The decarbonization of district heating in Poland and other Central and Eastern European countries is disappointingly slow. One of the reasons is the lack of expertise in the field of external environmental costs among heat plant managers. The empiric research presented in the work shows that most of them chose coal because of the false belief that it is cheap, while in reality its social cost is high. Helping heat plant managers to improve their expertise in energy production externalities may change their attitudes and accelerate the district heating decarbonization process in that part of Europe. The goal seems to be realistic since the research proves that most heat plant managers are willing to progress in this field.
JacobssonSLauberbV.The politics and policy of energy system transformation – explaining the German diffusion of renewable energy technology. Energy Policy2006;
34: 256–276.
4.
European Commission. ANNEX 2 – action to boost the clean energy transition – to the Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee, the Committee of the Regions and the European Investment Bank. Brussels: European Commission, 2016.
5.
ClessmannCHeldARathmannMet al.
Status and perspectives of renewable energy policy and deployment in the European Union – what is needed to reach the 2020 targets?Energy Policy2011;
39: 7637–7657.
Central Statistical Office (Poland). Statistical yearbook of the Republic of Poland.
Warsaw:
Central Statistical Office, 2016.
8.
MacaVMelicharJScasnyM.Internalization of external costs of energy generation in Central and Eastern European countries. J Environ Dev2012;
21: 181–197.
9.
BauermannK.German Energiewende and the heating market – impact and limits of policy. Energy Policy2016;
94: 235–246.
10.
GrohnheitPEMortensenBOG.Competition in the market for space heating. District heating as the infrastructure for competition among fuels and technologies. Energy Policy2003;
31: 817–826.
11.
ManishSPillaiIRBanerjeeR.Sustainability analysis of renewables for climate change mitigation. Energy Sustain Dev2006;
10: 25–36.
12.
JuroszekZKudelkoM.A model for local energy infrastructure development. Energy2016;
96: 625–643.
13.
MelicharJHavranekMMacaVet al. ExternE-Pol externalities of energy: extension of accounting framework and policy applications. Implementation of ExternE methodology in Eastern Europe, www.externe.info/externe_d7/sites/default/files/expolwp7.pdf (2004, accessed 27 March 2018).
14.
UyarraEEdlerJGarcia-EstevezJet al.
Barriers to innovation through public procurement: a supplier perspective.Technovation2014;
34: 631–645.
15.
BauwensT.Explaining the diversity of motivations behind community renewable energy. Energy Policy2016;
93: 278–290.
16.
AbergMFaltingLForssellA. Is Swedish district heating operating on an integrated market? Differences in pricing, price convergence, and marketing strategy between public and private district heating companies. Energy Policy2016;
90: 222–232.
17.
MichelsenCCMadlenerR.Switching from fossil fuel to renewables in residential heating systems: an empirical study of homeowners’ decisions in Germany. Energy Policy2016;
89: 95–105.
18.
EleftheriadisIMAnagnostopoulouEG.Identifying barriers in the diffusion of renewable energy sources. Energy Policy2015;
80: 153–164.
19.
FahlenEAhlgrenEO.Accounting for external costs in a study of a Swedish district-heating system – an assessment of environmental policies. Energy Policy2010;
38: 4909–4920.
20.
LigusM.An Analysis of competitiveness and potential of renewable energy technologies in Poland. Energy Environ2015;
26: 1247–1269.
21.
ValkilaNSaariA.Attitude–behaviour gap in energy issues: case study of three different Finnish residential areas. Energy Sustain Dev2013;
17: 24–34.
22.
KudelkoM.Internalisation of external costs in the Polish power generation sector: a partial equilibrium model. Energy Policy2006;
34: 3409–3422.
23.
23. European Commission.ExternE, externalities of energy, methodology 2005 update.
Luxembourg:
Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 2005.
24.
ZvingilaiteE.Human health-related externalities in energy system modelling the case of the Danish heat and power sector. Appl Energ2011;
88: 535–544.
25.
FestingerL.A theory of cognitive dissonance.
Stanford, CA:
Stanford University Press, 1957.
26.
StracherGBPrakashASokolEV.Coal and peat fires: a global perspective: volume 2: photographs and multimedia tours.
Amsterdam:
Elsevier, 2013, pp. 234–312.
