Carbon emission efficiency (CEE) reflects the interplay between carbon emissions and the economy, which refers to achieving more economic benefits and lower carbon emissions while considering energy, labor, and capital inputs. Assessing regional CEE is crucial for evaluating the level of China's regional low-carbon economic development. Thus, this paper proposes a scenario-based hybrid model with a foresight perspective and game cross-efficiency (GCE) analysis. It measures the future CEE of 41 Yangtze River Delta (YRD) cities from 2023 to 2030. The improved gray forecasting models generate the input and output datasets for GCE analysis, and the assurance region constraint simulates the carbon emission and energy consumption dual-control policy. The results show that: (1) the CEEs of 41 cities are generally low, with an average of 0.2142. Shanghai has the highest CEE, 0.8089, while Tongling has the lowest, 0.0307, under the current policy constraint. (2) Under the four control policy scenarios, the CEE of the YRD urban agglomeration generally follows a U-shaped trend. It indicates that the dual-control policy may lead to a short-term decline in the CEE of YRD, but in the long term, it may gradually increase in 2025 or 2026. (3) Spatial–temporal analysis reveals that the government should flexibly optimize and update the carbon intensity constraint value based on regional development differences and focus more on energy consumption. These results provide forward-looking guidance for China's regional low-carbon and high-quality development.
ChenXLinB. Towards carbon neutrality by implementing carbon emissions trading scheme: policy evaluation in China. Energy Policy2021; 157: 112510.
2.
DuXWuDYanY. Prediction of electricity consumption based on GM(1,N-r) model in Jiangsu province, China. Energy2023; 262: 125439.
3.
LiuSJiaJHuangH, et al.China’s CO2 emissions: a thorough analysis of spatiotemporal characteristics and sustainable policy from the agricultural land-use perspective during 1995–2020. Land (Basel)2023; 12: 1220.
4.
MaLXiangLWangC, et al.Spatiotemporal evolution of urban carbon balance and its response to new-type urbanization: a case of the middle reaches of the Yangtze River Urban Agglomerations, China. J Cleaner Prod2022; 380: 135122.
5.
LiuWZhangXFanJ, et al.Evaluation of potential for salt cavern gas storage and integration of brine extraction: cavern utilization, Yangtze River Delta region. Nat Resour Res2020; 29: 3275–3290.
6.
WangYHeL. Can China’s carbon emissions trading scheme promote balanced green development? A consideration of efficiency and fairness. J Cleaner Prod2022; 367: 132916.
7.
WangJXueYHanM. Impact of carbon emission price and natural resources development on the green economic recovery: fresh insights from China. Resour Policy2023; 81: 103255.
8.
LuoSLiuJ. An innovative index system and HFFS-MULTIMOORA method based group decision-making framework for regional green development level evaluation. Expert Syst Appl2022; 189: 116090.
9.
CaiLLuoJWangM, et al.Pathways for municipalities to achieve carbon emission peak and carbon neutrality: a study based on the LEAP model. Energy2023; 262: 125435.
10.
YangPPengSBenaniN, et al.An integrated evaluation on China’s provincial carbon peak and carbon neutrality. J Cleaner Prod2022; 377: 134497.
11.
WangHShangLTangD,et al.Research themes, evolution trends, and future challenges in China’s carbon emission studies. Sustainability2024; 16: 2080.
12.
CaiZGuoRZhangH,et al.Status and trends of carbon emissions research at the county level in China. Adv Clim Change Res2024; 15: 338–352.
13.
JiaJXinLLuC, et al.China’s CO2 emissions: a systematical decomposition concurrently from multi-sectors and multi-stages since 1980 by an extended logarithmic mean divisia index. Energy Strategy Rev2023; 49: 101141.
14.
PengHLingKZhangY. The carbon emission reduction effect of digital infrastructure development: evidence from the broadband China policy. J Cleaner Prod2024; 434: 140060.
15.
ZhaoDWangZTanD, et al.Comparison of carbon emissions from the southern and northern tributaries of the Three Gorge Reservoir over the Changjiang River Basin, China. Ecohydrol Hydrobiol2019; 19: 515–528.
16.
CaiKWuL. Grey prediction of carbon emission and carbon peak in several developing countries. Eng Appl Artif Intell2024; 133: 108210.
17.
DingSHuJLinQ. Accurate forecasts and comparative analysis of Chinese CO2 emissions using a superior time-delay grey model. Energy Econ2023; 126: 107013.
18.
ChenP. The spatial impacts of the circular economy on carbon intensity-new evidence from the super-efficient SBM-DEA model. Energy Environ2024; 35: 47–63.
19.
LiuXNiuQDongS,et al.How does renewable energy consumption affect carbon emission intensity? Temporal-spatial impact analysis in China. Energy2023; 284: 128690.
20.
SunYJiaJJuM,et al.Spatiotemporal dynamics of direct carbon emission and policy implication of energy transition for China’s residential consumption sector by the methods of social network analysis and geographically weighted regression. Land (Basel)2022; 11: 1039.
21.
XinYChangXZhuJ. How does the digital economy affect energy efficiency? Empirical research on Chinese cities. Energy Environ2024; 35: 1703–1728.
22.
WangMFengC. The consequences of industrial restructuring, regional balanced development, and market-oriented reform for China’s carbon dioxide emissions: a multi-tier meta-frontier DEA-based decomposition analysis. Technol Forecast Soc Change2021; 164: 120507.
23.
CharnesACooperWWRhodesE. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. Eur J Oper Res1978; 2: 429–444.
24.
WeiFZhangXChuJ, et al.Energy and environmental efficiency of China’s transportation sectors considering CO2 emission uncertainty. Transp Res Part D Transp Environ2021; 97: 102955.
25.
WuDWangYQianW. Efficiency evaluation and dynamic evolution of China’s regional green economy: a method based on the super-PEBM model and DEA window analysis. J Cleaner Prod2020; 264: 121630.
26.
ZhangNSunFHuY. Carbon emission efficiency of land use in urban agglomerations of Yangtze River Economic Belt, China: based on three-stage SBM-DEA model. Ecol Indic2024; 160: 111922.
27.
WuDLiuWRenY,et al.Exploring energy and tourism economy growth nexus with DEA-based index systems: the case of sustainable development of tourism destinations. Environ Sci Policy2024; 160: 103858.
28.
LiHWuD. Online investor attention and firm restructuring performance: insights from an event-based DEA-Tobit model. Omega (Westport)2024; 122: 102967.
29.
DoyleJGreenR. Efficiency and cross-efficiency in DEA: derivations, meanings and uses. J Oper Res Soc1994; 45: 567–578.
30.
HuangYHeXDaiY,et al.Hybrid game cross efficiency evaluation models based on interval data: a case of forest carbon sequestration. Expert Syst Appl2022; 204: 117521.
31.
ChenXZhuQXuC, et al.Energy and environmental efficiency of China's regional electric power industry by considering renewable energy constraints. Energy Environ2024; 35: 927–949.
32.
WangYWuDQianW,et al.Cross-efficiency intervals integrated ranking approach based on the generalized Fermat-Torricelli point. Comput Ind Eng2021; 162: 107786.
33.
FathiBAshenaMBahariAR. Energy, environmental, and economic efficiency in fossil fuel exporting countries: a modified data envelopment analysis approach. Sustainable Prod Consumption2021; 26: 588–596.
34.
LiBLiJLiuC, et al.Provincial inclusive green growth efficiency in China: spatial correlation network investigation and its influence factors. Land (Basel)2023; 12: 692.
35.
ZhangSGongZ. DEA Game cross efficiency method for dynamic change of competitive and cooperative between decision making units. Oper Res Manage Sci2017; 26: 21.
36.
ThompsonRGLeeEThrallRM. DEA/AR-efficiency of US independent oil/gas producers over time. Comput Oper Res1992; 19: 377–391.
37.
EbrahimiBKhaliliM. A new integrated AR-IDEA model to find the best DMU in the presence of both weight restrictions and imprecise data. Comput Ind Eng2018; 125: 357–363.
38.
YeFYangLLuH,et al.A novel data-driven decision model based on extended belief rule base to predict China’s carbon emissions. J Environ Manag2022; 318: 115547.
39.
SunWHuangC. Predictions of carbon emission intensity based on factor analysis and an improved extreme learning machine from the perspective of carbon emission efficiency. J Cleaner Prod2022; 338: 130414.
40.
QianWWangJ. An improved seasonal GM(1,1) model based on the HP filter for forecasting wind power generation in China. Energy2021; 209: 118499.
41.
TangTJiangWZhangH, et al.GM(1,1) based improved seasonal index model for monthly electricity consumption forecasting. Energy2022; 252: 124041.
42.
JiangHKongPHuY,et al.Forecasting China’s CO2 emissions by considering interaction of bilateral FDI using the improved grey multivariable Verhulst model. Environ Dev Sustainability2021; 23: 225–240.
43.
RenYWangYXiaL,et al.An innovative information accumulation multivariable grey model and its application in China's renewable energy generation forecasting. Expert Syst Appl2024; 252: 124130.
44.
WangHZhangZ. Forecasting Chinese provincial carbon emissions using a novel grey prediction model considering spatial correlation. Expert Syst Appl2022; 209: 118261.
45.
YuYShiCGuoJ, et al.To what extent can clean energy development advance the carbon peaking process of China?J Cleaner Prod2023; 412: 137424.
46.
XiaLRenYWangY. Forecasting clean energy power generation in China based on a novel fractional discrete grey model with a dynamic time-delay function. J Cleaner Prod2023; 416: 137830.
47.
WangYDangYLiY,et al.An approach to increase prediction precision of GM(1,1) model based on optimization of the initial condition. Expert Syst Appl2010; 37: 5640–5644.
48.
WangZLiDZhengH. Model comparison of GM (1,1) and DGM (1,1) based on Monte-Carlo simulation. Physica A2020; 542: 123341.
49.
RenYWangYXiaL, et al.Forecasting hospital outpatient volume using an optimized medical two-stage hybrid grey model. Grey Syst Theory Appl2024; 14: 671–707.
50.
GuoHXiaoXForrestJ. A research on a comprehensive adaptive grey prediction model CAGM(1,N). Appl Math Comput2013; 225: 216–227.
51.
Ofosu-AdarkwaJXieNJavedSA. Forecasting CO2 emissions of China’s cement industry using a hybrid Verhulst-GM (1,N) model and emissions’ technical conversion. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev2020; 130: 109945.
52.
MirjaliliSLewisA. The whale optimization algorithm. Adv Eng Softw2016; 95: 51–67.
53.
RenYXiaLWangY. Forecasting China's hydropower generation using a novel seasonal optimized multivariate grey model. Tech Forecasting Soc Change2023; 194: 122677.
54.
LiangMHuangGChenJ,et al.Energy-water-carbon nexus system planning: a case study of Yangtze River Delta urban agglomeration, China. Appl Energy2022; 308: 118144.
55.
LiZSunZChenY, et al.The net GHG emissions of the China Three Gorges Reservoir: I. Pre-impoundment GHG inventories and carbon balance. J Cleaner Prod2020; 256: 120635.
56.
DongHHuYQianL, et al.Preliminary manifestation of the Yangtze River Protection Strategy in improving the carbon sink function of estuary wetlands. Iscience2024; 27: 108974.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
