Many studies document the disproportionately high attrition rate of women in science, especially at early points in their careers. This ethnographic and conversational analytical study of a university life sciences laboratory group goes beneath statistical findings to explore one reason often cited by women who have dropped out of science: a `bad lab experience'. A detailed analysis of the interactional patterns or culture of the laboratory group suggests that discursive practices reinforce a conflation of gender, culture, and authority creating a climate that may be experienced as `chilly', or even `hostile', by some female members.
Barinaga, M. (1992) `Profile of a Field: Neuroscience, the Pipeline is Leaking', Science255: 1366-1367.
2.
Barinaga, M. (1993) `Feminists Find Gender Everywhere in Science', Science260: 392-393.
3.
Blakeslee, A.M. , Cole, C.M. and Conefrey, T. (1996) `Constructing Voices in Writing Research: Developing Participatory Approaches to Situated Inquiry', in G. Kirsch and P. Mortensen (eds) Ethics and Representation in Qualitative Studies of Literacy, pp. 134-154. Urbana, IL: National Center for Teachers of English (NCTE).
4.
Blum-Kulka, S. (1994) `The Dynamics of Family Dinner Talk: Cultural Contexts for Children's Passages to Adult Discourse', Research on Language and Social Interaction27: 1-50.
5.
Borland, K. (1991) ` “That's not What I Meant”: Interpretive Conflict in Oral Narrative Research', in S.B. Gluck and D. Patai (eds) Women's Words: The Feminist Practice of Oral History, pp. 63-75. New York: Routledge.
6.
Brown, P. and Levinson, S.C. (1987) Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7.
Brueggemann, B.J. (1996) `Still-Life: Representations and Silences in the Participant-Observer Role', in G. Kirsch and P. Mortensen (eds) Ethics and Representation in Qualitative Studies of Literacy, pp. 17-39. Urbana, IL: National Center for Teachers of English (NCTE).
8.
Cameron, D. (1985) Feminism and Linguistic Theory. London: Macmillan.
9.
Collins, R. (1979) The Credential Society. New York: Academic Press.
10.
Conefrey, T. (1993) `Women in Science in the 1990s', paper presented at the Society for the Social Studies of Science, Lafayette, IN, 19-21 November.
11.
Crawford, M. (1995) Talking Difference: On Gender and Language. London: Sage.
12.
Eakens, B. and Eakens, R.G. (1978) Sex Differences in Human Communication. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
13.
Edelsky, C. (1981) `Who's Got the Floor?', Language in Society10: 383-421.
14.
Fairclough, N. (1989) Language and Power. London: Longman.
15.
Fairclough, N. (1995) Critical Discourse Analysis: Papers in the Critical Study of Language. London: Longman.
16.
Fiske, J. (1994) `Media Matters', in N.K. Denzin and Y. Lincoln (eds) The Handbook of Qualitative Research, pp. 189-198. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
17.
Foucault, M. (1980a) `Two Lectures', in C. Gordon (ed. and trans.) Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings, pp. 78-108. New York: Pantheon.
18.
Foucault, M. (1980b) `The Eye of Power', in C. Gordon (ed. and trans.) Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings, pp. 147-165. New York: Pantheon.
19.
Foucault, M. (1984) `The Subject and Power', in B. Wallis (ed. and trans.) Art after Modernism, pp. 417-433. New York: New Museum of Contemporary Art.
20.
Fox, M.F. (1991) `Gender, Environmental Milieu, and Productivity in Science', in H. Zuckerman, J.R. Cole and J.T. Bruer (eds) The Outer Circle: Women in the Scientific Community, pp. 188-204. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
21.
Gilbert, G.N. and Mulkay, M. (1984) Opening Pandora's Box: A Sociological Analysis of Scientific Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
22.
Goodwin, M.H. (1990) He-Said-She-Said: Talk as Social Organization among Black Children. Bloomington: IndianaUniversity Press.
23.
Gumperz, J.J. , ed. (1982) Language and Social Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
24.
Harding, S. (1986) The Science Question in Feminism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
25.
Harding, S. (1991) Whose Science? Whose Knowledge? Thinking from Women's Lives. New York: Columbia University Press.
26.
Heritage, J. and Atkinson, J.M. (1984) `Introduction', in J.M. Atkinson and J. HeritageStructures of Social Action: Studies in Coversation Analysis, pp. 1-16. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
27.
Jacoby, S. and Gonzales, P. (1991) `The constitution of Expert-Novice in Scientific Discourse', Issues in Applied Linguistics2: 149-181.
28.
Keller, E.F. (1983) A Feeling for the Organism: The Life and Work of Barbara McClintock. New York: W.H. Freeman.
29.
Keller, E.F. (1985) Reflections on Gender and Science. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
30.
Keller, E.F. (1991) `The Wo/man Scientist: Issues of Sex and Gender in the Pursuit of Science', in H. Zuckerman, J.R. Cole and J.T. Bruer (eds) The Outer Circle: Women in the Scientific Community, pp. 227-236. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
31.
Knorr-Cetina, K. (1981) The Manufacture of Knowledge: An Essay of the Constructivist and Contextual Nature of Science. Oxford: Pergamon.
32.
Koritz, H.G. (1992) `Women in Science: Changing the Climate', Journal of College Science Teaching21: 260-261.
33.
Lakoff, R. (1973) `Language and Woman's Place', Language in Society2: 45-79.
34.
Lakoff, R. (1975) Language and Woman's Place. New York: Harper & Row.
35.
Latour, B. and Woolgar, S. (1979) Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
36.
Longino, H. (1988) `Science, Objectivity, and Feminist Values', Feminist Studies14: 561-574.
37.
Lynch, M. (1985) Art and Artifact in Laboratory Science: A Study in Shop Work and Shop Talk in a Research Laboratory. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
38.
Maltz, D.N. and Borker, R.A. (1982) `A Cultural Approach to Male-Female Miscommunication', in J.J. Gumperz (ed.) Language and Social Identity, pp. 196-216. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
39.
Morell, V. (1996) `Computer Culture Deflects Women and Minorities', Science271: 1915-1916.
40.
Mulkay, M. (1988) On Humor. New York: Blackwell.
41.
National Science Foundation (1988-1989) Changing America: The New Face of Science and Engineering. Washington, DC: National Science Foundation.
42.
National Science Foundation (1990-1991) Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering. Washington, DC: National Science Foundation.
43.
National Science Foundation (1994) Selected Data on Science and Engineering Doctorate Awards, 1993. Washington, DC: National Science Foundation.
44.
NECUSE (1996) Achieving Gender Equity in Science Classrooms. New England Consortium for Undergraduate Science Education. Published on line by the Office of the Dean of the College at Brown Island. http://www.brown.edu/ Administration/Dean_of_the_College/homepginfo/equity/Equity_handbook.html
45.
O'Barr, W. and Atkins, B.K. (1980) ` “Women's language” or “powerless language”?', in S. McConnell-Ginet, R. Borker and N. Furman (eds) Women and Language in Literature and Society, pp. 93-110. New York: Praeger.
46.
Ochs, E. (1993) `Constructing Social Identity: A Language Socialization Perspective', Research on Language and Social Interaction26: 287-306.
47.
Ochs, E. and Schieffelin, B. (1984) `Language Acquisition and Socialization: Three Developmental Stories and their Implications', in R. Shweder and R. LeVine (eds) Culture Theory: Essays on Mind, Self, and Emotion, pp. 276-320. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
48.
Ochs, E. and Taylor, C. (1995) `The “Father Knows Best” Dynamic in Dinnertime Narratives', in K. Hall and M. Bucholtz (eds) Gender Articulated, pp. 97-120. New York: Routledge.
49.
Ochs, E. , Jacoby, S. and Gonzales, P. (1994) `Interpretive Journeys: How Physicists Talk and Travel through Graphic Space', Configurations2: 151-172.
50.
Pizzini, F. (1991) `Communication Hierarchies in Humor: Gender Differences in the Obstetrical/Gynecological Setting', Discourse and Society2: 477-488.
51.
Psathas, G. (1995) Conversation Analysis: The Study of Talk-in-Interaction. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
52.
Rayman, P. and Brett, B. (1995) `Women Science Majors: What Makes a Difference in Persistence after Graduation', Journal of Higher Education66: 388-414.
53.
Reskin, B.F. , Koretz, J.F. and Francis, L.L. (1996) `Women in Science', Academe Bulletin82: 57-65.
54.
Rossiter, M. (1982) Women Scientists in America: Struggles and Strategies to 1940. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Press.
55.
Sacks, H. , Schegloff, E.A. and Jefferson, G. (1974) `A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-Taking for Conversation', Language50: 696-735.
56.
Sartre, J.-P. (1981) The Family Idiot: Gustave Flaubert, 1821-1857. Trans. by Carol Cosman. Vol. 1. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
57.
Schiebinger, L. (1989) The Mind Has No Sex?: Women in the Origins of Modern Science. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
58.
Schieffelin, B.B. (1990) `Language as a Resource for Social Theory', in B.B. Schieffelin (ed.) The Give and Take of Everyday Life: Language Socialization of Kaluli Children, pp. 13-37. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
59.
Scollon, R. and Scollon, S. (1983) `Face in Interethnic Communication', in J. Richards and R. Schmidt (eds) Language and Communication, pp. 156-188. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
60.
Seymour, E. (1992) `Undergraduate Problems with Teaching and Advising in SME Majors—Explaining Gender Differences in Attrition Rates', Journal of College Science Teaching21: 284-292.
61.
Seymour, E. (1995a) `The Loss of Women from Science, Mathematics, and Engineering Undergraduate Majors: an Explanatory Account', Science Education79: 437-473.
62.
Seymour, E. (1995b) `Revisiting the “Problem Iceberg”: Science, Mathematics, and Engineering Students Still Chilled Out', Journal of College Science Teaching24: 392-400.
63.
Seymour, E. and Hewitt, N.M. (1994) Talking about Leaving: Factors Contributing to High Attrition Rates among Science, Mathematics and Engineering Undergraduate Majors. Boulder: University of Colorado Press.
64.
Solin, A. (1995) `Ideology, Power, Interpretation—an Assessment of the Social Theory of Critical Linguistics', The New Courant4: 159-176.
65.
Sonnert, G. (1995) `Gender Equity in Science: Still an Elusive Goal', issues in Science and Technology11: 53-58.
66.
Sonnert, G. and Holton, G. (1996) `Career Patterns of Women and Men in the Science', American Scientist84: 63-71.
67.
Spender, D. (1985) Man Made Language. 2nd edn.New York: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
68.
Swann, J. (1988) `Talk Control: An Illustration from the Classroom of Problems in Analyzing Male Dominance of Conversation', in J. Coates and D. Cameron (eds) Women in their Speech Communities: New Perspectives on Language and Sex, pp. 123-140. London: Longman.
69.
Tannen, D. (1990) You Just Don't Understand: Women and Men in Conversation. New York: Ballantine.
70.
Tannen, D. (1996) Gender and Discourse. New York: Oxford University Press.
71.
Taylor, C.E. (1995) `Child as Apprentice-Narrator: Socializing Voice, Face, Identity, and Self-Esteem amid the Narrative Politics of Family Dinner', unpublished PhD thesis, University of Southern California.
72.
Thorne, B. and Henley, N., eds (1975) Language and Sex: Differences and Dominance. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
73.
Thorne, B. , Kramare, C. and Henley, N., eds (1983) Language, Gender and Society. Cambridge, MA: Newbury House.
74.
Tobias, S. (1990) They're not Dumb, They're Different: Stalking the Second Tier. Tucson, AZ: Research Corporation.
75.
Tobias, S. (1992) `Women in Science—Women and Science', Journal of College Science Teaching21: 276-278.
76.
Traweek, S. (1988) Beamtimes and Lifetimes: The World of High Energy Physics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
77.
Treichler, P.A. and Kramarae, C. (1983) `Women's Talk In The Ivory Tower', Communication Quarterly31: 118-132.
78.
Treichler, P.A. , Frankel, R.M., Kramarae, C., Zoppi, K. and Beckman, H.B. (1984) `Problems and Problems: Power Relationships in a Medical Encounter', in C. Kramarae, M. Schulz and W.O. Barr (eds), Language and Power, pp. 62-88. Beverly Hills: Sage.
79.
Van Dijk, T.A. (1993) `Principles of Critical Discourse Analysis', Discourse and Society4: 249-283.
80.
West, C. (1984) Routine Complications. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
81.
West, C. and Zimmerman, D.H. (1983) `Small Insults: a Study of Interruptions in Cross-Sex Conversations Between Unacquainted Persons', in B. Thorne, C. Kramarae and N. Henley (eds) Language, Gender and Society, pp. 103-107. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
82.
Woods, N. (1988) `Talking Shop: Sex and Status as Determinants of Floor Apportionment in a Work Setting', in J. Coates and D. Cameron (eds) Women and their Speech Communities, pp. 141-157. London: Longman.
83.
Yedes, J. (1996) `Playful Teasing: Kiddin' on the Square', Discourse and Society7: 417-438.
84.
Zimmerman, D. and West, C. (1975) `Sex Roles, Interruptions and Silences in Conversation', in B. Thorne and N. Henley (eds) Language and Sex: Difference and Dominance, pp. 105-129. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
