This paper analyzes the alternate energy option for lighting among rural households in the Himalayan region of Pakistan using a primary dataset collected from 500 households from the seven districts of Gilgit-Baltistan regions. A multivariate probit model was employed for examining the determinants of use of different sources of energy and a Poisson regression to estimate the number of alternate sources of energy used for lighting by the rural households. The propensity score matching (PSM) approach was employed to assess the impact of electricity as a source of light for the use of household appliances as well as providing light for evening work. Empirical results show the rural households in the study area use five different sources of energy for lighting, namely electricity, kerosene, candles, solar energy and batteries. Education and wealth play an important role in the use of clean sources of energy for light. The PSM results indicated a positive impact of electricity on the use of appliances, as well as on more extended working hours in the households in this Himalayan region.
International Energy Agency. Energy and climate change. World energy outlook special report.
Paris:
International Energy Agency, 2015. [9 rue de la Fédération, 75739 Paris Cedex 15].
2.
AventR. Some are more energy hungry than others. The Economist, 3 February 2010.
3.
UN.Seventeen development goals: 17 development goals to transform the world.
New York:
The United Nations, 2016.
4.
HusainT.Pakistan's energy sector issues: energy efficiency and energy environmental links. Lahore J Econ2010;
15: 33.
5.
International Energy Agency. World energy outlook. [9 rue de la Federation, 75739 Paris Cedex 15]France:
IEA, 2009.
6.
RahutDBMottalebKAAliA, et al.
Energy consumption transition through the use of electricity for lighting and cooking: evidence from Bhutan. Renew Energy Focus2017;
18: 11–21.
7.
RahutDBBeheraBAliA.Factors determining household use of clean and renewable energy sources for lighting in Sub-Saharan Africa. Renew Sust Energy Rev2017;
72: 661–672.
8.
BlaikiePMSadequeSZ.Policy in high places: environment and development in the Himalayan region.
Nepal:
ICIMOD, 2000.
9.
XUSWangT.On energy equity and China’s policy choices. Energy Environ2017;
28: 288–301.
10.
PatelRZhaoN.Keeping the lights on: fixing Pakistan’s energy crisis. Public Int Rep2014;
67: 2.
11.
International Energy Agency. World energy outlook 2011. [9 rue de la Fédération, 75739 Paris Cedex 15]France:
IEA, 2011.
12.
RahutDBAliABeheraB.Domestic use of dirty energy and its effects on human health: empirical evidence from Bhutan. Int J Sust Energy2016;
36: 983–993.
13.
DufloEGreenstoneMHannaR.Indoor air pollution, health and economic well-being. Surv Perspect Integr Environ Soc2008;
1: 1–9.
14.
LamNLSmithKRGauthierA, et al.
Kerosene: a review of household uses and their hazards in low-and middle-income countries. J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev2012;
15: 396–432.
15.
RahutDBDasSDe GrooteH, et al.
Determinants of household energy use in Bhutan. Energy2014;
69: 661–672.
16.
BarnesDFFloorW.Biomass energy and the poor in the developing world. J Int Affairs. 1999; 53: 237–262.
17.
HowellsMIAlfstadTVictorDG, et al.
A model of household energy services in a low-income rural African village. Energy Policy2005;
33: 1833–1851.
18.
JoshiJBoharaAK.Household preferences for cooking fuels and inter-fuel substitutions: unlocking the modern fuels in the Nepalese household. Energy Policy2017;
107: 507–523.
19.
MottalebKARahutDBAliA.An exploration into the household energy choice and expenditure in Bangladesh. Energy2017;
135: 767–776.
20.
HeltbergR.Factors determining household fuel choice in Guatemala. Envir Dev Econ2005;
10: 337–361.
21.
HouB-DTangXMaC, et al.
Cooking fuel choice in rural China: results from microdata. J Clean Product2017;
142: 538–547.
22.
MensahJTMarbuahGAmoahA.Energy demand in Ghana: a disaggregated analysis. Renew Sust Energy Rev2016;
53: 924–935.
23.
Adair-RohaniHLewisJMingleJ, et al. Burning opportunity: clean household energy for health, sustainable development, and wellbeing of women and children.
Geneva:
WHO Press, 2016
24.
OluwoleOAnaGRArinolaGO, et al.
Effect of stove intervention on household air pollution and the respiratory health of women and children in rural Nigeria. Air Qual Atmos Health2013;
6: 553–561.
25.
IngaleLTDubeKJSarodeDB, et al.
Monitoring and respiratory health assessment of the population exposed to cooking fuel emissions in a rural area of Jalgaon District, India. Asia Pac J Public Health2013;
25: 463–475.
26.
EdwardsJHLangpapC.Fuel choice, indoor air pollution and children's health. Envir Dev Econ2012;
17: 379–406.
27.
Spalding-FecherR.Health benefits of electrification in developing countries: a quantitative assessment in South Africa. Energy Sust Develop2005;
9: 53–62.
28.
EzzatiMKammenDM.Evaluating the health benefits of transitions in household energy technologies in Kenya. Energy Policy2002;
30: 815–826.
29.
EzzatiMKammenDM.The health impacts of exposure to indoor air pollution from solid fuels in developing countries: knowledge, gaps, and data needs. Environ Health Perspect2002;
110: 1057.
30.
HoldrenJPSmithKRKjellstromT, et al.Energy, the environment and health.
New York:
United Nations Development Programme, 2000.
31.
KhandkerSRBarnesDFSamadHA.Are the energy poor also income poor? Evidence from India. Energy Policy2012;
47: 1–12.
32.
RaoMNReddyBS.Variations in energy use by Indian households: an analysis of micro level data. Energy2007;
32: 143–153.
33.
RahutDBBeheraBAliA.Household energy choice and consumption intensity: empirical evidence from Bhutan. Renew Sustain Energy Rev2016;
53: 993–1009.
34.
RahutDBMottalebKAAliA, et al.
The use and determinants of solar energy by Sub-Saharan African households. Int J Sustain Energy2017; 37:
718–735.
35.
RahutDBMottalebKAAliA.Household energy consumption and its determinants in timor-leste. Asian Develop Rev2017;
34: 167–197.
36.
RahutDBAliAMottalebKA.Understanding the determinants of alternate energy options for cooking in the Himalayas: empirical evidence from the Himalayan region of Pakistan. J Clean Product2017;
149: 528–539.
37.
KarimuA.Cooking fuel preferences among Ghanaian households: an empirical analysis. Energy Sustain Develop2015;
27: 10–17.
38.
HuangW-H.The determinants of household electricity consumption in Taiwan: evidence from quantile regression. Energy2015;
87: 120–133.
39.
GregoryJSternDI.Fuel choices in rural Maharashtra. Biomass Bioenergy2014;
70: 302–314.
40.
BaiyegunhiLJSHassanMB.Rural household fuel energy transition: evidence from Giwa LGA Kaduna State, Nigeria. Energy Sustain Develop2014;
20: 30–35.
41.
MakoneseTIfegbesanAPRampediIT.Household cooking fuel use patterns and determinants across southern Africa: evidence from the demographic and health survey data. Energy Environ2017; 29: 29–48.
42.
PachauriSJiangL.The household energy transition in India and China. Energy Policy2008;
36: 4022–4035.
43.
PandeyVLChaubalA.Comprehending household cooking energy choice in rural India. Biomass Bioenerg. 2011;
35: 4724–4731.
44.
ReddyBSSrinivasT.Energy use in Indian household sector – an actor-oriented approach. Energy2009;
34: 992–1002.
45.
FarsiMFilippiniMPachauriS.Fuel choices in urban Indian households. Environ Develop Econ2007;
12: 757–774.
46.
AbebawD.Household determinants of fuelwood choice in urban Ethiopia: a case study of Jimma Town. J Develop Areas2007; 41: 117–126.
47.
OuedraogoB.Household energy preferences for cooking in urban Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso. Energy Policy2006;
34: 3787–3795.
48.
NepalMNepalAGrimsrudK.Unbelievable but improved cookstoves are not helpful in reducing firewood demand in Nepal. Envir Dev Econ2011;
16: 1–23.
49.
LayJOndraczekJStoeverJ.Renewables in the energy transition: evidence on solar home systems and lighting fuel choice in Kenya. Energy Econ2013;
40: 350–359.
50.
HeltbergR.Fuel switching: evidence from eight developing countries. Energy Econ2004;
26: 869–887.
51.
ViswanathanBKavi KumarKS.Cooking fuel use patterns in India: 1983–2000. Energy Policy2005;
33: 1021–1036.
52.
MomoduASAkinbamiJ-FAkinwunmiIO.Environmental and health implications of fuel substitution for cooking energy in Nigeria's household energy mix. Energy Environ2010;
21: 937–952.
53.
BhusalP, BD, PuolakkaMHalonenL. Fuel based lighting in developing countries and their replacement with LEDs – case study from Nepal. In: Proceedings of CIE lighting quality and energy efficiency, Vienna, Austria, 14–17 March, 2010, pp.500–504. Vienna: CIE.
54.
MillsE. Can technology free developing countries from light poverty? The Guardian, Thursday 30 July 2015.
55.
MensahJTAduG.An empirical analysis of household energy choice in Ghana. Renew Sustain Energy Rev2015;
51: 1402–1411.
56.
BeheraBRahutDBJeetendraA, et al.
Household collection and use of biomass energy sources in South Asia. Energy2015;
85: 468–480.
57.
FatmiZRahmanAKaziA, et al.
Situational analysis of household energy and biomass use and associated health burden of indoor air pollution and mitigation efforts in Pakistan. Int J Environ Res Public Health2010;
7: 2940–2952.
58.
ArcenasABojöJLarsenBr, et al.
The economic costs of indoor air pollution: new results for Indonesia, the Philippines, and Timor-Leste. J Nat Res Policy Res2010;
2: 75–93.
59.
FullertonDGBruceNGordonSB.Indoor air pollution from biomass fuel smoke is a major health concern in the developing world. Transac R Soc Trop Med Hygiene2008;
102: 843–851.
60.
ColbeckINasirZAHasnainS, et al.
Indoor air quality at rural and urban sites in Pakistan. Water Air Soil Pollut2008;
8: 61–69.
61.
KumarKKViswanathanB.Changing structure of income indoor air pollution relationship in India. Energy Policy2007;
35: 5496–5504.
62.
DasguptaSHuqMKhaliquzzamanM, et al.
Indoor air quality for poor families: new evidence from Bangladesh. Indoor Air2006;
16: 426–444.
63.
EzzatiMKammenDM.Household energy, indoor air pollution, and health in developing countries: knowledge base for effective interventions. Ann Rev Energy Environ2002;
27: 233–270.
JalanJRavallionM.Does piped water reduce diarrhea for children in rural India?J Econometrics2003;
112: 153–173.
68.
EdwardsJHLangpapC.Startup costs and the decision to switch from firewood to gas fuel. Land Econ2005;
81: 570–586.
69.
ÖzcanKMGülayEÜçdoğrukŞ.Economic and demographic determinants of household energy use in Turkey. Energy Policy2013;
60: 550–557.
70.
GuptaGKöhlinG.Preferences for domestic fuel: analysis with socio-economic factors and rankings in Kolkata, India. Ecol Econ2006;
57: 107–121.
71.
HosierRHDowdJ.Household fuel choice in Zimbabwe: an empirical test of the energy ladder hypothesis. Res Energy1987;
9: 347–361.
72.
RahutDBBeheraBAliA.Patterns and determinants of household use of fuels for cooking: empirical evidence from sub-Saharan Africa. Energy2016;
117: 93–104.
73.
EkholmTKreyVPachauriS, et al.
Determinants of household energy consumption in India. Energy Policy2010;
38: 5696–5707.
74.
RahutDBBeheraBAliA, et al.
A ladder within a ladder: understanding the factors influencing a household's domestic use of electricity in four African countries. Energy Econ2017;
66: 167–181.
75.
ParikhJK.Gender issues in energy policy. Energy Policy1995;
23: 745–754.
76.
XiaopingSHeerinkNFutianQ.The role of off-farm employment in the rural energy consumption transition – a village-level analysis in Jiangxi Province, China. China Econ Rev2009;
20: 350–359.
77.
MullerCHuijieY. Household Fuel Use in Rural China. In: 16th INFER annual conference, Pescara, Italy, 29 May-31 May 2014.
78.
SianesiB.An evaluation of the Swedish system of active labor market programs in the 1990s. Rev Econ Stat2004;
86: 133–155.
