This study seeks, within the extended framework of the so-called environmental Kuznets curve (EKC), to analyse the nonlinear effect of economic growth and energy consumption on environmental pollution (measured by CO2 emissions) in 30 countries, over the period 2000 – 2018. The panel smooth transition regression (PSTR) model is used to allow such a relationship between variables in different economic regimes to be determined. According to the analysis results, this study strengthens the idea that the relationship can be described as a shaped business cycle, in which economic growth first increases environmental degradation, and then, after a certain growth (income) level has been reached, reduces it. This business cycle relationship suggests that environmental improvements will eventually occur as economies grow. Another implication of these results is the importance of using energy in a greener way to combat climate change and to sustain economic development.
BekunFVAlolaAASarkodieSA.Toward a sustainable environment: nexus between CO2 emissions, resource rent, renewable and nonrenewable energy in 16-EU countries. Sci Total Environ2019;
657: 1023–1029.
2.
CharfeddineLKahiaM.Impact of renewable energy consumption and financial development on CO2 emissions and economic growth in the MENA region: a panel vector autoregressive (PVAR) analysis. Renewable Energy2019;
139: 198–213.
3.
NarayanS.Predictability within the energy consumption–economic growth nexus: some evidence from income and regional groups. Econ Modell2016;
54: 515–521.
4.
KraftJKraftA.On the relationship between energy and GNP. J Energy Dev1978;
3: 401–403.
5.
FangZChangY.Energy, human capital and economic growth in Asia Pacific countries – evidence from a panel cointegration and causality analysis. Energy Econ2016;
56: 177–184.
6.
PaulBPUddinGS.Energy and output dynamics in Bangladesh. Energy Econ2011;
33: 480–487.
7.
TangCFTanBWOzturkI.Energy consumption and economic growth in Vietnam. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev2016;
54: 1506–1514.
8.
ApergisNPayneJE.Renewable energy consumption and economic growth: evidence from a panel of OECD countries. Energy Policy2010;
38: 656–660.
9.
Rodríguez-CaballeroCVVentosa-SantaulàriaD.Energy-growth long-term relationship under structural breaks. Evidence from Canada, 17 Latin American economies and the USA. Energy Econ2017;
61: 121–134.
10.
DestekMAAslanA.Renewable and non-renewable energy consumption and economic growth in emerging economies: evidence from bootstrap panel causality. Renewable Energy2017;
111: 757–763.
11.
RafindadiAAOzturkI.Dynamic effects of financial development, trade openness and economic growth on energy consumption: evidence from South Africa. Int J Energy Econ Policy2017;
7: 74–85.
12.
BakirtasTAkpolatAG.The relationship between energy consumption, urbanization, and economic growth in new emerging-market countries. Energy2018;
147: 110–121.
13.
KuznetsS.Economic growth and income inequality. Am Econ Rev1955;
45: 1–28.
14.
BilgiliFKoçakEBulutÜ.The dynamic impact of renewable energy consumption on CO2 emissions: a revisited Environmental Kuznets Curve approach. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev2016;
54: 838–845.
15.
ZoundiZ.CO2 emissions, renewable energy and the Environmental Kuznets Curve, a panel cointegration approach. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev2017;
72: 1067–1075.
16.
AppiahMO.Investigating the multivariate Granger causality between energy consumption, economic growth and CO2 emissions in Ghana. Energy Policy2018;
112: 198–208.
17.
OlaleEOchuodhoTOLantzV, et al.
The environmental Kuznets curve model for greenhouse gas emissions in Canada. J Cleaner Prod2018;
184: 859–868.
18.
FangZChenY.Human capital and energy in economic growth – evidence from Chinese provincial data. Energy Econ2017;
68: 340–358.
19.
YangGSunTWangJ, et al.
Modeling the nexus between carbon dioxide emissions and economic growth. Energy Policy2015;
86: 104–117.
20.
AkbostancıE, Türüt-AşıkS and TunçGİ.The relationship between income and environment in Turkey: Is there an environmental Kuznets curve?Energy Policy2009;
37: 861–867. DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2008.09.088.
21.
AngJB.CO2 emissions, energy consumption, and output in France. Energy Policy2007;
35: 4772–4778.
22.
OmriA.CO2 emissions, energy consumption and economic growth nexus in MENA countries: evidence from simultaneous equations models. Energy Econ2013;
40: 657–664.
23.
BekunFVEmirFSarkodieSA.Another look at the relationship between energy consumption, carbon dioxide emissions, and economic growth in South Africa. Sci Total Environ2019;
655: 759–765.
24.
OzcanBTzeremesPDoganE.Re-estimating the interconnectedness between the demand of energy consumption, income, and sustainability indices. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int2019;
26: 26500–26516.
25.
TibaSOmriA.Literature survey on the relationships between energy, environment and economic growth. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev2017;
69: 1129–1146.
26.
DoganETurkekulB.CO2 emissions, real output, energy consumption, trade, urbanization and financial development: testing the EKC hypothesis for the USA. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int2016;
23: 1203–1213.
27.
PataUK.Renewable energy consumption, urbanization, financial development, income and CO2 emissions in Turkey: testing EKC hypothesis with structural breaks. J Cleaner Prod2018;
187: 770–779.
28.
LorenteD B and Álvarez-HerranzA. Economic growth and energy regulation in the environmental Kuznets curve. Environ Sci Pollut Res2016;
23: 16478–16494.
29.
LorenteDBÁlvarez-HerranzA.Economic growth and energy regulation in the environmental Kuznets curve. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int2016;
23: 16478–16494.
30.
BalcilarMOzdemirZATunçsiperB, et al.
On the nexus among carbon dioxide emissions, energy consumption and economic growth in G-7 countries: new insights from the historical decomposition approach. Environ Dev Sustainability. Epub ahead of print 19 December 2019. DOI: 10.1007/s10668-019-00563-6.
31.
BildiriciM E and GökmenoğluS M.Environmental pollution, hydropower energy consumption and economic growth: Evidence from G7 countries. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev2017;
75: 68–85.
32.
BildiriciMEGökmenoğluSM.Environmental pollution, hydropower energy consumption and economic growth: evidence from G7 countries. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev2017;
75: 68–85.
33.
GonzalezATeräsvirtaTVan DijkD, et al. Panel Smooth Transition Regression Models, Working paper, Department of Statistics, Uppsala University 2017; 3: 47. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-332277
34.
Gómez-LoscosAGadeaMDBandresE.Business cycle patterns in European regions. Empirical Econ2019; 1–23.
35.
MontoyaLAde HaanJ.Regional business cycle synchronization in Europe?Int Econ Econ Policy2008;
5: 123–137.
36.
IwataHOkadaKSamrethS.Empirical study on the determinants of CO2 emissions: evidence from OECD countries. Appl Econ2012;
44: 3513–3519.
37.
FengTTYangYSXieSY, et al.
Economic drivers of greenhouse gas emissions in China. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev2017;
78: 996–1006.
38.
BrizgaJFengKHubacekK.Drivers of greenhouse gas emissions in the Baltic States: a structural decomposition analysis. Ecol Econ2014;
98: 22–28.
39.
RafindadiA A and OzturkI.Impacts of renewable energy consumption on the German economic growth: Evidence from combined cointegration test. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev2017;
75: 1130–1141. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.093.
40.
RafindadiAAOzturkI.Impacts of renewable energy consumption on the German economic growth: evidence from combined cointegration test. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev2017;
75: 1130–1141.
41.
BrizgaJFengKHubacekK.Drivers of CO2 emissions in the former Soviet Union: a country level IPAT analysis from 1990 to 2010. Energy2013;
59: 743–753.
42.
Agras J and Chapman D. A dynamic approach to the Environmental Kuznets Curve hypothesis.Ecol Econ 1999; 28(2): 267–277.
43.
Sonnenschein J and Mundaca L. Decarbonization under green growth strategies? The case of South Korea. J Cleaner Prod 2016; 123: 180–193.
44.
ZhangY.Structural decomposition analysis of sources of decarbonizing economic development in China; 1992–2006. Ecol Econ2009;
68: 2399–2405.
45.
SinhaAShahbazM.Estimation of environmental Kuznets curve for CO2 emission: role of renewable energy generation in India. Renewable Energy2018;
119: 703–711.
46.
Aliprandi F, Stoppato A and Mirandola A. Estimating CO2 emissions reduction from renewable energy use in Italy. Renewable Energy 2016; 96: 220–232.
47.
EkinsP.The Kuznets Curve for the Environment and Economic Growth: Examining the Evidence. Environ Plan A1997;
29: 805–830. DOI: 10.1068/a290805.
48.
EkinsP.The Kuznets Curve for the environment and economic growth: examining the evidence. Environ Plan A1997;
29: 805–830.
49.
DindaS.Environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis: a survey. Ecol Econ2004;
49: 431–455.
50.
MagnaniE.The Environmental Kuznets Curve, environmental policy and income distribution. Ecol Econ2000;
32: 431–443.
51.
Hertwich EG and Peters GP. Carbon footprint of nations: A global, trade-linked analysis. Environ Sci Tech 2009; 43(16): 6414–6420.
52.
Baltagi BH and Hashem Pesaran M. Heterogeneity and cross section dependence in panel data models: theory and applications introduction. J Appl Econom 2007; 22(2): 229–232.
53.
González-Díaz A, Alcaráz-Calderón AM, González-Díaz MO, et al. Effect of the ambient conditions on gas turbine combined cycle power plants with post-combustion CO2 capture. Energy 2017; 134: 221–233.
54.
Teräsvirta T, Tjøstheim D and Granger CWJ. Modelling nonlinear economic time series. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.
55.
Teräsvirta T. Specification, estimation, and evaluation of smooth transition autoregressive models.J Am Stat Assoc 1994; 89(425): 208–218.
56.
Luukkonen R, Saikkonen P and Teräsvirta T. Testing linearity against smooth transition autoregressive models. Biometrika 1988; 75(3): 491–499.
57.
Tsay RS. Nonlinearity tests for time series. Biometrika 1986; 73(2): 461–466.
58.
OzturkIAcaravciA.CO2 emissions, energy consumption and economic growth in Turkey. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev2010;
14: 3220–3225.
