This study examines the relationship among energy use, real gross domestic product, and exports and thereby the impact of energy conservation for the quest of a sustainable environment-gross domestic product growth in the panel of five South Asian countries. The aggregate production function framework is estimated by employing first/second generational panel co-integration-based models for the panel data covering the years 1980–2014. The empirical findings demonstrate a statistically significant panel error correction mechanism among real gross domestic product, capital, labor, and energy use in both export-added and export-excluded models. The findings of panel causality test depict a significant causal relationship running from export and energy use towards gross domestic product in the long run. Furthermore, a significant feedback relationship between energy use and gross domestic product and between exports and gross domestic product has been found in the short run. These findings of vector error correction model-based panel causality test imply that reducing/cutting the extant aggregate energy use (fossil fuel dominant) via conservation policies are somewhat wanting and could be implemented at the cost of lower gross domestic product and export growths, ceteris paribus. Therefore, for reducing the level of carbon emissions arising from fossil fuel-based energy use and for a sustainable aggregate energy use to the production sector per se, there is an immense need of developing environment friendly/green sources of energy in the region. These consolidated and concerted strides of developing and substituting environment friendly energy options into the extant aggregate energy use will, inter alia, ensure the sustainability of environment-gross domestic product growth in South Asia.
BluszczA.European economies in terms of energy dependence. Qual Quant2017;
51: 1531–1548.
2.
SternDI.A multivariate cointegration analysis of the role of energy in the US macroeconomy. Energy Econ2000;
22: 267–283.
3.
SternDI.Economic growth and energy. Encycl Energy2004;
2: 35–51.
4.
Ozturk I. A literature survey on energy-growth nexus. Energy Policy 2010; 38: 340–349.
5.
OmriA.An international literature survey on energy-economic growth nexus: evidence from country-specific studies. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev2014;
38: 951–959.
6.
TibaSOmriA.Literature survey on the relationships between energy, environment and economic growth. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev2008;
69: 1129–1146.
7.
GrossmanGMHelpmanE.Endogenous innovation in the theory of growth. J Econ Perspect1991;
8: 23–44.
8.
Bahmani-OskooeeM.Export growth and economic growth: an application of cointegration and error-correction modeling. J Developing Areas1993;
27: 535–542.
AwokuseTO.Trade openness and economic growth: is growth export-led or import-led?Appl Econ2008;
40: 161–173.
11.
BalassaB.Exports and economic growth: further evidence. J Dev Econ1978;
5: 181–189.
12.
SadorskyP.Energy consumption, output and trade in South America. Energy Econ2012;
34: 476–488.
13.
ShahbazMLeanHHFarooqA.Natural gas consumption and economic growth in Pakistan. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev2013;
18: 87–94.
14.
ShahbazMNasreenSLingCH, et al.
Causality between trade openness and energy consumption: what causes what in high, middle and low income countries. Energy Policy2014;
70: 126–143.
15.
HossainS.Multivariate granger causality between economic growth, electricity consumption, exports and remittance for the panel of three SAARC countries. Eur Sci J 2014; 8: 347–376.
16.
ShakeelMIqbalMM. Energy consumption and GDP with the role of trade in South Asia. In: 2014 International conference on energy systems and policies (ICESP), Air University, Islamabad, Pakistan, 2014, pp.1–5. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineering (IEEE).
17.
RazaSAShahbazMNguyenDK.Energy conservation policies, growth and trade performance: evidence of feedback hypothesis in Pakistan. Energy Policy2015;
80: 1–10.
18.
ShakeelMIqbalMMMajeedMT.Energy consumption, trade and GDP: a case study of South Asian countries. Pakistan Dev Rev2014;
53: 461–476.
19.
SadorskyP.Trade and energy consumption in the Middle East. Energy Econ2011;
33: 739–749.
20.
Lean HH and Smyth R. Electricity consumption, output, and trade in Bhutan. In: ADB South Asia working paper series no. 34, December 2014. Mandaluyong City: Asian Development Bank.
21.
NarayanPKSmythR.Multivariate Granger causality between electricity consumption, exports and GDP: evidence from a panel of Middle Eastern countries. Energy Policy2009;
37: 229–236.
22.
LeanHHSmythR.On the dynamics of aggregate output, electricity consumption and exports in Malaysia: evidence from multivariate Granger causality tests. Appl Energy2010;
87: 1963–1971.
23.
LeanHHSmythR.Multivariate Granger causality between electricity generation, exports, prices and GDP in Malaysia. Energy2010;
35: 3640–3648.
24.
DedeoğluDKayaH.Energy use, exports, imports and GDP: new evidence from the OECD countries. Energy Policy2013;
57: 469–476.
25.
ESCAP UN. Economic and social survey of Asia and the Pacific.
London:
United Nations Publication, 2015.
26.
International Energy Agency (IEA). Energy balances of non-OECD countries.
Paris, France:
International Energy Agency, 2011.
27.
NarayanPKSmythR.Energy consumption and real GDP in G7 countries: new evidence from panel cointegration with structural breaks. Energy Econ2008;
30: 2331–2341.
28.
NarayanPKNarayanSPoppS.A note on the long-run elasticities from the energy consumption–GDP relationship. Appl Energy2010;
87: 1054–1057.
29.
PedroniP. Panel cointegration techniques and open challenges. In: Panel data econometrics. Cambridge, MA: Academic Press, 2019, pp. 251–287.
30.
NarayanPKWongP.A panel data analysis of the determinants of oil consumption: the case of Australia. Appl Energy2009;
86: 2771–2775.
31.
NarayanPKPoppS.The energy consumption-real GDP nexus revisited: Empirical evidence from 93 countries. Econ Model2012;
29: 303–308.
32.
SmythRNarayanPK.Applied econometrics and implications for energy economics research. Energy Econ2015;
50: 351–358.
33.
Asian Development Bank (ADB). Prime energy statistics in Asia and Pacific (1990–2009). Publications/Annual Reports, 2013.
FarhaniSShahbazMArouriM, et al.
The role of natural gas consumption and trade in Tunisia’s output. Energy Policy2014;
66: 677–684.
36.
TsiotrasAEstacheA.In the short run, energy efficiency concerns and trade protection hurt each other and growth, but in the long run, not necessarily so: 1980–2010 Latin American Evidence (No. ECARES 2014-38).
Brussels, Belgium:
Universite Libre de Bruxelles, 2014.
37.
FeenstraRCInklaarRTimmerMP.The next generation of the Penn World Table. Am Econ Rev2015;
105: 3150–3182.
38.
PesaranMHUllahAYamagataT.A bias adjusted LM test of error cross-section independence. Econ J2008;
11: 105–127.
39.
ImKSPesaranMHShinY.1997. Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. Mimeo, Department of Applied Economics, University of Cambridge.
40.
PesaranMH.A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross‐section dependence. J Appl Econ2007;
22: 265–312.
41.
PedroniP.Critical values for cointegration tests in heterogeneous panels with multiple regressors. Oxford Bull Econ Stat1999;
61: 653–670.
42.
PedroniP.Panel cointegration: asymptotic and finite sample properties of pooled time series tests with an application to the PPP hypothesis. Econ Theory2004;
20: 597–625.
43.
WesterlundJ.Testing for error correction in panel data. Oxford Bull Econ Stat2007;
69: 709–748.
44.
KaoCChiangMH. On the estimation and inference of a cointegrated regression in panel data. In: Baltagi B, Fomby T and Carter HR (eds) Nonstationary panels, panel cointegration, and dynamic panels. UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 2001, pp. 179–222.
45.
PesaranMH.Estimation and inference in large heterogeneous panels with a multifactor error structure. Econometrica2006;
74: 967–1012.
EngleRFGrangerCW.Co-integration and error correction: representation, estimation, and testing. Econometrica1987; 55: 251–276.
48.
Stern DI and Enflo K. Causality between energy and output in the long-run. Energy Economics 2013; 39: 135–146.
49.
Vaona A. Granger non-causality tests between (non) renewable energy consumption and output in Italy since 1861: the (ir) relevance of structural breaks. Energy Policy 2012; 45: 226–236.
50.
PersynDWesterlundJ.Error-correction-based cointegration tests for panel data. STATA J2008;
8: 232–241.
