New evidence is provided on the determinants of the carbon footprint (CF) at the household level, using the Spanish case as an example and data from the Household Budget Survey (HBS) and the E-MRIO database. The research presents two new contributions. On the one hand, the basis of analysis on what we call ‘Excess per capita CF’, that is, the part of CF that exceeds a threshold associated with a minimum per capita consumption of each product in a household, below which level it is difficult to expect reductions in consumption. Second, the use of a quantile regression (QR) approach for the estimation of the drivers of CF. Both issues imply important changes in the consideration of the influence of some drivers considered so far in the literature, related to which CF quantile the household is in. These differences between an ordinary least squares (OLS) and the QR are especially significant for variables such as income, household size, occupation, age, household composition, housing area and area of residence.
SaloMSavolainenHKarhinenS,et al.Drivers of household consumption expenditure and carbon footprints in Finland. J Cleaner Prod2021; 289: 125607.
2.
Ganglmair-WooliscroftAWooliscroftB. An investigation of sustainable consumption behavior systems – exploring personal and socio-structural characteristics in different national contexts. J Bus Res2022; 148: 161–173.
3.
DuboisGSovacoolBCarlo AallC, et al.It starts at home? Climate policies targeting household consumption and behavioral decisions are key to low-carbon futures. Energy Research & Social Science2019; 52: 144–158.
4.
CreutzigFRoyJLambWF, et al.Towards demand-side solutions for mitigating climate change. Nat Clim Change2018; 8: 260–263.
5.
BeylotABoitierBLancesseurN,et al.The waste footprint of French households in 2020. A comparison of scenarios of consumption growth using input-output analysis. J Ind Ecol2018; 22: 356–368.
6.
ChristisMBreemerschKVercalsterenA,et al.A detailed household carbon footprint analysis using expenditure accounts the case of Flanders (Belgium). J Cleaner Prod2019; 228: 1167–1175.
7.
ShittuO. Emerging sustainability concerns and policy implications of urban household consumption: a systematic literature review. J Cleaner Prod2020; 246: 119034.
8.
DruckmanAJacksonT. Understanding households as drivers of carbon emissions. In: Clift R and Druckman A (eds) Taking stock of industrial ecology. Springer International Publishing, 2016, pp. 181–202.
9.
GalliAIhabKMorenoS, et al.Assessing the ecological footprint and biocapacity of Portuguese cities: critical results for environmental awareness and local management. Cities2020; 96: 102442.
10.
BuhlJLiedtkeCTeublerJ,et al.Measure or management? Resource use indicators for policymakers based on microdata by households. Sustainability2018; 10: 4467.
11.
MachRWeinzettelbJŠčasnýbM. Environmental impact of consumption by Czech households: hybrid input–output analysis linked to household consumption data. Ecol Econ2018; 149: 62–73.
12.
De ArceRMahíaR. Drivers of electricity poverty in Spanish dwellings: a quantile regression approach. Energies2019; 12: 2089.
13.
VitaGLundstromJRHertwichEG,et al.The environmental impact of green consumption and sufficiency lifestyles scenarios in Europe: connecting local sustainability visions to global consequences. Ecol Econ2019; 164: 106322.
14.
DuttaMGuptaP. Relating emissions of carbon to characteristics of consumption in India. J Sustain Dev Energy Water Environ Syst2018; 6: 255–275.
15.
DuarteRMainar-CausapeAJSanchez-CholizJ. Domestic GHG emissions and the responsibility of households in Spain: looking for regional differences. Appl Econ2017; 49: 5397–5411.
16.
RakicMRakicB. Sustainable lifestyle marketing of individuals: the base of sustainability. Amfiteatru Econ2015; 17: 891–908.
17.
ZhangJYuBCaiJ,et al.Impacts of household income change on CO2 emissions: an empirical analysis of China. J Cleaner Prod2017; 157: 190–200.
18.
MinxJBaiocchiGWiedmannT, et al.Carbon footprints of cities and other human settlements in the UK. Environ Res Lett2013; 8: 035039.
19.
Al-MarriWAl-HabaibehAWatkinsM. An investigation into domestic energy consumption behaviour and public awareness of renewable energy in Qatar. Sustain Cities Soc2018; 41: 639–646.
20.
HerrmannMBrumbyDOreszczynT. Watts your usage? A field study of householders’ literacy for residential electricity data. Energy Effic2018; 11: 1703–1719.
21.
LongoCShankarANuttallP. It’s not easy living a sustainable lifestyle: how greater knowledge leads to dilemmas, tensions, and paralysis. J Bus Ethics2019; 154: 759–779.
22.
MoserSKleinhückelkottenS. Good intents, but low impacts: diverging importance of motivational and socioeconomic determinants explaining proenvironmental behavior, energy use, and carbon footprint. Environ Behav2018; 50: 626–656.
23.
TomasMLopezLAMonsalveF. Carbon footprint, municipality size and rurality in Spain: inequality and carbon taxation. J Cleaner Prod2020; 266: 121798.
24.
JalasMJuntunenJK. Energy intensive lifestyles: time use, the activity patterns of consumers, and related energy demands in Finland. Ecol Econ2015; 113: 51–59.
25.
GillBMoellerS. GHG Emissions and the rural-urban divide. A carbon footprint analysis based on the German official income and expenditure survey. Ecol Econ2018; 145: 160–169.
26.
OttelinJHeinonenJNässenJ,et al.Household carbon footprint patterns by the degree of urbanisation in Europe. Environ Res Lett2019b; 14: 114016.
27.
WiedenhoferDSmetschkaBAkenjiL,et al.Household time use, carbon footprints, and urban form: a review of the potential contributions of everyday living to the 1.5 C climate target. Curr Opinion Environ Sustainability2018; 30: 7–17.
28.
CaiBMLiuBBZhangB. Evolution of Chinese urban household’s water footprint. J Clean Prod2019; 208: 1–10.
29.
PothitouMHannaRFChalvatzisKJ. ICT Entertainment appliances’ impact on domestic electricity consumption. Renew Sustain Energy Rev2017; 69: 843–853.
30.
CazcarroIAmoresAArtoI,et al.Linking multisectoral economic models and consumption surveys for the European Union. Economic Systems Research, 2020.
31.
LenzenMMoranDKanemotoK,et al.Building eora: a global multi-regional input-output database at high country and sector resolution. Economic Systems Research2013; 25: 20–49.
32.
KanemotoKMoranDHertwitchE. Mapping the carbon footprint of nations. Environ Sci Technol2016; 50: 10512–10517.
33.
AtkinsonTCantillonBMarlierE,et al.Social indicators: the EU and social inclusion. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.
34.
HagenaarsAde VosKZaidiMA. Poverty Statistics in the Late 1980s: Research Based on Micro-data. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities (Luxembourg), 1994.
35.
LópezLAArceGMorenateM,et al.Assessing the inequality of spanish households through the carbon footprint: the 21st century great recession effect. Journal Industrial Ecology2016; 20: 571–581.
36.
KoenkerR. Quantile regression. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2005.
37.
BarslundM. CHECKROB: Stata module to perform robustness check of alternative specifications," Statistical Software Components S456837, Boston College Department of Economics, revised 6 June 2018. 2007.
38.
GoughIAdbdallahSJohnsonV,et al.The distribution of total greenhouse gas emissions by households in the UK, and some implications for social policy (LSE STICERD Research Paper No. CASE152). London: Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, London School of Economics, and New Economics’ Foundation, 2011.
39.
ShigetomiYKanemotoKYamamotoY,et al.Quantifying the carbon footprint reduction potential of lifestyle choices in Japan. Environ Res Lett2021; 16: 064022.
40.
PottierA. Expenditure elasticity and income elasticity of GHG emissions: a survey of literature on household carbon footprint. Ecol Econ2022; 192: 107521.
41.
FremstadAUnderwoodAZahranS. The environmental impact of sharing: household and urban economies in CO2 emissions. Ecol Econ2018; 145: 137–147.
42.
AllenPRobinsonMButansE,et al.Innovations for sustainable lifestyles: an agent-based model approach. Sustain Sci2019; 14: 341–354.
43.
SoleTWagnerC. Understanding domestic fuel use practices in an urban township. Build Res Inf2018; 46: 220–230.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
