Amid shifting geopolitical dynamics and accelerated energy transition, enhancing energy system resilience (ESR) has become a key strategy for achieving energy security during transition and turbulent times. Previous studies have primarily explored ESR from engineering and technological perspectives, overlooking the impact of natural resource dependence (NRD) on ESR. Using provincial data from China spanning 2004 to 2020, this study measures NRD and ESR by the mining employment proportion and the entropy weight TOPSIS method, respectively, and then empirically analyzes their relationship by utilizing two-way fixed effect OLS model. The results are as follows: (i) Consistent with the central argument of the “resource curse” hypothesis, NRD can directly weaken ESR; for every 1% increase in NRD, ESR decreases by an average of 0.4982%. (ii) NRD can indirectly weaken ESR by intensifying climate change and relaxing environmental regulation. (iii) The weakening effect is particularly pronounced in non-municipal regions and areas characterized by high innovation levels and advanced digital development. Drawing on these research findings, this paper proposes policy recommendations for different types of regions. These include management and environmental regulation of fossil energy extraction and energy transition subsidy optimization, to promote regional sustainable development.
LuQZhangWZhangP, et al.Monitoring the 2008 cold surge and frozen disasters snowstorm in south China based on regional ATOVS data assimilation. Sci China Earth Sci2010; 53: 1216–1228.
2.
MoriNTakahashiTYasudaT, et al.Survey of 2011 Tohoku earthquake tsunami inundation and run-up: SURVEY OF 2011 TOHOKU EARTHQUAKE TSUNAMI. Geophys Res Lett2011; 38: 49210.
3.
FangYShaoZ. The Russia-Ukraine conflict and volatility risk of commodity markets. Finan Res Lett2022; 50: 103264.
4.
ZhaoJJiangQDongX, et al.Would environmental regulation improve the greenhouse gas benefits of natural gas use? A Chinese case study. Energy Econ2020; 87: 104712.
5.
ChenSDingYSongY, et al.Study on China’s energy system resilience under the scenarios of long-term shortage of imported oil. Energy2023; 270: 126831.
6.
LeeC-CWangC. Does natural resources matter for sustainable energy development in China: the role of technological progress. Resources Policy2022; 79: 103077.
7.
IEA. Making the energy sector more resilient to climate change. Paris: IEA, 2015.
8.
ArghandehRVon MeierAMehrmaneshL, et al.On the definition of cyber-physical resilience in power systems. Renew Sustain Energy Rev2016; 58: 1060–1069.
9.
ZhouYDanZ. Modern energy resilience studies with artificial intelligence for energy transitions. Cell Rep Phys Sci2025; 6: 102508.
10.
GasserPLustenbergerPCinelliM, et al.A review on resilience assessment of energy systems. Sustain Resil Infrastruct2021; 6: 273–299.
11.
WeiMJiangZPandeyP, et al.Energy resilience in the built environment: a comprehensive review of concepts, metrics, and strategies. Renew Sustain Energy Rev2025; 210: 115258.
12.
ZhangWYangHCaoX, et al.A review of building energy resilience for maintaining indoor thermal stability during extreme weather events. Energy Build2025; 342: 115908.
13.
AminiFGhassemzadehSRostamiN, et al.Electrical energy systems resilience: a comprehensive review on definitions, challenges, enhancements and future proceedings. IET Renew Power Gen2023; 17: 1835–1858.
14.
LeiXXuJChenY, et al.Digital oasis: how green infrastructure is reshaping China’s energy resilience landscape. Systems2025; 13: 06.
15.
HasselqvistHRenströmSStrömbergH, et al.Household energy resilience: shifting perspectives to reveal opportunities for renewable energy futures in affluent contexts. Energy Res Soc Sci2022; 88: 102498.
16.
NepalRZhaoXLiuY, et al.Can green finance strengthen energy resilience? The case of China. Technol Forecast Soc Change2024; 202: 123302.
17.
LiuYDongKJiangQ. Assessing energy vulnerability and its impact on carbon emissions: a global case. Energy Economics2023; 119: 106557.
18.
HinesPAptJTalukdarS. Large blackouts in North America: historical trends and policy implications. Energy Policy2009; 37: 5249–5259.
19.
HenryDEmmanuel Ramirez-MarquezJ. Generic metrics and quantitative approaches for system resilience as a function of time. Reliab Eng Syst Saf2012; 99: 114–122.
20.
BruneauMChangSEEguchiRT, et al.A framework to quantitatively assess and enhance the seismic resilience of communities. Earthq SPEctra2003; 19: 733–752.
21.
LaiKIllindalaMS. A distributed energy management strategy for resilient shipboard power system. Appl Energy2018; 228: 821–832.
22.
MoslehiSReddyTA. Sustainability of integrated energy systems: a performance-based resilience assessment methodology. Appl Energy2018; 228: 487–498.
23.
LiuT-YLeeC-C. Convergence of the world’s energy use. Res Energy Econ2020; 62: 101199.
24.
SiniSAbdul-RahimASSulaimanC. Does natural resource influence conflict in Africa? Evidence from panel nonlinear relationship. Resources Policy2021; 74: 102268.
25.
ZhangJLiBHeH, et al.Natural resource dependence and renewable energy development: does government policy support matter?J Cleaner Prod2024; 436: 140466.
26.
HuHRanWWeiY, et al.Do energy resource curse and heterogeneous curse exist in provinces? Evidence from China. Energies2020; 13: 4383.
27.
AutyRM. The resource curse thesis: minerals in bolivian development, 1970–90. Singap J Trop Geogr1994; 15: 95–111.
28.
ZhangSShinwariRZhaoS, et al.Energy transition, geopolitical risk, and natural resources extraction: a novel perspective of energy transition and resources extraction. Resources Pol2023; 83: 103608.
29.
BaiRLiuY. Natural resources as a source of financing energy poverty reduction? Resources extraction perspective. Resources Pol2023; 82: 103496.
30.
FrancisRBekeraB. A metric and frameworks for resilience analysis of engineered and infrastructure systems. Reliab Eng Syst Saf2014; 121: 90–103.
31.
DongHTaoMWenL, et al.Does natural resource dependence restrict green development? An investigation from the “belt and road” countries. Environ Res2024; 255: 119108.
32.
HusainiDHMansorSALeanHH. Income inequality, natural resources dependence and renewable energy. Resources Policy2024; 89: 104480.
33.
ShinwariRYangjieWPayabAH, et al.What drives investment in renewable energy resources? Evaluating the role of natural resources volatility and economic performance for China. Resources Policy2022; 77: 102712.
34.
AhmadFDrazMUChandioAA, et al.Natural resources and environmental quality: exploring the regional variations among Chinese provinces with a novel approach. Resources Policy2022; 77: 102745.
35.
KhanMTIAliQAshfaqM. The nexus between greenhouse gas emission, electricity production, renewable energy and agriculture in Pakistan. Renewable Energy2018; 118: 437–451.
36.
XueJRasoolZNazarR, et al.Revisiting natural resources—globalization-environmental quality nexus: fresh insights from south Asian countries. Sustainability2021; 13: 4224.
37.
YuanLZhouZHeW, et al.A fuzzy logic approach within the DPSIR framework to address the inherent uncertainty and complexity of water security assessments. Ecol Indic2025; 170: 112984.
YuanLQiYHeW, et al.A differential game of water pollution management in the trans-jurisdictional river basin. J Cleaner Prod2024; 438: 140823.
40.
ZhaoXShangYMagazzinoC, et al.Multi-step impacts of environmental regulations on green economic growth: evidence in the lens of natural resource dependence. Resources Policy2023; 85: 103919.
41.
LiGGuoFDiD. Regional competition, environmental decentralization, and target selection of local governments. Sci Total Environ2021; 755: 142536.
42.
FanMLiMLiuJ, et al.Is high natural resource dependence doomed to low carbon emission efficiency? Evidence from 283 cities in China. Energy Economics2022; 115: 106328.
43.
RanQYangXYanH, et al.Natural resource consumption and industrial green transformation: does the digital economy matter?Resources Policy2023; 81: 103396.
44.
RoegePECollierZAMancillasJ, et al.Metrics for energy resilience. Energy Policy2014; 72: 249–256.
45.
SunHNieFFHuXY. Evaluation and difference analysis of energy security in China based on entropy-weight TOPSIS modeling. Resources Science2018; 40: 477–485.
46.
ZhangHLiY. Study on sustainable development of provincial energy systems in China. Environmental Science and Management2022; 47: 178–183.
47.
MartišauskasLAugutisJKrikštolaitisR, et al.A framework to assess the resilience of energy systems based on quantitative indicators. Energies2022; 15: 4040.
48.
WangYDengXZhangH, et al.Energy endowment, environmental regulation, and energy efficiency: evidence from China. Technol Forecast Soc Change2022; 177: 121528.
49.
LiZLuoZWangY, et al.Suitability evaluation system for the shallow geothermal energy implementation in region by entropy weight method and TOPSIS method. Renewable Energy2022; 184: 564–576.
50.
GaiMYangQ. Synergistic study of the green efficiency and economic resilience of agriculture from a sustainable development perspective: evidence from northeast China. Environ Sci Pollut Res2023; 30: 77568–77592.
51.
LiZShaoSShiX, et al.Structural transformation of manufacturing, natural resource dependence, and carbon emissions reduction: evidence of a threshold effect from China. J Cleaner Prod2019; 206: 920–927.
52.
CuiXZhongZ. Climate change, cropland adjustments, and food security: evidence from China. J Dev Econ2024; 167: 103245.
53.
FanDXiaoW. Environmental regulation, data element allocation level and industrial structure adjustment. Statistics and Decision2024; 40: 105–110.
54.
GibellatoSBallestraLVFianoF, et al.The impact of education on the energy trilemma Index: a sustainable innovativeness perspective for resilient energy systems. Appl Energy2023; 330: 120352.
55.
Xuan AoHEftekhariMAungkulanonP, et al.Impact of economic and government investment in residential solar power plant on energy system sustainability. Sustain Energy Technol Assess2022; 52: 102050.
56.
NgwakaUKhalidYLing-ChinJ, et al.Industrial cluster energy systems integration and management tool. Energy Convers Manage2023; 297: 117731.
57.
MughalNArifAJainV, et al.The role of technological innovation in environmental pollution, energy consumption and sustainable economic growth: evidence from south Asian economies. Energy Strategy Reviews2022; 39: 100745.
58.
XuanDJiangXFangY. Can globalization and the green economy hedge natural resources? Functions of population growth and financial development in BRICS countries. Resources Policy2023; 82: 103414.
59.
LiuWHeLXuJ, et al.Linking natural resource dependence to sustainable household wellbeing: a case study in western China. Agriculture2023; 13: 1935.
60.
WangZChenZMaC, et al.Nationwide evaluation of urban energy system resilience in China using a comprehensive index method. Sustainability2022; 14: 2077.
61.
MihailovaD. Redefining business models for the energy transition: social innovation and sustainable value creation in the European energy system. Energy Res Soc Sci2023; 100: 103114.
62.
LinYWangQ-JZhengM-Q. Nexus among digital economy, green innovation, and green development: evidence from China. Emerg Markets Finan Trade2024; 60: 704–723.
63.
ChenSYangYWuT. Digital economy and green total factor productivity—based on the empirical research on the resource-based cities. Environ Sci Pollut Res2023; 30: 47394–47407.
64.
ZhouHLiuJ. Digitalization of the economy and resource efficiency for meeting the ESG goals. Resources Policy2023; 86: 104199.
65.
DongZZhangXZhangN, et al.A distributed robust control strategy for electric vehicles to enhance resilience in urban energy systems. Adv Appl Energy2023; 9: 100115.
66.
CaoZTaoL. Green finance and economic resilience: investigating the nexus with natural resources through econometric analysis. Econ Anal Policy2023; 80: 929–940.
67.
TotouomANkengfackHNgameniJP. Effect of dependence on natural resources on employment quality: insights from African countries. Aus J Agri & Res Econ2024; 68: 805–825.
68.
BadeebRALeanHHClarkJ. The evolution of the natural resource curse thesis: a critical literature survey. Resources Policy2017; 51: 123–134.
69.
AsiamahOAgyeiSKAhmedB, et al.Natural resource dependence and the Dutch disease: evidence from sub-saharan Africa. Resources Policy2022; 79: 103042.
