This study investigates the factors that affect the investment environment of the renewable energy industry in emerging countries, and quantifies them to derive relative priorities, drawing on the Vietnamese solar market as a critical case. Vietnam's solar photovoltaic (PV) market was exposed to various adverse policy situations during 2017–2019. The priorities of the determinant factors were derived using analytic hierarchy process analysis, based on a survey of 20 energy experts. The priority of the factors in Level 1 include, in descending order, policies, legal framework, profitability, ease of access to finance, infrastructure, and external factors. The top five of the 29 important factors in Level 2 are level of policy implementation, policy consistency (predictability), feed-in-tariff price, incentives and subsidies for foreign (direct) investment in solar PV, fruitage remittance, and transmission/distribution lines. We demonstrate that the active establishment and implementation of policies is crucial for the development of the renewable energy market. The improvement of the grid infrastructure and measures for system integration should be supported in accordance with solar power deployment. Therefore, actively engaging the interests of various stakeholders comprehensively and in a balanced manner during policymaking can be decisive in supporting stable market growth, facilitated by partnerships between local developers and international investors.
HaYHByrneJ. The rise and fall of green growth: Korea's energy sector experiment and its lessons for sustainable energy policy. Wiley Interdisciplinary Rev: Energy Environ2019; 8: e335.
2.
HaYHByrneJLeeHS, et al.Assessing the impact of R&D policy on PV market development: the case of South Korea. Wiley Interdisciplinary Rev: Energy Environ2020; 9: e366.
U.S. Energy Information Administration. International Energy Outlook 2015 with projections to 2040, https://www.eia.gov/outlooks/aeo/pdf/0383(2015).pdf (2015, accessed 28 March 2020).
7.
U.S. Energy Information Administration. International Energy Outlook 2013 with projections to 2040, https://www.eia.gov/outlooks/aeo/pdf/0383(2013).pdf (2013, accessed 28 March 2020).
8.
ParamatiSRUmmallaMApergisN. The effect of foreign direct investment and stock market growth on clean energy use across a panel of emerging market economies. Energy Econ2016; 56: 29–41.
9.
YangLCaiXJHamoriS. Does the crude oil price influence the exchange rates of oil-importing and oil-exporting countries differently? A wavelet coherence analysis. Int Rev Econ Finance2017; 49: 536–547.
10.
YangLCaiXJHamoriS. What determines the long-term correlation between oil prices and exchange rates?North Am J Econ Finance2018; 44: 140–152.
11.
PengWHuSChenW,et al.Modeling the joint dynamic value at risk of the volatility index, oil price, and exchange rate. Int Rev Econ Finance2019; 59: 137–149.
12.
YangL. Connectedness of economic policy uncertainty and oil price shocks in a time domain `perspective. Energy Econ2019; 80: 219–233.
13.
SeriñoMNV. Energy security through diversification of non-hydro renewable energy sources in developing countries. Energy Environ2021; 33: 546–561.
14.
MurshedM. Does improvement in trade openness facilitate renewable energy transition? Evidence from selected south Asian economies. South Asia Econ J2018; 19: 151–170.
15.
FadlyD. Low-carbon transition: private sector investment in renewable energy projects in developing countries. World Dev2019; 122: 552–569.
16.
AzamMHaseebM. Determinants of foreign direct investment in BRICS - does renewable and non-renewable energy matter?Energy Strategy Rev2021; 35, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2021.100638.
17.
RagosaGWarrenP. Unpacking the determinants of cross-border private investment in renewable energy in developing countries. J Cleaner Prod2019; 235: 854–865.
18.
LeeAHChenHHKangHY. Multi-criteria decision making on strategic selection of wind farms. Renew Energy2009; 34: 120–126.
19.
SindhuSNehraVLuthraS. Solar energy deployment for sustainable future of India: hybrid SWOC-AHP analysis. Renew Sust Energy Rev2017; 72: 1138–1151.
20.
HaddadBLiazidAFerreiraP. A multi-criteria approach to rank renewables for the Algerian electricity system. Renew Energy2017; 107: 462–472.
21.
TasriASusilawatiA. Selection among renewable energy alternatives based on a fuzzy analytic hierarchy process in Indonesia. Sustain Energy Technol Assess2014; 7: 34–44.
22.
ÇolakMKayaİ. Prioritization of renewable energy alternatives by using an integrated fuzzy MCDM model: a real case application for Turkey. Renew Sust Energ Rev2017; 80: 840–853.
23.
KengpolARontlaongPTuominenM. Design of a decision support system for site selection using fuzzy AHP: A case study of solar power plant in north eastern parts of Thailand. In: 2012 Proceedings of PICMET'12: Technology Management for Emerging Technologies2012; 734–743.
24.
JhaSKPuppalaH. Prospects of renewable energy sources in India: prioritization of alternative sources in terms of Energy Index. Energy2017; 127: 116–127.
KeeleyARMatsumotoKI. Investors’ perspective on determinants of foreign direct investment in wind and solar energy in developing economies – Review and expert opinions. J Clean Prod2018; 179: 132–142.
27.
KimBKimJKimJ. Evaluation model for investment in solar photovoltaic power generation using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process. Sustainability2019; 11: 2905.
28.
MenanteauPFinonDLamyM. Prices versus quantities: choosing policies for promoting the development of renewable energy. Energy Pol2003; 31: 799–812.
29.
AbdmoulehZAlammariRAGastliA. Review of policies encouraging renewable energy integration & best practices. Renew Sustain Energy Rev2015; 45: 249–262.
30.
RomanoAAScandurraGCarforaA, et al.Renewable investments: the impact of green policies in developing and developed countries. Renew Sustain Energy Rev2017; 68: 738–747.
31.
BlazquezRChristensenDGrafK, et al.Risk quantification and risk management in renewable energy projects. Altran, Arthur D. Little, Report commissioned by IEA Renewable Energy Technology Deployment, 2011.
32.
Aragonés-BeltránPPastor-FerrandoJPGarcía-GarcíaF, et al.An analytic network process approach for siting a municipal solid waste plant in the metropolitan area of Valencia (Spain). J Environ Manage2010; 91: 1071–1086.
33.
Aragonés-BeltránPChaparroGFPastorFJP, et al.An AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process)/ANP (Analytic Network Process)-based multi-criteria decision approach for the selection of solar-thermal power plant investment projects. Energy2014; 66: 222–238.
34.
AlfaroLKalemli-OzcanSVolosovychV. Why doesn't capital flow from rich to poor countries? An empirical investigation. Rev Econ Stat2008; 90: 347–368.
35.
KarakayaESriwannawitP. Barriers to the adoption of photovoltaic systems: the state of the art. Renew Sust Energ Dev2015; 49: 60–66.
36.
BaloFŞağbanşuaL. The selection of the best solar panel for the photovoltaic system design by using AHP. Energy Procedia2016; 100: 50–53.
37.
CamposNKinoshitaY. The Location Determinants of Foreign Direct Investment in Transition Economies. Working Paper Group 3–9 Kinoshita. William Davidson Institute, Michigan, 2002.
38.
MateevM. Determinants of foreign direct investment in Central and Southeastern Europe: new empirical tests. Oxf J2009; 8: 133–149.
39.
ShamsuddinAF. Economic determinants of foreign direct investment in less developed countries. Pak Dev Rev1994; 33: 41–51.
40.
ChakrabartiA. The determinants of foreign direct investments: sensitivity analyses of cross-country regressions. Kyklos2001; 54: 89–114.
41.
EyraudLClementsBWaneA. Green investment: trends and determinants. Energy Pol2013; 60: 852–865.
42.
AngG. Overcoming barriers to international investment in clean energy. OECD Insights2016; in Patric Love (ed.), Debate the issues: Investment, pp. 83–86.
43.
LewisJIWiserRH. Fostering a renewable energy technology industry: an international comparison of wind industry policy support mechanisms. Energy Pol2007; 35: 1844–1857.
44.
MourelatouA. Renewable Energies: Success Stories. Copenhagen: European Environment Agency, 2001.
45.
MurovecNErkerRSProdanI. Determinants of environmental investments: testing the structural model. J Clean Prod2012; 37: 265–277.
46.
ZhaoZHuangW. Multi-objective Decision-making on Wind Power Projects Based on AHP Method. In: 2011 International Conference on Computer Distributed Control and Intelligent Environmental Monitoring, 2011; 242–245.
47.
MichelezJRossiNBlazquezR, et al.Risk Quantification and Risk Management in Renewable Energy Projects, Altran, Arthur D. Little, Report Commissioned by IEA Renewable Energy Technology Deployment; Altran GmbH & Co. KG: Germany, 2011.
48.
San CristóbalJR. Multi-criteria decision-making in the selection of a renewable energy project in Spain: the Vikor method. Renew Energy2011; 36: 498–502.
49.
ReicheDBechbergerM. Policy difference in the promotion of renewable energies in the EU. Energy Pol2004; 32: 843–849.
50.
FoxonTPearsonP. Overcoming barriers to innovation and diffusion of cleaner technologies: some features of a sustainable innovation policy regime. J Clean Prod2008; 16: 148–161.
51.
AnyanwuJC. Why does foreign direct investment go where it goes?: new evidence from African countries. Ann Econ Finance2012; 13: 425–462.
52.
BusseMHefekerC. Political risk, institutions and foreign direct investment. Eur J Polit Econ2007; 23: 397–415.
53.
JadhavP. Determinants of foreign direct investment in BRICS economies: analysis of economic, institutional and political factor. Procedia Soc Behav Sci2012; 37: 5–14.
54.
MerlevedeBSchoorsKJ. How to Catch Foreign Fish? FDI and Privatization in EU Accession Countries. Working Paper No. 785. William Davidson Institute, Michigan, 2005.
55.
DumludagD. An analysis of the determinants of foreign direct investment in Turkey: the role of the institutional context. J Bus Econ Manag2009; 10: 15–30.
56.
MorissetJPLumenga-NesoO. Administrative barriers to foreign investment in developing countries. Transnatl Corp2002; 11: 99–120.
57.
PîrlogeaC. Barriers to investment in energy from renewable sources. Economia Seria Manag2011; 14: 132–140.
58.
PainulyJP. Barriers to renewable energy penetration: a framework for analysis. Renew Energy2001; 24: 73–89.
59.
CannemiMGarcía-MelónMAragonés-BeltránP, et al.Modeling decision making as a support tool for policy making on renewable energy development. Energy Pol2014; 67: 127–137.
60.
ZengSLiuYLiuC, et al.A review of renewable energy investment in the BRICS countries: history, models, problems and solutions. Renew Sustain Energy Rev2017; 74: 860–872.
61.
AsieduE. Foreign direct investment in Africa: the role of natural resources, market size, government policy, institutions and political instability. World Econ2006; 29: 63–77.
62.
ChanMLHouKLiX, et al.Foreign direct investment and its determinants: a regional panel causality analysis. Q Rev Econ Finance2014; 54: 579–589.
63.
DemirhanEMascaM. Determinants of foreign direct investment flows to developing countries: a cross-sectional analysis. Prague Econ Pap2008; 2008: 356–369.
64.
JonesAW. Perceived barriers and policy solutions in clean energy infrastructure investment. J Clean Prod2015; 104: 297–304.
65.
EleftheriadisIMAnagnostopoulouEG. Identifying barriers in the diffusion of renewable energy sources. Energy Pol2015; 80: 153–164.
66.
PoelhekkeSvan der PloegR. Do Natural Resources Attract FDI? Evidence from Non-stationary Sector Level Data. Discussion Paper No. 8079. Centre for Economic Policy Research, London, 2010.
67.
AnuchitworawongCThampanishvongK. Determinants of foreign direct investment in Thailand: does natural disaster matter?Int J Disaster Risk Reduct2015; 14: 312–321.
68.
EscalerasMRegisterCA. Natural disasters and foreign direct investment. Land Econ2011; 87: 346–363.
69.
FlyvbjergB. Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qual Inq2006; 12: 219–245.
70.
ZambonKLCarneiroAAFSilvaANR, et al.Análise de decisão multicritério na localização de usinas termoelétricas utilizando SIG. Pesqui Oper2005; 25: 183–199.
71.
SaatyTL. Fundamentals of Decision Making and Priority Theory with the Analytic Hierarchy Process. 1st ed. Pennsylvania, USA: RWS Publications, 1994.
72.
SaatyTL. The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation. Pittsburgh PA: University of Pittsburgh, 1980.
73.
SaatyTL. Decision Making for Leaders: The Analytical Hierarchy Process for Decisions in a Complex World. Belmont, CA: Lifetime Learning Publication, A division of Wadsworth, 1982.
