Green retrofit of existing residential buildings is a sustainable way to improve the energy efficiency. However, such implementation faces some challenges due to the different willingness of residents involved. There is a lack of comparative study on residents’ preceptions of green retrofit in China, which is of great concern to the government. Therefore, this study investigates residents’ housing conditions and their perceptions of a green retrofit, based on the feedbacks from 9936 questionnaires which are collected from urban and rural residents throughout China. The Chi-squared test is employed to identify the key influencing factors, including demographic and housing characteristics. The results show that more than 90% of the respondents are willing to adopt retrofit, and installing a zoned temperature control system of individual rooms is a generally acceptable measure. The retrofit subsidy is a topic of high concern, and the respondents are more likely to undertake unified free retrofit, compared with separate retrofit supported by a partial subsidy. Besides, household income, city of residence, housing type and housing problems will cause significant differences in residents’ perceptions. After evaluating the retrofit potential of different resident groups, some suggestions are proposed for policymakers. The findings from this study can help develop differentiated strategies for residents, to promote green retrofit of existing residential buildings in China.
SeneviratneSIDonatMGPitmanAJ, et al.
Allowable CO2 emissions based on regional and impact-related climate targets. Nature2016;
529: 477–483.
2.
TanYLiuGZhangY, et al.
Green retrofit of aged residential buildings in Hong Kong: a preliminary study. Build Environ2018;
143: 89–98.
3.
JagarajanRMohd AsmoniMNAMohammedAH, et al.
Green retrofitting – a review of current status, implementations and challenges. Renew Sustain Energy Rev2017;
67: 1360–1368.
4.
LiuGLiXTanY, et al.
Building green retrofit in China: policies, barriers and recommendations. Energy Policy2020;
139: 111356.
5.
ZhaoXTanYShenL, et al.
Case-based reasoning approach for supporting building green retrofit decisions. Build Environ2019;
160: 106210.
6.
UN Environment and International Energy Agency. Towards a zero-emission, efficient, and resilient buildings and construction sector. Global Status Report 2017.
7.
AliUShamsiMHBohacekM, et al.
A data-driven approach to optimize urban scale energy retrofit decisions for residential buildings. Appl Energy2020;
267: 114861.
8.
AlamMZouPXWStewartRA, et al.
Government championed strategies to overcome the barriers to public building energy efficiency retrofit projects. Sustain Cities Soc2019;
44: 56–69.
9.
LiJShuiB.A comprehensive analysis of building energy efficiency policies in China: status quo and development perspective. J Clean Prod2015;
90: 326–344.
10.
GolubchikovODedaP.Governance, technology, and equity: an integrated policy framework for energy efficient housing. Energy Policy2012;
41: 733–741.
11.
ZhouZZhangSWangC, et al.
Achieving energy efficient buildings via retrofitting of existing buildings: a case study. J Clean Prod2016;
112: 3605–3615.
12.
JafariAValentinV.An optimization framework for building energy retrofits decision-making. Build Environ2017;
115: 118–129.
13.
BaldwinANLovedayDLLiB, et al.
A research agenda for the retrofitting of residential buildings in China – a case study. Energy Policy2018;
113: 41–51.
14.
Building Energy Research Center TU.2020 annual report on China building energy efficiency, 2020.
Beijing:
Tsinghua University.
15.
MaZCooperPDalyD, et al.
Existing building retrofits: methodology and state-of-the-art. Energy Build2012;
55: 889–902.
16.
PomboOAllackerKRivelaB, et al.
Sustainability assessment of energy saving measures: a multi-criteria approach for residential buildings retrofitting – a case study of the Spanish housing stock. Energy Build2016;
116: 384–394.
17.
BertoneEStewartRASahinO, et al.
Guidelines, barriers and strategies for energy and water retrofits of public buildings. J Clean Prod2018;
174: 1064–1078.
18.
BrownPSwanWChahalS.Retrofitting social housing: reflections by tenants on adopting and living with retrofit technology. Energy Eff2014;
7: 641–653.
19.
SharmaAChaniPSKulkarniSY.Energy-efficient retrofit of an unconditioned institute building. Arch Sci Rev2014;
57: 49–62.
20.
LiYRenJJingZ, et al.
The existing building sustainable retrofit in China – a review and case study. Proc Eng2017;
205: 3638–3645.
21.
LiuGTanYLiX.China’s policies of building green retrofit: a state-of-the-art overview. Build Environ2020;
169: 106554.
22.
ZhouNLevineMDPriceL.Overview of current energy-efficiency policies in China. Energy Policy2010;
38: 6439–6452.
23.
XuSGeJ.Sustainable shifting from coal to gas in North China: an analysis of resident satisfaction. Energy Policy2020;
138: 111296.
24.
BjørneboeMGSvendsenSHellerA.Initiatives for the energy renovation of single-family houses in Denmark evaluated on the basis of barriers and motivators. Energy Build2018;
167: 347–358.
25.
TuominenPKlobutKTolmanA, et al.
Energy savings potential in buildings and overcoming market barriers in member states of the European union. Energy Build2012;
51: 48–55.
26.
HwangB-GShanMXieS, et al.
Investigating residents’ perceptions of green retrofit program in mature residential estates: the case of Singapore. Habitat Int2017;
63: 103–112.
27.
TrottaG.The determinants of energy efficient retrofit investments in the English residential sector. Energy Policy2018;
120: 175–182.
28.
HrovatinNZorićJ.Determinants of energy-efficient home retrofits in Slovenia: the role of information sources. Energy Build2018;
180: 42–50.
29.
AbreuMIde OliveiraRAFLopesJ.Younger vs. older homeowners in building energy-related renovations: learning from the Portuguese case. Energy Rep2020;
6: 159–164.
30.
AziziSNairGOlofssonT.Analysing the house-owners’ perceptions on benefits and barriers of energy renovation in Swedish single-family houses. Energy Build2019;
198: 187–196.
31.
BroersWMHVasseurVKempR, et al.
Decided or divided? An empirical analysis of the decision-making process of Dutch homeowners for energy renovation measures. Energy Res Social Sci2019;
58: 101284.
32.
JiaJ-JXuJ-HFanY, et al.
Willingness to accept energy-saving measures and adoption barriers in the residential sector: an empirical analysis in Beijing. China Renew Sustain Energy Rev2018;
95: 56–73.
33.
LiuWZhangJBluemlingB, et al.
Public participation in energy saving retrofitting of residential buildings in China. Appl Energy2015;
147: 287–296.
34.
Code for thermal design of civil building (GB 50176-2016).
35.
BaiLWangS.Definition of new thermal climate zones for building energy efficiency response to the climate change during the past decades in China. Energy2019;
170: 709–719.
36.
SiegelAF.Chapter 17 – chi-squared analysis: testing for patterns in qualitative data. In: SiegelAF (ed) Practical business statistics. 7th ed.
Cambridge, MA:
Academic Press, 2016, pp.509–524.
37.
CurtisKYoungquistST.Part 21: categoric analysis: Pearson chi-square test. Air Med J2013;
32: 179–180.
