Well-designed environmental regulations are a prerequisite for achieving green economic growth. However, the effectiveness of campaign-style environmental regulation—a widely used environmental management instrument in developing nations or even in some developed nations, on green economic growth remains under-researched and has not reached a consistent conclusion. This paper takes advantage of China's Central Environmental Protection Inspector policy—the strictest and largest campaign-style environmental regulation policy in China's history, as a natural experiment and uses the difference-in-differences method to explore the effect of campaign-style environmental regulation on green economic growth, and further analyze its underlying mechanisms and heterogeneity effects. The panel data covering 280 prefecture-level cities in China from 2009 to 2019 are used. Our results show that Central Environmental Protection Inspector can result in an average of 14.2% increase in green economic growth, and this effect is sustainable for a long time. Mechanism analysis shows that Central Environmental Protection Inspector boosts green economic growth mainly by promoting green innovation and optimizing industrial structure. Further heterogeneity analysis reveals that the positive effect of Central Environmental Protection Inspector on green economic growth is greater in eastern China and underdeveloped cities.
GyamfiBAAdebayoTSBekunFV, et al.Sterling insights into natural resources intensification, ageing population and globalization on environmental status in Mediterranean countries. Energ Environ2022: 958305X–2210832X. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0958305X221083240.
XieZ. China’s historical evolution of environmental protection along with the forty years’ reform and opening-up. Environ Sci Ecotech2020; 1: 100001.
4.
ChengJYiJDaiS, et al.Can low-carbon city construction facilitate green growth? Evidence from China’s pilot low-carbon city initiative. J Clean Prod2019; 231: 1158–1170.
5.
PorterMELindeCVD. Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship. J Econ Perspectives1995; 9: 97–118.
6.
ZhangBChenXGuoH. Does central supervision enhance local environmental enforcement? Quasi-experimental evidence from China. J Public Econ2018; 164: 70–90.
JiaKChenS. Could campaign-style enforcement improve environmental performance? Evidence from China’s central environmental protection inspection. J Environ Manage2019; 245: 282–290.
9.
GuoLFosterKW. Administrative campaigns and environmental governance in contemporary China. In presentation at the Association for Asian Studies Annual Meeting in Atlanta2008.
10.
XuFTianMYangJ, et al.Does environmental inspection led by the central government improve the air quality in China? The moderating role of public engagement. Sustain2020; 12: 3316.
11.
LiuZXinL. Has China’s belt and road initiative promoted its green total factor productivity？Evidence from primary provinces along the route. Energ Policy2019; 129: 360–369.
12.
PanDHongW. Benefits and costs of campaign-style environmental implementation: evidence from China’s central environmental protection inspection system. Environ Sci Pollut R2022; 29: 45230–45247.
13.
WangHFanCChenS. The impact of campaign-style enforcement on corporate environmental action：evidence from China’s central environmental protection inspection. J Clean Prod2021; 290: 125881.
14.
WangHYangGOuyangX, et al.Does central environmental inspection improves enterprise total factor productivity? The mediating effect of management efficiency and technological innovation. Environ Sci Pollut R2021; 28: 21950–21963.
15.
TuZDengHChenR, et al.Environmental economic benefits of central environmental protection inspection: evidence from a pilot project in hebei province. Econ Review2020; 01: 3–16.
16.
EbensteinAFanMGreenstoneM, et al.New evidence on the impact of sustained exposure to air pollution on life expectancy from China’s Huai river policy. Proc Natl Acad Sci2017; 114: 10384–10389.
17.
HeLGengM. Can Chinese central government inspection on environmental protection improve air quality?Atmosphere (Basel)2020; 11: 1025.
18.
BekunFV. Mitigating emissions in India: accounting for the role of real income, renewable energy consumption and investment in energy. Int J Energ Econ Policy2022; 12: 188–192.
19.
GreenstoneMListJASyversonC. The Effects of Environmental Regulation on the Competitiveness of US Manufacturing. NBER Working Paper no.18392; 2012. September.
20.
KahnMEMansurET. Do local energy prices and regulation affect the geographic concentration of employment?J Public Econ2013; 101: 105–114.
21.
BekunFVGyamfiBAOnifadeST, et al.Beyond the environmental kuznets curve in E7 economies: accounting for the combined impacts of institutional quality and renewables. J Clean Prod2021; 314: 127924.
22.
PanDHongWHeM. Can campaign-style enforcement facilitate water pollution control? Learning from China’s environmental protection interview. J Environ Manage2022; 301: 113910.
23.
YuZ. Environmental protection interview, government environmental protection subsidies and enterprise green innovation. Foreign Econs Manage2021; 43: 22–37.
24.
KarplusVJWuM. Crackdowns in Hierarchies: Evidence from China’s Environmental Inspections. MIT CEEPR Working Paper 2019-017; 2019.
Ministry of Ecology and Environment of the People's Republic of China. The Central Environmental Protection Inspectors Group held a mobilization meeting to inspect the work of Hebei Province. 2016; https://www.mee.gov.cn/gkml/sthjbgw/qt/201601/t20160104_320975.htm.
28.
LiRZhouYBiJ, et al.Does the central environmental inspection actually work?J Environ Manage2020; 253: 109602.
29.
ZengHDongBZhouQ, et al.The capital market reaction to central environmental protection inspection: evidence from China. J Clean Prod2021; 279: 123486.
30.
WangWSunXZhangM. Does the central environmental inspection effectively improve air pollution?-an empirical study of 290 prefecture-level cities in China. J Environ Manage2021; 286: 112274.
31.
QuanY. Public Participation in campaign-style enforcement: evidence from central environmental inspection. 2020.
32.
ChenY. The driver of green innovation and green image: green core competence. J Bus Ethics2008; 81: 531–543.
33.
SohnSYJeonJHanEJ. A new cost of ownership model for the acquisition of technology complying with environmental regulations. J Clean Prod2015; 100: 269–277.
34.
ZhouXLeiKMengW, et al.Industrial structural upgrading and spatial optimization based on water environment carrying capacity. J Clean Prod2017; 165: 1462–1472.
35.
YangSCaoDLoK. Analyzing and optimizing the impact of economic restructuring on Shanghai’s carbon emissions using STIRPAT and NSGA-II. Sustain Cities Soc2018; 40: 44–53.
36.
ZhangMSunXWangW. Study on the effect of environmental regulations and industrial structure on haze pollution in China from the dual perspective of independence and linkage. J Clean Prod2020; 256: 120748.
37.
XiaFXuJ. Green total factor productivity: a re-examination of quality of growth for provinces in China. China Econ Rev2020; 62: 101454.
38.
ChungYHFäreRGrosskopfS. Productivity and undesirable outputs: a directional distance function approach. J Environ Manage1997; 51: 229–240.
39.
OhD. A global Malmquist-Luenberger productivity index. J Prod Anal2010; 34: 183–197.
40.
SongMDuJTanKH. Impact of fiscal decentralization on green total factor productivity. Int J Prod Econ2018; 205: 359–367.
41.
GoldsmithRW. A perpetual inventory of national wealth. Studies Inco Wealth1951; 14: 5–73.
42.
HallREJonesCI. Why do some countries produce so much more output per worker than others?Quarterly J Econ1999; 114: 83–116.
43.
WangXWangLWangS, et al.Marketisation as a channel of international technology diffusion and green total factor productivity: research on the spillover effect from China’s first-tier cities. Technol Anal Strategy2021; 33: 491–504.
44.
WangSChenGHanX. An analysis of the impact of the emissions trading system on the green total factor productivity based on the spatial difference-in-differences approach: the case of China. Int J Env Res Pub He2021; 18: 9040.
45.
XinBQuY. Effects of smart city policies on green total factor productivity: evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China. Int J Env Res Pub He2019; 16: 2396.
46.
YuanHFengYLeeC, et al.How does manufacturing agglomeration affect green economic efficiency?Energ Econ2020; 92: 104944.
47.
ZhangPYangQZhaoY. Relationship between social economic agglomeration and labor productivity of core cities in northeast China. Chinese Geogr. Sci2012; 22: 221–231.
48.
GuoSTangXMengT, et al.Industrial structure, R&D staff, and green total factor productivity of China: evidence from the low-carbon pilot cities. Complexity2021; 2021: 1–13.
49.
YangXLinSLiY, et al.Can high-speed rail reduce environmental pollution? Evidence from China. J Clean Prod2019; 239: 118135.
50.
HaoYZhengSZhaoM, et al.Reexamining the relationships among urbanization, industrial structure, and environmental pollution in China—new evidence using the dynamic threshold panel model. Energ Reports2020; 6: 28–39.
51.
ZhouLTangL. Environmental regulation and the growth of the total-factor carbon productivity of China’s industries: evidence from the implementation of action plan of air pollution prevention and control. J Envir Management2021; 296:113078.
52.
CaglarAEZafarMWBekunFV, et al.Determinants of CO2 emissions in the BRICS economies: the role of partnerships investment in energy and economic complexity. Sustain Energ Tech Assessment2022; 51: 101907.
53.
GyamfiBA. Consumption-based carbon emission and foreign direct investment in oil-producing sub-sahara African countries: the role of natural resources and urbanization. Environ Sci Pollut R2022; 29: 13154–13166.
54.
LiuQHuB. A study on the two-way causal relationship between industrial structure evolution and economic growth: empirical test based on 40 years of reform and opening-up in China. Glo J Emerging Market Econ2019; 11: 98–118.
55.
LiJLinB. Does energy and CO2 emissions performance of China benefit from regional integration?Energ Policy2017; 101: 366–378.
56.
SadehARaduCFFeniserC, et al.Governmental intervention and its impact on growth, economic development, and technology in OECD countries. Sustain2021; 13: 66.
57.
LuJLiBLiH, et al.Expansion of city scale, traffic modes, traffic congestion, and air pollution. Cities2021; 108: 102974.
58.
FengYWangXLiangZ, et al.Effects of emission trading system on green total factor productivity in China: empirical evidence from a quasi-natural experiment. J Cleaner Pro2021; 294: 126262.
59.
MiaoCFangDSunL, et al.Natural resources utilization efficiency under the influence of green technological innovation. Res Conservation rec2017; 126: 153–161.
60.
National Bureau of Statistics. China City Statistical Yearbook. China Statistics Publishing House: 2008-2019.
61.
BeckTLevineRLevkovA. Big bad banks? The winners and losers from bank deregulation in the United States. J Fin2010; 65: 1637–1667.
62.
ChenYFanZGuX, et al.Arrival of young talent: the send-down movement and rural education in China. Am Econ Rev2020; 110: 3393–3430.
63.
LiuSHouPGaoY,et al.Innovation and green total factor productivity in China: a linear and nonlinear investigation. Environ Sci Pollut R2020: 1–22.
DuGLiuSLeiN, et al.A test of environmental kuznets curve for haze pollution in China: evidence from the penal data of 27 capital cities. J Clean Prod2018; 205: 821–827.
66.
AgboolaPOHossainMEGyamfiBA, et al.Environmental consequences of foreign direct investment influx and conventional energy consumption: evidence from dynamic ARDL simulation for Turkey. Environ Sci Pollut R2022; 29: 53584–53597.
67.
LuYYuL. Trade liberalization and markup dispersion: evidence from China’s WTO accession. Am Eco J2015; 7: 221–253.
68.
LiangZZhangMMaoQ, et al.Improvement of eco-efficiency in China: a comparison of mandatory and hybrid environmental policy instruments. Int J Env Res Pub He2018; 15: 1473.
