It has been suggested that professional-client relationships have changed from the traditional authoritarian model, marked by professional dominance, neutrality and distance, to a participatory, client-centered model that is responsive to the lifeworld of the client. In addition to the effects of the proletarianization and deprofessionalization processes that have been said to diminish professional control, it was expected that the participatory model would prevail in Israel because of ideological commitment to egalitarian, solidary and informal relationships even between strangers. Nineteen lawyer-client conversations in an Israeli legal aid office were analyzed, focusing on five features that reflect the power, distance and solidarity dimensions of these models: (1) conversational openings; (2) professional register; (3) topic control; (4) the expression of emotion; (5) forms of address. Results showed that lawyer-client behavior in Israel resembled the authoritarian model rather than the participatory one. Strategies that were often associated with positive politeness were used by the lawyer for distancing and resulted in interactionally threatening moves. In addition, the sex of the participants and the constraints of bureaucratic practice also affected the model of professional behavior evidenced by these lawyers and clients.
Abel, R.L. (1986) `Lawyers', in L. Lipson and S. Wheeler (eds) Law and the Social Sciences, pp. 369-444. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
2.
Adelsward, V. (1988) Styles of Success: On Impression Management as Collaborative Action in Job Interviews. Linkoping: University of Linkoping.
3.
Ariel, M. (1988) `Female and Male Stereotypes in Israeli Literature and Media: Evidence from Introductory Patterns', Language and Communication8(1): 43-68.
4.
Barber, B. (1980) Informed Consent in Medicine Therapy and Research. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
5.
Berends, M. (1984) `A Case of Divorce', paper presented at the workshop for the study of interaction between lawyer and client, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands, 25-7 October.
6.
Blum-Kulka, S. (1983) `The Dynamics of Political Interviews', Text3(2): 131-153.
7.
Blum-Kulka, S. , Danet, B. and Gerson, R. (1985) `The Language of Requesting in Israeli Society', in S. Forgas (ed.) Language and Social Situations, pp. 113-136. New York: Springer.
8.
Bogoch, B. (1990) `The Dynamics of Power: A Sociolinguistic Analysis of Lawyer-Client Interaction in a Legal Setting', unpublished dissertation, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel.
9.
Bogoch, B. and Danet, B. (1984) `Challenge and Control in Lawyer-Client Interaction: A Case Study in an Israeli Legal Aid Office', Text4(1-3): 249-275. (Special issue, B. Danet (ed.) Studies of Legal Discourse).
10.
Brown, P. and Levinson, S. (1978) `Universals in Language Usage: Politeness Phenomena', in E.N. Goody (ed.) Questions and Politeness: Strategies in Social Interaction, pp. 56-289. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11.
Brown, R. and Gilman, A. (1960) `The Pronouns of Power and Solidarity', in Style in Language, pp. 254-276. New York: Wiley.
12.
Cain, M. (1979) `The General Practice Lawyer and the Client: Towards a Radical Conception', International Journal of the Sociology of Law7: 331-354.
13.
Cicourel, A. V. (1987) `The Role of Cognitive and “Imaginative Models” in Understanding Language Use in Natural Settings', paper presented at the International Pragmatics Conference, Antwerp, 17-22 August.
14.
Coupland, N. , Grainger, K. and Coupland, J. (1988) `Politeness in Context: Intergenerational Issues', Language in Society17: 253-262.
15.
D'Andrade, R. G. and Wish, M. (1985) `Speech Act Theory in Quantitative Research on Interpersonal Behavior', Discourse Processes8: 229-259.
16.
Danet, B. (1980) `Language in the Legal Process', Law and Society Review14: 445-565. (Special issue, B. Danet, (ed.) Legal Discourse.).
17.
Danet, B. (1984) `The Magic Flute: A Prosodic Analysis of Binomial Expressions in Legal Hebrew', Text4: 143-172.
18.
Erickson, F. and Rittenberg, W. (1987) `Topic Control and Person Control: A Thorny Problem for Foreign Physicians in Interaction with American Patients', Discourse Processes10: 401-415.
19.
Fisher, S. (1991) `A Discourse of the Social: Medical Talk/Power Talk/Oppositional Talk?', Discourse and Society2(2): 157-182.
20.
Fisher, S. and Groce, S.B. (1990) `Accounting Practices in Medical Interviews', Language in Society19: 225-250.
21.
Fisher, S. and Todd, A.D. (1983) The Social Organization of Doctor-Patient Communication. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.
22.
Flood, J. (1991) `Doing Business: The Management of Uncertainty in Lawyers' Work', Law and Society Review25(1): 41-71.
23.
Frankel, R.M. (1984) `From Sentence to Sequence: Understanding the Medical Encounter through Microinteractional Analysis', Discourse Processes7: 135-170.
24.
Frankel, R. (in press) Talking in Interviews: A Dispreference for Patient-Initiated Questions in Physician-Patient Encounters', in G. Psathas, G. Coulter and R.M. Frankel (eds) Interactional Competence. New York: Irvington.
25.
Freeman, S. (1987) `Organizational Constraints as Communicative Variables in Bureaucratic Medical Settings: A Case Study of Patient-Initiated Referral Talk in Independent Practice and Association-Affiliated Practices', Discourse Processes10: 385-400.
26.
Freidson, E. (1984) `The Changing Nature of Professional Control', Annual Review of Sociology10: 1-20.
27.
Grice, H.P. (1975) `Logic and Conversation', in P. Cole and J.I. Morgan (eds) Syntax and Semantics: Speech Acts, pp. 41-58. New York: Academic Press.
28.
Griffiths, J. (1984) `What Do [Dutch] Lawyers Actually Do in Divorce Cases?' paper presented at the workshop on the study of interaction between lawyer and client, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands. 24-7 October.
29.
Gross, R. and Osterman, P. (1972) The New Professionals. New York: Simon & Shuster.
30.
Harrison, M.I. (1992) `Medical Dominance or Proletarianization? Evidence from Israel', paper presented at the session on Professions in Political and Social Context, American Sociological Association Annual Meetings, Pittsburgh, August 1992.
31.
Haug, M.R. (1988) `A Re-examination of the Hypothesis of Physician Deprofessionalization', Milbank Quarterly, 66 (supplement 2): 48-56.
32.
Haug, M.R. and Sussman, M.B. (1969) `Professional Autonomy and the Revolt of the Client', Social Problems17: 153-161.
33.
Hein, A. and Wodak, R. (1987) `Medical Interviews in Internal Medicine: Some Results of an Empirical Investigation', Text1(7): 37-65.
34.
Johnson, T.J. (1972) Professions and Power. London: Macmillan.
35.
Katriel, T. (1986) Talking Straight: `Dugri' Speech in Israeli Sabra Culture. New York: Cambridge University Press.
36.
Kraus, V. (1981) `The Social Ranking of Occupations in Israel', unpublished dissertation. Haifa: Haifa University.
37.
Labov, W. and Fanshel, D. (1977) Therapeutic Discourse: Psychotherapy as Conversation. New York: Academic Press.
38.
Lacoste, M. (1981) `L'organisation de l'intéraction en situation institutionnelle: les closures de consulations hospitalières', Laboratoire Communication et Travail, unpublished manuscript. Paris: Université Paris Nord.
39.
McFarland, D. (n.d.) `Lawyer-Client Relations in Criminal Cases', unpublished dissertation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
40.
McKinlay, J. and Arches, J. (1985) `Toward the Proletarianization of Physicians', International Journal of Health Services18: 161-195.
41.
Mehan, H. (1987) `Language and Power in Organizational Process', Discourse Processes10: 291-301.
42.
Mishler, E.G. (1984) The Discourse of Medicine: Dialectics of Medical Interviews. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
43.
Nilson, L.B. (1979) `An Application of the Occupational “Uncertainty Principle” to the Professions', Social Problems26(5): 570-579.
44.
Philips, S.U. (1987) `The Social Organization of Knowledge and Its Consequences for Discourse in Bureaucratic Settings', Discourse Processes10: 429-433.
45.
Rosenthal, D.E. (1974) Lawyer and Client: Who's in Charge?New York: Russel Sage Foundation.
46.
Sarat, A. and Felstiner, W.L.E. (1990). Legal Realism in Lawyer-Client Communication', in J.N. Levi and A.G. Walker (eds) Language in the Judicial Process, pp. 133-150. New York: Plenum.
47.
Schumann, C. (1984) `The Legal Management of Emotional Issues: Client Control by Divorce Lawyers', paper presented at the workshop on the study of interaction between lawyer and client, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands, 24-7 October.
48.
Shuy, R. W. (1976) `The Medical Interview: Problems in Communication', Primary Care3(3): 365-386.
49.
Smith. P.M. (1985) Language, the Sexes and Society. New York: Blackwell.
50.
Starr, P. (1982) The Social Transformation of American Medicine. New York: Basic Books.
51.
Thomas, J. (1985) `The Language of Power: Towards a Dynamic Pragmatics', Journal of Pragmatics9: 765-785.
52.
Todd, A.D. (1989) Intimate Adversaries: Cultural Conflicts between Doctors and Women Patients. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
53.
Toren, Nina . (1975) `Deprofessionalization and Its Sources: A Preliminary Analysis', Sociology of Work and Occupations2(4): 323-337.
54.
Van Dijk, T.A. (1988) `Social Cognition, Social Power and Social Discourse', Text8(1-2): 129-157.
55.
Walker, A.G. (1988) `Linguistic Manipulation, Power and the Legal Setting', in L. Kedar (ed.) Power Through Discourse, pp. 57-79. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
56.
Weisman, C.S. and Teitlebaum, M.A. (1985) Physician Gender and the Physician-Patient Relationship: Recent Evidence and Relevant Questions', Social Science and Medicine20(11): 1119-1127.
57.
West, C. (1984a) `Medical Misfires: Mishearings, Misgivings and Misunderstandings in Physician-Patient Dialogues', Discourse Processes7: 107-134.
58.
West, C. (1984b) `When the Doctor is a “Lady”: Power, Status and Gender in Physician-Patient Encounters', Symbolic Interaction7(1): 87-106.
59.
Wolfson, N. and Manes, J. (1980) `Don't “Dear” Me!', in S. McConnell-Ginet, R. Borker and N. Furman (eds) Women and Language in Literature and Society, pp. 18-24. New York: Praeger.
60.
Yaeger-Dror, M. and Sister, E. (1987) ` “Scuse me, waitaminute”: Directive Use in Israeli Hebrew', Linguistics25: 1127-1163.
