Chemical reaction and thermal characteristiecs of Maxwell nanofluid flow-through solar collector as a potential solar energy cooling application: A modified Buongiorno's model
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online August, 2023
Chemical reaction and thermal characteristiecs of Maxwell nanofluid flow-through solar collector as a potential solar energy cooling application: A modified Buongiorno's model
Solar collectors absorb solar radiation at the focus of solar concentrating systems as heat energy which is further transferred to nanofluid. Entropy creation in Maxwell nanofluid flow over an infinite horizontal surface of a porous media is the subject of the current investigation. A non-linear stretching surface then induces a parabolic trough solar collector (PTSC) flow. The thermal boundary layer is studied using a modified version of Buongiorno's Model. As a result, the PDEs, which encompass the physical aspects of the issue, must be transformed into solvable and boundary-constrained ODEs. By using a proper similarity transformation, boundary conditions and partial differential expressions are reduced to a set of non-linear ordinary differential equations. The Keller box method is used to find approximate solutions to ODEs. Tests are carried out on a nanofluid known as Copper-engine oil (Cu-EO). The Nusselt number was lowered, but the skin friction coefficient was increased as a result of a substantial magnetic parameter. In addition, Reynolds number and Brinkman number are used to measure fluctuations in viscosity, and, as a result, entropy variations throughout the domain are increased. Temperature decreased due to chemical reaction and Schmidt number, while thermal radiation increased skin friction and Nusselt. According to the current analysis, the heat collector has enhanced PTSC with Maxwell nanofluid.
JamshedWShahzadFSafdarR,et al.Implementing renewable solar energy in presence of Maxwell nanofluid in parabolic trough solar collector: a computational study. Waves Random Complex MEdia2021: 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/17455030.2021.1989518
2.
AcharyaS. Simulation and control of PV-wind-hydrohybrid renewable energy system and possibility in Nepal. International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research2016; 7: 8.
3.
MaghamiMResmaeil RezadadMEbrahimNA,et al.Qualitative and quantitative analysis of solar hydrogen generation literature from 2001 to 2014. Scientometrics2015; 105: 759–771.
4.
HasaniAHAbdullahSFZuhdiAWM,et al.Modelling and simulation of photovoltaic solar cell using silvaco TCAD and matlab software. In 2018 IEEE international conference on semiconductor electronics (ICSE)2018, August (pp. 214–217). Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: IEEE.
5.
SharmaKSinghSYadavM,et al.A review on the performance of the nanofluid based solar collectors—solar energy. Asian Rev. Mech. Eng2015; 4: 17–26.
6.
PanchalHPatelNMominA,et al.Researchers and reviews on active solar distillation system. IJSRD Int J Sci Res Dev2014; 2: 146–153.
7.
AlktraneeMH. A review of performance hybrid photovoltaic/thermal system for general-applications. Hungarian Agricultural Engineering2017; 32: 5–15.
8.
Fernández-GarcíaAZarzaEValenzuelaL,et al.Parabolic-trough solar collectors and their applications. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev2010; 14: 1695–1721.
9.
AhmedMS. Nanofluid: new fluids by nanotechnology. In Thermophysical properties of Complex materials. London IntechOpen Limited: IntechOpen2019. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.86784
10.
SheikhpourMArabiMKasaeianA,et al.Role of nanofluids in drug delivery and biomedical technology: methods and applications. Nanotechnol, Sci Appl2020; 13: 47.
11.
MajumderSDDasA. A short review of organic nanofluids: preparation, surfactants, and applications. Frontiers in Materials2021; 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmats.2021.630182
12.
WongKVDe LeonO. Applications of nanofluids: current and future. Advances in mechanical engineering2010; 2: 519659.
13.
DehajMSRezaeianMMousaviD,et al.Efficiency of the parabolic through solar collector using NiFe2O4/water nanofluid and U-tube. Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers2021; 120: 136–149.
14.
AlashkarAGadallaM. Investigation of using Ag/therminol nanofluids as heating fluids in PTSC-based power plants. In ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition (Vol. 58417, p. V006T08A099). USA: American Society of Mechanical Engineers2017, November.
15.
MaxwellJ. C., A treatise on electricity and magnetism, vol. 1, Clarendon Press, Oxford, UK, 1881.
16.
IrfanMKhanMKhanWA,et al.Modern development on the features of magnetic field and heat sink/source in Maxwell nanofluid subject to convective heat transport. Phys Lett A2018; 382: 1992–2002.
17.
AmanSSallehMZIsmailZ,et al.Exact solution for heat transfer free convection flow of Maxwell nanofluids with graphene nanoparticles. In Journal of physics: conference series (Vol. 890, p. 012004). United Kingdom: IOP Publishing2017, September.
LiuCKhanMURamzanM,et al.Nonlinear radiative Maxwell nanofluid flow in a darcy–forchheimer permeable media over a stretching cylinder with chemical reaction and bioconvection. Sci Rep2021; 11: 1–21.
20.
AzizAJamshedWAliY,et al.Heat transfer and entropy analysis of Maxwell hybrid nanofluid including effects of inclined magnetic field, Joule heating and thermal radiation. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems-S2020; 13: 2667.
21.
ChuYMAliRAsjadMI,et al.Heat transfer flow of Maxwell hybrid nanofluids due to pressure gradient into rectangular region. Sci Rep2020; 10: 1–18.
22.
AliRAsjadMIAldalbahiA,et al.Convective flow of a Maxwell hybrid nanofluid due to pressure gradient in a channel. J Therm Anal Calorim2021; 143: 1319–1329.
23.
AhmadFAbdalSAyedH,et al.The improved thermal efficiency of Maxwell hybrid nanofluid comprising of graphene oxide plus silver/kerosene oil over stretching sheet. Case Studies in Thermal Engineering2021; 27: 101257.
24.
MadhuMKishanNChamkhaAJ. Unsteady flow of a Maxwell nanofluid over a stretching surface in the presence of magnetohydrodynamic and thermal radiation effects. Propulsion and Power research2017; 6: 31–40.
25.
JamshedW. Numerical investigation of MHD impact on Maxwell nanofluid. Int Commun Heat Mass Transfer2021; 120: 104973.
26.
MalvandiAMoshiziSASoltaniEG,et al.Modified Buongiorno’s model for fully developed mixed convection flow of nanofluids in a vertical annular pipe. Comput Fluids2014; 89: 124–132.
27.
MahantheshBShehzadSAMackolilJ,et al.Heat transfer optimization of hybrid nanomaterial using modified Buongiorno model: a sensitivity analysis. Int J Heat Mass Transfer2021; 171: 121081.
28.
SureshSVenkitarajKPSelvakumarP,et al.Effect of Al2O3–Cu/water hybrid nanofluid in heat transfer. Exp Therm Fluid Sci2012; 38: 54–60.
29.
MalvandiAGanjiDD. Mixed convection of alumina/water nanofluid in microchannels using modified Buongiorno's model in presence of heat source/sink. Journal of Applied Fluid Mechanics2016; 9: 2277–2289.
30.
RawatSKUpretiHKumarM. Comparative study of mixed convective MHD Cu-water nanofluid flow over a cone and wedge using modified Buongiorno’s model in presence of thermal radiation and chemical reaction via cattaneo-christov double diffusion model. Journal of Applied and Computational Mechanics2020; 7(3): 1383–1402.
31.
RanaPShuklaNBégOA,et al.Lie group analysis of nanofluid slip flow with Stefan blowing effect via modified Buongiorno’s model: entropy generation analysis. Differential Equations and Dynamical Systems2021; 29: 193–210.
32.
RanaPMahantheshBMackolilJ,et al.Nanofluid flow past a vertical plate with nanoparticle aggregation kinematics, thermal slip and significant buoyancy force effects using modified Buongiorno model. Waves Random Complex MEdia2021: 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/17455030.2021.1977416
33.
RazaJDeroSLundLA,et al.Duality and stability of MHD darcy–forchheimer porous medium flow of rotating nanofluid on a linear shrinking/stretching sheet: Buongiorno model. Int J Numer Methods Heat Fluid Flow2021. https://doi.org/10.1108/HFF-01-2021-0054
34.
DayMA. The no-slip condition of fluid dynamics. Erkenntnis1990; 33: 285–296.
35.
HaqS. UKhanIAliF,et al.Influence of slip condition on unsteady free convection flow of viscous fluid with ramped wall temperature. In Abs Appl Anal (Vol. 2015). London, UK: Hindawi2015, August.
36.
SayedHMAlyEHVajraveluK. Influence of slip and convective boundary conditions on peristaltic transport of non-Newtonian nanofluids in an inclined asymmetric channel. Alexandria Eng J2016; 55: 2209–2220.
37.
SrinivasacharyaDHimabinduK. Effect of slip and convective boundary conditions on entropy generation in a porous channel due to micropolar fluid flow. Int J Nonlinear Sci Numer Simul2018; 19: 11–24.
38.
AcharyaNDasKKunduPK. Outlining the impact of second-order slip and multiple convective condition on nanofluid flow: a new statistical layout. Can J Phys2018; 96: 104–111.
39.
Al-DhaifallahMNassefAMRezkH,et al.Optimal parameter design of fractional order control based INC-MPPT for PV system. Sol Energy2018; 159: 650–664.
40.
Mohyud-DinTSAdnanKhanU,et al.Thermal transport investigation in Magneto-radiative GO-MoS2/H2O–C2H6O2 hybrid nanofluid subject to cattaneo–christov model. Molecules2020; 25: 2592.
41.
JamshedWNisarKSIbrahimRW,et al.Computational frame work of Cattaneo-Christov heat flux effects on Engine oil based Williamson hybrid nanofluids: a thermal case study. Case Studies in Thermal Engineering2021; 26: 101179.
42.
JamshedWNisarKSIbrahimR, et al.Thermal expansion optimization in solar aircraft using tangent hyperbolic hybrid nanofluid: a solar thermal application. Journal of Materials Research and Technology (2021); 14: 985–1006.
43.
JamshedWEidMRMohd NasirNAA,et al.Thermal examination of renewable solar energy in parabolic trough solar collector utilizing Maxwell nanofluid: a noble case study. Case Studies in Thermal Engineering2021;27: 101258.
44.
JamshedWBaleaznuDMohd NasirNAA,et al.The improved thermal efficiency of Prandtl–Eyring hybrid nanofluid via classical Keller box technique. Sci Rep2021. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-02756-4
45.
SajidTJamshedWShahzadF, et al.Impact of gold nanoparticles along with Maxwell velocity and smoluchowski temperature slip boundary conditions on fluid flow: Sutterby model. Chin J Phys2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjph.2021.11.011
46.
SajidTJamshedWShahzadF,et al.Impact of Maxwell velocity slip and Smoluchowski temperature slip on CNTs with modified Fourier theory: Reiner-Philippoff model. Plos One2021. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0258367
47.
JamshedWEidMRAissaA, et al.Partial velocity slip effect on working magneto non-Newtonian nanofluids flow in solar collectors subject to change viscosity and thermal conductivity with temperature. Plos One2021. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0259881
48.
JamshedWSuriya Uma DeviSSafdarR, et al.Comprehensive analysis on copper-iron (II, III)/oxide-engine oil Casson nanofluid flowing and thermal features in parabolic trough solar collector. Journal of Taibah University for Science2021; 15: 619–636.
49.
EidMRMaboodF. Thermal analysis of higher-order chemical reactive viscoelastic nanofluids flow in porous media via stretching surface. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C2021. https://doi.org/10.1177/09544062211008481
50.
MahianOKianifarAKleinstreuerC,et al.A review of entropy generation in nanofluid flow. Int J Heat Mass Transfer2013; 65: 514–532.
51.
SelimefendigilFÖztopHF. Thermal management and modeling of forced convection and entropy generation in a vented cavity by simultaneous use of a curved porous layer and magnetic field. Entropy2021; 23:152.
52.
LoganathanKMuhiuddinGAlanaziAM,et al.Entropy optimization of third-grade nanofluid slip flow embedded in a porous sheet with zero mass flux and a non-Fourier heat flux model. Front Phys2020; 8: 250.
53.
IshakMSAlsaberyAIHashimI,et al.Entropy production and mixed convection within trapezoidal cavity having nanofluids and localised solid cylinder. Sci Rep2021; 11: 1–22.
54.
HerniterJD. An entropy model of brand purchase behavior. Journal of Marketing Research1973; 10: 361–375.
55.
ShahZSheikholeslamiMKumamP,et al.Modeling of entropy optimization for hybrid nanofluid MHD flow through a porous annulus involving variation of Bejan number. Sci Rep2020; 10: 1–14.
56.
MukhtarTJamshedWAzizA, et al. Computational investigation of heat transfer in a flow subjected to MHD of Maxwell nanofluid over a stretched flat sheet with thermal radiation. Numer Methods Partial Differ Equ 2020. https://doi.org/10.1002/num.22643
57.
OwhaibWBasavarajappaMAl-KouzW. Radiation effects on 3D rotating flow of Cu-water nanoliquid with viscous heating and prescribed heat flux using modified Buongiorno model. Sci Rep2021; 11: 20669.
58.
JamshedWSirinCSelimefendigilF, et al.Thermal characterization of coolant Maxwell type nanofluid flowing in parabolic trough solar collector (PTSC) used inside solar powered ship application. Coatings2021; 11: 1552.
59.
BrewsterMQ. Thermal radiative transfer and properties. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley and Sons, 1992.
60.
JamshedWNisarKS. Computational single phase comparative study of Williamson nanofluid in parabolic trough solar collector via Keller Box method. Int J Energy Res2021. https://doi.org/10.1002/er.6554
61.
JamshedW.AzizA. A comparative entropy based analysis of Cu and Fe3O4 /methanol powell-eyring nanofluid in solar thermal collectors subjected to thermal radiation variable thermal conductivity and impact of different nanoparticles shape. Result in Physics2018; 9: 195–205.
62.
JamshedWAzizA. Entropy analysis of TiO2-Cu/EG casson hybrid nanofluid via cattaneo-christov heat flux model. Applied Nanosciences2018; 08: 01–14.
63.
JamshedW. Numerical investigation of MHD impact on Maxwell nanofluid. Int Commun Heat Mass Transfer2021; 120: 104973.
64.
HussainSMJamshedW. A comparative entropy based analysis of tangent hyperbolic hybrid nanofluid flow: implementing finite difference method. Int Commun Heat Mass Transfer2021; 129: 105671.
65.
AzizAJamshedWAzizT. Mathematical model for thermal and entropy analysis of thermal solar collectors by using Maxwell nanofluids with slip conditions thermal radiation and variable thermal conductivity. Open Physics2018; 16: 123–136.
66.
KellerHB. New difference scheme for parabolic problems. New York: Academic Press, 1971, 2.327–350.
67.
DasSChakrabortySJanaRN.,et al.Entropy analysis of unsteady magneto-nanofluid flow past accelerating stretching sheet with convective boundary condition. Appl Math Mech2015; 36: 1593–1610.
68.
QureshiMA. Thermal capability and entropy optimization for prandtl-eyring hybrid nanofluid flow in solar aircraft implementation. Alexandria Eng J2021; 61:5295–5307.
69.
ChuY-MKhanUZaibA, et al. Numerical and computer simulations of cross-flow in the streamwise direction through a moving surface comprising the significant impacts of viscous dissipation and magnetic fields: Stability analysis and dual solutions. Mathematical Problems in Engineering2020; 2020: 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8542396
70.
ChuY-MAli ShahNAgarwalP, et al. Analysis of fractional multi-dimensional Navier–Stokes equation. Advances in Difference Equations2021; 2021(1): 671. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13662-021-03250-x
71.
ChuY-MNazirUSohailM, et al. Enhancement in thermal energy and solute particles using hybrid nanoparticles by engaging activation energy and chemical reaction over a parabolic surface via finite element approach. Fractal and Fractional2021; 5(3): 119. https://doi.org/10.3390/fractalfract5030119
72.
HashimHChuM. Numerical simulation for heat and mass transport analysis for magnetic-nanofluids flow through stretchable convergent/divergent channels. International Journal of Modern Physics B2021; 35(19).
73.
AsjadMIAliRIqbalA, et al. Application of water based drilling clay-nanoparticles in heat transfer of fractional Maxwell fluid over an infinite flat surface. Scientific Reports2021; 11(1): 1–14.
74.
IkramMDImranMAChuYM, et al. MHD flow of a Newtonian fluid in symmetric channel with ABC fractional model containing hybrid nanoparticles. Combinatorial Chemistry and High Throughput Screening2021.
75.
UllahI. Heat transfer enhancement in Marangoni convection and nonlinear radiative flow of gasoline oil conveying Boehmite alumina and aluminum alloy nanoparticles. International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer2022; 132: 105920. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2022.105920
76.
UllahI. Activation energy with exothermic/endothermic reaction and Coriolis force effects on magnetized nanomaterials flow through Darcy–Forchheimer porous space with variable features. Waves in Random and Complex Media2022; 45: 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/17455030.2021.2023779
77.
QiangXMahboobAChuYM. Numerical Approximation of Fractional-Order Volterra Integrodifferential Equation. Journal of Function Spaces2020.
78.
AsjadMIZahidMChuYM, et al. Prabhakar fractional derivative and its applications in the transport phenomena containing nanoparticles. Thermal Science2021(2): 411–416.
