Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2025-8
The role of finance,technology,and growth policies in shaping sustainable mineral and natural gas management: Utilizing dynamic auto-regressive distributed lag (ARDL) and frequency domain causality (FDC) models
Since the onset of the Industrial Revolution, the financial sector has emerged as a substantial contributor to the advancement of human society. Nevertheless, providing financial support for environmentally detrimental projects has raised numerous questions regarding establishing a direct connection between financial market instruments and their impact on the environment. This study summarizes the key findings and insights from the comprehensive analysis of the impact of natural resources, including minerals and natural gas, on various economic indicators across the G20 countries. By focusing on the complex relationship between resource abundance and economic performance, shedding light on the significance of responsible resource management and sustainability practices. Mineral resources have been shown to influence Foreign Direct Investment (FDI), trade, financial technology adoption, and net trade. Abundant minerals attract FDI inflows, leading to economic growth, while mineral exports contribute positively to trade balances and financial technology development. However, the impact on FDI outflows can be influenced by various factors, emphasizing the need for diversified economies and sustainable resource management. Natural gas plays a significant role in shaping economic indicators, including FDI, transport services exports, goods export services, financial technology, net trade, and grants for technology. Abundant natural gas reserves attract foreign investment and drive economic growth, stimulating the transport and export sectors. The adoption of advanced financial technology in the energy industry is fostered by the export of natural gas, but the impact on FDI outflows and net trade depends on global dynamics. Responsible resource management, diversification, and sustainability practices are crucial for harnessing economic benefits while ensuring environmental and economic stability. This analysis provides valuable insights for policymakers and stakeholders in navigating the complexities of resource-driven economies and working toward sustainable and prosperous futures.
ChristmannP. Mineral resource governance in the 21st century and a sustainable European Union. Miner Econ2021; 34: 187–208.
2.
Segura-SalazarJTavaresLM. Sustainability in the minerals industry: seeking a consensus on its meaning. Sustainability2018; 10: 1429.
3.
TamasigaPOnyeakaHOuassouEh. Unlocking the green economy in African countries: an integrated framework of FinTech as an enabler of the transition to sustainability. Energies2022; 15: 8658.
4.
XiaoWKongHShiL, et al.The impact of innovation-driven strategy on high-quality economic development: evidence from China. Sustainability2022; 14: 4212.
5.
Sánchez-GarcíaEMartínez-FalcóJMarco-LajaraB,et al.Revolutionizing the circular economy through new technologies: a new era of sustainable progress. Environ Technol Innov2024; 33: 103509, ISSN 2352-1864.
6.
AlliouiHMourdiY. Exploring the full potentials of IoT for better financial growth and stability: a comprehensive survey. Sensors2023; 23: 8015.
7.
RaneNChoudharySRaneJ. Blockchain and artificial intelligence (AI) integration for revolutionizing security and transparency in finance (November 17, 2023). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4644253.
8.
AgarwalNWongthongthamPKhairwalN,et al.Blockchain application to financial market clearing and settlement systems. J Risk Finan Manage2023; 16: 52..
9.
AlamsyahASyahrirS. The taxonomy of blockchain-based technology in the financial industry. F1000Res.2023 Jul 18; 12: 57.
10.
AbubakarJAl-AnsariKAliH, et al.improving cooperation among central banks in terms of digital currencies: challenges and prospects for OIC Member Countries. 2023.
11.
Al-AnsariKAysanA. Central bank digital currencies, internet of things, and blockchain: prospects and challenges for Islamic finance. 2022.
12.
BhattiUBazaiSHussainS, et al.Deep learning-based trees disease recognition and classification using hyperspectral data. Comput Mater Continua.2023; 77: 681–697.
13.
AlmusaedAYitmenIAlmssadA. Reviewing and integrating AEC practices into industry 6.0: strategies for smart and sustainable future-built environments. Sustainability2023; 15: 13464.
14.
EsmaeilianBSarkisJLewisK,et al.Blockchain for the future of sustainable supply chain management in Industry 4.0. Resour Conserv Recycl2020; 163: 1–12.
15.
XuYWangLXiongY, et al.Does digital transformation foster corporate social responsibility? Evidence from Chinese mining industry. J Environ Manage2023 Oct 15; 344: 118646.
16.
RejebARejebKKeoghJG,et al.Barriers to blockchain adoption in the circular economy: a fuzzy Delphi and best-worst approach. Sustainability2022; 14: 3611.
DuttaPChoiTMSomaniS,et al.Blockchain technology in supply chain operations: applications, challenges and research opportunities. Transp Res E Logist Transp Rev2020 Oct; 142: 102067.
19.
TrubyJ. Governing artificial intelligence to benefit the UN sustainable development goals. Sustain Develop2020; 28: 946–959.
20.
ChateauJMavroeidiE. The jobs potential of a transition towards a resource efficient and circular economy. OECD Environment Working Papers, No. 167, OECD Publishing, Paris. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1787/28e768df-en.
21.
YamaguchiS. International Trade and the Transition to a More Resource Efficient and Circular Economy: A Concept Paper. OECD Trade and Environment Working Papers, No. 2018/03, OECD Publishing, Paris. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1787/847feb24-en.
BianchiMCordellaM. Does circular economy mitigate the extraction of natural resources? Empirical evidence based on analysis of 28 European economies over the past decade. Ecol Econ2023; 203: 107607, ISSN 0921-8009https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2022.107607
24.
BhattiUTangHWuG, et al.Deep Learning with Graph Convolutional Networks: An Overview and Latest Applications in Computational Intelligence. Int J Intell Syst2023; 2023: 1–16.
25.
KhajuriaAAtienzaVAChavanichS, et al.Accelerating circular economy solutions to achieve the 2030 agenda for sustainable development goals. Circular Economy2022; 1: 100001, ISSN 2773-1677.
BradfordCWonhyukLIM. eds. Global leadership in transition: Making the G20 more effective and responsive. USA: Brookings Institution Press, 2011. Available at http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7864/j.ctt1261q3.
28.
CooperAFPouliotV. How much is global governance changing? The G20 as international practice. Coop Confl2015; 50: 334–350. http://www.jstor.org/stable/45084293
ShrivastavaPVidhiR. Pathway to sustainability in the mining industry: a case study of Alcoa and Rio Tinto. Resources2020; 9: 70.
31.
BhattiUHashmiMZSunY, et al.Editorial: Artificial intelligence applications in reduction of carbon emissions: Step towards sustainable environment. Front Environ Sci2023; 11: 1–15.
32.
UdeaghaMCNgepahN. Can public–private partnership investment in energy (PPPI) mitigate CO2 emissions in South Africa? Fresh evidence from the novel dynamic ARDL simulations approach. FrontEnviron Sci2023; 10: 1044605.
33.
PatelNKautishPShahbazM. Unveiling the complexities of sustainable development: An investigation of economic growth, globalization and human development on carbon emissions in 64 countries. Sustainable Dev2023;1 : 1–13.
34.
KabeyiMJBOlanrewajuOA. Sustainable energy transition for renewable and low carbon grid electricity generation and supply. Front. Energy Res2022; 9: 743114.
35.
NiZYangJRazzaqA. How do natural resources, digitalization, and institutional governance contribute to ecological sustainability through load capacity factors in highly resource-consuming economies?Resources Policy2022; 79: 103068, ISSN 0301-4207.
36.
YuDWenhuiXAnserMK, et al.Navigating the global mineral market: a study of resource wealth and the energy transition. Resources Policy2023; 82: 103500, ISSN 0301-4207.
37.
BhattiUMengxingHNeira-MolinH, et al.MFFCG – multi feature fusion for hyperspectral image classification using graph attention network. Expert Syst Appl2023; 229: 120496.
38.
ChurchCCrawfordA. Minerals and the metals for the energy transition: exploring the conflict implications for mineral-rich, fragile states. In: HafnerMTagliapietraS (eds) The geopolitics of the global energy transition: lecture notes in energy, Vol.73. Cham: Springer, 2020: 1–11.
39.
MohsinMZhuQNaseemS, et al.Mining industry impact on environmental sustainability, economic growth, social interaction, and public health: an application of semi-quantitative mathematical approach. Processes2021; 9: 72.
40.
BazalukOKuchynOSaikP, et al.Impact of ground surface subsidence caused by underground coal mining on natural gas pipeline. Sci Rep2023 Nov 7; 13: 19327.
41.
KhanMParvaizGSDedahanovAT, et al.The impact of technologies of traceability and transparency in supply chains. Sustainability2022; 14: 16336.
42.
AyanBGünerESon-TuranS. Blockchain technology and sustainability in supply chains and a closer look at different industries: a mixed method approach. Logistics2022; 6: 85.
43.
McGrathPMcCarthyLMarshallD,et al.Tools and technologies of transparency in sustainable global supply chains. Calif Manage Rev2021; 64: 67–89.
44.
MapleCSzpruchLEpiphaniouG, et al.The AI revolution: opportunities and challenges for the finance sector. 2023. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.16538.
45.
El HajjMHammoudJ. Unveiling the influence of artificial intelligence and machine learning on financial markets: a comprehensive analysis of AI applications in trading, risk management, and financial operations. J. Risk Financial Manag2023; 16: 34..
46.
FanZYanZWenS. Deep learning and artificial intelligence in sustainability: a review of SDGs, renewable energy, and environmental health. Sustainability2023; 15: 13493.
47.
CioffiRTravaglioniMPiscitelliG, et al.Artificial intelligence and machine learning applications in smart production: progress, trends, and directions. Sustainability2020; 12: 92.
48.
TangHBhattiULiJ, et al.A new hybrid forecasting model based on dual series decomposition with long-term short-term memory. Int J Intell Syst2023; 2023: 1–12.
49.
IssaHJabbouriRMehannaR-A. AI micro-decisions in FinTechs: a mixed method research design. Manage Decis2023; 61: 3316–3342.
50.
MunirMAHabibMSHussainA, et al.Blockchain adoption for sustainable supply chain management: economic, environmental, and social perspectives. Front. Energy Res2022; 10: 899632.
51.
Martínez-PeláezROchoa-BrustARiveraS, et al.Role of digital transformation for achieving sustainability: mediated role of stakeholders, key capabilities, and technology. Sustainability2023; 15: 11221.
52.
MuganyiTYanLSunHP. Green finance, fintech and environmental protection: evidence from China. Environ Sci Ecotechnol2021 Jul 2; 7: 100107.
53.
LiuQYouY. Fintech and green credit development—evidence from China. Sustainability2023; 15: 5903.
54.
AlhatamiEBhattiUHuangM,et al.Review and enhancement of discrete cosine transform (DCT) for medical image fusion. IEEE Access2023; 1: 1–15.
55.
SultanaTHossainMSVoumikLC,et al.Democracy, green energy, trade, and environmental progress in South Asia: advanced quantile regression perspective. Heliyon2023 Sep 29; 9: e20488.
56.
ZhangHZhangLWangK,et al.Unveiling key drivers of indirect carbon emissions of Chinese older households. Sustainability2019; 11: 5740.
MagazzinoCMeleMMorelliG. The relationship between renewable energy and economic growth in a time of COVID-19: a machine learning experiment on the Brazilian economy. Sustainability2021; 13: 1285.
59.
MahmoodHIrshadAuRTanveerM. Do innovation and renewable energy transition play their role in environmental sustainability in Western Europe?Humanit Soc Sci Commun2024; 11(22): 1–12.
60.
ZhouQWuJImranM, et al.Examining the trade-offs in clean energy provision: Focusing on the relationship between technology transfer, renewable energy, industrial growth, and carbon footprint reduction. Heliyon2023; 9(10): e20271.
61.
BhuiyanMAZhangQKhareV, et al.Renewable energy consumption and economic growth nexus—a systematic literature review. Front Environ Sci2022; 10: 878394.
62.
ChhabraMGiriAKKumarA. Do trade openness and institutional quality contribute to carbon emission reduction? Evidence from BRICS countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res2023; 30: 50986–51002.
63.
WangQZhangF. The effects of trade openness on decoupling carbon emissions from economic growth – evidence from 182 countries. J Clean Prod2021; 279: 123838.
64.
AleksynskaMHavrylchykO. FDI From the south: the role of institutional distance and natural resources. Eur J Polit Econ2013; 29: 38–53.
65.
HayatATahirM. Foreign direct investment, natural resources and economic growth: a threshold model approach. J Econ Stud2021; 48: 929–944.
66.
NdikumanaLSarrM. Capital flight, foreign direct investment and natural resources in Africa. Resour Policy2019; 63: 101427.
67.
WangJYangJYangL. Do natural resources play a role in economic development? Role of institutional quality, trade openness, and FDI. Resources Policy2023; 81: 103294.
68.
PengJChenHJiaL, et al.Impact of digital industrialization on the energy industry supply chain: evidence from the natural gas industry in China. Energies2023; 16: 1564.
69.
AlgerianHHMMatarK. The importance of foreign direct investment in the development of the natural gas industry in Iraq. J Human Soc Sci Res2023; 2: 1–15.
70.
ÇetinMSarıgülSSTopcuBA, et al.Does globalization mitigate environmental degradation in selected emerging economies? Assessment of the role of financial development, economic growth, renewable energy consumption and urbanization. Environ Sci Poll Res2023; 30: 100340–100359.
71.
ÇetinMAslanASarıgülSS. Analysis of the dynamics of environmental degradation for 18 upper middle-income countries: the role of financial development. Environ Sci Poll Res2022; 29: 64647–64664.
72.
OzturkSCetinMDemirH. Income inequality and CO2 emissions: nonlinear evidence from Turkey. Environ, Dev Sustain2022; 24: 11911–11928.
73.
ThadewaldTBüningH. Jarque–Bera test and its competitors for testing normality – a power comparison. J Appl Stat2007; 34: 87–105.
74.
BreuschTSPaganAR. A simple test for heteroscedasticity and random coefficient variation. Econom: J Econ Soc1979; 1: 1287–1294.
75.
RamseyJB. Tests for specification errors in classical linear least-squares regression analysis. J Royal Statis Soc Ser B: Statis Methodol1969; 31: 350–371.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
