This study estimates the effects of energy efficiency policy in the residential sector using panel data of 48 contiguous states starting from 1970 to 2017. To avoid any unobserved heterogeneity and facilitate efficiency in estimation, this study employs a Dynamic Panel Data model with a two-step Generalized Method of Moments technique. The results suggest that energy efficiency policy for the residential sector has saved about 8.6 percent in energy consumption, which is about 22 percent of the total stated saving, leaving an energy efficiency gap of 1.5771 quadrillion Btu. Consistent with previous estimations, this study finds that theoretical saving amounts overestimate energy efficiency output and overinflate the increase in potential energy efficiency by about 32 percent. Since energy efficiency policy has failed to achieve the stated amount of saving in the residential sector, households have no incentive to adopt the energy efficiency policy, which has created an unusual gap in energy efficiency.
DOE. Impacts of Model Building Energy Codes U.S. Department of Energy under contract DE-AC05-76RL01830, 2016.
3.
NAPEE. Energy Efficiency Program Administrators and Building Energy Codes. National Action Plan for Energy Efficiency, www.epa.gov/eeactionplan (2009, accessed 6 July 2020).
4.
McKinsey &Company.Unlocking energy efficiency in the U.S. economy.
Chicago:
McKinsey Global Energy and Materials, McKinsey & Company, 2009.
5.
DOE. Achieving energy savings and emission reductions from building energy codes: a primer for state planning. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Energy, 2015.
6.
BrownMA.Market failures and barriers as a basis for clean energy policies. Energy Policy2001;
29: 1197–1207.
7.
EPRI. Assessment of Achievable Potential from Energy Efficiency and Demand Response Programs in the U.S. (2010–2030). Electric Power Research Institute. Report number: 1016987, 2009.
8.
GillinghamKNewellRGPalmerKL.Energy efficiency economics and policy.
Cambridge:
National Bureau of Economic Research, 2009.
9.
National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and National Research Council. Real prospects for energy efficiency in the United States. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2010.
10.
MolinaMKushlerM.Policies matter: creating a foundation for an energy-efficient utility of the future an ACEEE white paper. Washington, DC: ACEEE, 2015.
KoiralaBBoharaALiH.Effects of energy-efficiency building codes in the energy savings and emissions of carbon dioxide.Environ Econ Policy Stud2013;
15: 271–290.
13.
GillinghamKPalmerK.Bridging the energy efficiency gap: policy insights from economic theory and empirical evidence. Rev Environ Econ Policy2014;
8: 18–38.
14.
HirstEBrownM.Closing the efficiency gap: barriers to the efficient use of energy. Resour Conserv Recycl1990;
3: 267–281.
15.
TietenbergT.Reflections—energy efficiency policy: pipe dream or pipeline to the future? Rev Environ Econ Policy2009;
3: 304–320.
16.
LinaresPLabandeiraX.Energy efficiency: economics and policy. J Econ Surv2010;
24: 573–592.
17.
AllcottHGreenstoneM.Is there an energy efficiency gap?J Econ Perspect2012;
26: 3–28.
18.
BrobergTKazukauskasA.Inefficiencies in residential use of energy – a critical overview of literature and energy efficiency policies in EU and Sweden. CERE Working Paper, 2014, vol. 7.
19.
Ecofys Energy Savings 2020. A contributing study to roadmap 2050: a practical guide to a prosperous, low-carbon Europe. Utrecht: Ecofys, 2010.
20.
DOE. Building energy codes 10: an introduction. U.S. Department of Energy’s Building Energy Codes Program. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Energy, 2010.
DOE. Electricity end uses, energy efficiency, and distributed energy resources baseline: Residential Sector Chapter. The Department of Energy, Office of Energy Policy and Systems Analysis, under Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Contract No. DE-AC02-05CH11231, 2017.
23.
EIA. U.S. Energy Information Administration. Table 11.3 carbon dioxide emissions from energy consumption: transportation sector. Monthly Energy Review, October 2019.
24.
EIA.Annual energy outlook 2013 with projections to 2040. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Energy, 2013.
25.
BiganoABoselloFMaranoits G. Energy demand and temperature: a dynamic panel analysis. International Energy Markets Working Papers 12117. Milan: Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei, 2006.
26.
Arellano and Bond, 1991. Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Review of Economic Studies 58, 277–297.
27.
AndersonTWHsiaoC.Estimation of dynamic models with error components. J Am Stat Assoc1981;
76: 598–606.
28.
ArellanoMBoverO.Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models. J Econom1995;
68: 29–51.
29.
BlundellRBondS.Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel-data models. J Econom1998;
87: 115–143.
30.
BondSR.Dynamic panel data models: a guide to micro data methods and practice.
Oxford:
Nuffield College and Institute for Fiscal Studies, 2002.
31.
RoodmanD.How to do xtabond2: an introduction to difference and system GMM in Stata. Stata J2009;
9: 86–136.
32.
LiuG. Estimating energy demand elasticities for OECD countries. A dynamic panel data approach. Discussion Papers 373. Oslo: Statistics Norway, Research Department, 2004.
33.
BernsteinMAGriffinJ.Regional differences in price-elasticity of demand forenergy. Technical Report, The Rand Corporation, Santa Monica, CA, USA, 2005.
34.
PaulAMyersEPalmerK.A partial adjustment model of U.S. electricity demand by region, season, and sector. Resource for the Future Discussion Paper 08–50,
Washington,
DC, 2009.
35.
AlberiniAFilippiniM.Response of residential electricity demand to price: the effect of measurement error. Energy Econ2011;
33: 889–895.
36.
NayanSKadirNAhmadM, et al. Revisiting energy consumption and GDP: evidence from dynamic panel data analysis. Procedia Econ Financ2013;
7: 42–47.
37.
National Climatic Data Center at NOAA, 2019.
38.
LevinALinC-FChuC-SJ.Unit root tests in panel data: asymptotic and finite-sample properties. Journal of Econometrics2002;
108: 1–24.
39.
WesterlundJ.Testing for error correction in panel data. Oxford Bull Econ Stats2007;
69: 709–748.
40.
SantosG.Fuel demand in Brazil in a dynamic panel data approach. Energy Economics2013;
36: 229–240.
41.
EIA. Drivers of U.S. household energy consumption, 1980-2009. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Energy, 2015.
