This research article investigates the impact of democracy on peak turning point of the environmental Kuznets curve in the context of the Association of South East Asian Nations (ASEAN) countries that have different levels of development and democracy. For this purpose, time-series data for the period of 1980–2014 have been employed. The empirical findings support the existence of the environmental Kuznets curve for CO2 emission in the ASEAN countries. It is also found that democracy measured by civil liberties delays the turning point of the environmental Kuznets curve and, therefore, increases the environmental cost of economic growth. The research output provides meaningful inputs to formulate an effective public policy for the protection of the environment in the ASEAN countries.
GrossmanK.Economic environment and the economic growth. Q J Econ1995;
110: 353–377.
2.
PanayotouT.Empirical tests and policy analysis of environmental degradation at different stages of economic development.
Working Paper WP238, Technology and Employment Programme, Geneva:
International Labour Organization, 1993.
3.
ShafikNBandyopadhyayS.Economic growth and environmental quality: time-series and cross-country evidence.
The World Bank, Washington, DC:
World Bank Publications, 1992.
4.
BeckermanW.Economic growth and the environment: Whose growth? Whose environment?World Dev1992;
20: 481–496.
5.
SeldenTMSongD.Environmental quality and development: is there a Kuznets curve for air pollution emissions?J Environ Econ Manage1994;
27: 147–162.
6.
Copeland BR and Taylor MS. Trade, growth, and the environment. Journal of Economic Literature 2004; 42: 7–71.
7.
ChimeliABBradenJB.The environmental Kuznets curve and optimal growth.
Palisades, NY:
Columbia University, 2002.
8.
Deacon R and Bernardo M. “Political Economy and Natural Resource Use.” Departmental Working Papers, Department of Economics, University of California: Santa Barbara, California, 2004.
CollierP.The political economy of state failure. Oxford Rev Econ Policy2009;
25: 219–240.
11.
MidlarskyMI.Democracy and the environment: an empirical assessment. J Peace Res1998;
35: 341–361.
12.
ADB. Asian Development Bank Sustainability Report 2016: Investing for an Asia and the Pacific Free of Poverty, RPT167995-2, ADB Avenue, Mandaluyong City.
13.
CongletonRD.Political institutions and pollution control. Rev Econ Stat1992;
74: 412–421.
14.
TorrasMBoyceJK.Income, inequality, and pollution: a reassessment of the environmental Kuznets curve. Ecol Econ1998;
25: 147–160.
15.
BarrettSGraddyK.Freedom, growth, and the environment. Environ Dev Econ2000;
5: 433–456.
16.
NeumayerE.Do democracies exhibit stronger international environmental commitment? A cross-country analysis. J Peace Res2002;
39: 139–164.
17.
LiQReuvenyR.Democracy and environmental degradation. Int Stud Q2006;
50: 935–956.
18.
AubourgRWGoodDHKrutillaK.Debt, democratization, and development in Latin America: how policy can affect global warming. J Policy Anal Manage2008;
27: 7–19.
19.
WardH.Liberal democracy and sustainability. Environ Polit2008;
17: 386–409.
20.
BernauerTKoubiV.Effects of political institutions on air quality. Ecol Econ2009;
68: 1355–1365.
21.
BuitenzorgyMMolAP.Does democracy lead to a better environment? Deforestation and the democratic transition peak. Environ Resour Econ2011;
48: 59–70.
VanekJ. Capitalism, economic democracy, and ecological destruction of our planet. In: Advances in the economic analysis of participatory and labor-managed firms. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 2011, pp. 289–298.
24.
FarzaneganMRMarkwardtG.Pollution, economic development and democracy: evidence from the MENA countries. Joint Discussion Paper Series in Economics, 2012.
25.
DipietroWR.Does the extent of democracy, the degree of income inequality, or the size of the private sector influence national environmental performance?Res World Econ2013;
4: 55.
26.
FredrikssonPGNeumayerE.Democracy and climate change policies: is history important?.Ecol Econ2013;
95: 11–19.
27.
SjöstedtMJagersSC.Democracy and the environment revisited: the case of African fisheries. Mar Policy2014;
43: 143–148.
28.
YouW-HZhuH-MYuK, et al.
Democracy, financial openness, and global carbon dioxide emissions: heterogeneity across existing emission levels. World Dev2015;
66: 189–207.
29.
PolicardoL.Is democracy good for the environment? Quasi-experimental evidence from regime transitions. Environ Resour Econ2016;
64: 275–300.
30.
BuitenzorgyM.Three essays on democracy, economic development and the environment. 2016. Faculty of Agriculture and Environment, University of Sydney.
31.
SulemanaIJamesHSRikoonJS.Environmental Kuznets curves for air pollution in African and developed countries: exploring turning point incomes and the role of democracy. J Environ Econ Policy2017;
6: 134–152.
32.
GhodratiSHaratiJNazariA.Democracy and environment quality in selected countries: an application of panel data. Iran Econ Rev2018;
22: 21–49.
33.
LópezRGalinatoGI.Deforestation and forest-induced carbon dioxide emissions in tropical countries: how do governance and trade openness affect the forest-income relationship?.J Environ Dev2005;
14: 73–100.
34.
ScruggsL (ed). Democracy and environmental protection: an empirical analysis. In: Annual meeting of the midwest political science association 67th annual national conference, Palmer House Hilton, Chicago, IL, 2009.
35.
FaureMGMartinPZhipingL, et al. Instruments for environmental governance: what works?. Environ Governance Sustainability2012.
36.
HalkosGETzeremesNG.Carbon dioxide emissions and governance: a nonparametric analysis for the G-20. Energy Econ2013;
40: 110–118.
37.
LvZ.The effect of democracy on CO2 emissions in emerging countries: does the level of income matter?Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev2017;
72: 900–906.
38.
VadlamannatiKCGaarderAR.Does democracy guarantee (de)forestation? An empirical analysis. Int Area Stud Rev2017;
20: 97–121.
39.
PovitkinaM.The limits of democracy in tackling climate change. Environ Polit2018;
27: 411–432.
40.
DindaS.Environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis: a survey. Ecol Econ2004;
49: 431–455.
41.
AlbornozFColeMAElliottRJ, et al.
In search of environmental spillovers. World Econ2009;
32: 136–163.
42.
ColeMAElliottRJ.FDI and the capital intensity of “dirty” sectors: a missing piece of the pollution haven puzzle. Rev Dev Econ2005;
9: 530–548.
ZarskyL.Havens, halos and spaghetti: untangling the evidence about foreign direct investment and the environment. Foreign Direct Investment Environ1999;
13: 47–74.
AngJB.CO2 emissions, energy consumption, and output in France. Energy Policy2007;
35: 4772–4778.
47.
RichmondAKKaufmannRK.Is there a turning point in the relationship between income and energy use and/or carbon emissions?.Ecol Econ2006;
56: 176–189.
48.
ApergisNPayneJE.CO2 emissions, energy usage, and output in Central America. Energy Policy2009;
37: 3282–3286.
49.
KivyiroPArminenH.Carbon dioxide emissions, energy consumption, economic growth, and foreign direct investment: causality analysis for Sub-Saharan Africa. Energy2014;
74: 595–606.
50.
HaliciogluF.An econometric study of CO2 emissions, energy consumption, income and foreign trade in Turkey. Energy Policy2009;
37: 1156–1164.
51.
WebberDJAllenDO.Environmental Kuznets curves: mess or meaning?Int J Sustainable Dev World Ecol2010;
17: 198–207.
52.
GrangerCWNewboldP.Spurious regressions in econometrics. J Econom1974;
2: 111–120.
53.
KaoC.Spurious regression and residual-based tests for cointegration in panel data. J Econom1999;
90: 1–44.
54.
LevinALinC-FChuC-S.Unit root tests in panel data: asymptotic and finite-sample properties. J Econom2002;
108: 1–24.
55.
Im KS, Pesaran MH, Shin Y. Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. Journal of Econometrics 2003; 115: 53–74.
56.
PedroniP.Purchasing power parity tests in cointegrated panels. Rev Econ Stat2001;
83: 727–731.
57.
PedroniP.Critical values for cointegration tests in heterogeneous panels with multiple regressors. Oxf Bull Econ Stat1999;
61: 653–670.
58.
PaehlkeRC. Environmental challenges to democratic practice. In: Lafferty WM and Meadowcroft J (eds) Democracy and the environment: problems and prospects. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 1996, pp.18–38.
