Proposal of a novel mixed integer linear programming model for site selection of a wind power plant based on power maximization with use of mixed type wind turbines
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online August, 2020
Proposal of a novel mixed integer linear programming model for site selection of a wind power plant based on power maximization with use of mixed type wind turbines
Several methods that have been developed to obtain energy, which is indispensable for life and whose necessity has increased geometrically in the course of time, are no longer sustainable. Therefore, human being has headed towards sustainable alternative energy sources. Wind has been one of the most interested renewable energy sources for human as of the beginning of the 20th century. This study focuses on one of the most important work items at the establishment phase of this important energy source, power plant site selection. Within the scope of linear programming perspective, two models were presented based on mixed integer linear programming. The first model provides employment of single-type wind turbine on the selected site, whereas the second model, which was developed within the current study, aims additional increase in total power output by allowing employment of multiple-type wind turbine on the selected site. The same region showed up as the most appropriate site to establish wind power plant as a result of both models of the study.
HughesLLongA.Is there an oil weapon?Int Secur2014;
39: 152–189.
2.
EichengreenBChituLMehlA.Network effects, homogeneous goods and international currency choice: new evidence on oil markets from an older era. Can J Econ2016;
49: 173–206.
3.
BeaudreauBLightfootH.The physical limits to economic growth by R&D funded innovation. Energy2015;
84: 45–52.
4.
LedecGRappKAielloR.Greening the wind – environmental and social considerations for wind power development.
Washington, DC:
The World Bank, 2011.
5.
Şentürkİ.The effects of energy consumption on economic growth by sources.
Ankara:
Hacettepe University, 2012.
10 ShaheenMKhanMZ.A method of data mining for selection of site for wind turbines. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev2016;
55: 1225–1233.
11.
KloseADrexlA.Facility location models for distribution system design. Eur J Oper Res2005;
162: 4–29.
12.
BakhtavarEKhademiDMikaeilR.The use of fuzzy-weighted binary integer goal programming to select the optimum site for a central processing plant. J South Afr Inst Min Metall2017;
117: 505–510.
13.
Rouyendegh BD, Yildizbasi A, Arikan UZB.Using Intuitionistic Fuzzy TOPSIS in Site Selection of Wind Power Plants in Turkey. Advances in Fuzzy Systems2018;
2018: 1–14.
14.
BravoMJonesDPla-SantamariaD, et al.
Robustness of weighted goal programming models: an analytical measure and its application to offshore wind-farm site selection in United Kingdom. Ann Oper Res2018;
267: 65–79.
15.
LotfiRMostafaeipourAMardaniN, et al.
Investigation of wind farm location planning by considering budget constraints. Int J Sustainable Energy2018;
37: 799–817.
16.
BansalRCBharadwajAK.Exploring feasibility and scope for wind resource potential with turbine selection for a land site. Asian J Electr Sci2018;
7: 10–19.
17.
WuYChenKXuH, et al.
An innovative method for offshore wind farm site selection based on the interval number with probability distribution. Eng Optim2017;
49: 2174–2192.
18.
FischettiMPisingerD. Mathematical optimization and algorithms for offshore wind farm design: an overview. Bus Inform Syst Eng 2018; 61: 469–485.
19.
LoukogeorgakiEVagionaDGVasileiouM.Site selection of hybrid offshore wind and wave energy systems in Greece incorporating environmental impact assessment. Energies2018;
11: 1–16.
20.
VagionaDGKamilakisM.Sustainable site selection for offshore wind farms in the south Aegean – Greece. Sustainability2018;
10: 1–18.
21.
BodilySECarraeayRFreyS, et al.Quantitative business analysis: text and cases.
Irwin:
McGraw-Hill Education, 1997 (ISE editions).
22.
SarıaslanH.Linear programming in resource allocation.
Ankara:
Turhan Kitabevi Publications, 2000.
23.
ÜnalH.Fuzzy linear programming and an application on the İstanbul stock exchange.
Adana:
Çukurova University, 2015.
24.
DissanyakeSTÖnalH.Amenity driven price effects and conservation reserve site selection: a dynamic linear integer programming approach. Ecol Econ2011;
70: 2225–2235.
25.
PalmaJMLMCastroFARibeiroLF, et al.
Linear and nonlinear models in wind resource assessment and wind turbine micro-siting in complex terrain. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn2008;
96: 2308–2326.
26.
SöğütZÜlgenKOktayZ.Mathematical modelling of electricity production from wind energy and an application. J Defense Sci2008;
7: 35–55.
27.
MustakerovIBorissovaD.Wind turbines type and number choice using combinatorial optimization. Renewable Energy2010;
35: 1887–1894.
28.
LinYFangMC.An integrated approach for site selection of offshore wind-wave power production. IEEE J Ocean Eng2012;
37: 740–755.
29.
GorsevskiPVCathcartSCMirzaeiG, et al.
A group-based spatial decision support system for wind farm site selection in Northwest Ohio. Energy Policy2013;
55: 374–385.
30.
KeremAAtayeterYGörgülüS, et al.
Preparation and implementation of wind energy feasibility infrastructure of Mehmet Akif Ersoy University, İstiklal Campus. J Grad School Nat Appl Sci2014;
5: 18–24.
31.
SözenAMirzapourAÇakırMT, et al.
Selecting best location of wind plants using DEA and TOPSIS approach in Turkish cities. Gazi J Eng Sci2015;
1: 173–193.
32.
JonesDFWallG.An extended goal programming model for site selection in the offshore wind farm sector. Ann Oper Res2015;
245: 121–135.
33.
Sameie H and Arvan M. A simulation-based Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) model to evaluate wind plants locations. Decision Science Letters2015;
4: 165–180.
34.
ÖmürgönülşenMEmreTAtıcıKB.The measurement of relative efficiency of wind power plants in Turkey with data envelopment analysis. Hacettepe Univ J Econ Admin Sci2016;
34: 79–96.
35.
YıldızCŞekkeliM.Optimal bidding in Turkey day ahead electricity market for wind energy and pumped storage hydro power plant. Pamukkale J Eng Sci2016;
22: 361–366.
36.
DavisWMartínM.Optimal year-round operation for methane production from CO2 and water using wind and/or solar energy. J Cleaner Prod2014;
80: 252–261.
37.
de la CruzVMartínM.Characterization and optimal site matching of wind turbines: effects on the economics of synthetic mathane production. J Cleaner Prod2016;
133: 1302–1311.
38.
AyodeleTROgunjuyigbeASOOdigieO, et al.
On the most suitable sites for wind farm development in Nigeria. Data Brief2018;
19: 29–41.
39.
NoorollahiYYousefiHMohammadiM.Multi-criteria decision support system for wind farm site selection using GIS. Sustainable Energy Technologies Assess2016;
13: 38–50.
40.
SatkinMNoorollahiYAbbaspourM, et al.
Multi criteria site selection model for wind-compressed air energy storage power plants in Iran. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev2014;
32: 579–590.
41.
GassVSchmidtJStraussF, et al.
Assessing the economic wind power potential in Austria. Energy Policy2013;
53: 323–330.
HusienWEl-OstaWDekamE.Effect of the wake behind wind rotor on optimum energy output of wind farms. Renewable Energy2013;
49: 128–132.
44.
ChowdhurySZhangJMessacA, et al.
Unrestricted wind farm layout optimization (UWFLO): investigating key factors influencing the maximum power generation. Renewable Energy2012;
38: 16–30.
45.
ShakoorRHassanMYRaheemA, et al.
Wake effect modeling: a review of wind farm layout optimization using Jensen’s model. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev2016;
58: 1048–1059.
46.
HouPHuWChenC, et al.
Optimisation of offshore wind farm cable connection layout considering levelised production cost using dynamic minimum spanning tree algorithm. IET Renewable Power Gener2016;
10: 175–183.
SamoraniM.The wind farm layout optimization problem. In: PardalosPRebennackSPereiraM, et al. (eds) Handbook of wind power systems.
Edmonton:
Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2014, pp.21–38.
49.
ArcherCL.The Santa Cruz eddy and United States wind power.
Stanford:
Stanford University, 2004.
50.
ArcherCJacobsonM.Evaluation of global wind power. J Geophys Res2005;
110: 1–20.
51.
RahmaniRKhairuddinACheratiSM, et al. A novel method for optimal placing wind turbines in a wind farm using particle swarm optimization (PSO). In: IPEC, 2010 conference proceedings, http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/mostRecentIssue.jsp?punumber=5685176 (2010, accessed 3 October 2019).
52.
RajperSAminI.Optimization of wind turbine micrositing: a comparative study. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev2012;
16: 5485–5492.
53.
WangLTanAGuY.Comparative study on optimizing the wind farm layout using different design methods and cost models. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn2015;
146: 1–10.
54.
ChenLMacDonaldE.A system-level cost-of-energy wind farm layout optimization with landowner modeling. Energy Convers Manag2014;
77: 484–494.
55.
WangLTanACholetteM, et al.
Optimization of wind farm layout with complex land divisions. Renewable Energy2017;
105: 30–40.
56.
MosettiGPoloniCDiviaccoB.Optimization of wind turbine positioning in large windfarms by means of a genetic algorithm. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn1994;
51: 105–116.
57.
YinPWuTHsuP.A power-deficiency and risk-management model for wind farm micro-siting using cyber swarm algorithm. Appl Math Model2016;
40: 2177–2189.
58.
GonzalezJSPayanMBRiquelme SantosJM, et al.
A review and recent developments in the optimal wind-turbine micro-siting problem. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev2014;
30: 133–144.
