This paper is concerned with quantification rhetoric: the manner in which numerical and non-numerical quantity formulations are deployed when proposing and undermining argumentative cases. The analysis is focused on a set of materials derived from the making and response to a current affairs television programme about the (putative) lack of success in charity-supported cancer research in providing effective treatments. The study demonstrates: (a) how a range of calculation, fractionation, aggregation and presentational practices can be selectively drawn on to form the scaffolding of contrasting versions; (b) the systematic translation between numerical (e.g. `1 percent') and non-numerical (e.g. `small') formulations to obtain specific argumentative effects; and (c) the role of basic, but often inexplicit, definitional decisions to both constitute phenomena in a manner that makes them countable, and also to select arenas for the effective advancing of quantification argument. Overall, the study illustrates the efficacy of recent discourse theory and analysis for understanding the rhetorical orientation of quantitative versions of the world.
Ashmore, M. (1989) The Reflexive Thesis: Writing a Sociology of Scientific Knowledge. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
2.
Ashmore, M. , Mulkay, M. and Pinch, T. (1989) Health and Efficiency: A Sociological Study of Health Economics. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
3.
Atkinson, J.M. (1978) Discovering Suicide: Studies in the Social Organization of Sudden Death. London: Macmillan.
4.
Atkinson, J.M. (1984) Our Master's Voices: The Language and Body Language of Politics. London: Metheun.
5.
Barnes, B. (1982) T.S. Kuhn and Social Science. London: Macmillan.
6.
Billig, M. (1985) `Prejudice, Categorization and Particularization: From a Perceptual to a Rhetorical Approach', European Journal of Social Psychology15: 79-103.
7.
Billig, M. (1987) Arguing and Thinking: A Rhetorical Approach to Social Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8.
Billig, M. (1989a) `The Argumentative Nature of Holding Strong Views: A Case Study', European Journal of Social Psychology19: 203-223.
9.
Billig, M. (1989b) `Psychology, Rhetoric, and Cognition', History of the Human Sciences2: 289-307.
10.
Bloor, D. (1976) Knowledge and Social Imagery. London: Routledge.
11.
Channell, J. (1990) `Precise and Vague Quantities in Writing Economics', in W. Nash (ed.) The Writing Scholar: Studies in Academic Discourse. London: Sage.
12.
Cicourel, A. V. (1974) `Police Practices and Official Records', in R. Turner (ed.) Ethnomethodology. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
13.
Clark, C. and Pinch, T. (1988) `Micro-sociology and Micro-economics: Selling by Social Control', in N. Fielding (ed.) Actions and Structure. London: Sage.
14.
Drew, P. (1984) `Speakers' Reportings of Invitation Sequences', in J.M. Atkinson and J.C. Heritage (eds) Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
15.
Drew, P. (1990) `Strategies in the Dispute between Lawyers and Witnesses', in J.N. Levi and A.G. Walker (eds) Language and the Judicial Process. New York: Plenum.
16.
Edwards, D. and Mercer, N. (1987) Common Knowledge. London: Methuen.
17.
Edwards, D. and Potter, J. (forthcoming) Discursive Psychology. London: Sage.
18.
Garfinkel, H. (1967) Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Gusfield, J. (1981) The Culture of Public Problems: Drinking-Driving and the Symbolic Order. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
21.
Heritage, J. and Greatbatch, D. (1986) `Generating Applause: A Study of Rhetoric and Response Party Political Conferences', American Sociological Review92: 110-157.
22.
Huff, D. (1954) How to Lie with Statistics. London: Gollancz.
23.
Jefferson, G. (1990) `List Construction as Task and Resource', in G. Psathas (ed.) Interactional Competence. Washington, DC: University Press of America.
24.
Lave, J. (1986) `The Values of Quantification', in J. Law (ed.) Power, Action and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge. London: Routledge.
25.
Lee, J.R.E. (1984) `Innocent Victims and Evil-Doers', Women's Studies International Forum7: 69-73.
26.
Levinson, S. (1987) `Minimization and Conversational Inference', in J. Verschueren and M. Bertuccelli-Papi (eds) The Pragmatic Perspective. Amsterdam; John Benjamins.
27.
Litton, I. and Potter, J. (1985) `Social Representations in the Ordinary Explanation of a “Riot” ', European Journal of Social Psychology15: 371-388.
28.
Livingston, E. (1986) The Ethnomethodological Basis of Mathematics. London: Routledge.
29.
Livingston, E. (1987) Making Sense of Ethnomethodology. London: Routledge.
30.
Lynch, M. (1988) `The Externalized Retina: Selection and Mathematization in the Visual Documentation of Objects in the Life Sciences', Human Studies11: 201-234.
31.
McCloskey, D. (1985) The Rhetoric of Economics. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
32.
McHoul, A. (1987) `Why Are There No Guarantees for Interrogators?', Journal of Pragmatics11: 455-471.
33.
McKenzie, D. (1978) `Statistical Theory and Social Interests: A Case Study', Social Studies of Science8: 35-83.
34.
Mulkay, M. (1985) The Word and the World: Explorations in the Form of Sociological Analysis. London: Allen and Unwin.
35.
Pinch, T. and Clark, C. (1986) `The Hard Sell: Patter-merchanting and the Strategic (Re)production and Local Management of Economic Reasoning in the Sales Routines of Market Pitchers', Sociology20: 169-191.
36.
Pomerantz, A. (1979) `Telling My Side: “Limited Access” as a “Fishing Device” ', Sociological Inquiry50: 186-196.
37.
Pomerantz, A. (1986) `Extreme Case Formulations: A New Way of Legitimating Claims', Human Studies9: 219-230.
38.
Pomerantz, A. (1987) `Descriptions in Legal Settings', in G. Button and J.R.E. Lee (eds) Talk and Social Organization. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
39.
Potter, J. (1984) `Testability, Flexibility: Kuhnian Values in Psychologists' Discourse Concerning Theory Choice', Philosophy of the Social Sciences14: 303-330.
40.
Potter, J. and Edwards, D. (1990) `Nigel Lawson's Tent: Discourse Analysis, Attribution Theory and the Social Psychology of Fact', European Journal of Social Psychology20: 405-424.
41.
Potter, J. and Halliday, Q. (1990) `Community Leaders as a Device for Warranting Versions of Crowd Events', Journal of Pragmatics14: 225-241.
42.
Potter, J. and Reicher, S. (1987) `Discourses of Community and Conflict: The Organization of Social Categories in Accounts of a Riot', British Journal of Social Psychology26: 25-40.
43.
Potter, J. and Wetherell, M. (1987) Discourse and Social Psychology: Beyond Attitudes and Behaviour. London: Sage.
44.
Potter, J. and Wetherell, M. (1988) `Accomplishing Attitudes: Fact and Evaluation in Racist Discourse', Text8: 51-68.
45.
Potter, J. , Wetherell, M., Gill, R. and Edwards, D. (1990) `Discourse: Noun, Verb or Social Practice', Philosophical Psychology3: 205-217.
46.
Sacks, H. (1974) `On the Analyzability of Stories by Children', in R. Turner (ed.) Ethnomethodology. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
47.
Sacks, H. (1979) `Hotrodder: A Revolutionary Category', in G. Psathas (ed.) Everyday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology. New York: Irvington.
48.
Sacks, H. (1989) `Lecture Eight: On Measuring', Human Studies12: 295-305.
49.
Schlesinger, P. (1987) `Putting “Reality” Together, 2nd edn.London: Routledge.
50.
Silverstone, R. (1981) Framing Science: The Making of a BBC Documentary. London: BFI.
51.
Simons, H. , ed. (1989) Rhetoric in the Human Sciences. London: Sage.
52.
Simons, H. (1990) `A Perspective on the Rhetoric of the Scientific Research Report and an Illustration: “Drug Pushing” in a Medical Journal Article', mimeo, Temple University.
53.
Smith, D. (1978) `K is Mentally Ill: The Anatomy of a Factual Account', Sociology12: 23-53.
54.
Sudnow, D. (1967) Passing On: The Social Organization of Dying. New York: Prentice-Hall.
55.
Walkerdine, V. (1988) The Mastery of Reason. London: Routledge.
56.
Watson, R. (1983) `The Presentation of Victim and Motive in Discourse: The Case of Police Interrogations and Interviews', Victimology8: 31-52.
57.
Watson, R. and Weinberg, T. (1982) `Interviews and the Interactional Construction of Accounts of Homosexual Identity', Social Analysis11: 56-78.
58.
Wetherell, M. and Potter, J. (1988) `Discourse Analysis and the Identification of Interpretative Repertoires', in C. Antaki (ed.) Analysing Lay Explanation: A Case Book. London: Sage.
59.
Wieder, L. (1974) Language and Social Reality. The Hague: Mouton.
60.
Wooffitt, R. (1989) `(Telling) Tales of the Unexpected: A Sociological Analysis of Accounts of the Paranormal', unpublished PhD, University of York.
61.
Woolgar, S. (1988a) `Time and Documents in Reseacher Interaction: Some Ways of Making Out What is Happening in Experimental Science', Human Studies11: 171-200.
62.
Woolgar, S. (1988b) Science: The Very Idea. London: Tavistock.
63.
Woolgar, S. and Pawluch, D. (1985) `Ontological Gerrymandering: The Anatomy of Social Problems Explanations', Social Problems32: 214-227.
64.
Wowk, M. (1984) `Blame Allocation, Sex and Gender in a Murder Interrogation', Women's Studies International Forum7: 75-82.
65.
Zimmerman, D.H. (1974) `Fact as a Practical Accomplishment', in R. Turner (ed.) Ethnomethodology. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
