A pilot-scale bubble column contactor has been utilized for carbon dioxide chemisorption from simulated flue gas in the temperature range 30°C to 50°C. The influence of the most important operating parameters has been investigated. A total of 25 experiments were designed using the response surface methodology (RSM) and were then carried out in the bubble contact column. The results revealed that the liquid volume in the column, the alkaline concentration, and the temperature had a positive effect, while the gas hold-up had a negative effect on the CO2 removal efficiency. A statistical model has been developed using the RSM D-optimal experimental design method. To achieve the highest CO2 chemisorption, several operating conditions have been optimized. The model predicted that the maximum percentage of carbon dioxide removal would be 86.64%, and under the same operating conditions the experimental removal efficiency was 87.12%.
YuCHHuangCHTanCS. A review of CO2 capture by absorption and adsorption. Aerosol Air Qual Res2012; 12: 745–769.
2.
ChrysikopoulosSChountalasP. Integrating energy and environmental management systems to enable facilities to qualify for carbon funds. Energy Environ2018; 29: 938–956.
3.
EisenbergerPMCohenRWChichilniskyG, et al.Global warming and carbon-negative technology: prospects for a lower-cost route to a lower-risk atmosphere. Energy & Environment2009; 20: 973–984.
4.
PengYZhaoBLiL. Advance in post-combustion CO2 capture with alkaline solution: a brief review. Energy Procedia2012; 14: 1515–1522.
5.
WangMLawalAStephensonP, et al.Post-combustion CO2 capture with chemical absorption: a state-of-the-art review. Chem Eng Res Des2011; 89: 1609–1624.
6.
JossLGazzaniMMazzottiM. Rational design of temperature swing adsorption cycles for post-combustion CO2 capture. Chem Eng Sci2017; 158: 381–394.
7.
NawarAGhaediHAliM, et al.Recycling waste-derived marble powder for CO2 capture. Process Saf Environ Prot2019; 132: 214–225.
8.
ZhangWLiuHSunC, et al.Capturing CO2 from ambient air using a polyethyleneimine–silica adsorbent in fluidized beds. Chem Eng Sci2014; 116: 306–316.
9.
ZhaoCChenXAnthonyEJ, et al.Capturing CO2 in flue gas from fossil fuel-fired power plants using dry regenerable alkali metal-based sorbent. Progr Energy Comb Sci2013; 39: 515–534.
10.
ZhaoLZengGGuY, et al.Nature inspired fractal tree-like photobioreactor via 3D printing for CO2 capture by microaglae. Chem Eng Sci2019; 193: 6–14. ALGAL.
11.
ChenYXuCVaidyanathanS.Influence of gas management on biochemical conversion of CO2 by microalgae for biofuel production, Appl Energy2020; 261: 114420. ALGAL
12.
VilleneuveKAlbarracin ZaidizaDRoizardD, et al.Modeling and simulation of CO2 capture in aqueous ammonia with hollow fiber composite membrane contactors using a selective dense layer. Chem Eng Sci2018; 190: 345–360.
13.
DonaldsonTLNguyenYN. Carbon dioxide reaction kinetics and transport in aqueous amine membranes. Ind Eng Chem Fundam1980; 19: 260–266.
14.
WangFZhaoJMiaoH, et al.Current status and challenges of the ammonia escape inhibition technologies in ammonia-based CO2 capture process. Appl Energy2018; 230: 734–749.
15.
Plesu PopescuAEGonzálezÀLlorensJ, et al.Investigating best available technique for CO2 chemical absorption: solvent selection based on empirical surrogate model and exergy loss. Clean Technol Environ Policy 2021 2412021; 24: 333–350.
16.
VegaFBaena-MorenoFMGallego FernándezLM, et al.Current status of CO2 chemical absorption research applied to CCS: towards full deployment at industrial scale. Appl Energy2020; 260: 114313.
17.
MaXLiYZhangC, et al.Development of Mn/Mg-copromoted carbide slag for efficient CO2 capture under realistic calcium looping conditions. Process Saf Environ Prot2020; 141: 380–389.
18.
ManiarasuRRathoreSKMuruganS. A review on materials and processes for carbon dioxide separation and capture. Energy Environ2023; 34: 3–57.
19.
DuanYLuebkeDHenry PennlineH. Efficient theoretical screening of solid sorbents for CO2 capture applications*. Int J Clean Coal Energy2012; 1: 1–11.
20.
OchediFOLiuYAdewuyiYG. State-of-the-art review on capture of CO2 using adsorbents prepared from waste materials. Process Saf Environ Prot2020; 139: 1–25.
21.
EkhlasiLYounesiHRashidiA, et al.Populus wood biomass-derived graphene for high CO2 capture at atmospheric pressure and estimated cost of production. Process Saf Environ Prot2018; 113: 97–108.
22.
ShackleySCarterSSimsK, et al.Expert perceptions of the role of biochar as a carbon abatement option with ancillary agronomic and soil-related benefits. Energy Environ2011; 22: 167–188.
23.
JiangLGonzalez-DiazALing-ChinJ, et al.Post-combustion CO2 capture from a natural gas combined cycle power plant using activated carbon adsorption. Appl Energy2019; 245: 1–15.
24.
MazariSAHossainNBasirunWJ, et al.An overview of catalytic conversion of CO2 into fuels and chemicals using metal organic frameworks. Process Saf Environ Prot2021; 149: 67–92.
25.
MaSWangYLiuZ, et al.Preparation of carbon nanofiber with multilevel gradient porous structure for supercapacitor and CO2 adsorption. Chem Eng Sci2019; 205: 181–189.
26.
MeiCWenPLiuZ, et al.Selective production of propylene from methanol: mesoporosity development in high silica HZSM-5. J Catal2008; 258: 243–249.
27.
MeiBQinYTaghaviM. Thermodynamic performance of a new hybrid system based on concentrating Solar System, molten carbonate fuel cell and organic rankine cycle with CO2 capturing analysis. Proc. Safety Environ Prot2021; 146: 531–551.
28.
MuchanPSaiwanCNarku-TettehJ, et al.Screening tests of aqueous alkanolamine solutions based on primary, secondary, and tertiary structure for blended aqueous amine solution selection in post combustion CO2 capture. Chem Eng Sci2017; 170: 574–582.
29.
SahraeiSRashidiHValeh-e-SheydaP. Investigation of operational parameters and optimization of flue gas carbon dioxide absorption process by diethanolamine via response surface methodology. J Sep Sci Eng2019; 11: 26–40.
30.
SakwattanapongRAroonwilasAVeawabA. Behavior of reboiler heat duty for CO2 capture plants using regenerable single and blended alkanolamines. Ind Eng Chem Res2005; 44: 4465–4473.
31.
QinFWangSHartonoA, et al.Kinetics of CO2 absorption in aqueous ammonia solution. Int J Greenh Gas Control2010; 4: 729–738.
32.
PuxtyGRowlandRAttallaM. Comparison of the rate of CO2 absorption into aqueous ammonia and monoethanolamine. Chem Eng Sci2010; 65: 915–922.
33.
GuoHLiCShiX, et al.Nonaqueous amine-based absorbents for energy efficient CO2 capture. Appl Energy2019; 239: 725–734.
34.
AkbariMValeh-e-SheydaP. CO2 Equilibrium solubility in and physical properties for monoethanolamine glycinate at low pressures. Process Saf Environ Prot2019; 132: 116–125.
35.
ZhangWJinXTuW, et al.Development of MEA-based CO2 phase change absorbent. Appl Energy2017; 195: 316–323.
36.
WangRYangYWangM, et al.Energy efficient diethylenetriamine–1-propanol biphasic solvent for CO2 capture: experimental and theoretical study. Appl Energy2021; 290: 116768.
37.
GusnawanPGanegamageSHeagyM, et al.Reactive CO2 absorption mechanism of a soybean-based (SBB) solvent containing 18 amino acid salts in polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) hollow fiber membrane-based gas-liquid membrane contactor. Chem Eng J2020; 399: 125819.
38.
SongHJParkSKimH, et al.Carbon dioxide absorption characteristics of aqueous amino acid salt solutions. Int J Greenh Gas Control2012; 11: 64–72.
39.
HerskowitsDHerskowitsVStephanK, et al.Characterization of a two-phase impinging jet absorber—II. Absorption with chemical reaction of CO2 in NaOH solutions. Chem Eng Sci1990; 45: 1281–1287.
40.
KnuutilaHSvendsenHFAnttilaM. CO2 Capture from coal-fired power plants based on sodium carbonate slurry; a systems feasibility and sensitivity study. Int J Greenh Gas Control2009; 3: 143–151.
41.
ChenPCHuangCHSuT, et al.Optimum conditions for the capture of carbon dioxide with a bubble-column scrubber. Int J Greenh Gas Control2015; 35: 47–55.
42.
LiTKeenerTCChengL. Carbon dioxide removal by using Mg(OH)2 in a bubble column: effects of various operating parameters. Int J Greenh Gas Control2014; 31: 67–76.
43.
HanSJYooMKimDW, et al.Carbon dioxide capture using calcium hydroxide aqueous solution as the absorbent. Energy Fuels2011; 25: 3825–3834.
44.
DarmanaDDeenNGKuipersJAM. Detailed modeling of hydrodynamics, mass transfer and chemical reactions in a bubble column using a discrete bubble model. Chem Eng Sci2005; 60: 3383–3404.
45.
ZhaoCZhaoCChenX, et al.Capturing CO2 in flue gas from fossil fuel-fired power plants using dry regenerable alkali metal-based sorbent. Prog Energy Combust Sci2013; 39: 515–534.
46.
GondalSAsifNSvendsenHF, et al.Carbon dioxide absorption into hydroxide and carbonate systems. Chem Eng Sci2014; 122: 307–320.
47.
FleischerCBeckerSEigenbergerG. Detailed modeling of the chemisorption of CO2 into NaOH in a bubble column. Chem Eng Sci1996; 51: 1715–1724.
48.
MoonCSungYAhnS, et al.Thermochemical and combustion behaviors of coals of different ranks and their blends for pulverized-coal combustion. Appl Therm Eng2013; 54: 111–119.
49.
WangMLawalAStephensonP, et al.Post-combustion CO2 capture with chemical absorption: a state-of-the-art review. Chem Eng Res Des2011; 89: 1609–1624.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
