Previous psychological research involving women who have been raped is criticized for its focus on psychopathology, its use of traditional methodologies, its limited conception of the person, and its reliance on dichotomous categories. A social constructionist, discourse analytic approach is offered as an alternative. Eight women who had been raped by dates or acquaintances volunteered for open-ended, unstructured interviews. Their accounts had two major features: the difficulty of naming the experience rape and the importance of the men's accounts in the women's efforts to make sense of their experience. Our analyses identify the complex discourse strategies that are actively used to formulate experience and to negotiate victim/non-victim identities for the women themselves and villain/non-villain identities for the men who raped them. We discuss the importance of formulating rape and the connections among the discourse used by women who are raped, by rapists and by researchers.
Brownmiller, S. (1975) Against Our Will: Men, Women and Rape. New York: Simon & Schuster.
2.
Burgess, A. W. and Holmstrom, L.L. (1974) `Rape Trauma Syndrome', American Journal of Psychiatry131: 9.
3.
Burnam, M.A.Stein, J.A. , Golding, J.M., Siegel, J.M., Sorenson, S.B., Forsythe, A.B. and Telles, C.A. (1988) `Sexual Assault and Mental Disorders in a Community Population', Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology56: 843-850.
4.
Check, J.V.P. and Malamuth, N.M. (1983) `Sex Role Stereotyping and Reactions to Depictions of Stranger versus Acquaintance Rape', Journal of Personality and Social Psychology45: 344-356.
5.
Coates, D. , Wortman, C.B. and Abbey, A. (1979) `Reactions to Victims', in I.H. Frieze, D. Bar-Tal and J.S. Carroll (eds) New Approaches to Social Problems: Applications of Attribution Theory, pp. 21-52. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
6.
Edwards, D. and Potter, J. (1992) Discursive Psychology. London: Sage.
7.
Esper, J. (1986) `Reactions to Violence: Normal Adjustment is Not Psychopathology', Issues in Radical Therapy12: 25-27, 52-54.
8.
Essed, P. (1991) Understanding Everyday Racism. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
9.
Gavey, N. (1989) `Feminist Poststructuralism and Discourse Analysis', Psychology of Women Quarterly13: 459-475.
10.
Gavey, N. (1992) `Technologies and Effects of Heterosexual Coercion', Feminism & Psychology2: 325-351.
11.
Groth, A.N. and Burgess, A.W. (1977) `Rape: A Sexual Deviation', American Journal of Orthopsychiatry47: 400-406.
12.
Harré, R. (1974) `Blueprint for a New Science', in N. Armistead (ed.) Reconstructing Social Psychology, pp. 240-259. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
13.
Harré, R. (1980) Social Being. Totawa, NJ: Littlefield, Adams.
14.
Harré, R. and Secord, P.F. (1972) The Explanation of Social Behaviour. Oxford: Blackwell.
15.
Harré, R. and Van Langenhove, L. (1991) `Varieties of Positioning', Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour21: 394-407.
16.
House, J. and Kasper, G. (1981) `Politeness Markers in English and German', in F. Coulmas (ed.) Conversational Routine: Explorations in Standardized Communication Situations and Prepatterned Speech, pp. 157-185. The Hague: Mouton.
17.
Jackson, S. (1978) `The Social Context of Rape: Sexual Scripts and Motivation', Women's Studies International Quarterly1: 27-38.
18.
Janoff-Bulman, R. (1979) `Characterological versus Behavioral Self-blame: Inquiries into Depression and Rape', Journal of Personality and Social Psychology37: 1798-1809.
19.
Johnson, S. (1989) Wildfire: Igniting the She/volution. Albuquerque, NM: Wildfire Books.
20.
Kelley, H.H. (1967) `Attribution Theory in Social Psychology', in D. Levine (ed.) Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, Vol. 15, pp. 192-240. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
21.
Lamb, S. (1991) `Acts without Agents: An Analysis of Linguistic Avoidance in Journal Articles on Men who Batter Women', American Journal of Orthopsychiatry61: 250-257.
22.
Penelope, J. (1990) Speaking Freely. New York: Pergamon.
23.
(Special Issue of Human Studies9: 219-230).
24.
Potter, J. and Wetherell, M. (1987) Discourse and Social Psychology: Beyond Attitudes and Behaviour. London: Sage.
25.
Renner, K.E. , Wackett, C. and Ganderton, S. (1988) `The “Social” Nature of Sexual Assault', Canadian Psychology29: 163-173.
26.
Rennie, H. (1992) `Breaking the Silence, Telling the Story: The Discursive Production of Selves in the Aftermath of Rape', unpublished MA thesis, University of Guelph.
27.
Ryan, W. (1976) Blaming the Victim. New York: Vintage Books.
28.
Schegloff, E.A. (1972) `Notes on a Conversational Practice: Formulating Place', in D. Sudnow (ed.) Studies in Social Interaction, pp. 75-119. New York: Free Press.
29.
Schönbach, P. (1990) Account Episodes: The Management or Escalation of Conflict. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
30.
Scully, D. and Marolla, J. (1984) `Convicted Rapists' Vocabulary of Motive: Excuses and Justifications', Social Problems31: 530-544.
31.
Shotland, R.L. and Goodstein, L. (1983) `Just Because She Doesn't Want to Doesn't Mean It's Rape: An Experimentally Based Causal Model of the Perception of Rape in a Dating Situation', Social Psychology Quarterly46: 220-232.
32.
Silverman, D.C. (1978) `Sharing the Crisis of Rape: Counseling the Mates and Families of Victims', American Journal of Orthopsychiatry48: 166-173.
33.
Spender, D. (1984) `Defining Reality: A Powerful Tool', in C. Kramarae, M. Schulz, and W.M. O'Barr (eds) Language and Power. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
34.
Tannen, D. (1989) Talking Voices. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
35.
Taylor, S.E. , Wood, J.V. and Lichtman, R.R. (1983) `It Could Be Worse: Selective Evaluation as a Response to Victimization', Journal of Social Issues39: 19-40.
36.
Warshaw, R. (1988) I Never Called it Rape. New York: Harper & Row.
37.
Widdicombe, S. and Wooffitt, R. (1990) ` “Being” versus “Doing” Punk: On Achieving Authenticity as a Member', Journal of Language and Social Psychology9: 257-277.
