Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2025-8
Comparative evaluation of biochar produced from laboratory waste media using different thermochemical methods and its potential in plant growth promoting properties
The disposal of laboratory waste, especially microbiology media, is a growing concern due to its potential environmental impact. In this study, the conversion of laboratory waste, specifically nutrient agar media, into biochar using three different pyrolysis methods: conventional tube pyrolysis, biomass gasification, and microwave-assisted pyrolysis has been explored. Microwave pyrolysis of biomass resulted in higher biochar yield (63.85%) than conventional pyrolysis (58.16%) and gasification (32.18%). The obtained biochar has been subjected to different analytical techniques to understand the comparative differences in characteristics. Conventional pyrolysis yields the most negative zeta potential (−27.5 mV), whereas biomass gasification results in −16.7 mV, and microwave-derived biochar produces −7.5 mV to −4.8 mV, indicating diverse colloidal stability, anionic character, and potential for tailored soil applications. In plant growth experiments, the application of conventionally pyrolyzed biochar demonstrated superior performance, with the highest germination percentage (84.62%) and significantly longer shoot lengths (p < 0.001) revealing its potential environmental benefits. In summary, the research has broad implications, ranging from waste management and biochar production efficiency to potential applications in soil improvement and environmental remediation. Further, it contributes to the ongoing efforts to develop sustainable solutions for waste disposal and environmental conservation.
ZamroniMPraharaRSKartikoA, et al.The waste management program of 3R (Reduce, Reuse, Recycle) by economic incentive and facility support. J Phys: Conf Ser2020; 1471: 012048. IOP Publishing.
2.
ParkSHLeeCRHongSK. Implications of agar and agarase in industrial applications of sustainable marine biomass. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol2020; 104: 2815–2832.
3.
YekkalarMPanahiSNikravanM. Evaluation of current laboratory waste management: a step towards green campus at amirkabir university of technology. Implementing Campus Greening Initiatives: Approaches, Methods and Perspectives2015 [cited 2024 Aug 26]: 215–227. Springer. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11961-8_17
4.
ZahariMSJaafarIIsmailS, et al.Laboratory waste management and treatment. In: Industrial waste engineering. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2024, pp.397–439. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-46747-9_9
5.
HatamiMASabourMRNikravanM. A systematic analysis of research trends on incineration during 2000–2019. Int J Environ Sci Technol2021; 18: 353–364.
6.
SunHGaoLXueC,et al.Marine-polysaccharide degrading enzymes: status and prospects. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf2020; 19: 2767–2796.
7.
ChenXFuXHuangL, et al.Agar oligosaccharides: a review of preparation, structures, bioactivities and application. Carbohydr Polym2021; 265: 118076.
8.
SelvamSMJanakiramanTParamasivanB. Characterization of engineered corn cob biochar produced in allothermal pyrolysis reactor. Mater Today Proc2021; 47: 312–317.
9.
ZahidMUPervaizEHussainA, et al.Synthesis of carbon nanomaterials from different pyrolysis techniques: a review. Mater Res Express2018; 5: 052002.
10.
SelvamSMBalasubramanianP. Emerging trends and research frontiers of biochar derived through microwave assisted pyrolysis: a scientometric review. Bioresour Technol Rep2023; 24: 101601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biteb.2023.101601
11.
MishraSUpadhyayRK. Review on biomass gasification: gasifiers, gasifying mediums, and operational parameters. Mater Sci Energy Technol2021; 4: 329–340.
12.
SiddiquaAHahladakisJNAl-AttiyaWA. An overview of the environmental pollution and health effects associated with waste landfilling and open dumping. Environ Sci Pollut Res2022; 29: 58514–58536.
13.
AdegokeKAAduFAOyebamijiAK, et al.Microplastics toxicity, detection, and removal from water/wastewater. Mar Pollut Bull2023; 187: 114546.
14.
SinghPRawatSJainN, et al.A review on biochar composites for soil remediation applications: Comprehensive solution to contemporary challenges. J Environ Chem Eng2023; 110635. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2023.110635
15.
PalansooriyaKNOkYSAwadYM, et al.Impacts of biochar application on upland agriculture: a review. J Environ Manage2019; 234: 52–64.
16.
SwagathnathGRangabhashiyamSMuruganS,et al.Influence of biochar application on growth of Oryza sativa and its associated soil microbial ecology. Biomass Convers Bioref2019; 9: 341–352.
17.
SolaimanZMMurphyDVAbbottLK. Biochars influence seed germination and early growth of seedlings. Plant Soil2012; 353: 273–287.
18.
DaiYZhengHJiangZ,et al.Combined effects of biochar properties and soil conditions on plant growth: a meta-analysis. Sci Total Environ2020; 713: 136635.
19.
El SayedAMHamadKHEidY, et al.Production of paper using chemical pulping process of sugarcane bagasse. International Journal of Industry and Sustainable Development2022; 3: 57–65.
20.
MotghareKARathodAPWaghmareSS, et al.Performance evaluation and heat transfer studies on biomass gasifier cook-stove. International Journal of Application or Innovation in Engineering & Management2015; 4: 352–361.
21.
SelvamSMParamasivanB. Evaluation of influential factors in microwave assisted pyrolysis of sugarcane bagasse for biochar production. Envt Technol & Innovat2021; 24:101939.
22.
SinghBDolkMMShenQ,et al.Biochar pH, electrical conductivity and liming potential. Biochar: A guide to analytical methods2017 Mar 1; 23: 23–38.
23.
LehmannJJosephS. Biochar for environmental management: an introduction. In: Biochar for environmental management. London, UK: Routledge, 2015 Feb 20, pp.1–13.
24.
SulimanWHarshJBAbu-LailNI, et al.The role of biochar porosity and surface functionality in augmenting hydrologic properties of a sandy soil. Sci Total Environ2017 Jan 1; 574: 139–147.
25.
GuptaGKRamMBalaR, et al.Pyrolysis of chemically treated corncob for biochar production and its application in Cr (VI) removal. Environ Prog Sustain Energy2018 Sep; 37: 1606–1617.
26.
SaikiaRChutiaRSKatakiR,et al.Perennial grass (Arundo donax L.) as a feedstock for thermo-chemical conversion to energy and materials. Biores. Technol2015; 188: 265–272.
27.
OlszykDMShiroyamaTNovakJM,et al.A rapid-test for screening biochar effects on seed germination. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal2018 Sep 8; 49: 2025–2041.
28.
BaliyanNDhimanSDheemanS, et al.Optimization of gibberellic acid production in endophytic Bacillus cereus using response surface methodology and its use as plant growth regulator in chickpea. J Plant Growth Regul2022 Oct; 41: 3019–3029.
29.
KamblePNGiriSPManeRS,et al.Estimation of chlorophyll content in young and adult leaves of some selected plants. Univers J Environ Res Technol2015 Dec 15; 5: 306–310.
30.
LawasKIDolienteSCarpioR, et al.Parametric study of corn cob biochar (CCBc) yield via microwave pyrolysis. MATEC Web of Conferences2019; 268: 04005. EDP Sciences.
31.
BeheraBDeyBBalasubramanianP. Algal biodiesel production with engineered biochar as a heterogeneous solid acid catalyst. Bioresour Technol2020 Aug 1; 310: 123392.
32.
Valera-MedinaAAmer-HatemFAzadAK, et al.Review on ammonia as a potential fuel: from synthesis to economics. Energy Fuels2021 Feb 28; 35: 6964–7029.
33.
AjienAIdrisJMd SofwanN, et al.Coconut shell and husk biochar: a review of production and activation technology, economic, financial aspect and application. Waste Manag Res2023; 41: 37–51.
34.
AtienzaAHOrculloJSalamatC, et al.Coconut shell feedstock based top lit updraft gasifier for biochar and heat cogeneration. J Phys Conf Ser2020; 1519: 012014.
35.
MillánLMRVargasFESNzihouA.Characterization of steam gasification biochars from lignocellulosic agrowaste towards soil applications. Waste Biomass Valorization2021; 12: 4141–4155.
36.
EndersAHanleyKWhitmanT, et al.Characterization of biochars to evaluate recalcitrance and agronomic performance. Bioresour Technol2012 Jun 1; 114: 644–653.
37.
AdekanyeTDadaOKolapoJ. Pyrolysis of maize cob at different temperatures for biochar production: proximate, ultimate and spectroscopic characterisation. Res Agric Eng2022 Jan 1; 68(1): 27–34. https://doi.org/10.17221/106/2020-RAE
38.
McDonald-WharryJSManley-HarrisMPickeringKL. Reviewing, combining, and updating the models for the nanostructure of non-graphitizing carbons produced from oxygen-containing precursors. Energy & Fuels2016 Oct 20; 30: 7811–7826.
39.
KhalediSDelbariMGalaviH, et al.Effects of biochar particle size, biochar application rate, and moisture content on thermal properties of an unsaturated sandy loam soil. Soil and Tillage Research2023 Feb 1; 226: 105579.
40.
FanJLiYYuH, et al.Using sewage sludge with high ash content for biochar production and Cu (II) sorption. Sci Total Environ2020 Apr 15; 713: 136663.
41.
AllenJADownieAE. Predicting slow pyrolysis process outcomes with simplified empirical correlations for a consistent higher heating temperature: biochar yield and ash content. Energy Fuels2020 Nov 9; 34: 14223–14231.
42.
HongMZhangLTanZ,et al.Effect mechanism of biochar’s zeta potential on farmland soil’s cadmium immobilization. Environmental Science and Pollution Research2019 Jul 1; 26: 19738–19748.
43.
FahmiAHJolHSinghD. Physical modification of biochar to expose the inner pores and their functional groups to enhance lead adsorption. RSC Adv2018; 8: 38270–38280.
44.
Farhangi-AbrizSGhassemi-GolezaniK. Improving electrochemical characteristics of plant roots by biochar is an efficient mechanism in increasing cations uptake by plants. Chemosphere2023 Feb 1; 313: 137365.
LiuZDuganBMasielloCA,et al.Biochar particle size, shape, and porosity act together to influence soil water properties. Plos one2017 Jun 9; 12: e0179079.
47.
Blanco-CanquiH. Biochar and soil physical properties. Soil Sci Soc Am J2017 Jul; 81: 687–711.
48.
ChenJWangPDingL, et al.The comparison study of multiple biochar stability assessment methods. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis2021 Jun 1; 156: 105070.
49.
CraswellETChalkPMKaudalBB. Role of 15N in tracing biologically driven nitrogen dynamics in soils amended with biochar: a review. Soil Biol Biochem2021 Nov 1; 162: 108416.
50.
AnthonysamySILahijaniPMohammadiM,et al.Low temperature adsorption of nitric oxide on cerium impregnated biomass-derived biochar. Korean J Chem Eng2020; 37: 130–140.
51.
ChenXFuXHuangL, et al.Agar oligosaccharides: a review of preparation, structures, bioactivities and application. Carbohydr Polym2021 Aug 1; 265: 118076.
52.
DeviPSarohaAK. Effect of temperature on biochar properties during paper mill sludge pyrolysis. International Journal of ChemTech Research2013 Mar; 5: 682–687.
53.
ParkJHWangJJKimSH, et al.Cadmium adsorption characteristics of biochars derived using various pine tree residues and pyrolysis temperatures. J Colloid Interface Sci2019; 553: 298–307.
54.
TaherymoosaviSJosephSMunroeP. Characterization of organic compounds in a mixed feedstock biochar generated from Australian agricultural residues. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis2016; 120: 441–449.
55.
RoyHIslamMSArifinMT,et al.Synthesis, characterization and sorption properties of biochar, chitosan and ZnO-based binary composites towards a cationic dye. Sustainability2022; 14: 14571.
56.
ArwenyoBVarcoJJDygertA, et al.Uptake of phosphorus from modified P-enriched Douglas Fir biochar and Its effects on crop growth and P use efficiency. J Geosci Environ Prot2022; 10: 207–229. https://doi.org/10.4236/gep.2022.109013
57.
LeeYEJoJHKimIT,et al.Influence of NaCl concentration on food-waste biochar structure and templating effects. Energies2018; 11: 2341.
58.
AzizNAMohamedHKaniaD, et al.Bioenergy production by integrated microwave-assisted torrefaction and pyrolysis. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev2024 Mar 1; 191: 114097.
59.
HuangYFChiuehPTKuanWH,et al.Microwave pyrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass: heating performance and reaction kinetics. Energy2016; 100: 137–144.
60.
SarkarJKWangQ. Different pyrolysis process conditions of south Asian waste coconut shell and characterization of gas, bio-char, and bio-oil. Energies2020; 13: 1970.
61.
WallaceCAAfzalMTSahaGC. Effect of feedstock and microwave pyrolysis temperature on physio-chemical and nano-scale mechanical properties of biochar. Bioresources and Bioprocessing2019; 6(33): 1–1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40643-019-0268-2
62.
JefferySMemelinkIHodgsonE, et al.Initial biochar effects on plant productivity derive from N fertilization. Plant Soil2017; 415: 435–448.
63.
TomarMChaplotPCChoudharyJ, et al.Effect of salicylic acid and biochar on nutrient content and uptake of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) under rainfed condition. Biol Forum2022; 14: 613–616.
64.
JukantiAKGaurPMGowdaCLL,et al.Nutritional quality and health benefits of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.): a review. Br J Nutr2012; 108: S11–S26.
65.
ShackleySCarterSKnowlesT, et al.Sustainable gasification–biochar systems? A case-study of rice-husk gasification in Cambodia, part II: field trial results, carbon abatement, economic assessment and conclusions. Energy Policy2012; 41: 618–623.
66.
HansenVMüller-StöverDAhrenfeldtJ, et al.Gasification biochar as a valuable by-product for carbon sequestration and soil amendment. Biomass Bioenergy2015; 72: 300–308.
67.
MurtazaGAhmedZUsmanM, et al.Biochar induced modifications in soil properties and its impacts on crop growth and production. J Plant Nutr2021; 44: 1677–1691.
68.
WenPWuZHanY, et al.Microwave-assisted synthesis of a novel biochar-based slow-release nitrogen fertilizer with enhanced water-retention capacity. ACS Sustain Chem Eng2017; 5: 7374–7382.
69.
NocentiniMMastrolonardoGMichelozziM, et al.Effects of biochar and compost addition in potting substrates on growth and volatile compounds profile of basil (Ocimum basilicum L.). J Sci Food Agric2023; 104(3): 1609–1620. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.13045
70.
IacominoGCozzolinoAIdbellaM, et al.Potential of biochar as a peat substitute in growth media for Lavandula angustifolia, Salvia rosmarinus and Fragaria× ananassa. Plants2023; 12: 3689. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12213689
71.
LiaoJXSoPSBordoloiS, et al.Plant performance and soil–plant carbon relationship response to different biochar types. Biochar2024; 6: 75.
