Digitalization's role in shaping climate change,renewable energy,and technological innovation for achieving sustainable development in top Asian countries
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online May, 2026
Digitalization's role in shaping climate change,renewable energy,and technological innovation for achieving sustainable development in top Asian countries
Digitalization has emerged as a key player in reducing pollution and fostering a shift towards a low-carbon economy. However, its effectiveness in enhancing environmental sustainability hinges on the collaborative efforts of various economic stakeholders and their engagement with digital technologies. This research delves into the role of digitalization in advancing green innovation and facilitating the transition to renewable energy, focusing on its impact on environmental sustainability. Analyzing data from leading Asian countries from 1990 to 2022 through Panel quantile regression, the study reveals that digitalization significantly boosts environmental sustainability with green innovation and energy transition efforts. The findings highlight that green innovation is critical in diminishing ecological degradation, with notable effects (−0.085%, −0.104%, and −0.028%) across different quantiles, decreasing resource consumption and fostering sustainability. Furthermore, the shift towards renewable energy contributes to a cleaner environment by supporting decarbonization initiatives, thereby lessening environmental degradation. The analysis demonstrates that digitalization (−0.002%, −0.015%, −0.006%) curtails environmental degradation across various quantiles. Importantly, digitalization's interaction with green innovation and renewable energy acts synergistically to curb ecological degradation in Asia's leading economies. The study suggests that policy integration involving digitalization and green innovation could yield more excellent environmental benefits than the isolated impact of digitalization. By enhancing efficiency, optimizing resource utilization, encouraging the uptake of renewable energy, and fostering sustainable practices, the combined effect of digitalization and green initiatives offers substantial prospects for reducing environmental degradation. Consequently, policy frameworks that incorporate digitalization can significantly improve environmental quality.
ShilkyPatraSEkkaP, et al.Climate change: A Major challenge to biodiversity conservation, ecological services, and sustainable development. In: The palgrave handbook of socio-ecological resilience in the face of climate change: Contexts from a developing country. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore, 2023, pp.577–592. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-2206-2_33
2.
Al-EmranMGriffy-BrownC. The role of technology adoption in sustainable development: Overview, opportunities, challenges, and future research agendas. Technol Soc2023; 73: 102240.
BlazquezJFuentesRManzanoB. On some economic principles of the renewable energy. Energy Policy2020; 147: 111807.
5.
KangMZhaoWJiaL,et al.Balancing carbon emission reductions and social economic development for sustainable development: Experience from 24 countries. Chin Geogr Sci2020; 30: 379–396.
6.
MensahCNLongXBoamahKB, et al.The effect of innovation on CO 2 emissions of OCED countries from 1990 to 2014. Environ Sci Pollut Res2018; 25: 29678–29698.
7.
ShahbazMAl-AnsariTAslamM, et al.A state of the art review on biomass processing and conversion technologies to produce hydrogen and its recovery via membrane separation. Int J Hydrogen Energy2020; 45: 15166–15195.
8.
KhattakSIAhmadMKhanZU,et al.Exploring the impact of innovation, renewable energy consumption, and income on CO2 emissions: New evidence from the BRICS economies. Environ Sci Pollut Res2020; 27: 13866–13881.
9.
DebnathBDasAChowdaryPA,et al.(eds). Technological Advancement in E-waste Management: Towards Smart, Sustainable, and Intelligent Systems. Abingdon: CRC Press, 2023.
10.
ShenJRidwanLIRaimiL,et al.Recent developments in green hydrogen–environmental sustainability nexus amidst energy efficiency, green finance, eco-innovation, and digitalization in top hydrogen-consuming economies. Energy Environ2023: 0958305X231153936.
11.
MahoreSMahoreRYDhobleSJ. Economics of electronic waste (e-waste): A critical review of negative externalities and the circular economy. In: 360-Degree Waste management. Fundamentals, Agricultural and Domestic Waste, and Remediation, Elsevier, 2023, Vol. 1, pp.215–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-90760-6.00003-5.
12.
AdhaRHongCYAgrawalS,et al.ICT, carbon emissions, climate change, and energy demand nexus: The potential benefit of digitalization in Taiwan. Energy Environ2023; 34: 1619–1638.
13.
JahangerAUsmanM. Investigating the role of information and communication technologies, economic growth, and foreign direct investment in the mitigation of ecological damages for achieving sustainable development goals. Eval Rev2023; 47: 653–679.
14.
WangAShanSIbrahimRL,et al.A new look at environmental sustainability from the lens of green policies, eco-digitalization, affluence, and urbanization: Empirical insights from BRICS economies. Energy Environ2023: 0958305X231177736.
15.
WangFRaniTRazzaqA. Environmental impact of fiscal decentralization, green technology innovation and institution’s efficiency in developed countries using advance panel modelling. Energy Environ2023; 34: 1006–1030.
16.
WangQZhangFLiR. Revisiting the environmental kuznets curve hypothesis in 208 counties: The roles of trade openness, human capital, renewable energy and natural resource rent. Environ Res2023; 216: 114637.
17.
DanishKhanNBalochMA, et al.The effect of ICT on CO2 emissions in emerging economies: Does the level of income matters?Environ Sci Pollut Res2018; 25: 22850–22860.
18.
DestekMASinhaA. Renewable, non-renewable energy consumption, economic growth, trade openness and CO2: Evidence from organisation for economic co-operation and development countries. J Cleaner Prod2020; 242: 118537.
19.
BadiMSwethaSGMahapatraS,et al.Innovation, opportunities, and ongoing challenges of AI and IOE in the power and energy sector. In: Applications of big data and artificial intelligence in smart energy systems. River Publishers, 2023, pp.1–25.
20.
ElavarasanRMAfridhisSVijayaraghavanRR, et al.SWOT Analysis: A framework for comprehensive evaluation of drivers and barriers for renewable energy development in significant countries. Energy Reports2020; 6: 1838–1864.
21.
AsgharRSulaimanMHMustaffaZ, et al.The important contribution of renewable energy technologies in overcoming Pakistan's energy crisis: Present challenges and potential opportunities. Energy Environ2023; 34: 3450–3494.
22.
GençerETorkamaniSMillerI, et al.Sustainable energy system analysis modeling environment: Analyzing life cycle emissions of the renewable energy. Appl Energy2020; 277: 115550.
23.
CardosoMBGonzálezAD. Residential renewable energy and thermal efficiency in an arid environment of northeast Patagonia, Argentina. Energy Sustain Dev2019; 50: 82–90.
24.
BalochMAMahmoodNZhangJW. Effect of natural resources, renewable energy and economic development on CO2 emissions in BRICS countries. Sci Total Environ2019; 678: 632–638.
25.
KokkinosKKarayannisVMoustakasK. Circular bio-economy via renewable energy supported by fuzzy cognitive map modeling towards sustainable low-carbon environment. Sci Total Environ2020; 721: 137754.
26.
PoruschiLAmbreyCL. Energy justice, the built environment, and solar photovoltaic (PV) renewable energys in urban Australia: A dynamic panel data analysis. Energy Res Soc Sci2019; 48: 22–32.
27.
LiRLiLWangQ. The impact of energy efficiency on carbon emissions: Evidence from the transportation sector in Chinese 30 provinces. Sustainable Cities Soc2022; 82: 103880.
28.
CaglarAEMertMBolukG. Testing the role of information and communication technologies and renewable energy consumption in CO2 quality: Evidence from world top 10 pollutant footprint countries. J Cleaner Prod2021; 298: 126784.
29.
MujtabaAJenaPKBekunFV, et al.Symmetric and asymmetric impact of economic growth, capital formation, renewable and non-renewable energy consumption on environment in OECD countries. Renew Sustain Energy Rev2022; 160: 112300.
30.
BekunFVGyamfiBAOnifadeST,et al.Beyond the environmental kuznets curve in E7 economies: Accounting for the combined impacts of institutional quality and renewables. J Cleaner Prod2021; 314: 127924.
31.
SunYAnwarARazzaqA, et al. Asymmetric role of renewable energy, green innovation, and globalization in deriving environmental sustainability: Evidence from top-10 polluted countries. Renew Energy2022; 185: 280–290.
32.
CaoHKhanMKRehmanA, et al.Impact of globalization, institutional quality, economic growth, electricity and renewable energy consumption on carbon dioxide emission in OECD countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res2022; 29: 24191–24202.
33.
FengSChongYYuH, et al.Digital financial development and CO2: Evidence from green-biased technology innovation and environmental inclusion. J Cleaner Prod2022; 380: 135069.
34.
FatimaTShahzadUCuiL. Renewable and nonrenewable energy consumption, trade and CO2 emissions in high emitter countries: Does the income level matter?J Environ Planning Manage2021; 64: 1227–1251.
35.
HusainiDHLeanHH. Digitalization and energy sustainability in ASEAN. Resour Conserv Recycl2022; 184: 106377.
36.
Wolde-RufaelYMulat-WeldemeskelE. The moderating role of environmental tax and renewable energy in CO2 emissions in Latin America and Caribbean countries: evidence from method of moments quantile regression. Environ Chall2022; 6: 100412.
37.
UsmanAOzturkIHassanA, et al. The effect of ICT on energy consumption and economic growth in South Asian economies: an empirical analysis. Telemat Inform2021; 58: 101537.
38.
ZhangYMaXPangJ, et al.The impact of digital transformation of manufacturing on corporate performance—the mediating effect of business model innovation and the moderating effect of innovation capability. Res Int Bus Finance2023; 64: 101890.
39.
LinBZhuJ. Determinants of renewable energy technological innovation in China under CO2 emissions constraint. J Environ Manage2019; 247: 662–671.
40.
GormusSAydinM. Revisiting the environmental kuznets curve hypothesis using innovation: New evidence from the top 10 innovative economies. Environ Sci Pollut Res2020; 27: 27904–27913.
41.
KamyabHSaberiKamarposhtiMHashimH,et al.Carbon dynamics in agricultural greenhouse gas emissions and removals: A comprehensive review. Carbon Lett2024; 34: 265–289.
42.
BashirMFMaBBashirMA, et al.Investigating the role of environmental taxes and regulations for renewable energy consumption: Evidence from developed economies. Econ Res-Ekonomska Istraživanja2022; 35: 1262–1284.
43.
BashirMFSadiqMTalbiB, et al.An outlook on the development of renewable energy, policy measures to reshape the current energy mix, and how to achieve sustainable economic growth in the post COVID-19 era. Environ Sci Pollut Res2022b; 29: 43636–43647.
44.
BashirMFMaBShahbazM, et al.The nexus between environmental tax and carbon emissions with the roles of environmental technology and financial development. Plos One2020; 15(11): e0242412.
45.
AhmedZZafarMWAliS. Linking urbanization, human capital, and the CO2 in G7 countries: An empirical analysis. Sustainable Cities Soc2020; 55: 102064.
46.
AhmadMWuY. Combined role of green productivity growth, economic globalization, and eco-innovation in achieving ecological sustainability for OECD economies. J Environ Manag2022; 302: 113980.
47.
XueLZhangQZhangX, et al. Can digital transformation promote green technology innovation?Sustainability2022; 14: 7497.
48.
WangQHuSLiR. Could information and communication technology (ICT) reduce carbon emissions? The role of trade openness and financial development. Telecomm Policy2024; 48: 102699.
49.
WangQZhangFLiR. Free trade and carbon emissions revisited: The asymmetric impacts of trade diversification and trade openness. Sustainable Dev2024; 32: 876–901.
50.
WangQZhangFLiR, et al.Does artificial intelligence facilitate the energy transition and curb carbon emissions? The role of trade openness. J Cleaner Prod2024; 447: 141298. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.141298
51.
GodilDISharifAAliMI, et al.The role of financial development, R&D expenditure, globalization and institutional quality in energy consumption in India: New evidence from the QARDL approach. J Environ Manag2021; 285: 112208.
52.
SuJSuK. Does the digital economy promote industrial structural upgrading? -A test of mediating effects based on heterogeneous technological innovation. Sustainability2021; 13(18): 10105.
53.
MatthewsRW. Modelling of energy and carbon budgets of wood fuel coppice systems. Biomass Bioenergy2001; 21(1): 1–19.
54.
Al-MulaliUSheau-TingLOzturkI. The global move toward internet shopping and its influence on pollution: An empirical analysis. Environ Sci Pollut Res2015; 22: 9717–9727.
55.
CoroamaVCHiltyLMBirtelM. Effects of internet-based multiple-site conferences on greenhouse gas emissions. Telemat Inform2012; 29: 362–374.
56.
MonzonAAlonsoALopez-LambasM. Joint analysis of intermodal long distance-last mile trips using urban interchanges in EU cities. Transportation Research Procedia2017; 27: 1074–1079.
57.
LengJRuanGJiangP, et al. Blockchain-empowered sustainable manufacturing and product lifecycle management in industry 4.0: A survey. Renew Sustain Energy Rev2020; 132: 110112.
58.
MaoSWangBTangY, et al. Opportunities and challenges of artificial intelligence for green manufacturing in the process industry. Engineering2019; 5(6): 995–1002.
59.
EsmaeilianBWangBLewisK, et al.The future of waste management in smart and sustainable cities: A review and concept paper. Waste Manage2018; 81: 177–195.
60.
Danish. Effects of information and communication technology and real income on CO2 emissions: The experience of countries along belt and road. Telemat Inform2019; 45: 101300.
61.
HaseebAXiaESaudS, et al.Does information and communication technologies improve environmental quality in the era of globalization? An empirical analysis. Environ Sci Pollut Res2019; 26: 8594–8608.
62.
ChienFAnwarAHsuCC, et al.The role of information and communication technology in encountering environmental degradation: Proposing an SDG framework for the BRICS countries. Technol Soc2021; 65: 101587.
63.
HischierRReichartI. Multifunctional electronic media-traditional media: The Problem of an Adequate Functional Unit A case study of a printed newspaper, an internet newspaper and a TV broadcast. Int J Life Cycle Assess2003; 8: 201–208.
64.
AvomDNkengfackHFotioHK,et al.ICT And environmental quality in sub-saharan Africa: Effects and transmission channels. Technol Forecast Soc Change2020; 155: 120028.
65.
LiuJYuQChenY,et al.The impact of digital technology development on carbon emissions: A spatial effect analysis for China. Resour Conserv Recycl2022; 185: 106445.
66.
MukhutySUpadhyayARothwellH. Strategic sustainable development of industry 4.0 through the lens of social responsibility: The role of human resource practices. Bus Strategy Environ2022; 31: 2068–2081.
MyovellaGKaracukaMHaucapJ. Digitalization and economic growth: A comparative analysis of sub-saharan Africa and OECD economies. Telecomm Policy2020; 44: 101856.
70.
MiaoZChenX. Combining parametric and non-parametric approach, variable & source-specific productivity changes and rebound effect of energy & environment. Technol Forecast Soc Change2022; 175: 121368.
71.
LangeSPohlJSantariusT. Digitalization and energy consumption. Does ICT reduce energy demand?Ecol Econ2020; 176: 106760.
72.
RenSHaoYXuL, et al.Digitalization and energy: How does internet development affect China's energy consumption?Energy Econ2021; 98: 105220.
73.
KarlilarSBalcilarMEmirF. Environmental sustainability in the OECD: The power of digitalization, green innovation, renewable energy and financial development. Telecomm Policy2023; 47: 102568.
74.
HashmiRAlamK. Dynamic relationship among environmental regulation, innovation, CO2 emissions, population, and economic growth in OECD countries: A panel investigation. J Cleaner Prod2019; 231: 1100–1109.
75.
HuangYHaseebMUsmanM,et al.Dynamic association between ICT, renewable energy, economic complexity and CO2: Is there any difference between E-7 (developing) and G-7 (developed) countries?Technol Soc2022; 68: 101853.
76.
KwilinskiALyulyovOPimonenkoT. Environmental sustainability within attaining sustainable development goals: The role of digitalization and the transport sector. Sustainability2023; 15: 11282.
77.
RaniTWangFRaufF, et al.Linking personal remittance and fossil fuels energy consumption to environmental degradation: Evidence from all SAARC countries. Environ Dev Sustainability2023; 25: 8447–8468.
