How do high-tech industry,energy efficiency (gas and oil),and social globalization affect load capacity factor in Saudi Arabia? A Time-varying quantile regression
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online March, 2026
How do high-tech industry,energy efficiency (gas and oil),and social globalization affect load capacity factor in Saudi Arabia? A Time-varying quantile regression
The significant allure of widely available fossil energy sources at a reasonable cost engenders formidable impediments to the transition toward renewable energy sources in Saudi Arabia, one of the world's foremost energy-producing nations. Mitigating the escalating levels of emissions and addressing the substantial ecological deficits requires a comprehensive investigation of the prospective contributions of energy efficiency and high-tech industry as integral components in the strategic response to environmental challenges. In light of this, our current study employs quarterly data spanning from 1990 to 2021 and introduces an innovative approach known as time-varying quantile regression (TVQR), which has not been previously utilized in the existing literature. We complement this with time-varying nonparametric quantile causality to assess the impacts of disaggregated energy efficiency, the high-tech industry, and social globalization on ecological quality (proxied by load capacity factor (LF)) across different quantiles and time intervals in Saudi Arabia. Our TVQR analysis reveals that both the high-tech industry and oil and gas efficiency have a positive impact on environmental quality, as evidenced by their ability to enhance the LF indicator across a significant portion of quantiles and time intervals. Conversely, economic growth and social globalization have a negative impact on environmental quality. Additionally, the selected explanatory variables exhibit significant predictive power over LF across various time frames and quantiles. Lastly, we have formulated a comprehensive policy framework aimed at enhancing ecological quality.
ÇitilMİlbasmışMOlanrewajuVO, et al.Does green finance and institutional quality play an important role in air quality. Environ Sci Pollut Res2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-26016-2
3.
DaiJAhmedZAlvaradoR,et al.Assessing the nexus between human capital, green energy, and load capacity factor: policymaking for achieving sustainable development goals. Gondwana Res2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2023.04.009
KanatOYanZAsgharMM, et al.Do natural gas, oil, and coal consumption ameliorate environmental quality? Empirical evidence from Russia. Environ Sci Pollut Res2022; 29: 4540–4556.
6.
AkramRChenFKhalidF, et al.Heterogeneous effects of energy efficiency and renewable energy on carbon emissions: evidence from developing countries. J Cleaner Prod2020a; 247: 119122.
7.
AkramRChenFKhalidF, et al.Heterogeneous effects of energy efficiency and renewable energy on carbon emissions: evidence from developing countries. J Cleaner Prod2020b; 247: 119122.
8.
JinXAhmedZKorkutU, et al.Do investments in green energy, energy efficiency, and nuclear energy R & D improve the load capacity factor? An augmented ARDL approach. Geosci Front2023a: 101646. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2023.101646
9.
JinXAhmedZPataUK, et al.Do investments in green energy, energy efficiency, and nuclear energy R&D improve the load capacity factor? An augmented ARDL approach. Geosci Front2023b: 101646. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2023.101646
10.
XuBLinB. Investigating the role of high-tech industry in reducing China’s CO2 emissions: a regional perspective. J Cleaner Prod2018a; 177: 169–177.
11.
XuBLinB. Investigating the role of high-tech industry in reducing China’s CO2 emissions: a regional perspective. J Cleaner Prod2018b; 177: 169–177.
12.
ShahzadUFerrazDNguyenHH,et al.Investigating the spill overs and connectedness between financial globalization, high-tech industries and environmental footprints: fresh evidence in context of China. Technol Forecast Soc Change2022a; 174: 121205.
13.
ShahzadUFerrazDNguyenH-H,et al.Investigating the spill overs and connectedness between financial globalization, high-tech industries and environmental footprints: fresh evidence in context of China. Technol Forecast Soc Change2022b; 174: 121205.
14.
RudolphAFiggeL. Determinants of ecological footprints: what is the role of globalization?Ecol Indic2017; 81: 348–361.
15.
AhmedZWangZMahmoodF, et al.Does globalization increase the ecological footprint? Empirical evidence from Malaysia. Environ Sci Pollut Res2019; 26: 18565–18582.
16.
DoganAPataUK. The role of ICT, R&D spending and renewable energy consumption on environmental quality: testing the LCC hypothesis for G7 countries. J Cleaner Prod2022; 380: 135038.
17.
ShangYRazzaqAChupraditS, et al.The role of renewable energy consumption and health expenditures in improving load capacity factor in ASEAN countries: exploring new paradigm using advance panel models. Renewable Energy2022; 191: 715–722.
18.
AdebayoTSPataUKAkadiriSS. A comparison of CO2 emissions, load capacity factor, and ecological footprint for Thailand’s environmental sustainability. Environ Develop Sustain2022: 0123456789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-022-02810-9
19.
AkadiriSSAdebayoTSRitiJS, et al.The effect of financial globalization and natural resource rent on load capacity factor in India: an analysis using the dual adjustment approach. Environ Sci Pollut Res2022; 29: 89045–89062.
20.
KahouliBHamdiBNaflaA,et al.Investigating the relationship between ICT, green energy, total factor productivity, and ecological footprint: empirical evidence from Saudi Arabia. Energy Strategy Rev2022; 42: 100871.
21.
XuZBalochMA, Danish, et al.Nexus between financial development and CO2 emissions in Saudi Arabia: analyzing the role of globalization. Environ Sci Pollut Res2018; 25: 28378–28390.
RafiqueMZSchneiderNShahzadU,et al.High-tech industries, financial expansion, and low-carbon energy deployment along the belt and road initiative. Sustain Dev2022; 30: 1779–1795.
27.
WangZGaoLWeiZ, et al.How FDI and technology innovation mitigate CO2 emissions in high-tech industries: evidence from province-level data of China. Environ Sci Pollut Res2022; 29: 4641–4653.
28.
AnserMKKhanKAUmarM, et al.Formulating sustainable development policy for a developed nation: exploring the role of renewable energy, natural gas efficiency and oil efficiency towards decarbonization. Int J Sustain Dev World Ecol2023; 0: 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2023.2268586
29.
AkdagSYıldırımH. Toward a sustainable mitigation approach of energy efficiency to greenhouse gas emissions in the European countries. Heliyon2020; 6: e03396.
30.
BishtRPitchforthEMurraySF. Understanding India, globalisation and health care systems: a mapping of research in the social sciences. Global Health2012; 8: 32.
31.
SharifASaqibNDongK,et al.Nexus between green technology innovation, green financing, and CO2 emissions in the G7 countries: the moderating role of social globalisation. Sustain Dev2022a; 30: 1934–1946.
32.
AlariqiMLongWSinghPR, et al.Modelling dynamic links among energy transition, technological level and economic development from the perspective of economic globalisation: evidence from MENA economies. Energy Rep2023; 9: 3920–3931.
33.
DuLJiangHAdebayoTS, et al.Asymmetric effects of high-tech industry and renewable energy on consumption-based carbon emissions in MINT countries. Renew Energy2022; 196: 1269–1280.
34.
ShiMJiaZMehmoodU. Exploring the roles of green finance and environmental regulations on CO2es: defining the roles of social and economic globalization in the next eleven nations. Environ Sci Pollut Res2023; 30: 62967–62980.
35.
WangZChenXUllahS,et al.Resource curse or blessing? Evaluating the role of natural resource, social globalization, and environmental sustainability in China. Resources Policy2023; 85: 103749.
36.
KirikkaleliDAdebayoTS. Political risk and environmental quality in Brazil: role of green finance and green innovation. Int J Finance Econ2023; 5. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijfe.2732
37.
SharifASaqibNDongK,et al.Nexus between green technology innovation, green financing, and CO2 emissions in the G7 countries: the moderating role of social globalisation. Sustain Dev2022b; 4: 12–24.
38.
LiuXAdebayoTSRamzanM, et al.Do coal efficiency, climate policy uncertainty and green energy consumption promote environmental sustainability in the United States? An application of novel wavelet tools. J Cleaner Prod2023; 417: 137851.
39.
AlolaAAÖzkanOUsmanO. Role of non-renewable energy efficiency and renewable energy in driving environmental sustainability in India: evidence from the load capacity factor hypothesis. Energies2023b; 16: Article 6.
40.
NaimogluMAkalM. The relationship between energy technology, energy efficiency, renewable energy, and the environment in Türkiye. J Cleaner Prod2023; 418: 138144.
41.
ZhangYLiLSadiqM,et al.Impact of a sharing economy on sustainable development and energy efficiency: evidence from the top ten Asian economies. J Innov Knowledge2023; 8: 100320.
42.
AdebayoTSUllahS. Towards a sustainable future: the role of energy efficiency, renewable energy, and urbanization in limiting CO2 emissions in Sweden. Sustain Dev2023; 3. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2658
43.
OlanrewajuVOIrfanMAltuntaşM, et al.Towards sustainable environment in G7 nations: the role of renewable energy consumption, eco-innovation and trade openness. Front Environ Sci2022; 10. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2022.925822
44.
OjekemiOSRjoubHAwosusiAA,et al.Toward a sustainable environment and economic growth in BRICS economies: do innovation and globalization matter?Environ Sci Pollut Res2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-19742-6
45.
AwosusiAAOzdeserHSerajM,et al.Can green resource productivity, renewable energy, and economic globalization drive the pursuit of carbon neutrality in the top energy transition economies?Int J Sustain Dev World Ecol2023; 0: 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2023.2192007
46.
OyebanjiMOKirikkaleliDAyobamijiAA. Consumption-based CO2 emissions in Denmark: the role of financial stability and energy productivity. Integr Environ Assess Manag2023; n/a. https://doi.org/10.1002/ieam.4757
47.
AdebayoTS. Environmental consequences of fossil fuel in Spain amidst renewable energy consumption: a new insights from the wavelet-based Granger causality approach. Int J Sustain Dev World Ecol2022; 29: 579–592.
PataUKIsikC. Determinants of the load capacity factor in China: a novel dynamic ARDL approach for ecological footprint accounting. Resources Policy2021; 74: 102313.
50.
AlolaAAÖzkanOUsmanO. Examining crude oil price outlook amidst substitute energy price and household energy expenditure in the USA: a novel nonparametric multivariate QQR approach. Energy Economics2023a; 120: 106613.
OzkanOSharifAMeyLS, et al. The dynamic role of green technological innovation, financial development and trade openness on urban environmental degradation in China: Fresh insights from carbon efficiency. Urban Climate2023; 52: 101679. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.uclim.2023.101679
54.
KoenkerR. A note on studentizing a test for heteroscedasticity. J Econom1981; 17: 107–112.
55.
AkhayereEKartalMTAdebayoTS, et al. Role of energy consumption and trade openness towards environmental sustainability in Turkey. Environmental Science and Pollution Research2023; 30(8): 21156–21168. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-23639-9
56.
KoenkerRHallockKF. Quantile regression. Journal of Economic Perspectives2001; 15(4): 143–156.
57.
YuILuT. The relationship between economic growth, energy consumption, and CO2 emissions: Empirical evidence from China. Science of the Total Environment2004; 542: 360–371.
58.
OlanipekunIOOzkanOOlasehinde-WilliamsG. Is renewable energy use lowering resource-related uncertainties. Energy2023; 2(6): 126–137.
59.
LeeC-COlasehinde-WilliamsGÖzkanO. Geopolitical oil price uncertainty transmission into core inflation: evidence from two of the biggest global players. Energy Econ2023; 126: 106983.
60.
Olasehinde-WilliamsGÖzkanOAkadiriSS. Effects of climate policy uncertainty on sustainable investment: a dynamic analysis for the U.S. Environ Sci Pollut Res2023; 30: 55326–55339.
61.
BalcilarMGuptaRPierdziochC. Does uncertainty move the gold price? New evidence from a nonparametric causality-in-quantiles test. Resources Policy2016; 49: 74–80.
62.
NishiyamaYHitomiKKawasakiY,et al.A consistent nonparametric test for nonlinear causality—specification in time series regression. J Econom2011; 165: 112–127.
63.
JeongKHärdleWKSongS. A consistent nonparametric test for causality in quantile. Econ Theory2012; 28: 861–887.
64.
BirindelliGMiazzaAPaimanovaV, et al. Just “blah blah blah”? Stock market expectations and reactions to COP26. International Review of Financial Analysis2023; 8(8): 102–122.
65.
BalcilarMOzdemirZA. Economic growth and energy consumption causal nexus viewed through a bootstrap rolling window. Energy Economics2010; 32(6): 1398–1410.
66.
BroockWAScheinkmanJADechertWD,et al.A test for independence based on the correlation dimension. Econom Rev1996; 15: 197–235.
67.
AndrewsDWKPlobergerW. Optimal tests when a nuisance parameter is present only under the alternative. Econometrica1994; 62: 1383–1414.
68.
AndrewsDWK. Tests for parameter instability and structural change with unknown change point. Econometrica1993; 61: 821–856.
69.
HansenB E. Approximate asymptotic p values for structuras-change tests. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics1997; 15(1): 60–67.
70.
SimNZhouH. Oil prices, US stock return, and the dependence between their quantiles. J Bank Financ2015; 55: 1–8.
71.
DasNMurshedMRejS, et al.Can clean energy adoption and international trade contribute to the achievement of India’s 2070 carbon neutrality agenda? Evidence using quantile ARDL measures. Int J Sustain Dev World Ecol2023; 30: 262–277.
72.
GalvaoAF. Unit root quantile autoregression testing using covariates. J Econom2009; 152: 165–178.
73.
YameogoCEWOmojolaibiJADaudaROS. Economic globalisation, institutions and environmental quality in sub-Saharan Africa. Res Global2021; 3: 100035.
74.
AdedoyinFFGumedeMIBekunFV, et al.Modelling coal rent, economic growth and CO2 emissions: does regulatory quality matter in BRICS economies?Sci Total Environ2020; 710: 136284.
75.
AhmedMGalalM. Using artificial neural networks to recognize the determinants of economic growth: new approach ‘evidence from developing countries’. Indian J Econ Business2021; 20. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5410524
76.
AkramRUmarMXiaoliG,et al.Dynamic linkages between energy efficiency, renewable energy along with economic growth and carbon emission. A case of MINT countries an asymmetric analysis. Energy Rep2022; 8: 2119–2130.
77.
Olasehinde-WilliamsGÖzkanO. A consideration of the environmental externality of Turkey’s integration into global value chains: evidence from dynamic ARDL simulation model. Environmental Science and Pollution Research2023; 30(11): 29154–29163.
78.
PataUKKartalMTUllahS. Enhancing environmental quality in the United States by linking biomass energy consumption and load capacity factor. Geoscience Frontiers2023; 14(3): 101–121.
