Understanding the spatiotemporal evolution of industrial carbon emission efficiency (ICEE), identifying its key determinants, and developing targeted countermeasures are crucial for improving ICEE and achieving sustainable development and dual-carbon objectives. This study aims to evaluate the ICEE of 285 Chinese cities from 2000 to 2021, exploring its dynamic patterns and key driving factors. We employ a super Slacks-Based Measure (SBM) with nonexpected outputs to calculate ICEE, and utilize the Malmquist Index to decompose dynamic changes into efficiency and technical components. A spatially constrained multivariate clustering analysis is applied to classify cities into six clusters, followed by GeoSHAP (Geospatial Shapley Additive Explanations) to assess the influence of various factors on ICEE. The main findings indicate that: (1) ICEE generally increased over time, with declines and notable fluctuations around 2008 and 2012, mainly driven by technical changes; (2) ICEE displays clear geospatial clustering, with pronounced high- and low-efficiency regions; (3) high-efficiency regions driven by science, technology, and innovation should maintain efficient economic development, whereas low-efficiency regions need to improve energy use efficiency and promote clean energy adoption. These results provide practical guidance for reducing industrial carbon emissions in China and support the effective implementation of national dual-carbon strategies.
ZhangBYinJDingR, et al.Urban synergistic carbon emissions reduction research: a perspective on spatial complexity and link prediction. J Environ Manag2024; 370. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.122505
2.
GültekinABDikmenCBErciyesAH, et al.An examination of sustainability and United Nations sustainable development goals: Turkey case. In: 3rd International sustainable buildings symposium (ISBS), U Arab Emirates, Mar 15–17 2017, Proceedings of 3rd international sustainable buildings symposium (isbs 2017), vol. 2, pp.252–271.
3.
AntunesAMDMangueiraACS. The importance of the observatory of industrial activities and trends in science, technology and innovation. Quim Nova2005; 28: S112–S118.
4.
KongboonRGheewalaSHSampattagulS. Greenhouse gas emissions inventory data acquisition and analytics for low carbon cities. J Cleaner Prod2022; 343. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130711
5.
YinJTuXMengY. Advancing industrial carbon emission efficiency in Chinese cities: integrating dual-constrained clustering with NCPSO-BP forecasting and XGBoost analysis. Environ Dev Sustain2025. DOI: 10.1007/s10668-025-06752-w
6.
LiCYangZHuangD, et al.Occurrence and transformation mechanism of deep coalbed methane in medium and high rank coal under temperature and pressure coupling control. Fuel2026; 404. Article. DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2025.136188.
7.
HuangXLiuYStouffsR. Exploring spatio-temporal heterogeneity of rural settlement patterns on carbon emission across more than 2800 Chinese counties using multiple supervised machine learning models. J Environ Manag2025; 373: 123932.
8.
ZhangXWangXTangC, et al.China’s cross-regional carbon emission spillover effects of urbanization and industrial shifting. J Cleaner Prod2024; 439. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.140854
9.
RodriguezIGarcia-PerezISadeghiN, et al.Impact of ocean acidification on skeletal structures in gilthead sea bream (Sparus aurata): in vitro and in vivo studies. Aquaculture2026; 610. Article. DOI: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2025.742919.
10.
SunYMaH. Interpretable analysis of transformer winding vibration characteristics: SHAP and multi-classification feature optimization. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst2025; 166: 110585.
11.
LiGTianKWeiW, et al.Non-catalytic supercritical water gasification of cedar tree trunk: influencing factors and kinetics. Renewable Energy2026; 256. Article. DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2025.123866.
12.
SaisudDKongkaewW.A hybrid CORELAP-association rules and fuzzy AHP framework for plant layout optimization in the para rubber plywood industry. Expert Syst Appl2026; 295. Article. DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2025.128766.
13.
MengXLingZChenY, et al.Exploring the differential responses of ecosystem services to urbanization: a perspective from the metropolitan area as a whole and internal service bundles. Ecol Indic2025; 176: 113685.
14.
LiWFangSYanC, et al.Research on the impact of digital economy on industrial carbon emission efficiency – an analysis based on spatial threshold model. J Cleaner Prod2025; 515: 145755.
15.
ChenXYChenCYChenXH, et al.Urban form and carbon emissions: an evaluation tool for computational urban design. In: 30th International seminar on urban form conference (ISUF), Univ Belgrade, Fac Architecture, Belgrade, SERBIA, Sep 04–09 2023, Praxis of urban morphology, pt 2, pp.258–268.
16.
ZhangWLiJLiGX, et al.Emission reduction effect and carbon market efficiency of carbon emissions trading policy in China. Energy2020; 196. DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2020.117117
17.
ToneK. A slacks-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis. Eur J Oper Res2001; 130: 498–509.
18.
BlairMWDiazJMHidalgoR, et al.Microsatellite characterization of Andean races of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Theor Appl Genet2007; 116: 29–43. 2007/10/10.
19.
LiHShiJF.Energy efficiency analysis on Chinese industrial sectors: an improved super-SBM model with undesirable outputs. J Cleaner Prod2014; 65: 97–107. Article.
20.
LvCCShaoCHLeeCC.Green technology innovation and financial development: do environmental regulation and innovation output matter?Energy Economics2021; 98. Article. DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105237.
21.
YangL-HWangY-MLanY-X, et al.A data envelopment analysis (DEA)-based method for rule reduction in extended belief-rule-based systems. Knowl Based Syst2017; 123: 174–187.
22.
ZhouLZhouCHCheL, et al.Spatio-temporal evolution and influencing factors of urban green development efficiency in China. J Geog Sci2020; 30: 724–742. Article.
23.
JiangHTYinJWeiDQ, et al.Industrial carbon emission efficiency prediction and carbon emission reduction strategies based on multi-objective particle swarm optimization-backpropagation: a perspective from regional clustering. Sci Total Environ2024; 906. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.167692
24.
IzadikhahMTavanaMDi CaprioD, et al.A novel two-stage DEA production model with freely distributed initial inputs and shared intermediate outputs. Expert Syst Appl2018; 99: 213–230.
25.
LiYSunHAl-AnsariMM, et al.Assessment and optimization of combustion efficiency and emissions of industrial gases burner blended with hydrogen and ammonia gaseous fuel. Renewable Energy2025; 252. Article. DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2025.123543.
26.
LingLHuLZhaoX.How to achieve net-zero carbon emission? Evidence from energy-biased technical change. Energy2025; 329. Article. DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2025.136642.
AngSChenC-M. Pitfalls of decomposition weights in the additive multi-stage DEA model. Omega (Westport)2016; 58: 139–153.
29.
AmirteimooriA. DEA Efficiency analysis: efficient and anti-efficient frontier. Appl Math Comput2007; 186: 10–16.
30.
LiuBLDingCJAhmedAD, et al.Carbon emission allowances and green development efficiency. J Cleaner Prod2024; 463. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.142246
31.
LiBHanYWangC, et al.Did civilized city policy improve energy efficiency of resource-based cities? Prefecture-level evidence from China. Energy Policy2022; 167: 113081.
32.
LiKY.Can resource endowment and industrial structure drive green innovation efficiency in the context of COP 26?Resources Policy2023; 82. Article. DOI: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.103502.
33.
YinJWeiDQiuY, et al.Strategies for enhancing tourism efficiency in Guizhou, China: based on spatiotemporal dynamic analysis and driving force decomposition. Environ Dev Sustain2024. DOI: 10.1007/s10668-024-05942-2
34.
YinJ-hZhangLYiB-y, et al.Regional heterogeneity of malaria healthcare seeking and diagnosis in China (2017–2022): implications in preventing re-establishment of malaria transmission. J Infect Public Health2025; 18: 102601.
35.
DongXZhangJF. Heterogeneity of regional carbon emission markets in China: evidence from multidimensional determinants. Energy Economics2024; 138: 107835.
36.
ZhangBYinJ. Unlocking collaborative carbon reduction potential across Chinese cities: a heterogeneity and endogenous dynamics analysis through network evolution. Sustain Cities Soc2025; 130: 106536.
37.
XuYMaoWHuS.Unveiling the pulse of urban metro stations: a TOD-driven approach to measuring vibrancy using geographically weighted random forest. Int J Dig Earth2025; 18. Article. DOI: 10.1080/17538947.2025.2524054.
38.
ZhaiGHanSChenK, et al.Towards a novel few-shot object counting paradigm with point-guided exemplar prompt in Industrial Internet of Things. Future Generation Comput Syst Int J Escience2026; 174. Article. DOI: 10.1016/j.future.2025.107946.
39.
LiTWuYRenF, et al.Assessing the impact of stand structure on forest net primary productivity: a multiple machine learning-SHAP models and DSEM integrated approach. Comput Electron Agric2025; 236: 110427.
40.
WuHXuLRenS, et al.How do energy consumption and environmental regulation affect carbon emissions in China? New evidence from a dynamic threshold panel model. Resources Policy2020; 67: 101678.
41.
ZhiDYSongDDChenY, et al.Spatial insights for sustainable transportation based on carbon emissions from multiple transport modes: a township-level case study in China. Cities2024; 155. DOI: 10.1016/j.cities.2024.105405
42.
YangXLiuYBezamaA, et al.Agricultural carbon emission efficiency and agricultural practices: implications for balancing carbon emissions reduction and agricultural productivity increment. Environ Dev2024; 50. DOI: 10.1016/j.envdev.2024.101004
43.
WangSXuMLiQ, et al.Analysis on trend evolution and driving factors of soil protection services in eastern sandy region of China. Ecol Indic2023; 154. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.110816
44.
DirixKMuchezPDegryseP, et al.Integrating multi-element geochemical and magnetic survey at ancient Sagalassos (southwest Turkey): anthropogenic versus natural anomalies. Archaeol Prospect2013; 20: 233–247. Article.
45.
AydinogluACSismanS.Comparing modelling performance and evaluating differences of feature importance on defined geographical appraisal zones for mass real estate appraisal. Spatial Econ Anal2024; 19: 225–249. Article.
46.
ZhaoBYangXXWuQH, et al.Uncovering the structural effect mechanisms of natural and social factors on land subsidence: a case study in Beijing. Sustainability2022; 14: 18. Article.
47.
RemizovAMemonSAKimJR.Novel building energy performance-based climate zoning enhanced with spatial constraint. Appl Energy2024; 355: 29. Article.
48.
QiuYHZhangTCaoYQ, et al.Impact of low-carbon city pilot policy on the status of urban transport carbon emission networks: empirical evidence based on China's aviation, railway, and water transportation. Sustain Cities Soc2025; 130. DOI: 10.1016/j.scs.2025.106568
49.
ZhangBYinJ. Exploring the impact of spatial structure on carbon emissions in Chinese urban agglomerations: insights into polycentric and compact development patterns. Urban Climate2025; 62. DOI: 10.1016/j.uclim.2025.102557
50.
ZhangLYMaXOckYS, et al.Research on regional differences and influencing factors of Chinese industrial green technology innovation efficiency based on Dagum Gini coefficient decomposition. Land (Basel)2022; 11. Article. DOI: 10.3390/land11010122.
51.
ZhangBYinJJiangHT, et al.Multi-source data assessment and multi-factor analysis of urban carbon emissions: a case study of the Pearl River Basin, China. Urban Climate2023; 51. DOI: 10.1016/j.uclim.2023.101653
52.
MaY-X.Enhanced field emission studies of carbon nanotube emitters with cross-like cathode electrode for the FED panel. In: International conference on advanced research on advanced structure, materials and engineering (ASME 2011), Beijing, Peoples R China, 2012Dec 24–25 2011, Advanced research on advanced structure, materials and engineering, pp.229–232.
53.
LundbergSMLeeSI.A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. In: 31st annual conference on neural information processing systems (NIPS)Long Beach, CA, Dec 04–09 2017, Advances in neural information processing systems 30 (nips 2017).
JameiMSharmaPAliM, et al.Application of an explainable glass-box machine learning approach for prognostic analysis of a biogas-powered small agriculture engine. Energy2024; 288. DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2023.129862
56.
LeeMH. Predicting and analyzing the fill factor of non-fullerene organic solar cells based on material properties and interpretable machine-learning strategies. Sol Energy2024; 267. DOI: 10.1016/j.solener.2023.112191
57.
LiuL. An ensemble framework for explainable geospatial machine learning models. Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinf2024; 132: 104036.
58.
KeEZhaoJZhaoY. Investigating the influence of nonlinear spatial heterogeneity in urban flooding factors using geographic explainable artificial intelligence. J Hydrol2025; 648: 132398.
59.
YinHYXiaoRFeiXF, et al.Analyzing “economy-society-environment” sustainability from the perspective of urban spatial structure: a case study of the Yangtze River delta urban agglomeration. Sustain Cities Soc2023; 96. DOI: 10.1016/j.scs.2023.104691
60.
LeiHXueMGLiuHL, et al.Unveiling the driving patterns of carbon prices through an explainable machine learning framework: evidence from Chinese emission trading schemes. J Cleaner Prod2024; 438. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.140697
61.
ZhiDZhaoHChenY, et al.Quantifying the heterogeneous impacts of the urban built environment on traffic carbon emissions: new insights from machine learning techniques. Urban Climate2024; 53: 101765.
62.
ZhangGChangFLiuJ. Carbon emission prediction of 275 cities in China considering artificial intelligence effects and feature interaction: a heterogeneous deep learning modeling framework. Sustain Cities Soc2024; 114: 105776.
63.
ShanTFengSLiK, et al.Unveiling the effects of artificial intelligence and green technology convergence on carbon emissions: an explainable machine learning-based approach. J Environ Manag2025; 373: 123657.
64.
AssunÇãoRMNevesMCCâmaraG, et al.Efficient regionalization techniques for socio-economic geographical units using minimum spanning trees. Int J Geogr Inf Sci2006; 20: 797–811.
65.
LarkRM.Forming spatially coherent regions by classification of multi-variate data: an example from the analysis of maps of crop yield. Int J Geogr Inf Sci1998; 12: 83–98. Article.
66.
DingSHuangWXuW, et al.Improving kitchen waste composting maturity by optimizing the processing parameters based on machine learning model. Bioresour Technol2022; 360. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2022.127606
BioneFRAVenancioIMSantosTP, et al.Estimating total organic carbon of potential source rocks in the Espírito Santo Basin, SE Brazil, using XGBoost. Mar Pet Geol2024; 162: 106765.
69.
LiuSWangGKongF, et al.PM2.5 pollution characteristics, drivers, and regional transport during different pollution levels in Linyi, China: an integrated PMF-ML-SHAP framework and transport models. J Hazard Mater2025; 494: 138534.
70.
LiZQ. Geoshapley: a game theory approach to measuring spatial effects in machine learning models. Ann Am Assoc Geographers2024; 114: 1365–1385.
71.
ValdiserriPBalleriniVRossi di SchioE. Hourly data for evaluating the carbon dioxide emission factor of heat pumps or other devices connected to the Italian grid. Data Brief2022; 45: 108682.
72.
HabibMAHasanuzzamanMHosenuzzamanM, et al.Energy consumption, energy saving and emission reduction of a garment industrial building in Bangladesh. Energy2016; 112: 91–100.
73.
ShaoCLvCNingJ, et al.The impact of China's manufacturing industry transfer on the comprehensive efficiency of pollution and carbon emissions reduction: an empirical analysis using a spatial panel model. Energy Econ2025; 148: 108624.
74.
Serino OlanderAAlbuquerque WolfLMoestamL, et al.Decarbonisation of manufacturing operations: a case study in automotive manufacturing. Product Manuf Res2025; 13. Article. DOI: 10.1080/21693277.2025.2514613.
75.
BaudinoMGuptaSD. Unraveling nonlinear dynamics between urbanization, growth, and emissions in emerging and developing economies. Econ Model2025; 151: 107155.
76.
ZhangQGaoXKhanSU, et al.SHAP-ing urban sustainability: Integrating NDDF and lightGBM to uncover coordinated pollution and carbon abatement costs in Chinese cities. Sustain Cities Soc2025; 130. Article. DOI: 10.1016/j.scs.2025.106542.
77.
LiWFangSYanC, et al.Research on the impact of digital economy on industrial carbon emission efficiency—an analysis based on spatial threshold model. J Cleaner Prod2025; 515. Article. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.145755.
78.
LiuXYWangLHuangJP, et al.Revealing the covariation of atmospheric O2 and pollutants in an industrial metropolis by explainable machine learning. Environ Sci Technol Lett2023; 10: 851–858.
79.
ZhouCYWangZWangXL, et al.Deciphering the nonlinear and synergistic role of building energy variables in shaping carbon emissions: a LightGBM-SHAP framework in office buildings. Build Environ2024; 266. DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2024.112035
