This paper focuses on the development of the pro-nuclear growth coalition in Japan. It also describes how, after the Fukushima disaster, the coalition was challenged by an increasing number of anti-nuclear movements and scientific discussions of nuclear energy policies. By analyzing the risk politics associated with nuclear power, the study helps explain the development of pro-nuclear narratives and the pro-nuclear coalition. Based on archival analysis of accounts from the media, governments, and experts, it argues that governmental and nongovernmental actors in Japan and the United States formed a pro-nuclear growth coalition to pursue economic growth and then cooperated to promote pro-nuclear energy policies. The research also illustrates that post-Fukushima risk narratives challenged pro-nuclear energy policies and the dominance of the pro-nuclear growth coalition with fear. Although anti-nuclear sentiment has increased after Fukushima, it has not coalesced enough to be considered a consensus.
HeG. Nuclear power in China after Fukushima: understanding public knowledge, attitudes, and trust. J Risk Res2014; 17: 435–451.
2.
SzarkaJ. From exception to norm–and back again? France, the nuclear revival, and the post-Fukushima landscape. Environ Polit2013; 22: 646–663.
3.
VanderheidenS. The politics of energy: an introduction. Environ Polit2011; 20: 607–616.
4.
OosterveerP. Reinventing risk politics: reflexive modernity and the European BSE crisis. J Environ Policy Plan2002; 4: 215–229.
5.
StoneCN. Urban regimes and the capacity to govern: a political economy approach. J Urban Aff1993; 15: 1–28.
6.
PierreJ. Models of urban governance the institutional dimension of urban politics. Urban Aff Rev1999; 34: 372–396.
7.
FeindtPHOelsA. Does discourse matter? Discourse analysis in environmental policy making. J Environ Policy Plan2005; 7: 161–173.
8.
LitmanenT. International anti-nuclear movement in Finland, France and the United States, Peace Research. Can J Peace Stud1998; 30: 1–19.
9.
LitmanenTKojoM. Not excluding nuclear power: the dynamics and stability of nuclear power policy arrangements in Finland. J Integr Environ Sci2011; 8: 171–194.
10.
Pempel TJ. The developmental regime in a changing world economy. In: Woo-Cumings M (ed.) The Developmental State. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1999, pp.137–181.
11.
BakerKStokerG. Metagovernance and nuclear power in Europe. J Eur Public Policy2012; 19: 1026–1051.
12.
Savitch HV and Kantor P. Cities in the international marketplace: the political economy of urban development in North America and Western Europe. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2002.
13.
MossbergerKStokerG. The evolution of urban regime theory the challenge of conceptualization. Urban Aff Rev2001; 36: 810–835.
14.
StoneCN. Regime politics: governing Atlanta, 1946–1988, Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 1989.
15.
StokerGRegime theory and urban politics. In: JudgeDStokerGWolmanH (eds). Theories of urban politics, London: Sage, 1995, pp. 54–71.
16.
BlancoI. Analysing urban governance networks: bringing regime theory back in. Environ Plan Gov Policy2013; 31: 276–291.
17.
Kokubun N. Japan’s hunger for growth: environment as political symbolism. Dissertation, University of Victoria, Masters’ Theses in Political Science, 2013. http://hdl.handle.net/1828/5123.
18.
McCammonH. Discursive opportunity structure. The Wiley-Blackwell Encyclopedia of Social and Political Movements2013.
19.
Koopmans R and Statham P. Ethnic and civic conceptions of nationhood and the differential success of the extreme right in Germany and Italy. In: Giugni M, McAdam D, Tilly C (eds) How social movements matter. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 1999, pp.225–251.
20.
BekkersV. New media, micromobilization, and political agenda setting: crossover effects in political mobilization and media usage. Inform Soc2011; 27: 209–219.
21.
RutsaertP. The use of social media in food risk and benefit communication. Trends Food Sci Technol2013; 30: 84–91.
ZwigenbergR. “The coming of a second sun”: the 1956 atoms for peace exhibit in Hiroshima and Japan’s embrace of nuclear power. Asia Pacific J2012; 10: 1–15.
24.
HayashiMHughesL. The Fukushima nuclear accident and its effect on global energy security. Energy Policy2013; 9: 102–111.
25.
HayashiMHughesL. The policy responses to the Fukushima nuclear accident and their effect on Japanese energy security. Energy Policy2013; 59: 86–101.
26.
SolingenE. Nuclear logics: contrasting paths in East Asia and the Middle East, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2009.
27.
FunabashiH. Why the Fukushima nuclear disaster is a man-made calamity. Int J Jpn Sociol2012; 21: 65–75.
28.
MoonCIPrasadR. Beyond the developmental state: networks, politics, and institutions. Governance1994; 7: 360–386.
29.
AuPHKawaiK. Media capture and information monopolization in Japan. Jpn Econ Rev2012; 63: 131–147.
30.
Freeman LA. Closing the shop: information cartels and Japan’s mass media. Princeton, N.J: Princeton University Press, 2000.
31.
De Lange W. A history of Japanese journalism: Japan’s press club as the last obstacle to a mature press. Kent, England: Japan Library, 1998.
32.
Horikawa Y. The roles of social media in information aquisition during the Tohoku earthquake. Rev Inform Commun Policy 2012; 5: 1–25.
33.
Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT). White paper on science and technology – toward a robust and resilient society. Tokyo: The Stationery Office, www.mext.go.jp/english/whitepaper/1323541.htm (2012, accessed 4 December 2014).
34.
VidalJ. Fukushima spin was Orwellian. The Guardian2011.
35.
BinderAR. Figuring out# Fukushima: an initial look at functions and content of US Twitter commentary about nuclear risk. Environ Commun2012. 6: 268–277.
36.
HasegawaK.Facing nuclear risks: lessons from the Fukushima nuclear disaster. Int J Jpn Sociol2012. 21: 84–91.
37.
HayashiMHughesL. The policy responses to the Fukushima nuclear accident and their effect on Japanese energy security. Energy Policy2013; 59: 86–101.
38.
SaitoA. Global city formation in a capitalist developmental state: Tokyo and the waterfront sub-centre project. Urban Stud2003; 40: 283–308.
39.
TsukamotoT. Why is Japan neoliberalizing? Rescaling of the Japanese developmental state and ideology of stat-capital fixing. J Urban Aff2012; 34: 395–418.
40.
Shin HR and Choi BD. Risk perceptions in UK climate change and energy policy narratives. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 2013; 17: 84–107.
41.
Cabinet Secretariat. Reform of Japan's Nuclear Safety Regulation, Tokyo (in Japanese), 2012.
Johnson C. Miti and the Japanese Miracle: The Growth of Industry: 1925–1975. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1982.
45.
Kong TY. Politics of Economic Reform in South Korea: A Fragile Miracle. London: Routledge, 2000.
46.
Minns J. Of miracles and models: the rise and decline of the developmental state in South Korea. Third World Quarterly 2001; 22: 1025–1043.
47.
Bae Y and Sellers JM. Globalization, the developmental state and the politics of urban growth in Korea: a multilevel analysis. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 2007; 31: 543–560.
48.
Hahm SD and Plein LC. Institutions and technological development in Korea: The role of the presidency. Comparative Politics 1995; 28: 55–76.
49.
Chung J-Y and Kirby RJR. The Political Economy of Development and Environment in Korea. London: Routledge, 2002.
50.
MolotchH. The city as a growth machine: Toward a political economy of place. Am J Sociol1976; 82: 309–332.
51.
ScheufeleDA. Agenda-setting, priming, and framing revisited: Another look at cognitive effects of political communication. Mass Communication & Society2000; 3: 297–316.
52.
SjöbergL. The allegedly simple structure of experts’ risk perception: an urban legend in risk research. Sci Technol Human Values2002; 27: 443–459.
53.
StromE. In search of the growth coalition American urban theories and the redevelopment of Berlin. Urban Aff Rev1996; 31: 455–481.
54.
Swartz DL. Recasting power in its third dimension: review of Steven Lukes, Power: A Radical View. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005. Theor Soc 2007; 36:103–109.
55.
WynneB. Uncertainty and environmental learning: reconceiving science and policy in the preventive paradigm. Glob Environ Change1992; 2: 111–127.
