakarBSamantaSHalderG. Delonix regia heterogeneous catalyzed two-step biodiesel production from Pongamia pinnata oil using methanol and 2-propanol. J Clean Prod2020; 255: 120313.
140.
OgunsolaADDurowojuMOAladeAO, et al.Modeling and optimization of two-step shea butter oil biodiesel synthesis using snail shells as heterogeneous base catalysts. Energy Adv2022; 1: 113–128.
141.
HeCMeiYZhangY, et al.Enhanced biodiesel production from diseased swine fat by ultrasound-assisted two-step catalyzed process. Bioresour Technol2020; 304: 123017.
142.
EsmaeiliH. A critical review on the economic aspects and life cycle assessment of biodiesel production using heterogeneous nanocatalysts. Fuel Process Technol2022; 230: 107224.
143.
HeXYuD. Research trends in life cycle assessment research: a 20-year bibliometric analysis (1999–2018). Environ Impact Assess Rev2020; 85: 106461.
144.
KhounaniZHosseinzadeh-BandbafhaHMoustakasK, et al.Environmental life cycle assessment of different biorefinery platforms valorising olive wastes to biofuel, phosphate salts, natural antioxidant, and an oxygenated fuel additive (triacetin). J Clean Prod2021; 278: 123916.
145.
ChapmanJIsmailAEDinuCZ. Industrial applications of enzymes: recent advances, techniques, and outlooks. Catalysts2018; 8, Article 238.
146.
SaravananAYaashikaaPRSenthil KumarP, et al.Techno-economic and environmental sustainability prospects on biochemical conversion of agricultural and algal biomass to biofuels. J Clean Prod2023; 414: 137749.
147.
SaravananAKarishmaSSenthil KumarP, et al.Process optimization and kinetic studies for the production of biodiesel from Artocarpus heterophyllus oil using modified mixed quail waste catalyst. Fuel2022; 330: 125644.
148.
SieiraPGalanteEBMendesAJ, et al.Life cycle assessment of a biodiesel production unit. Am J Chem Eng2015; 3: 25–29.
149.
YaashikaaPRKumarPSKarishmaS. Bio-derived catalysts for production of biodiesel: a review on feedstock, oil extraction methodologies, reactors and lifecycle assessment of biodiesel. Fuel2022; 316: 123379.
150.
ChenYMuT. Revisiting greenness of ionic liquids and deep eutectic solvents. Green Chem Eng2021; 2: 174–186.
151.
ChungZLTanYHChanYS, et al.Life cycle assessment of waste cooking oil for biodiesel production using waste chicken eggshell derived CaO as catalyst via transesterification. Biocatal Agric Biotechnol2019; 21: 101317.
152.
LaniNSNgadiNMohammed InuwaI, et al.A cleaner approach with magnetically assisted reactor setup over CaO–zeolite/Fe3O4 catalyst in biodiesel production: evaluation of catalytic performance, reusability and life cycle assessment studies. J Clean Prod2023; 419: 138329.
153.
HuangJWangJHuangZ, et al.Photothermal technique-enabled ambient production of microalgae biodiesel: mechanism and life cycle assessment. Bioresour Technol2023; 369:128390.
154.
HuangJSHuangZCLiuTY, et al.One-step photothermal synthesis of biofuels from high-acid-value non-edible oils with adjacent Cs single atoms at ambient conditions. Rare Met2025; 44: 1–15.
155.
HuangJLiuTWangK, et al.Room-temperature and carbon-negative production of biodiesel via synergy of geminal-atom and photothermal catalysis. Environ Chem Lett2024; 22: 1607–1613.
156.
PatelKSinghSK. Environmental sustainability analysis of biofuels: a critical review of LCA studies. Clean Technol Environ Policy2023; 25: 2489–2510.
157.
Nogales-DelgadoS. Biodiesel production and life cycle assessment: status and prospects. Energies2025; 18: 3338.
158.
RazaMAliLInayatA, et al.Sustainability of biodiesel production using immobilized enzymes: a strategy to meet future bio-economy challenges. Int J Energy Res2022; 46: 19090–19108.
159.
AndradeTAMartínMErricoM, et al.Biodiesel production catalyzed by liquid and immobilized enzymes: optimization and economic analysis. Chem Eng Res Des2019; 141: 1–4.
160.
OlofssonJBartaZBörjessonP, et al.Integrating enzyme fermentation in lignocellulosic ethanol production: life-cycle assessment and techno-economic analysis. Biotechnol Biofuels2017; 10: 51.
161.
CM Size, Share & trends analysis report by product (carbon, glass), by resin (thermosetting, thermoplastics), by manufacturing process, by end use, and segment forecasts, 2020–2027, GVR Inc., San Francisco, CA, USA, 2020: 142.
162.
ChandraRPradhanSPatelA, et al.An approach for dairy wastewater remediation using mixture of microalgae and biodiesel production for sustainable transportation. J Environ Manag2021; 297: 113210.
163.
YaashikaaPRKeerthana DeviMSenthil KumarP, et al.A review on biodiesel production by algal biomass: outlook on lifecycle assessment and techno-economic analysis. Fuel2022; 324: 124774.
164.
MathurSWaswaniHSinghD, et al.Alternative fuels for agriculture sustainability: carbon footprint and economic feasibility. AgriEng2022; 4: 993–1015.
165.
ChristopherLPKumarHZambareVP. Enzymatic biodiesel: challenges and opportunities. Appl Energy2014; 119: 497–520.
166.
Gowthama KrishnanMRajkumarSDevasagarT. The sustainable prospect of biodiesel production: transformative technologies, catalysts from bio-wastes, and techno-economic assessment. Mater Today Proc2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2024.03.005
167.
OsmanAIFangBZhangY, et al.Life cycle assessment and techno-economic analysis of sustainable bioenergy production: a review. Environ Chem Lett2024; 22: 1115–1154.
168.
PashaMKRahimMDaiL, et al.Comparative study of a two-step enzymatic process and conventional chemical methods for biodiesel production: economic and environmental perspectives. Chem Eng J2024; 489:151254.
169.
AlvesESMirandaLPGuimarãesJR, et al.Techno-economic-environmental analysis of biodiesel production by magnetic nanoparticles CLEAs of Eversa® Transform. In: Computer aided chemical engineering. Vol. 51. Elsevier, Amsterdam 2022, pp.553–558.
170.
Ala’aHOsmanAIJamilF, et al.Integrating life cycle assessment and characterisation techniques: a case study of biodiesel production utilising waste Prunus armeniaca seeds (PAS) and a novel catalyst. J Environ Manag2022; 304: 114319.
171.
Al-MawaliKSOsmanAIAla’aH, et al.Life cycle assessment of biodiesel production utilising waste date seed oil and a novel magnetic catalyst: a circular bioeconomy approach. Renew Energy2021; 170: 832–846.
172.
Ala’aHOsmanAIKumarPSM, et al.Circular economy approach of enhanced bifunctional catalytic system of CaO/CeO2 for biodiesel production from waste loquat seed oil with life cycle assessment study. Energy Convers Manage2021; 236: 114040.
173.
SrikumarKTanYHRashidU, et al.A life cycle assessment of biodiesel from waste cooking oil using bifunctional magnetic nanocatalyst. Energy2025; 331: 137029.
174.
SilvaJMDos SantosKPDos SantosES, et al.Immobilization of Thermomyces lanuginosus lipase on a new hydrophobic support (Streamline phenyl™): strategies to improve stability and reusability. Enzyme Microb Technol2023; 163: 110166.
175.
NguyenHCAregawiBHFuCC, et al.Biodiesel production through electrolysis in the presence of choline chloride-based deep eutectic solvent. Optimization by response surface methodology. J Mol Liq2023; 379: 121633.
176.
YusufBOOladepoSAGaniyuSA, et al.Synthesis and evaluation of CuO/UiO-66 metal-organic frameworks as a solid catalyst for biodiesel production from waste cooking oil. J Mol Catal2024; 564: 114313.
177.
MathimaniTLeTSalmenSH, et al.Process optimization of one-step direct transesterification and dual-step extraction–transesterification of the Chlorococcum–Nannochloropsis consortium for biodiesel production. Environ Res2024; 240: 117580.
178.
WangYSedghiRShahbeikH, et al.A comprehensive review of exergy analysis in biodiesel-powered engines for sustainable power generation. Sustain Energy Technol Assess2024; 68: 103869.
179.
AhmadFA. The use of agro-waste-based adsorbents as sustainable, renewable, and low-cost alternatives for the removal of ibuprofen and carbamazepine from water. Heliyon2023; 9: e16449.
180.
YadavGYadavNAhmaruzzamanM. Advances in biomass derived low-cost carbon catalyst for biodiesel production: preparation methods, reaction conditions, and mechanisms. RSC Adv2023; 13: 23197–23210.
181.
SultanaNHossainSZAbusaadM, et al.Prediction of biodiesel production from microalgal oil using Bayesian optimization algorithm-based machine learning approaches. Fuel2022; 309: 122184.
182.
NingYNiuSWangY, et al.Sono-modified halloysite nanotube with NaAlO2 as novel heterogeneous catalyst for biodiesel production: optimization via GA_BP neural network. Renew Energy2021; 175: 391–404.
