Co-benefits are used to reflect multiple important benefits that could be achieved by a single policy or measure. In recent years, researches on co-benefits have developed rapidly in various fields, but there is limited research associated with eco-industrial development. In order to investigate the driving forces of co-benefits in the field of eco-industrial development, this study established an emergy-based hybrid model for such a research objective. In order to verify this model, Suzhou industrial park in China has been selected as a case study. The results showed that co-benefits achieved in 2015 through eco-industrial development-based strategies in Suzhou industrial park were more than that were in 2010. Waste reutilization environmental efficiency effect was the most significant positive driving forces, while energy consumption efficiency effect had the least impact on generating co-benefits in Suzhou industrial park. Policy implications such as strengthening eco-industrial network and further industrial structure promotion are proposed.
ShihYHTsengCH.Cost-benefit analysis of sustainable energy development using life-cycle co-benefits assessment and the system dynamics approach. Appl Energy2014;
119: 57–66.
4.
ZhangSHWorrellECrijns-GrausW, et al.
Co-benefits of energy efficiency improvement and air pollution abatement in the Chinese iron and steel industry. Energy2014;
78: 333–345.
5.
DharSShuklaPR.Low carbon scenarios for transport in India: co-benefits analysis. Energy Policy2015;
81: 186–198.
6.
MrkajicVVukelicDMihajlovA.Reduction of CO2 emission and non-environmental co-benefits of bicycle infrastructure provision: the case of the University of Novi Sad, Serbia. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev2015;
49: 232–242.
7.
ZhangSHWorrellECrijns-GrausW.Evaluating co-benefits of energy efficiency and air pollution abatement in China’s cement industry. Appl Energy2015;
147: 192–213.
8.
MaDChenWYYinX, et al.
Quantifying the co-benefits of decarbonisation in China’s steel sector: an integrated assessment approach. Appl Energy2016;
162: 1225–1237.
9.
WestJJSmithSLSilvaRA, et al.
Co-benefits of mitigating global greenhouse gas emissions for future air quality and human health. Nat Clim Change2013;
3: 885–889.
10.
BainPGMilfontTLKashimaY, et al.
Co-benefits of addressing climate change can motivate action around the world. Nat Clim Change2015;
6: 154–157.
11.
DongHJDaiHCDongL, et al.
Pursuing air pollutant co-benefits of CO2 mitigation in China: a provincial leveled analysis. Appl Energy2015;
144: 165–174.
12.
LiuZAdamsMCoteRP, et al.
Co-benefits accounting for the implementation of eco-industrial development strategies in the scale of industrial park based on emergy analysis. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev2018;
81: 1522–1529.
13.
CoteRPHallJ.Industrial parks as ecosystems. J Clean Prod1995;
3: 41–46.
14.
USAPCSD. President’s Council on Sustainable Development. Eco-efficiency task force report. www.whitehouse.gov/PCSD (accessed 1 December 2010).
15.
OhDSKimKBJeongSY.Eco-Industrial Park Design: a Daedeok Technovalley case study. Habitat Int2005;
29: 269–284.
16.
VeigaLBEMagriniASzkloAS.Eco industrial parks: a tool towards the reduction, reuse and recycling (3Rs) of by-products and wastes: case study in Paracambi EIP, Rio de Janeiro State. WIT Trans Ecol Environ2008;
109: 395–404.
17.
RobertsBH.The application of industrial ecology principles and planning guidelines for the development of eco-industrial parks: an Australian case study. J Clean Prod2004;
12: 997–1010.
18.
BiancoVRosaMDScarpaF, et al.
Implementation of a cogeneration plant for a food processing facility: a case study. Appl Therm Eng2016;
102: 500–512.
19.
LiuZAdamsMCoteRP, et al.
Comprehensive development of industrial symbiosis for the response of greenhouse gases emission mitigation: challenges and opportunities in China. Energy Policy2017;
102: 88–95.
20.
LiuZAdamsMWenZG, et al.
Eco-industrial development around the globe: recent progress and continuing challenges. Resour Conserv Recycl2017;
127: A1–A2.
21.
GengYCoteR.Scavengers and decomposers within an eco-industrial park. Int J Sustain Dev World Ecol2002;
9: 333–340.
22.
HeeresRRVermeulenWde WalleFB.Eco-industrial park initiatives in the USA and the Netherlands: first lessons. J Clean Prod2004;
12: 985–995.
23.
SakrDBaasLEl-HaggarS, et al.
Critical success and limiting factors for eco-industrial parks: global trends and Egyptian context. J Clean Prod2011;
19: 1158–1169.
24.
LiuZAdamsMCoteRP, et al.
Comparative study on the pathways of industrial parks towards sustainable development between China and Canada. Resour Conserv Recycl2018;
128: 417–425.
25.
GengYZhangPUlgiatiS, et al.
Emergy analysis of an industrial park: the case of Dalian, China. Sci Total Environ2010;
408: 5273–5283.
26.
LiuZGengYParkHS, et al.
An emergy-based hybrid method for assessing industrial symbiosis of an industrial park. J Clean Prod2016;
114: 132–140.
27.
DongLFujitaTZhangH, et al.
Promoting low-carbon city through industrial symbiosis: a case in China by applying HPIMO model. Energy Policy2013;
61: 864–873.
28.
DongHJOhnishiSFujitaT, et al.
Achieving carbon emission reduction through industrial & urban symbiosis: a case of Kawasaki. Energy2014;
64: 277–286.
29.
LiuZGengYWangFF, et al.
Emergy-ecological footprint hybrid method analysis on the industrial parks from the geographical and regional perspective. Environ Eng Sci2015;
32: 193–202.
30.
LiuZGengYSergioU, et al.
Uncovering key factors influencing one industrial park’s sustainability: a combined evaluation method of emergy analysis and index decomposition analysis. J Clean Prod2016;
114: 141–149.
31.
TilleyDRBrownMT.Dynamic emergy accounting for assessing the environmental benefits of subtropical wetland stormwater management systems. Ecol Modell2006;
192: 327–361.
32.
WangLZhangJNiW.Emergy evaluation of eco-industrial park with power plant. Ecol Model2005;
189: 233–240.
33.
LiuZGengYZhangP, et al.
Emergy-based comparative analysis of industrial clusters: economic and Technological Development of Shenyang Area, China. Environ Sci Pollut Res2014;
21: 10243–10253.
34.
LiuZGengYWangH, et al.
Emergy-based comparative analysis of energy intensity in different industrial systems. Environ Sci Pollut Res2015;
22: 18687–18698.
35.
LanSFQinPLuHF. Emergy evaluation of eco-economic system.
Beijing:
Chemical Industry Press, 2002.
36.
JiangPXuBGengY, et al.
Assessing the environmental sustainability with a co-benefits approach: a study of industrial sector in Baoshan District in Shanghai. J Clean Prod2016;
114: 114–123.
37.
ZhangXHDengSHZhangYZ, et al.
Emergy evaluation of the impact of waste exchanges on the sustainability of industrial systems. Ecol Eng2011;
37: 206–216.
