In this study, the long-term interactions between carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions, real gross domestic product, fossil fuel consumption, and financial development are examined for 15 emerging markets during 1980–2014 by using heterogeneous dynamic panel data techniques. Long-run elasticity results show that the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis is not valid for emerging markets. Besides, long-run findings reveal that fossil fuel energy consumption has a powerful negative impact on the environmental quality of emerging markets. Moreover, long-run findings of emerging markets show that 1% increase in financial development raises CO2 emissions at 0.76% level. Considering empirical findings, emerging markets should tend to use environmentally friendly technologies to avoid the possible environmental problems caused by pollution. Therefore, green energy investors should be supported by possible incentive policies. In addition, emerging markets should turn towards financial regulations, which extend credit channels for clean industries whereby emerging countries could achieve their sustainable development goals.
AlcantaraVRocaJ.Energy and CO2 emissions in Spain. Energy Econ1995;
17: 221–230.
6.
RocaJAlcantaraV.Energy intensity, CO2 emissions and the environmental Kuznets curve. The Spanish case. Energy Policy2001;
29: 553–556.
7.
LiseW.Decomposition of CO2 emissions over 1980–2003 in Turkey. Energy Policy2006;
34: 1841–1852.
8.
SayNPYücelM.Energy consumption and CO2 emissions in Turkey: empirical analysis and future projection based on an economic growth. Energy Policy2006;
34: 3870–3876.
9.
SoytasUSariREwingBT.Energy consumption, income, and carbon emissions in the United States. Ecol Econ2007;
62: 482–489.
10.
SoytasUSariR.Energy consumption, economic growth, and carbon emissions: challenges faced by an EU candidate member. Ecol Econ2007;
68: 1667–1675.
11.
AngJB.Economic development, pollutant emissions and energy consumption in Malaysia. J Policy Model2008;
30: 271–278.
12.
ApergisNPayneJE.CO2 emissions, energy usage, and output in Central America. Energy Policy2009;
37: 3282–3296.
13.
ApergisNPayneJE.The emissions, energy consumption, and growth nexus: evidence from the Commonwealth of independent states. Energy Policy2010;
38: 650–655.
14.
HaliciogluF.An econometric study of CO2 emissions, energy consumption, income and foreign trade in Turkey. Energy Policy2009;
37: 1156–1164.
15.
SadorskyP.Renewable energy consumption, CO2 emissions and oil prices in the G7 countries. Energy Econ2009;
31: 456–462.
16.
ZhangXPChengXM.Energy consumption, carbon emissions, and economic growth in China. Ecol Econ2009;
68: 2706–2712.
17.
ApergisNPayneJEMenyahK, et al.
On the causal dynamics between emissions, nuclear energy, renewable energy, and economic growth. Ecol Econ2010;
69: 2255–2260.
18.
ChangCC.A multivariate causality test of carbon dioxide emissions, energy consumption and economic growth in China. Appl Energy2010;
87: 3533–3537.
19.
MenyahKWolde-RufaelY.Energy consumption, pollutant emissions and economic growth in South Africa. Energy Econ2010;
32: 1374–1382.
20.
Al-MulaliU.Oil consumption, CO2 emission and economic growth in MENA countries. Energy2011;
36: 6165–6171.
21.
HossainMS.Panel estimation for CO2 emissions, energy consumption, economic growth, trade openness and urbanization of newly industrialized countries. Energy Policy2011;
39: 6991–6999.
22.
LiFDongS, LX, et al.
Energy consumption-economic growth relationship and carbon dioxide emissions in China. Energy Policy2011;
39: 568–574.
23.
PaoHTTsaiCM.Multivariate Granger causality between CO2 emissions, energy consumption, FDI (foreign direct investment) and GDP (gross domestic product): evidence from a panel of BRIC (Brazil, Russian Federation, India, and China) countries. Energy2011;
36: 685–693.
24.
SharmaSS.Determinants of carbon dioxide emissions: Empirical evidence from 69 countries. Appl Energy2011;
88: 376–382.
25.
WangSSZhouDQZhouP, et al.
CO2 emissions, energy consumption and economic growth in China: a panel data analysis. Energy Policy2011;
39: 4870–4875.
26.
Al-MulaliUChe SabCN.Energy consumption, pollution and economic development in 16 emerging countries. J Econ Stud2013;
40: 686–698.
27.
OzcanB.The nexus between carbon emissions, energy consumption and economic growth in Middle East countries: a panel data analysis. Energy Policy2013;
62: 1138–1147.
28.
ZeshanMAhmedV.Energy, environment and growth nexus in South Asia. Environ Dev Sustain2013;
15: 1465–1475.
29.
ShafieiSSalimRA.Non-renewable and renewable energy consumption and CO2 emissions in OECD countries: a comparative analysis. Energy Policy2014;
66: 547–556.
30.
AnastasiaV.The causal relationship between GDP, exports, energy consumption, and CO2 in Thailand and Malaysia. Int J Econ Perspect2015;
9: 37–48.
31.
BastolaUSapkotaP.Relationships among energy consumption, pollution emission, and economic growth in Nepal. Energy2015;
80: 254–262.
32.
KaisSSamiH.An econometric study of the impact of economic growth and energy use on carbon emissions: panel data evidence from fifty eight countries. Renew Sustain Energy Rev2016;
59: 1101–1110.
33.
QuWHXuLQuGH, et al.
The impact of energy consumption on environment and public health in China. Nat Hazards2017;
87: 675–697.
34.
GrossmanGMKruegerAB.Environmental impacts of a North American Free Trade Agreement. NBER Working Papers Series No. 3914, Cambridge, November 1991.
35.
DindaS.Environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis: a survey. Ecol Econ2004;
49: 431–455.
36.
ShafikNBandyopadhyayS.Economic growth and environmental quality: time series and cross-country evidence. World Bank Working Paper Series No. 904, 30 May 1992. Washington, DC: World Bank.
37.
PanayotouT.Demystifying the environmental Kuznets curve: turning a black box into a policy tool. Environ Dev Econ1997;
2: 465–484.
38.
ListJAGalletCA.The environmental Kuznets curve: does one size fit all?Ecol Econ1999;
31: 409–423.
39.
DindaSCoondooDPalM.Air quality and economic growth: an empirical study. Ecol Econ2000;
34: 409–423.
40.
JalilAMahmudSF.Environment Kuznets curve for CO2 emissions: a cointegration analysis for China. Energy Policy2009;
37: 5167–5172.
41.
SabooriBSulaimanJMohdS.Economic growth and CO2 emissions in Malaysia: a cointegration analysis of the environmental Kuznets curve. Energy Policy2012;
51: 184–191.
42.
ShahbazMOzturkIAfzaT, et al.
Revisiting the environmental Kuznets curve in a global economy. Renew Sustain Energy Rev2013;
25: 494–502.
43.
ShahbazMKhraiefNUddinGS, et al.
Environmental Kuznets curve in an open economy: a bounds testing and causality analysis for Tunisia. Renew Sustain Energy Rev2014;
34: 325–336.
44.
Al-MulaliUTangFCOzturkI.Estimating the environment Kuznets curve hypothesis: evidence from Latin America and the Caribbean countries. Renew Sustain Energy Rev2015;
50: 918–924.
45.
ApergisNOzturkI.Testing environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis in Asian countries. Ecol Indicator2015;
52: 16–22.
46.
UçakHAslanATurgutA.A dynamic analysis of CO2 emissions and the GDP relationship: empirical evidence from high-income OECD countries. Energy Sources Part B2015;
10: 38–50.
47.
Al-MulaliUOzturkI.The investigation of environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis in the advanced economies: the role of energy prices. Renew Sustain Energy Rev2016;
54: 1622–1631.
48.
Al-MulaliUSolarinSAOzturkI.Investigating the presence of the environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) hypothesis in Kenya: an autoregressive distributed lag (ARDL) approach. Nat Hazards2016;
80: 1729–1747.
49.
BilgiliFKoçakEBulutÜ, et al.
The dynamic impact of renewable energy consumption on CO2 emissions: a revisited environmental Kuznets curve approach. Renew Sustain Energy Rev2016;
54: 838–845.
50.
DijkgraafEVolleberghHRJ.A note on testing for environmental Kuznets curves with panel data. Nota Di Lavoro. No. 63.2001. Milan: Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei, 2001.
51.
CoondooDDindaS.Causality between income and emission: a country group-specific econometric analysis. Ecol Econ2002;
40: 351–367.
52.
AkbostancıETürüt-AsıkSTunçGI.The relationship between income and environment in Turkey: is there an environmental Kuznets curve?Energy Policy2009;
37: 861–867.
53.
NarayanPKNarayanS.Carbon dioxide emissions and economic growth: panel data evidence from developing countries. Energy Policy2010;
38: 661–666.
54.
BorhanHBAhmedEM.Simultaneous model of pollution and income in Malaysia. Int J Econ Perspect2012;
6: 50–73.
55.
SabooriBSulaimanJ.Environmental degradation, economic growth and energy consumption: evidence of the environmental Kuznets curve in Malaysia. Energy Policy2013;
60: 892–905.
56.
KapusuzoğluA.Causality relationships between carbon dioxide emissions and economic growth: results from a multi-country study. Int J Econ Perspect2014;
8: 5–15.
57.
OnafoworaOAOwoyeO.Bounds testing approach to analysis of the environment Kuznets curve hypothesis. Energy Econ2014;
44: 47–62.
58.
BaekJ.Environmental Kuznets curve for CO2 emissions: the case of Arctic countries. Energy Econ2015;
50: 13–17.
59.
LiXYanXAnQ, et al.
The coordination between China’s economic growth and environmental emission from the environmental Kuznets curve viewpoint. Nat Hazards2016;
83: 233–252.
60.
LuoGWengJHZhang, et al.
A reexamination of the existence of environmental Kuznets curve for CO2 emissions: evidence from G20 countries. Nat Hazards2017;
85: 1023–1042.
61.
PermanRSternDJ.Evidence from panel unit root and cointegration tests that the environmental Kuznets curve does not exist. Aust J Agric Resour Econ2003;
47: 325–347.
62.
RichmondAKKaufmannRK.Is there a turning point in the relationship between income and energy use and/or carbon emissions?Ecol Econ2006;
56: 176–189.
63.
ShahbazMLeanHH.Does financial development increase energy consumption? The role of industrialization and urbanization in Tunisia. Energy Policy2012;
40: 473–479.
64.
ShahbazMTiwariAKNasirM.The effects of financial development, economic growth, coal consumption and trade openness on CO2 emissions in South Africa. Energy Policy2013;
61: 1452–1459.
65.
FarhaniSChaibiARaultC.CO2 emissions, output, energy consumption, and trade in Tunisia. Econ Model2014;
38: 426–434.
66.
FarhaniSOzturkI.Causal relationship between CO2 emissions, real GDP, energy consumption, financial development, trade openness, and urbanization in Tunisia. Environ Sci Pollut Res2015;
22: 15663–15676.
67.
DoganETurkekulB.CO2 emissions, real output, energy consumption, trade, urbanization and financial development: testing the EKC hypothesis for the USA. Environ Sci Pollut Res2016;
23: 1203–1213.
68.
Martinez-ZarzosoI.The impact of urbanization on CO2 emissions: evidence from developing countries. Nota Di Lavoro No. 50.2008. Milan: Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei, 2008.
69.
SadorskyP.Energy consumption, output and trade in South America. Energy Econ2012;
34: 476–488.
70.
KatırcıoğluSTFethiSKalmazDB, et al.
Interactions between energy consumption, international trade, and real income in Canada: an empirical investigation from a new version of the Solow growth model. Int J Green Energy2016;
13: 1059–1074.
71.
KatircioğluSTFethiSKalmazDB, et al.
Energy consumption, international trade, and real income in the USA: an empirical investigation using conditional error correction models. J Renew Sustain Energy2014;
6: 1–17.
72.
AntweilerWCopelandBRTaylorMS.Is free trade good for the environment?Am Econ Rev2001;
91: 877–908.
73.
BirdsallNWheelerD.Trade policy and industrial pollution in Latin America: where are the pollution havens?J Environ Dev1993;
2: 137–149.
BencivengaVRSmithBD.Financial intermediation and endogenous growth. Rev Econ Stud1991;
58: 195–209.
76.
LevineRLoayzaNBeckT.Financial intermediation and growth: causality and causes. J Monetary Econ2000;
46: 31–77.
77.
CumminsJDDionneGGagneR, et al.
Efficiency of insurance firms with endogenous risk management and financial intermediation activities. J Prod Anal2009;
32: 145–159.
78.
SadorskyP.The impact of financial development on energy consumption in emerging economies. Energy Policy2010;
38: 2528–2535.
79.
ZhangYJ.The impact of financial development on carbon emissions: an empirical analysis in China. Energy Policy2011;
39: 2197–2203.
80.
OzturkIAcaravciA.The long-run and causal analysis of energy, growth, openness and financial development on carbon emissions in Turkey. Energy Econ2013;
36: 262–267.
81.
ÇetinMEcevitE.The impact of financial development on carbon emissions under the structural breaks: empirical evidence from Turkish economy. Int J Econ Perspect2017;
11: 64–78.
82.
LanoiePLaplanteBRoyM.Can capital markets create incentives for pollution control?Ecol Econ1998;
26: 31–41.
83.
DasguptaSLaplanteBMamingiN.Pollution and capital markets in developing countries. J Environ Econ Manage2001;
42: 310–335.
84.
TadesseS.Financial development and technology. William Davidson Institute Working Paper No. 749. Michigan: William Davidson Institute, 2005.
85.
ClaessensSFeijenE.Financial sector development and the millennium development goals. Working Paper No.89. Washington, DC: World Bank, 2007.
86.
TamazianAChousaJPVadlamannatiCK.Does higher economic and financial development lead to environmental degradation: evidence from BRIC countries. Energy Policy2009;
37: 246–253.
87.
ShahbazMSolarinSAMahmoodH, et al.
Does financial development reduce CO2 emissions in Malaysian economy? A time series analysis. Econ Model2013;
35: 145–152.
88.
TamazianARaoBB.Do economic, financial and institutional developments matter for environmental degradation? Evidence from transitional economies. Energy Econ2010;
32: 137–145.
89.
Al-MulaliUChe SabC.The impact of energy consumption and CO2 emission on the economic growth and financial development in the sub Saharan African countries. Energy2012;
39: 180–186.
90.
Al-MulaliUChe SabC.The impact of energy consumption and CO2 emission on the economic and financial development in 19 selected countries. Renew Sustain Energy Rev2012;
16: 4365–4369.
91.
ShahbazMHyeQMATiwariAK, et al.
Economic growth, energy consumption, financial development, international trade and CO2 emissions in Indonesia. Renew Sustain Energy Rev2013;
25: 109–121.
92.
BoutabbaMA.The impact of financial development, income, energy and trade on carbon emissions: evidence from the Indian economy. Econ Model2014;
40: 33–41.
93.
Al-MulaliUOzturkILeanHH.The influence of economic growth, urbanization, trade openness, financial development, and renewable energy on pollution in Europe. Nat Hazards2015;
79: 621–644.
94.
JavidMSharifF.Environmental Kuznets curve and financial development in Pakistan. Renew Sustain Energy Rev2016;
54: 406–414.
95.
KatircioğluSTTaşpinarN.Testing the moderating role of financial development in an environmental Kuznets curve: empirical evidence from Turkey. Renew Sustain Energy Rev2017;
68: 572–586.
96.
Asumadu-SarkodieSOwusuPA.A multivariate analysis of carbon dioxide emissions, electricity consumption, economic growth, financial development, industrialization, and urbanization in Senegal. Energy Sources Part B2017;
12: 77–84.
97.
TalukdarDMeisnerCM.Does the private sector help or hurt the environment? Evidence from carbon dioxide pollution in developing countries. World Dev2001;
29: 827–840.
98.
JalilAFeridunM.The impact of growth, energy and financial development on the environment in China: a cointegration analysis. Energy Econ2011;
33: 284–291.
99.
ShahbazMFaridulISabihuddinBM.Financial development, energy consumption and CO2 emissions: evidence from ARDL approach for Pakistan. Munich Personal RePEc Archive (MPRA), No. 30138. Germany: Munich University Library, 2011.
100.
SalahuddinMGowJOzturkI.Is the long-run relationship between economic growth, electricity consumption, carbon dioxide emissions and financial development in Gulf Cooperation Council Countries robust?Renew Sustain Energy Rev2015;
51: 317–326.
101.
SaidiKMbarekMB.The impact of income, trade, urbanization, and financial development on CO2 emissions in 19 emerging economies. Environ Sci Pollut Res2017;
24: 12748–12757.
102.
OmriADalySRaultC, et al.
Financial development, environmental quality, trade and economic growth: what causes what in MENA countries. Energy Econ2015;
48: 242–252.
Demirgüç-KuntALevineR.Stock markets, corporate finance, and economic growth: an overview. World Bank Econ Rev1996;
10: 223–239.
107.
BeckTDemirgüç-KuntALevineR.Financial institutions and markets across countries and over time: the updated financial development and structure database. World Bank Econ Rev2010;
24: 77–92.
McConnelKE.Income and the demand for environmental quality. Environ Dev Econ1997;
2: 383–399.
110.
NasirMRehmanFU.Environmental Kuznets curve for carbon emissions in Pakistan: an empirical investigation. Energy Policy2011;
39: 1857–1864.
111.
BaekJKimHS.Is economic growth good or bad for the environment? Empirical evidence from Korea. Energy Econ2013;
36: 744–749.
112.
CharfeddineLKhediriKB.Financial development and environmental quality in UAE: cointegration with structural breaks. Renew Sustain Energy Rev2016;
55: 1322–1335.
113.
LeTHChangYParkD.Trade openness and environmental quality: international evidence. Energy Policy2016;
92: 45–55.
114.
British Petrol. Statistical review of world energy, www.bp.com/statisticalreview (2015, accessed 24 September 2017).
BeraAKJarqueCM.Efficient tests for normality, homoscedasticity and serial independence of regression residuals: Monte Carlo Evidence. Econ Lett1981;
7: 313–318.
LumleyTDiehrPEmersonS, et al.
The importance of the normality assumption in large public health data sets. Annu Rev Public Health2002;
23: 151–169.
119.
WeisbergS.Applied linear regression. 3rd ed.
Englewood Cliffs, NJ:
John Wiley and Sons Inc., 2005.
120.
PesaranHM.A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross section dependence. J Appl Econ2007;
22: 265–312.
121.
HoechleD.Robust standard errors for panel regressions with cross-sectional dependence. Stata J2007;
7: 281–312.
122.
PesaranHM.General diagnostic tests for cross section dependence in panels. CESifo Working Paper No. 1229.
Munich:
Center for Economic Studies and Ifo Institute (CESifo), 2004.
123.
BaiJNgS.Panel unit root tests with cross-section dependence: a further investigation. Econ Theory2010;
26: 1088–1114.
124.
PesaranHM.A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross-section dependence. Cambridge Working Papers in Economics No. 0346. University of Cambridge: Faculty of Economics, 2003.
125.
WesterlundJHosseinkouchhackMSolbergerM.The local power of the CADF and CIPS panel unit root tests. Econ Rev2016;
35: 845–870.
PesaranHMShinYSmithRP.Pooled mean group estimation of dynamic heterogeneous panels. J Am Stat Assoc1999;
94: 621–634.
128.
BlackburneIIEFrankMW.Estimation of nonstationary heterogeneous panels. Stata J2007;
7: 197–208.
129.
ZahonogoP.Trade and economic growth in developing countries: evidence from sub-Saharan Africa. J African Trade2016;
3: 41–56.
130.
SarkodieSAStrezovV.A review on environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis using bibliometric and meta-analysis. Sci Total Environ2019;
649: 128–145.
131.
FocacciA.Empirical analysis of the environmental and energy policies in some developing countries using widely employed macroeconomic indicators: the cases of Brazil, China and India. Energy Policy2005;
33: 543–554.
132.
TsurumiTManagiS.Decomposition of the environmental Kuznets curve: scale, technique, and composition effects. Environ Econ Policy Stud2010;
11: 19–36.
133.
KaufmannRKDavidsdottirBGarnhamS, et al.
The determinants of atmospheric SO2 concentrations: reconsidering the environmental Kuznets curve. Ecol Econ1998;
25: 209–220.
134.
ShuklaVParikhK.The environmental consequences of urban growth: cross-sectional perspectives on economic development, air pollution, and city size. Urban Geography1992;
13: 422–449.
