The present experimental investigations deal with the spark plug location and its effect on the performance and emission of a 100% raw biogas-fueled variable compression ratio engine. Different measurements of performance, combustion, and emission parameters are used to analyze the effect of four spark locations protruded inside the clearance volume (viz. 0, 2, 5, and 10 mm). The protrusion of the spark plug by 2 mm is observed to be optimum for compression ratios 8, 9, and 10. For this optimum spark plug location, engine efficiency and fuel economy are found to be higher. Faster combustion, in this particular case, has led to early and higher peak cylinder pressure and burnt gas temperature. Lower emissions of hydrocarbons and carbon monoxide have verified the optimality of 2 mm protrusion location of the spark plug for all the compression ratios. Thus, present investigations recommend minor protrusion of the spark plug to assist the combustion process, to enhance the performance and lowering the emission of a biogas-fueled engine.
KorakianitisTNamasivayamAMCrookesRJ.Natural-gas fueled spark-ignition (SI) and compression-ignition (CI) engine performance and emissions. Prog Energy Combust Sci2011;
37: 89–112.
2.
World energy outlook report, 2014. International Energy Agency, Rue de la federation, Paris Cedex, France.
3.
ArbabMIMasjukiHHVarmanM, et al.
Fuel properties, engine performance and emission characteristic of common biodiesels as a renewable and sustainable source of fuel. Renew Sustain Energy Rev2013;
22: 133–147.
4.
HookMTangX.Depletion of fossil fuels and anthropogenic climate change – a review. Energy Policy2006;
52: 797–809.
5.
HottaSKSahooNMohantyK, et al.
Effect of compression ratio on the performance of a constant speed spark ignition engine operating on raw biogas. J Energy Environ Sustain2018;
5: 53–57.
6.
SteinRGaliettiKLeoneT. Dual equal VCT – a variable camshaft timing strategy for improved fuel economy and emissions. SAE paper 950975, 1995.
7.
FontanaGGalloniE.Variable valve timing for fuel economy improvement in a small spark-ignition engine. Appl Energy2009;
86: 96–105.
8.
SridharGPaulPJMukundaHS.Biomass derived producer gas as a reciprocating engine fuel – an experimental analysis. Biomass Bioenergy2001;
21: 61–72.
9.
TurkozNErkusBMKaramangilI, et al.Experimental investigation of the effect of E85 on engine performance and emissions under various ignition timing. Fuel2014;
115: 826–832.
10.
LeeKKimTChaH, et al.
Generating efficiency and NOx emissions of a gas engine generator fueled with a biogas hydrogen blend and using an exhaust gas recirculation system. Int J Hydrogen Energy2010;
35: 5723–5730.
11.
ClarkeJRTabaczynskiRJ.Internal combustion engine with adjustable compression ratio and knock control. Patent 6135086, USA, 2000.
12.
StyronJP.Variable compression ratio connecting rod for internal combustion engine. Patent US7028647B2, USA, 2007.
13.
IbrahimAEl ‐AdawyMEl‐KassabyMM, et al.
The impact of changing the compression ratio on the performance of an engine fueled by biodiesel blends. Energy Technol2013;
1: 395–404.
14.
AbdelR AA andOsman MM.Experimental investigation of varying the compression ratio of SI engine under different ethanol gasoline fuel blends. Int J Energy Res1997;
21: 31–40.
15.
MidkiffKCBellSRRathnamS, et al.
Fuel composition effects on emissions from a spark-ignited engine operated on simulated biogases. J Eng Gas Turbines Power2001;
123: 132–138.
16.
MitalKM.Biogas system: principles and application.
New Delhi:
New Age International (P) Limited, 1996.
17.
OzcanHJehadAAY.Performance and emission characteristics of LPG powered four stroke SI engine under variable stroke length and compression ratio. Energy Convers Manag2008;
49: 1193–1201.
18.
ChoiGHHanSBChungYJ.The effect of hydrogen enrichment on exhaust emissions and thermal efficiency in a LPG fuelled engine. KSME Int J2013;
17: 1196–1202.
19.
MustafiNNMiragliYCRaineRR, et al.
Spark-ignition engine performance with ‘powergas’ fuel (mixture of CO/H2): a comparison with gasoline and natural gas. Fuel2006;
85: 1605–1612.
20.
SubrahmanyamJPGajendraBMK. Experimental investigations on the performance characteristics of a producer gas fuelled spark ignition engine. SAE paper 2001-01-1189, 2001.
21.
HuangJCrookesRJ.Spark ignition engine performance with simulated biogas – a comparison with gasoline and natural gas. J Inst Energy1998;
71: 197–203.
22.
WongJKS. Study of mixtures of methane and carbon dioxide as fuels in a single cylinder engine (CLR). SAE paper 770796, 1977.
23.
PorpathamERameshANagalingamB.Effect of hydrogen addition on the performance of a biogas fuelled spark ignition engine. Int J Hydrogen Energy2007;
32: 2057–2065.
24.
ForeroJDRinconAFontalvoA, et al.
Characteristics of auto-ignition in internal combustion engines operated with gaseous fuels of variable methane number. J Energy Resour Technol2017;
139: 042205-1–042205-8.
25.
QuaderA. Effects of spark location and combustion duration on nitric oxide and hydrocarbon emissions. SAE paper 730153, 1973.
26.
WentworthJ. Effects of combustion chamber shape and spark location on exhaust nitric oxide and hydrocarbon emissions. SAE paper 740529, 1974.
27.
WitzeP. The effect of spark location on combustion in a variable-swirl engine. SAE paper 820044, 1982.
28.
GurbuzHAkcayIHBuranD.An investigation on effect of in-cylinder swirl flow on performance, combustion and cyclic variations in hydrogen fuelled spark ignition engine. J Energy Inst2014;
87: 1–10.
29.
HanSBChangYHChungYJ.Flow direction characteristics in the vicinity of the spark plug in an S.I. engine. KSME Int J2000;
14: 891–899.
30.
DuclosJBruneauxGBaritaudT. 3D modelling of combustion and pollutants in a 4-valve SI engine; effect of fuel and residuals distribution and spark location. SAE paper 961964, 1996.
31.
ShivaprasadKVChitragarPRKumarGN.Experimental investigation of variations in spark timing using a spark‐ignition engine with hydrogen‐blended gasoline. Energy Technol2015;
3: 1174–1182.
32.
ShahAPerTBengtJ.Investigation of performance and emission characteristics of a heavy duty natural gas engine operated with pre-chamber spark plug and dilution with excess air and EGR. SAE Int J Engines2012;
5: 1790–1801.
33.
DemesoukasSCaillolCHigelinP, et al.
Near wall combustion modeling in spark ignition engines. Part A: flame–wall interaction. Energy Convers Manag2015;
106: 1426–1438.
34.
YaminJABadranOO.Analytical study to minimize the heat losses from a propane powered 4-stroke spark ignition engine. Renew Energy2001;
27: 463–478.
35.
KlineSJMcClintockFA.Describing uncertainties in single-sample experiments. Mech Eng1953;
75: 3–12.
36.
MoffatRJ.Contributions to the theory of single-sample uncertainty analysis. ASME J Fluids Eng1982;
104: 250–260.
37.
LarsenGJ.Reciprocating piston engine with a varying compression ratio. Patent 5025757 (A), USA, 1991.
38.
DebnathBKSahooNSahaUK.Thermodynamic analysis of a variable compression ratio diesel engine running with palm oil methyl ester. Energy Convers Manag2013;
65: 147–154.
39.
WalshJLRossCCSmithMS, et al.Biogas utilization handbook.
Atlanta:
The Environment, Health and Safety Division, Georgia Tech Research Institute, Atlanta Publication, 1988.
40.
SwaminathanSMallikarjunaJMRameshA.An experimental study of the biogas–diesel HCCI mode of engine operation. Energy Convers Manag2010;
51: 1347–1353.
41.
PorpathamERameshANagalingamB.Effect of compression ratio on the performance and combustion of a biogas fuelled spark ignition engine. Fuel2012;
95: 247–256.
42.
ShahA.Improving efficiency of gas engine using pre-chamber ignition. PhD Thesis, Lund University, Sweden, 2015.
43.
StoneR.***Introduction to internal combustion engines.
Warrendale, PA:
Society of Automotive Engineers Inc., 1997.
44.
TaylorCF.The internal combustion engine in theory and practices. 1st ed.
Cambridge:
The M.I.T. Press Publication, 1977.
45.
AlgerTGingrichJRobertsC, et al.
Cooled exhaust-gas recirculation for fuel economy and emissions improvement in gasoline engines. Int J Engine Res2012;
12: 252–264.
46.
HeywoodJB.Internal combustion engine fundamentals.
New York:
McGraw Hill International Editions, 1988.
47.
KawaharaNTomitaEKadowakiT, et al. In situ fuel concentration measurement near a spark plug in a spray guided direct injection spark ignition engine using infrared absorption method. Experiments in fluids2010; 49(4): 925-36.
48.
PundirBP.IC engines: combustion and emissions.
New Delhi:
Narosa Publishing House, 2010.
49.
RakopoulosCD.Evaluation of a spark ignition engine cycle using first and second law analysis technique. Energy Convers Manag1993;
34: 1299–1314.
50.
GurbuzH.Parametrical investigation of heat transfer with fast response thermocouple in SI engine. J Energy Eng2016;
142: 04016014.
51.
GurbuzHBuranDAkcayIH.An experimental study on performance and cyclic variations in a spark ignition engine fuelled with hydrogen and gasoline. J Therm Sci Technol2013;
33(1): 33-41.
52.
GurbuzHBuranD.Experimental study on effect of concentrated turbulence around the spark plug zone in a swirling flow on a hydrogen SI engine performance and combustion parameters. J Energy Eng2016;
142: 04015031.
53.
KriegerRB. The computation of apparent heat release for internal combustion engines. ASME paper 66-WA/DGP-4, 1966.
54.
GurbuzH.Experimental evaluation of combustion parameters with an ion-current sensor integrated to a fast response thermocouple in a SI-engine. J Energy Eng2017;
143: 04016046.
55.
ChaudhariAKulkarniVSahooN. Effect of variable compression ratio and intake charge dilution on fuel efficiency and emission for a spark ignition engine. SAE paper 2015-01-0772, 2015.
56.
HottaSKSahooNMohantyK.Comparative assessment of a spark ignition engine fueled with gasoline and raw biogas. Renew Energy 2019; 134: 1307-1319, DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2018.09.049.
