Book review: Isabel Alonso-Belmonte,M. Dolores Porto and Manuela Romano,Polarised Discourse: Language,Cognition and Social Practice

Bail CA Argyle LP Brown TW , et al. (2018) Exposure to opposing views on social media can increase political polarization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences – PNAS 115(37): 9216–9221. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1804840115

Iyengar S Lelkes Y Levendusky M , et al. (2019) The origins and consequences of affective polarisation in the United States. Annual Review of Political Science 22: 129–146. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-051117-073034

Lakoff G (2014) The ALL NEW Don’t Think of an Elephant!: Know Your Values and Frame the Debate. Chelsea Green Publishing.

Mautner G (2016) Checks and balances: How corpus linguistics can contribute to CDA. In: Wodak R Meyer M (eds) Methods of Critical Discourse Studies. Sage, pp.155–180. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/284725923 (accessed 2 July 2026).

Musolff A (2006) Metaphor scenarios in public discourse. Metaphor and Symbol 21(1): 23–38. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327868ms2101_2

Musolff A (2016) Political metaphor Analysis: Discourse and Scenarios. Bloomsbury Academic.

Van Dijk TA (1998) Ideology: A Multidisciplinary Approach. Sage.

Van Dijk TA (2008) Discourse and Context. A Sociocognitive Approach. Cambridge University Press.

Yardi S boyd d (2010) Dynamic debates: An analysis of group polarisation over time on Twitter. Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society 20: 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/0270467610380016