Promoting high-quality economic development, boosting high-level ecological environment protection, and integrating deeply digital economy and energy efficiency has become a general trend. This paper, based on 284 prefecture-level Chinese cities from 2008 to 2018, uses the entropy weight method and super-efficient SBM-DEA model to measure the digital economy and energy efficiency (decompose into energy pure technical efficiency and energy scale efficiency), respectively. After the spatial and temporal evolution characteristics, a fixed-effect model is constructed to study the impact of the digital economy on energy efficiency. The research results show that: (1) the development of the digital economy effectively promotes energy efficiency, mainly reflected in the improvement of pure technical efficiency of energy; (2) the development of both the digital economy and the energy efficiency in China has complex spatial and temporal evolutionary characteristics, and there is heterogeneity in the impact of the digital economy on energy efficiency at the temporal and spatial levels; and (3) digital economy effectively improves energy efficiency by reducing unnecessary energy consumption through the R&D innovation effect. The development of the digital economy has far-reaching significance on the optimization and upgrading of the economic system, accelerating the improvement of energy efficiency and achieving green transformation.
XueYTangCWuHT, et al. The emerging driving force of energy consumption in China: does digital economy development matter?Energy Policy2022; 165: 112997.
2.
HaoYGuoYXWuHT. The role of information and communication technology on green total factor energy efficiency: does environmental regulation work?Bus Strategy Environ2022; 31: 403–424.
3.
IrfanMZhaoZYMukeshimanaMC, et al. Wind energy development in South Asia: Status, potential and policies. In: 2nd International Conference on Computing, Mathematics and Engineering Technologies (iCoMET), Sukkur, Pakistan, 30–31 January 2019.
4.
IrfanMZhaoZYPanjwaniMK, et al. Assessing the energy dynamics of Pakistan: prospects of biomass energy. Energy Rep2020; 6: 80–93.
5.
DoganE. CO2 emissions, real GDP, renewable energy and tourism: evidence from panel of the most-visited countries. Statistika-Stat Econ J2017; 97: 63–76.
6.
DoganEInglesi-LotzR. Analyzing the effects of real income and biomass energy consumption on carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions: empirical evidence from the panel of biomass-consuming countries. Energy2017; 138: 721–727.
7.
RenSMLiLQHanYQ, et al. The emerging driving force of inclusive green growth: does digital economy agglomeration work?Bus Strategy Environ2022; 31: 1656–1678.
8.
RenSYHaoYXuL, et al. Digitalization and energy: how does internet development affect China’s energy consumption?Energy Econ2021; 98: 105220.
9.
LiuHLeiHZhouY. How does green trade affect the environment? Evidence from China. J Econ Anal2022; 1: 1–27.
10.
RenSLiuZZhanbayevR, et al. Does the internet development put pressure on energy-saving potential for environmental sustainability? Evidence from China. J Econ Anal2022; 1: 81–101.
11.
SachsJDSchmidt-TraubGMazzucatoM, et al. Six transformations to achieve the sustainable development goals. Nat Sustain2019; 2: 805–814.
12.
HiltyLMArnfalkPErdmannL, et al. The relevance of information and communication technologies for environmental sustainability—a prospective simulation study. Environ Model Softw2006; 21: 1618–1629.
13.
IsmagilovaEHughesLDwivediYK, et al. Smart cities: advances in research—an information systems perspective. Int J Inf Manage2019; 47: 88–100.
14.
KristoffersenEBlomsmaFMikalefP, et al. The smart circular economy: a digital-enabled circular strategies framework for manufacturing companies. J Bus Res2020; 120: 241–261.
15.
LiowKHSongJZhouX. Volatility connectedness and market dependence across major financial markets in China economy. Quantit Finance Econ2021; 5: 397–420.
16.
LiZYangCHuangZ. How does the Fintech sector react to signals from central bank digital currencies?Finance Res Lett2022; 50: 103308.
17.
HiltyLMAebischerBRizzoliAE. Modeling and evaluating the sustainability of smart solutions. Environ Model Softw2014; 56: 1–5.
18.
AntikainenMUusitaloTKivikyto-ReponenP. Digitalisation as an enabler of circular economy. In: 10th CIRP Conference on Industrial Product-Service Systems (IPS), Linkoping, Sweden, 29–31 May 2018, pp. 45–49.
19.
GosslingSHallCM. Sharing versus collaborative economy: how to align ICT developments and the SDGs in tourism?J Sustain Tourism2019; 27: 74–96.
20.
LitvinenkoVS. Digital economy as a factor in the technological development of the mineral sector. Nat Resour Res2020; 29: 1521–1541.
21.
CastroGDFernandezMCGColsaAU. Unleashing the convergence amid digitalization and sustainability towards pursuing the sustainable development goals (SDGs): a holistic review. J Cleaner Prod2021; 280: 122204.
22.
ShahzadUFerrazDNguyenH-H, et al. Investigating the spill overs and connectedness between financial globalization, high-tech industries and environmental footprints: fresh evidence in context of China. Technol Forecast Soc Change2022; 174: 121205.
23.
ZhuJHuangZLiZ, et al. The impact of urbanization on energy intensity—an empirical study on OECD countries. Green Finance2021; 3: 508–526.
24.
ChenLJ. Environmental cost of sustainable development and climate change: can SAARC shift some liability with renewable energy and efficiency?Environ Sci Pollut Res2021; 28: 67137–67149.
25.
DusykNBerkhoutTBurchS, et al. Transformative energy efficiency and conservation: a sustainable development path approach in British Columbia, Canada. Energy Effic2009; 2: 387–400.
26.
ZakariAKhanITanDJ, et al. Energy efficiency and sustainable development goals (SDGs). Energy2022; 239: 122365.
27.
DincerIRosenMA. A worldwide perspective on energy, environment and sustainable development. Int J Energy Res (UK)1998; 22: 1305–1321.
28.
FankhauserSJotzoF. Economic growth and development with low-carbon energy. Wiley Interdiscip Rev-Clim Change2018; 9: e495.
29.
JiaSYangCWangM, et al. Heterogeneous impact of land-use on climate change: study from a spatial perspective. Front Environ Sci2022; 10. Original Research. DOI: 840603.
30.
ZhengCDengFZhuoC, et al. Green credit policy, institution supply and enterprise green innovation. J Econ Anal2022; 1: 28–51.
31.
AliMTursoyTSamourA, et al. Testing the impact of the gold price, oil price, and renewable energy on carbon emissions in South Africa: novel evidence from bootstrap ARDL and NARDL approaches. Resour Policy2022; 79: 102984.
32.
QashouYSamourAAbumunsharM. Does the real estate market and renewable energy induce carbon dioxide emissions? Novel evidence from Turkey. Energies2022; 15: 763.
33.
PataUKSamourA. Do renewable and nuclear energy enhance environmental quality in France? A new EKC approach with the load capacity factor. Prog Nucl Energy2022; 149: 104249.
34.
ChristopoulosSDemirCKullM. Cross-sectoral coordination for sustainable solutions in Croatia: the (meta) governance of energy efficiency. Energy Policy2016; 99: 57–87.
35.
XuPPChanEHW. ANP model for sustainable building energy efficiency retrofit (BEER) using energy performance contracting (EPC) for hotel buildings in China. Habitat Int2013; 37: 104–112.
36.
Atta MillsEFEDongJLiuYL, et al. Towards sustainable competitiveness: how does financial development affect dynamic energy efficiency in belt & road economies?Sustain Prod Consumpt2021; 27: 587–601.
37.
LvYLChenWChengJQ. Effects of urbanization on energy efficiency in China: new evidence from short run and long run efficiency models. Energy Policy2020; 147: 111858.
38.
SembekovATazhbayevNUlakovN, et al. Digital modernization of Kazakhstan’s economy in the context of global trends. Econ Ann Xxi2021; 187: 51–62.
39.
RantaVAarikka-StenroosLVaisanenJM. Digital technologies catalyzing business model innovation for circular economy—multiple case study. Resour Conserv Recycl2021; 164: 105155.
40.
MayGStahlBTaischM, et al. Energy management in manufacturing: from literature review to a conceptual framework. J Cleaner Prod2017; 167: 1464–1489.
41.
LiKKimDJLangKR, et al. How should we understand the digital economy in Asia? Critical assessment and research agenda. Electron Commer Res Appl2020; 44: 101004.
42.
PagoropoulosAPigossoDCAMcAlooneTC. The emergent role of digital technologies in the circular economy: a review. In: 9th CIRP Industrial Product/Service-Systems (IPSS) Conference—Circular Perspectives on Product/Service-Systems, Copenhagen, Denmark, 19–21 June 2017, pp. 19–24.
43.
CioffiRTravaglioniMPiscitelliG, et al. Smart manufacturing systems and applied industrial technologies for a sustainable industry: a systematic literature review. Appl Sci-Basel2020; 10: 2897.
44.
KristoffersenEMikalefPBlomsmaF, et al. Towards a business analytics capability for the circular economy. Technol Forecast Soc Change2021; 171: 120957.
45.
BressanelliGAdrodegariFPeronaM, et al. The role of digital technologies to overcome circular economy challenges in PSS business models: an exploratory case study. In: 10th CIRP Conference on Industrial Product-Service Systems (IPS), Linkoping, Sweden, 29–31 May 2018, pp. 216–221.
46.
LiuPZhaoYZhuJ, et al. Technological industry agglomeration, green innovation efficiency, and development quality of city cluster. Green Finance2022; 4: 411–435.
47.
AliSDoganEChenFZ, et al. International trade and environmental performance in top ten-emitters countries: the role of eco-innovation and renewable energy consumption. Sustain Dev2021; 29: 378–387.
48.
AliSYanQYIrfanM, et al. Green investment for sustainable business development: the influence of policy instruments on solar technology adoption. Front Energy Res2022; 10: 874824.
49.
WangWMuraveyDShenY, et al. Optimal investment and reinsurance strategies under 4/2 stochastic volatility model. Scand Actuar J2022: 1–37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03461238.2022.2108335.
50.
ChunxiangAShenYZengY. Dynamic asset-liability management problem in a continuous-time model with delay. Int J Control2022; 95: 1315–1336.
51.
FäreRGrosskopfSNorrisM, et al. Productivity growth, technical progress, and efficiency change in industrialized countries. Am Econ Rev1994; 84: 66–83.
52.
XuSYangCHuangZ, et al. Interaction between digital economy and environmental pollution: new evidence from a spatial perspective. Int J Environ Res Public Health2022; 19: 5074.
53.
SuYLiZYangC. Spatial interaction spillover effects between digital financial technology and urban ecological efficiency in China: an empirical study based on spatial simultaneous equations. Int J Environ Res Public Health2021; 18: 8535.
54.
YaoYHuDYangC, et al. The impact and mechanism of fintech on green total factor productivity. Green Finance2021; 3: 198–221.
55.
JiaSQiuYYangC. Sustainable development goals, financial inclusion, and grain security efficiency. Agronomy2021; 11: 2542.
56.
LiuSMShenXYJiangTP, et al. Impacts of the financialization of manufacturing enterprises on total factor productivity: empirical examination from China’s listed companies. Green Finance2021; 3: 59–89.
57.
DemirtasYEKececiNF. The efficiency of private pension companies using dynamic data envelopment analysis. Quantit Finance Econ2020; 4: 204–219.
58.
KoliaDLPapadopoulosS. The levels of bank capital, risk and efficiency in the Eurozone and the U.S. in the aftermath of the financial crisis. Quantit Finance Econ2020; 4: 66–90.
59.
WangSYangCLiZ. Green total factor productivity growth: policy-guided or market-driven?Int J Environ Res Public Health2022; 19: 10471.
60.
DoganESekerF. Determinants of CO2 emissions in the European Union: the role of renewable and non-renewable energy. Renew Energy2016; 94: 429–439.
61.
DoganETurkekulB. CO2 emissions, real output, energy consumption, trade, urbanization and financial development: testing the EKC hypothesis for the USA. Environ Sci Pollut Res2016; 23: 1203–1213.
62.
CuiYNWangGYIrfanM, et al. The effect of green finance and unemployment rate on carbon emissions in China. Front Environ Sci2022; 10: 887341.
63.
ShiRBIrfanMLiuGL, et al. Analysis of the impact of livestock structure on carbon emissions of animal husbandry: a sustainable way to improving public health and green environment. Front Public Health2022; 10: 835210.
64.
YangCLiTAlbitarK. Does energy efficiency affect ambient PM2.5? The moderating role of energy investment. Front Environ Sci2021; 9: 707751.
65.
RenSYHaoYWuHT. The role of outward foreign direct investment (OFDI) on green total factor energy efficiency: does institutional quality matters? Evidence from China. Resour Policy2022; 76: 102587.
66.
QiuWZhangJWWuHT, et al. The role of innovation investment and institutional quality on green total factor productivity: evidence from 46 countries along the “belt and road”. Environ Sci Pollut Res2022; 29: 16597–16611.
67.
WuHTRenSYYanGY, et al. Does China’s outward direct investment improve green total factor productivity in the “Belt and Road” countries? Evidence from dynamic threshold panel model analysis. J Environ Manag2020; 275. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111295.
68.
LiHLuYZhangJ, et al. Trends in road freight transportation carbon dioxide emissions and policies in China. Energy Policy2013; 57: 99–106.
69.
IrfanMRazzaqASharifA, et al. Influence mechanism between green finance and green innovation: exploring regional policy intervention effects in China. Technol Forecast Soc Change2022; 182. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121882.
