Like most other things, fracking has its good and bad points. In the former regard, it is a technological breakthrough that can increase the supplies of energy of the entire economy. In the latter, it has been linked with an increased incidence of earthquakes and water pollution, surely negatives. As well, there is some evidence fracking would not exist, at least not to the present extent, were it not for government subsidies, which, we argue, misallocate resources.
Rothbard MN. Law, property rights, and air pollution. Cato J 1982; 2; reprinted in Block WE (ed.) Economics and the environment: A reconciliation. Vancouver: The Fraser Institute, 1990, pp. 233–279.
ColbornTKwiatkowskiCSchultzK. Natural gas operations from a public health perspective. Hum Ecol Risk Assess2011; 17: 1039–1056.
13.
Walter EB and Peter LN. Water Capitalism: The Case for Privatizing Oceans, Rivers, Lakes, and Aquifers. New York City: Lexington Books; Rowman and Littlefield, 2015.
14.
Carson K. Fracking: Poster child for the corporate welfare state. C4SS. Center for a Stateless Society, 24 July 2014.
15.
Abdelnour M. Fracking a new bubble for a new year. Mises Institute, 22 January 2015.
16.
Stockman D. This time is the same: Like the housing bubble, the fed is ignoring the shale bubble in plain sight. David Stockman's Contra Corner. Subsidium, 8 December 2014.
BlockWNational defense and the theory of externalities, public goods and clubs. In: HoppeH-H (ed). The myth of national defense: Essays on the theory and history of security production, Auburn: Mises Institute, 2003, pp. 301–334.
29.
CowenT. The theory of market failure: A critical examination, Fairfax, VA: George Mason University Press, 1988.
30.
De JasayA. Social contract, free ride: A study of the public goods problem, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 1989.
31.
HolcombeR. A theory of the public goods. Rev Austrian Econ1997; 10: 1–10.
32.
HoppeH-H. Fallacies of the public goods theory and the production of security. J Libert Stud1989; IX: 27–46.
33.
HummelJ. National goods vs. public goods: Defense, disarmament and free riders. Rev Austrian Econ1990; IV: 88–122.
34.
OsterfeldD. Anarchism and the public goods issue: Law, courts and the police. J Libert Stud1989; 9: 47–68.
35.
PasourECJr. The free rider as a basis for government intervention. J Libert Stud1981; V: 453–464.
36.
Rothbard MN (ed.). Praxeology, value judgments, and public policy. In: The logic of action one. Camberley, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, 1997, pp. 78–99.
37.
SchmidtzD. The limits of government: An essay on the public goods argument, Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1991.
38.
SechrestLPrivateering and national defense: Naval warfare for private profit. In: HoppeH-H (ed). The myth of national defense: Essays on the theory and history of security production, Auburn, AL: Ludwig von Mises Institute, 2003, pp. 239–274.
39.
SechrestL. Public goods and private solutions in maritime history. Quart J Austrian Econ2004; 7: 3–27.
40.
SechrestL. Private provision of public goods: Theoretical issues and some examples from maritime history. ICFAI J Public Finance2004; II: 45–73.
41.
SechrestL. Privately funded and built U.S. warships in the quasi-war of 1797–1801. Indepen Rev2007; 12: 101–113.
42.
TinsleyP. With liberty and justice for all: A case for private police. J Libert Stud1998–1999; 14: 95–100.
43.
BarnettRE. Getting normative, the role of natural rights in constitutional adjudication. Constitut Comment1995; 12: 93–122.
44.
BlockWECappelliP. Debate over the normative positive distinction in economics. Econ Manage Financial Markets2013; 8: 11–19.
45.
Rothbard MN. The mantle of science. Reprinted from: Schoeck H and Wiggins JW (eds) Scientism and values. Princeton, NJ: D. Van Nostrand, 1960; The logic of action one: Method, money, and the Austrian school. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 1997, pp. 3–23.
46.
RothbardMN. The ethics of liberty, New York: New York University Press, 1998.
47.
BolickC. Grassroots tyranny: The limits of federalism, Washington DC: Cato, 1993.
