This paper examines the impact of informal economy and ecological footprint on environmental regulation for a sample of 25 Sub-Saharan Africa economies (SSA) countries from 1991 to 2017. The results obtained from the techniques of static panel (Pooled ordinary least squares (POLS), random effects (RE), fixed effects (FE), and panel corrected standard error (PCSE)) as well as from dynamic panel (generalized method of moments in differences (D-GMM), and generalized method of moments in system (S-GMM)) were all consistent. They showed that the environmental regulation has a significant positive impact for both informal economy and ecological footprint in the selected economies. Regarding the relation between ecological footprint and per capita gross domestic product (GDP), an inverted U-shaped environmental Kuznets curve is verified. The study concludes that weak environmental regulation in the region reinforces informal economy and environmental pollution. Hence, findings from this study can help policymakers in the region to have a better understanding of the role of environmental regulation in reducing informal economy and environmental degradation.
DadaJTAjideFMSharimakinA. Shadow economy, institutions and environmental pollution: insights from Africa. World J Sci Technol Sustain Dev2021; 18(2): 153–171.
2.
SwainRBKambhampatiUSKarimuA. Regulation, governance and the role of the informal sector in influencing environmental quality?Ecol Econ2020; 173: 106649.
3.
SultanaNRahmanMMKhanamR,et al.The causative factors of environmental degradation in South Asia. J Asian Econ2022; 79: 101452.
4.
SultanaNRahmanMMKhanamR,et al.Environmental quality and its nexus with informal economy, corruption control, energy use, and socioeconomic aspects: the perspective of emerging economies. Heliyon2022; 8(6): e09569.
5.
NguyenKHKakinakaM. Renewable energy consumption, carbon emissions, and development stages: some evidence from panel cointegration analysis. Renew Energy2019; 132: 1049–1057.
6.
OhXBRozaliNEMLiewPY,et al.Design of integrated energy-water systems using pinch analysis: a nexus study of energy-water-carbon emissions. J Cleaner Prod2021; 322: 129092.
7.
DanishWZ. Investigation of the ecological footprint’s driving factors: what we learn from the experience of emerging economies. Sustain Cities Soc2019; 49: 101626.
8.
PataUK. Linking renewable energy, globalization, agriculture, CO2 emissions and ecological footprint in BRIC countries: a sustainability perspective. Renew Energy2021; 173: 197–208.
9.
AhmadMIşıkCJabeenG,et al.Heterogeneous links among urban concentration, non-renewable energy use intensity, economic development, and environmental emissions across regional development levels. Sci Total Environ2021; 765: 144527.
10.
MedinaLSchneiderF. Shedding light on the shadow economy: a global database and the interaction with the official one. Available at SSRN 3502028. 2019.
11.
PangJLiNMuH,et al.Empirical analysis of the interplay between shadow economy and pollution: with panel data across the provinces of China. J Cleaner Prod2021; 285: 124864.
12.
GoelRKHerralaRMazharU. Institutional quality and environmental pollution: MENA countries versus the rest of the world. Econ Syst2013; 37: 508–521.
13.
BlackmanABannisterGJ. Community pressure and clean technology in the informal sector: an econometric analysis of the adoption of propane by traditional Mexican brickmakers. J Environ Econ Manage1998; 35: 1–21.
14.
CerveroR. Informal transport in the developing world. UN-HABITAT, 2000.
15.
ElginCOztunaliO. Institutions, informal economy, and economic development. Emerg Markets Fin Trade2014a; 50: 145–162.
16.
OlanipekunAOSakaN. Response of the Nigerian construction sector to economic shocks. Constr Econ Build2019; 19: 160–180.
17.
CanhNPSchinckusCThanhSD,et al.The determinants of the energy consumption: a shadow economy-based perspective. Energy2021; 225: 120210.
18.
BaksiSBoseP. Informal sector, regulatory compliance, and leakage. J Dev Econ2016; 121: 166–176.
19.
DasguptaPMälerKG. Poverty, institutions, and the environmental resource-base. Handb Dev Econ1995; 3: 2371–2463.
20.
HarbaughAWBantaERHillMC,et al.Modflow-2000, the U. S. Geological survey modular ground-water model-user guide to modularization concepts and the ground-water flow process. 2000.
21.
NarayanPKNarayanS. Carbon dioxide emissions and economic growth: panel data evidence from developing countries. Energy Policy2010; 38: 661–666.
22.
ColeMA. Corruption, income and the environment: An empirical analysis. Ecol Econ2007; 62(3-4): 637–647.
23.
PargalSWheelerD. Informal regulation of industrial pollution in developing countries: evidence from Indonesia. J Polit Econ1996; 104: 1314–1327.
24.
PanayotouT. The economics of environments in transition. Environ Dev Econ1999; 4: 401–412.
25.
HettigeHManiMWheelerD. Industrial pollution in economic development: the environmental Kuznets curve revisited. J Dev Econ2000; 62: 445–476.
NkengfackHKaffo FotioHTotouomA. How does the shadow economy affect environmental quality in Sub-Saharan Africa? Evidence from heterogeneous panel estimations. J Knowl Econ2021; 12: 1635–1651.
30.
AzamMLiuLAhmadN. Impact of institutional quality on environment and energy consumption: evidence from developing world. Environ Dev Sustain2021; 23: 1646–1667.
31.
DoğanMSaraçMGTürkerDA. Effect of salt on the inter-relationship between the morphological, emulsifying and interfacial rheological properties of O/W emulsions at oil/water interface. J Food Eng2020; 275: 109871.
32.
RenSHaoYWuH. Government corruption, market segmentation and renewable energy technology innovation: evidence from China. J Environ Manag2021; 300: 113686.
33.
ZhouALiJ. Impact of income inequality and environmental regulation on environmental quality: evidence from China. J Cleaner Prod2020; 274: 123008.
34.
AbidM. The close relationship between informal economic growth and carbon emissions in Tunisia since 1980: the (ir) relevance of structural breaks. Sustain Cities Soc2015; 15: 11–21.
35.
KarimSAppiahMNaeemMA,et al.Modelling the role of institutional quality on carbon emissions in sub-saharan African countries. Renew Energy2022; 198: 213–221.
36.
AdekoyaOBAjayiGESuhrabM,et al.How critical are resource rents, agriculture, growth, and renewable energy to environmental degradation in the resource-rich African countries? The role of institutional quality. Energy Policy2022; 164: 112888.
37.
KaranfilFOzkayaA. Estimation of real GDP and unrecorded economy in Turkey based on environmental data. Energy Policy2007; 35: 4902–4908.
38.
BenkraiemRLahianiAMiloudiA,et al.The asymmetric role of shadow economy in the energy-growth nexus in Bolivia. Energy Policy2019; 125: 405–417.
39.
ShinYYuBGreenwood-NimmoM. Modelling asymmetric cointegration and dynamic multipliers in a nonlinear ARDL framework. In: Festschrift in honor of Peter Schmidt. New York, NY: Springer, 2014, pp.281–314.
40.
Hatemi-jA. Asymmetric causality tests with an application. Empir Econ2012; 43: 447–456.
41.
ElginCOztunaliO. Pollution and informal economy. Econ Syst2014b; 38: 333–349.
42.
BaksiSBoseP. Environmental regulation in the presence of an informal sector. University of Winnipeg Department of Economics Working Paper, 3, 1–28. 2010.
43.
KaranfilF. Environmental regulation in the presence of unrecorded economy. Int Econ2011; 126: 91–108.
44.
HurlinCMignonV. Second generation panel unit root tests. 2007.
45.
ArellanoMBondS. Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Rev Econ Stud1991; 58: 277–297.
46.
ArellanoMBoverOand BlundellR, et al. Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models. J Econom1995; 68(1): 115–143.
47.
BlundellRBondS. Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. J Econom1998; 87: 115–143.
48.
NickellS. Biases in dynamic models with fixed effects. Econometrica1981; 49: 1417–1426.
49.
AbidM. Impact of economic, financial, and institutional factors on CO2 emissions: evidence from sub-Saharan Africa economies. Util Policy2016; 41: 85–94.
50.
ADB. Guidelines for estimating greenhouse gas emissions of Asian development bank projects. Mandaluyong City: Asian Development Bank (ADB), 2017.
51.
DadaJTAdeizaANoorAI, et al. Investigating the link between economic growth, financial development, urbanization, natural resources, human capital, trade openness and ecological footprint: evidence from Nigeria. J Bioeconomics2022: 1–27.
52.
SimionescuMStrielkowskiWGavurovaB. Could quality of governance influence pollution? Evidence from the revised environmental Kuznets curve in central and eastern European countries. Energy Reports2022; 8: 809–819.
53.
SebestyénVDomokosEAbonyiJ. Focal points for sustainable development strategies—text mining-based comparative analysis of voluntary national reviews. J Environ Manage2020; 263: 110414.
54.
HorvathJYangG. Unemployment dynamics and informality in small open economies. Eur Econ Rev2022; 141: 103949.
55.
PritadrajatiDSKusumaACSaxenaSC. Scarred for life: Lasting consequences of unemployment and informal self-employment: An empirical evidence from Indonesia. Econ Anal Policy2021; 70: 206–219.
56.
GasparėnienėLRemeikienėRWilliamsCC. Theorizing the informal economy. In: Unemployment and the informal economy. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 2022, pp.7–60.
57.
MauleónISardàJ. Unemployment and the shadow economy. Appl Econ2017; 49: 3729–3740.
58.
HoveSTursoyT. An investigation of the environmental Kuznets curve in emerging economies. J Cleaner Prod2019; 236: 117628.
59.
TenawDBeyeneAD. Environmental sustainability and economic development in sub-Saharan Africa: a modified EKC hypothesis. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev2021; 143: 110897.
