Biomass char is defined as the carbonaceous by-product of biomass pyrolysis or gasification and is an undesired by-product that is disposed as a waste, usually at a very high cost. Chars have interesting characteristics like high carbon content and high porosity. These characteristics can make attractive the utilization of biomass char for alternative and innovative applications, e.g. as precursors for activated carbons or as filtering mediums. In this framework, this present work focuses the attention on the surface properties of char which is a key parameter for the evaluation of its applicability in adsorption applications. The combination of three main variables has been considered: the carrier gas (nitrogen or carbon dioxide), the temperature (set at 500°C, 700°C and 900°C) and the initial heating rate (10°C min−1, 30°C min−1 or 50°C min−1). Maximum heating values are observed at 700°C for the case of inert atmosphere (pyrolysis) and the values reduce slightly for the case of CO2 gasification. On the contrary, CO2 gasification has a positive effect on the porosity of the biomass chars. This present research has the scope to provide a first insight on the effect of operating conditions on the optimal char characteristics for the utilization of biomass char as a cheap alternative for filters and adsorbents. An interesting future potential transition of existing biomass CHP facilities would be the evolution into biorefineries, in accordance with the new mandates about Circular Economy.
VakalisSSotiropoulosAMoustakasK, et al.
Thermochemical valorization and characterization of household bio-waste. J Environ Manage2017;
203: 648–654.
2.
PatuzziFPrandoDVakalisS, et al.
Small-scale biomass gasification CHP systems: Comparative performance assessment and monitoring experiences in South Tyrol (Italy). Energy2016;
112: 285–293.
3.
VakalisSPatuzziFBaratieriM.Introduction of an energy efficiency tool for small-scale biomass gasifiers – a thermodynamic approach. Energy Convers Manag2017;
131: 1–9.
4.
CherubiniF.The biorefinery concept: Using biomass instead of oil for producing energy and chemicals. Energy Convers Manag2010;
51: 1412–1421.
5.
HenrichEBürkleSMeza-RenkenZ, et al.
Combustion and gasification kinetics of pyrolysis chars from waste and biomass. J Anal Appl Pyrol1999;
49: 221–241.
6.
ManeerungTLiewJDaiY, et al.
Activated carbon derived from carbon residue from biomass gasification and its application for dye adsorption: kinetics, isotherms and thermodynamic studies. Bioresour Technol2016;
200: 350–359.
7.
ShenYZhaoPShaoQ, et al.
In-situ catalytic conversion of tar using rice husk char-supported nickel-iron catalysts for biomass pyrolysis/gasification. Appl CatalB Environ2014;
152–153: 140–151.
8.
DehkhodaAMWestAHEllisN.Biochar based solid acid catalyst for biodiesel production. Appl Catal A Gen2010;
382: 197–204.
9.
LiMZhengYChenY, et al.
Biodiesel production from waste cooking oil using a heterogeneous catalyst from pyrolyzed rice husk. Bioresour Technol2014;
154: 345–348.
10.
HervyMBerhanuSWeiss-HortalaE, et al.
Multi-scale characterisation of chars mineral species for tar cracking. Fuel2017;
189: 88–97.
11.
Ahmad J, Cordioli E, Patuzzi F, et al. Possible utilization pathways of char from biomass thermochemical conversion: char as a catalytic filtering medium for tar cracking. In: 24th European biomass conference and exhibition, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2016, pp. 475–479. ETA-Florence Renewable Energies.
12.
HansenVMüller-StöverDAhrenfeldtJ, et al.
Gasification biochar as a valuable by-product for carbon sequestration and soil amendment. Biomass Bioenergy2015;
72: 300–308.
13.
WangXZhouWLiangG, et al.
Characteristics of maize biochar with different pyrolysis temperatures and its effects on organic carbon, nitrogen and enzymatic activities after addition to fluvo-aquic soil. Sci Total Environ2015;
538: 137–144.
BenedettiVPatuzziFBaratieriM.Gasification char as a potential substitute of activated carbon in adsorption applications. Energy Procedia2017;
105: 712–717.
16.
BenedettiVPatuzziFBaratieriM.Characterization of char from biomass gasification and its similarities with activated carbon in adsorption applications. Appl Energy2018;
227: 92–99.
17.
FuPYiWBaiX, et al.
Effect of temperature on gas composition and char structural features of pyrolyzed agricultural residues. Bioresour Technol2011;
102: 8211–8219.
18.
FuPHuSXiangJ, et al.
Evaluation of the porous structure development of chars from pyrolysis of rice straw: Effects of pyrolysis temperature and heating rate. J Anal Appl Pyrol2012;
98: 177–183.
19.
FuPHuSXiangJ, et al.
Study on the gas evolution and char structural change during pyrolysis of cotton stalk. J Anal Appl Pyrol2012;
97: 130–136.
20.
AzargoharRNandaSKozinskiJA, et al.
Effects of temperature on the physicochemical characteristics of fast pyrolysis bio-chars derived from Canadian waste biomass. Fuel2014;
125: 90–100.
21.
AsadullahMZhangSMinZ, et al.
Effects of biomass char structure on its gasification reactivity. Bioresour Technol2010;
101: 7935–7943.
22.
CetinEMoghtaderiBGuptaR, et al.
Influence of pyrolysis conditions on the structure and gasification reactivity of biomass chars. Fuel2004;
83: 2139–2150.
23.
GuerreroMRuizMPAlzuetaMU, et al.
Pyrolysis of eucalyptus at different heating rates: studies of char characterization and oxidative reactivity. J Anal Appl Pyrol2005;
74: 307–314.
24.
FuPHuSXiangJ, et al.
Evolution of char structure during steam gasification of the chars produced from rapid pyrolysis of rice husk. Bioresour Technol2012;
114: 691–697.
25.
VakalisSHeimannRTalleyA, et al.
Introduction to frictional pyrolysis (FP) – an alternative method for converting biomass to solid carbonaceous products. Fuel2016;
175: 49–56.
26.
PourmakhdomiAA.Comparison of energy balances of steam explosion and torrefaction technologies. Master Thesis. Department of Bioenergy Technology, Lappeenranta University of Technology, 2014.
27.
VakalisSHeimannRAhmadJ, et al.
The case of frictional torrefaction and the effect of reflux condensation on the operation of the rotary compression unit. Bioresour Technol2018;
268: 91–96.
28.
TolvanenHKeipiTRaikoR.A study on raw, torrefied, and steam-exploded wood: fine grinding, drop-tube reactor combustion tests in N2/O2 and CO2/O2 atmospheres, particle geometry analysis, and numerical kinetics modeling. Fuel2016;
176: 153–164.
29.
SharmaRKWootenJBBaligaVL, et al.
Characterization of chars from pyrolysis of lignin. Fuel2004;
83: 1469–1482.
30.
UNI EN ISO 18134-22015. Biocombustibili solidi - Determinazione del contenuto di umidità - Metodo dell’essiccamento in forno - Parte 2: Umidità totale - Metodo semplificato. 2015.
31.
UNI EN 147752010. Biocombustibili solidi - Determinazione del contenuto di ceneri. 2010.
32.
UNI EN ISO 169482015. Biocombustibili solidi - Determinazione del contenuto totale di carbonio, idrogeno e azoto. 2015.
33.
UNI EN 14918:2010, Biocombustibili solidi - Determinazione del potere calorifico. 2010.
34.
VakalisSPatuzziFBaratieriM.Thermodynamic modelling of small-scale biomass gasifiers: development and assessment of the ''Multi-Box'' approach. Bioresour Technol2016;
206: 173–179.
35.
] ŞensözSAngınD.Pyrolysis of safflower (Charthamus tinctorius L.) seed press cake: part 1. The effects of pyrolysis parameters on the product yields. Bioresour Technol2008;
99: 5492–5497.
36.
AysuTKüçükMM.Biomass pyrolysis in a fixed-bed reactor: effects of pyrolysis parameters on product yields and characterization of products. Energy2014;
64: 1002–1025.
37.
AyllonMAznarMSanchezJ, et al.
Influence of temperature and heating rate on the fixed bed pyrolysis of meat and bone meal. Chem Eng J2006;
121: 85–96.
38.
VakalisSSotiropoulosAMoustakasK, et al.
Characterization of hotel bio-waste by means of simultaneous thermal analysis. Waste Biomass Valor2016;
7: 649–657.
39.
ChunYShengGChiouCT, et al.
Compositions and sorptive properties of crop residue-derived chars. Environ Sci Technol2004;
38: 4649–4655.
40.
LiALiuH-LWangH, et al.
Effects of temperature and heating rate on the characteristics of molded bio-char. BioResources2016;
11: 3259–3274.
41.
CantrellKBHuntPGUchimiyaM, et al.
Impact of pyrolysis temperature and manure source on physicochemical characteristics of biochar. Bioresour Technol2012;
107: 419–428.
42.
DemirbasA.Effects of temperature and particle size on bio-char yield from pyrolysis of agricultural residues. J Anal Appl Pyrol2004;
72: 243–248.
43.
AngınD.Effect of pyrolysis temperature and heating rate on biochar obtained from pyrolysis of safflower seed press cake. Bioresour Technol2013;
128: 593–597.
44.
KlinghofferNBCastaldiMJNzihouA.Influence of char composition and inorganics on catalytic activity of char from biomass gasification. Fuel2015;
157: 37–47.
45.
ŞensözSAngınD.Pyrolysis of safflower (Charthamus tinctorius L.) seed press cake in a fixed-bed reactor: part 2. Structural characterization of pyrolysis bio-oils. Bioresour Technol2008;
99: 5498–5504.
46.
VakalisSBaratieriM.State-of-the-art of small scale biomass gasifiers in the region of South Tyrol. Waste Biomass Valor2015;
6: 817–829.
47.
VakalisSMoustakasKHeimannR, et al.
The renewable battery concept via conversion of agricultural waste into biocoal using frictional pyrolysis. J Clean Product2019;
229: 1183–1188.
48.
ScarlatNFahlFLugatoE, et al.
Integrated and spatially explicit assessment of sustainable crop residues potential in Europe. Biomass Bioenergy2019;
122: 257–269.
49.
MikulandrićRVermeulenBNicolaiB, et al.
Modelling of thermal processes during extrusion based densification of agricultural biomass residues. Appl Energy2016;
184: 1316–1331.
